博碩士論文 91431013 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:8 、訪客IP:3.229.122.166
姓名 黃應雄(Ying-Hsing Huang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系在職專班
論文名稱 台灣與大陸在ERP專案管理、專案成員向心力與離心力的不同之處
(The Difference of Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces on ERP Project Management between Taiwan and China)
相關論文
★ ERP專案成員離心力與向心力對代理問題之影響★ 事業策略、人力資源管理與組織績效之實證研究
★ 商用飛機維修成本控制之研究-以某國籍航空公司為例★ ERP系統更換關鍵成功因素研究-以Oracle系統導入為例
★ 中小企業自行開發ERP 系統關鍵成功因素研究- 以高科技產業為例★ 文化創意產業產品策略選擇之影響因素-以國片為例
★ 專案管理風險對ERP專案成功之影響★ 品質機能展開與多準則決策於設備開發應用
★ ERP導入品質因素對IFRS轉換專案之影響★ ERP投資金額對服務品質及導入後IT治理目標之分析
★ ERP 導入問題對專案的影響★ IFRS轉換對員工退休金計畫影響
★ IFRS轉換對企業績效評估的影響★ IFRS轉換問題對IFRS效益的影響
★ ERP環境下企業集團自行編製合併報表能力對XBRL資訊透明度之研究★ IFRS資訊品質對於IFRS特色與內控報導目標之中介效果探討
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 摘要
本研究主要研究兩岸有關社會及文化差異,反應在ERP專案管理有關專案成員離心力與向心力對ERP系統導入效率的影響。調查對象為台灣地區高科技製造商及在中國大陸地區的台灣製造商ERP系統導入之實際運作,特別是鎖定一般容易被忽略的非技術層面因素。同時,也展現前所未有而且也是第一次的實證研究,結果顯示兩岸企業在離心力概念的互動、達成及自由流通資訊因素並沒有顯著不同之處;但在權力劃分因素確有顯著的差異,顯示台灣高科技製造業的專案團隊享受較高的權力。另ERP專案成員的向心力因素,台灣高科技製造廠商及大陸地區的台灣製造商則呈現出顯著的不同。
總之,基於大陸目前在基礎建設、人文、產業環境與台灣存有一定的差異性下,建議台商在導入ERP系統之前,務必讓專案成員充分了解導入目標,並選任具有專業素養的專案經理,同時提供充分的教育訓練,藉此提高專案成員的向心力以祈於ERP專案導入的順利運行。
摘要(英) The present describes research that centripetal and centrifugal forces on ERP project management which to impact to the ERP project implementation efficiently under the difference of Chinese social culture between Taiwan and China. The analysis focuses on the actual practice of ERP implementation between Taiwanese high-tech manufacturers and the manufacturers in China with a special purpose which aim at the non-technical factors that long has been ignored by many project members.
The study performs one of the first empirical researches to examine the main differences among centrifugal and centripetal forces structure formed by various Taiwanese high-tech manufactures and those manufactures in China. In addition, to examine the roles of the two forces in the project management that influences team member’s attitude and thinking, which impact to the outcome of implementation of ERP project.
In summary, rooted in the divergence of between Taiwan and China in terms of the infrastructure, Social culture and the industrial environment, we suggested that the Taiwanese manufacturer prior to the implementation of ERP project, must get the team members to fully understand the goal of the team and select the project manager who has the expertise. At the same time provide sufficient training and increase the centripetal force in order to help the implementation smoothly.
關鍵字(中) ★ 企業資源規劃
★ 離心力
★ 向心力
★ 代理問題
關鍵字(英) ★ Agency Problems
★ Centripetal Force
★ Centrifugal Force
★ ERP
論文目次 目錄
論文提要 ………………………………………………………………I
第壹章 序論……………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景與動機 …………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的………………………………………………….4
第三節 研究架構 …………………………………………………7
第貳章 文獻回顧………………………………………………………8
第一節 離心力 ……………………………………………………10
第二節 向心力…………………………………………………………14
第三節 監督,代理問題及導入ERP失敗…………………………18
第叁章 研究方法………………………………………………………21
第一節 取樣及程序……………………………………………….21
第二節 內容效度………………………………………………….23
第三節 敘述性統計分析………………………………………….24
第肆章 研究分析及結果………………………………………………26
第一節 因素分析………………………………………………….28
第二節 平均值,標準差及相關係數檢定 ………………………30
第三節 T檢定………………………………………………………31
第伍章 結論與未來研究方向…………………………………………35
第一節 理論意涵………………………………………………….35
第二節 管理意涵………………………………………………….37
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議……………………………….41
參考文獻……………………………………………………………… 43
附錄一………………………………………………………………… 47
表目錄
表1、台灣地區問卷回收率……………………………………………21
表2、大陸昆山地區問卷回收率………………………………………22
表3、敘述性統計………………………………………………………24
表4、獨立樣本測試 大陸 vs 台灣 …………………………………25
表5、用於研究中的問項………………………………………………27
表6、因素分析結果……………………………………………………29
表7、平均值,標準差,及相關係數…………………………………30
表8、Mean factor-based scores for China vs Taiwan…………31
圖目錄
圖1、離心力……………………………………………………………32
圖2、向心力……………………………………………………………33
圖3、專案管理…………………………………………………………34
參考文獻 參考文獻
(一) 書籍
「創新求勝: 智價企業論」: 王美音.楊子江譯,(1997),初版、p.213 台北遠流出版社出版,譯自:NONAKA & TAKEUCHI, 1995.
「組織行為學」:李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬譯(2002)年 第九版修訂,p.460 華泰文化事業公司出版,譯自:Stephen P. Robbins, 2001
「Balance Scorecard」: Robert S. Kaplan, David P. Norton. “Measurement and Management in the Information Age” Chapter 1, pp 3
(二) 期刊
Abdinnour-Helm, S., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., Lengnick-Hall, C. A. 2003, “Pre-implementation attitudes and organizational readiness for implementing an Enterprise Resource Planning system,” European Journal of Operational Research (146:2), pp.258-273.
Amason, A. C. 1996, “Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams”, Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148
Attewell, P. and Rule, J. 1984, “Computing and organizationas: what we know and what we don’t know,” Communications of the ACM (17:12), pp.1184-1192.
Atuahene-Gima, K. 2003 “The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: how does problem solving matter?” Academy of Management Journal (46:3), pp.359-373.
Austin, R.D. 2001 “The effects of time pressure on quality in software development: an agency model,” Information Systems Research (12:2), pp.195-207.
Baiman, S. 1990, “Agency research in managerial accounting: a second look,” Accounting, Organizations and Society (15:4), pp.341-371.
Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K.M. 1995, “Product development: Past research, present findings, and future research,” Academy of Management Review 20, pp.343-378.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. 1961 “The Management of Innovation.” London : Tavistock.
Cafasso, F., 1994. Few IS projects come in on time, on budget. Computerworld 28 (50), 20.
Clark, K., & Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product development performance; Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cooke, R. A & Szumal, J. L. 1994, The impact of group interaction styles on problem-solving effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30(4), 415-437
Davenport, T. H.1998 “Putting the enterprise into the enterprise systems,” Harvard Business Review (76:4), pp.121-132.
Davenport, T. H. 2000 “Mission critical: realizing the promise of enterprise systems,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989 “Agency theory: an assessment and review,” Academy of Management Review (14:1), pp.57-74.
Gersick, C. J. G..1994, “Pacing strategic change: The case of new venture,” Academy of Management Journal (37), pp.9-45.
Gladstein DL., 1984. “Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness”. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
Griffin, A. 1997 “The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time,” Journal of Marketing Research (34), pp.24-35.
Gurbaxani, V. and Whang, S. “The impact of information systems on organizations and markets”, Communications of the ACM (34:1), 1991, pp.59-73.
Harrison, P.D., Harrell, A. 1993 “Impact of “adverse selection” on managers’ project evaluation decisions,” Academy of Management Journal (36:3), pp.635-643.
Hicks, D. A., Stecke, K. E. “The ERP maze: enterprise resource planning and other production and inventory control software”, IIE Solutions (27), 1995, pp.12-16.
Hong, K.K., Kim, Y.G.. 2002 “The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective,” Information & Management (40:1), pp.25-40.
Hyatt, D. E., Rudy, T. M. 1997 “An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: once more into the breech,” Personnel Psychology (50), pp.553-585.
J. B. Miner. 1965. “Studies in Management Education” New York Springer.
Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., Means, T. L., 2000. Project Risk impact on software development team performance. Project Management Journal 31 (4), 19-26
Kirby, S. L., Davis, M.A., 1998. A study of escalating commitment in principal-agent relationships: effects of monitoring and personal responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (2), 206-217.
Kumar, V., Maheshwari, B., Kumar, U. 2003 “An investigation of critical management issues in ERP implementation: empirical evidence from Canadian organizations,” Technovation (23), pp.793-807.
Larson CE, LaFasto FMJ. 1989. “Teamwork : What must go right / What can go wrong”. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.
Lederer A. L,. Prasad, J., 2000. Software management and cost estimating error. Journal of Systems and Software 50, 33-42.
Mahaney, R.C. and Lederer, A.L. 2003, “Information systems project management: an agency theory interpretation,” The Journal of Systems and Software (68:1), pp.1-9.
Markus, M. L., Axline, S., Petrie, D., Tanis C. 2000, “Learning from adopters’ experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved,” Journal of Information Technology (15), pp.245-265.
Martin, M. H. “An ERP strategy,” Fortune (2), 1998, pp.95-97.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D. 1995, “An integrative model of organizational trust,” Academy of Management Journal (20:3), pp.709-734.
Menon, A., Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. 1997. Product quality: Impact of interdepartmental interactions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25: 187-200.
Norman, P.M. 2004 “Knowledge acquisition, knowledge loss, and satisfaction in high technology alliances,” Journal of Business Research (57), pp.610-619.
Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
Project Management Institute, PMI,
Website : http://www.pmi.org/info/PP_PMBOK2000Excerpts.asp
Rutledge, R.W., Karim, K.E. “The influence of self-interest and ethical considerations on managers’ evaluation judgments,” Accounting, Organizations and Society (24), 1999, pp.173-184.
Shenhar, A. J., 1998. From theory to practice: toward a typology of project Management Styles. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 45 (1), 33-48.
Sheremata, W. A. 2000, “Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure,” Academy of Management Review (25), pp.389-408.
Slusher, E.A. & R.J. Elbert 1992, “Prototype for Managing Engineering Design Process”, in G. I. Susman(ed.), “Intergrating Design and Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage”, N. Y. : Oxford University Press, pp. 123-139
Terry Dawes, 2003. “Project Management – an integrated approach”. The British Journal of Administrative Management. Orpington : Dec 2002/Jan 2003,. Iss 34 pg 24
Tosi, H.L., Katz, J.P., Gomez-Mejia, L.R. 1997. Disaggregating the agency contract: the effects of monitoring, incentive alignment, and term in office on agent decision making. Academy of Management Journal40 (3), 584-602.
Tushman, M. L., 1977, “Special boundary roles in the innovation process”, Administrative Science Quarterly (22), 1977, pp.587-605.
Tuttle, B. M., Harrell, A., Harrison, P. 1997 “Moral hazard, ethical considerations, and the decision to implement an information system,” Journal of Management Information Systems (13:4), pp.7-27.
Van de Ven, A. H. 1980. Problem solving, planning and innovation – Part I : Test of the program planning model. “Human Relations”, 33:711-740.
(三) 碩、博士論文
游為舒 (2003), 結合專案管理與限制理論之生產排程法, 中華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文
楊豐松 (2003), 資訊系統發展團隊合作之突現與疊代囚犯兩難賽局共演化策略。國立政治大學資訊管理研究所博士論文
指導教授 蔡文賢(Wen-Hsien Tsai) 審核日期 2004-12-25
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明