博碩士論文 91441014 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:10 、訪客IP:3.236.16.13
姓名 黃文仙(Wen-Hsien Huang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 多重參考點對消費者後悔之影響
(On Multiple Reference Points of Consumer Regret)
相關論文
★ 網頁背景圖片對消費者產品偏好的影響★ 組合商品的定價模式對消費者的滿意度與價值知覺
★ KTV消費型態與消費者類型之關聯★ 蘋果沉浸度研究
★ 女性業務人員的配飾、妝容、上衣對業務職能特質知覺之影響★ 男性業務人員服飾配件對職能特質知覺之影響
★ 個人辦公桌擺設對員工工作投入與專業職能知覺之影響★ 飯店房間內擺設對消費者知覺與金錢價值之影響 --- 以人格特質為干擾變數
★ 療癒著色本對情緒轉換與風險偏好的影響★ 名片設計對業務人員的職能特質與工作績效之知覺影響
★ 美語補習班的創新服務★ 台灣工具機製造商之策略構面、組織構面及財務績效之關係研究:五大廠商之個案分析
★ 反向策略之廣告效果研究★ 不同性刺激形式所引發的性幻想程度對廣告效果之影響
★ 情緒在消費者決策行為中的影響★ 廣告訊息框架效果對消費者態度之影響: MOA的調節角色
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 「如果我當初買的是A公司股票,我就不會賠錢了!」 後悔 (regret) 是一種讓人感到痛苦、覺得自己犯了錯、想要再重來一次的負面情緒。它是反事實比較 (counterfactual comparison) 的結果,發生在當我們瞭解到或想像到如果當初做了不一樣的決定,我們目前的情況應該會變得更好。而那個當初放棄的方案(如A公司股票)便是消費者進行比較的參考點 (reference point)。儘管愈來愈多學者指出,消費者的後悔情緒可能受不同參考點的影響,但卻缺乏相關研究。本論文即在探討多參考點對消費者決策後悔之影響。透過539位MBA 和EMBA 學生,以及 227 位股票投資人所參與的二個研究,本研究發現:(1) 消費者決策後悔會受到多個參考點影響,這些參考點包括無為 (inaction)、期望和較佳之放棄方案;(2) 在這些參考點中,無為對消費者決策後悔之影響最大;此外,(3) 決策後悔主要受到損益 (losses or gains) 的影響而非損益的大小 (the size of the loss or gain)。本研究發現對後續有關消費者後悔情緒的研究具有重大影響。
摘要(英) Regret is the result of a comparison between “what is” and “what might have been”. Although regret is a relevant emotion in our daily life, research studying how regrets are influenced by multiple reference points is lacking. This dissertation presents two studies that investigated the regrets of decision makers in relation to multiple “what might have been” scenarios. In the context of a choice set comprising three alternatives, the first study of 539 MBA and EMBA students demonstrated that people use multiple reference points in judging their post-decisional regrets. The second study of 227 real stock investors in a field survey further showed that investors’ regrets are most influenced by what their outcomes might have been had they not invested, by their expected outcomes and by the best-performing rejected stocks. Among these reference points, the non-investment (inaction) outcome has the largest impact on regret. In addition, we also found that the feeling of regret was influenced by losses or gains relative to each reference point rather than by the size of the loss or gain. Several theoretical and managerial implications are discussed and future research directions are suggested.
關鍵字(中) ★ 期望
★ 反事實思考
★ 後悔
★ 參考點
★ 消費者決策
關鍵字(英) ★ Regr
★ Decision making
★ Multiple reference points
論文目次 Chapter 1: Introduction 01
Questions that motivated the present research 01
Overview of the dissertation 04
Chapter 2: Theoretical Background 06
The role of reference points in the evaluation of outcomes 06
Regret and counterfactual thinking 08
Multiple reference points in regret assessment 12
Chapter 3: Study 1 19
Stimuli and design 19
Procedure 21
Dependent variables 22
Data analysis 22
Results 23
Discussion 25
Chapter 4: Study 2 27
Sample and data collection 27
Procedure and dependent variables 28
Data analysis 29
Results 30
Discussion 33
Chapter 5: General Discussion 34
Conclusion 34
Managerial implications 37
Limitations and future research suggestions 38
References 40
Appendix A 49
Appendix B 51
參考文獻 1. Bell, David E. (1982), “Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty,” Operations Research, 30 (5), 961-981.
2. Bell, David E. (1985), “Disappointment in Decision Making under uncertainty,” Operations Research, 33 (1), 1-27.
3. Boles, Terry L. and David M. Messick, (1990), “Accepting Unfairness: Temporal Influence on Choice,” in Contemporary Issues in Decision Making, ed. Borcherding, Katrin, Oleg I. Larichev, and David M. Messick, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing, 375-389.
4. Boles, Terry L. and David M. Messick, (1995), “A reverse Outcome Bias: The Influence of Multiple Reference Points on the Evaluation of Outcomes and Decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61 (3), 262-275.
5. Brehaut, Jamie C., Annette M. O’Connor, Timothy J. Wood, Thomas F.Hack, Laura Siminoff, Elisa Gordon, Deb Feldman-Stewart (2003), “Validation of a Decision Regret Scale. Medical Decision Making, 23 (4), 281-292.
6. Bridges, Eileen (1993), “Service Attributes: Expectations and Judgments,” Psychology & Marketing, 10 (3), 185-197.
7. Burgess, Ann W. and Lyndal L Holmstrom, (1979), “Rape: Crisis and Recovery,” Bowie, MD: Robert J. Brady Co.
8. Cherry, Bennett, Lisa D. Ord??ez, and Stephen W. Gilliland (2003), “Grade Expectations: The Effects of Expectations on Fairness and Satisfaction Perceptions,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16 (5), 375-295.
9. Collins, Rebecca L. (1996), “For Better or Worse: The Impact of Upward Social Comparison on Self-Evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (1), 51-69.
10. Copeland, Phyllis V. and Andrew D. Cuccia (2002), “Multiple Determinants of Framing Referents in Tax Reporting and Compliance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88 (1), 499-526.
11. Fox, Shaul and Kobie Dayan (2004), “Framing and Risky Choice as Influenced by Comparison of One’s Achievements with Others: The Case of Investment in the Stock Exchange,” Journal of Business and Psychology, 18 (3), 301-321.
12. Frederick, Shane and George Loewenstein (1999), “Hedonic Adaptation,” in Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, ed. Daniel Kahneman, Edward Diener, and Norbert Schwarz, New York: Russell Sage, 302-328.
13. Gilovich, Thomas, Ranxiao Frances Wang, Dennis Regan, and Sadafumi Nishina (2003), “Regrets of Action and Inaction Across Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34 (1), 61-71.
14. Inman, J. Jeffrey and Marcel Zeelenberg (2002), “Regret in Repeat Purchase versus Switching Decisions: The Attenuating Role of Decision Justifiability,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (1), 116-128.
15. Inman, J. Jeffrey, James S. Dyer, and Jianmin Jia (1997), “A Generalized Utility Model of Disappointment and Regret Effects on Post-Choice Valuation,” Marketing Science, 16 (2), 97-111.
16. Johnson, Marcia K. and Steven J. Sherman (1990), “Constructing and Reconstructing the Past and the Future in the Present,” in Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behaviour, ed. E. Tory Higgins and Richard M. Sorrentino New York: Guilford Press, 482-526.
17. Jones, Steven K., Deborah Frisch, Tricia J. Yurak, and Eric Kim (1998), “Choices and Opportunities: Another Effect of Framing on Decisions,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11 (3), 211-226.
18. Kahneman, Daniel (1992), “Reference Points, Anchors, Norms, and Mixed Feelings,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51 (2), 296-312.
19. Kahneman, Daniel and Dale T. Miller (1986), “Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives,” Psychological Review, 93 (2), 136-153.
20. Kahneman, Daniel and Mark W. Riepe (1998), “Aspects of Investor Psychology, “ The Journal of Portfolio Management, 24 (4), 52-65.
21. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47 (2), 263-291.
22. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1982a), “The Psychology of Preferences,” Scientific American, 246, 160-173.
23. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1982b), “The Simulation Heuristic,” in Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, ed. Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky, New York: Cambridge University Press, 201-208.
24. Kasimatis, Margaret and Gary L. Wells (1995), “Individual Differences in Counterfactual Thinking, “ in What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking, ed. Roese, Neal J. Roese and James M. Olson, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 80-102.
25. Lin, Chien-Huang and Wen-Hsien Huang (2006), “The Influence of Unawareness Set and Order Effects in Consumer Regret. Journal of Business and Psychology, Accepted and forthcoming
26. Loomes, Graham and Robert Sugden (1982), “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty,“ The Economic Journal, 92 (368), 905-824.
27. Loomes, G.raham and Robert Sugden (1987), “Testing for Regret and Disappointment in Choice under Uncertainty,” The Economic Journal, 97, 118-129.
28. Loomes, Graham and Roberg Sugden (1988), “The Impact of Regret and Disappointment,” Economica, 55, 47-62.
29. Mandel, David R. (2003), “Counterfactuals, Emotions and Context,” Cognition and Emotion 17 (1), 139-159.
30. Markman, Keith D., Igor Gavanski, Steven J. Sherman, and Matthew N. McMullen (1993), “The Mental Simulation of Better and Worse Possible Worlds,“ Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29 (1), 87-109.
31. McMullen, Matthew N., Keith D. Markman, and Igor Gavanski (1995), “Living in neither the Best nor Worst of All Possible Worlds: Antecedents and Consequences of Upward and Downward Counterfactual Thinking,” in What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, ed. Neal J. Roese and James M. Olson, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 133-167.
32. Mellers, Barbara A., Alan Schwartz, and Ilana Ritov (1999), “Emotion-Based Choice,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 128 (3), 332-345.
33. Neale, Margaret A. and Max H. Bazerman (1991), Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation, New York: Free Press.
34. Niedenthal, Paula M., June P. Tangney, and Igor Gavanski (1994), ““If Only I Weren’t” versus “If Only I Hadn’t”: Distinguishing Shame and Guilt in Counterfactual Thinking,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (4), 585-595.
35. Oliver, Richard L. (1996), Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
36. Olson, James M., Oswald Buhrmann, and Neal J. Roese (2000), “Comparing Counterfactual Thinking,” in Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research, ed. Jerry Suls and Ladd Wheeler, New York: Plenum Press, 379-398.
37. Ord??ez, Lisa D. and Terry Connolly, and Richard Coughlan (2000), “Multiple Reference Points in Satisfaction and Fairness Assessment,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13 (3), 329-344.
38. Richard, Rene, Joop Van der Pligt, and Nanne de Vries (1996), “Anticipated Regret and Time Perspective: Changing Sexual Risk-Taking Behaviour,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9 (3), 185-199.
39. Roese, Neal J. (1994), “The Functional Basis of Counterfactual Thinking,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 (5), 805-818.
40. Roese, Neal J. (1997), “Counterfactual Thinking,” Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133-148.
41. Roese, Neal J. and Taekyun Hur (1997), “Affective Determinants of Counterfactual Thinking,” Social Cognition, 15 (4), 274-290.
42. Roese, Neal J. and James M. Olson (1995), “Counterfactual Thinking: A Critical Overview,” in What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking, ed. Neal J. Roese and James M. Olson, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1-55.
43. Roese, Neal J. and James M. Olson (1997), “Counterfactual Thinking: The Intersection of Affect and Function,” in Advances in experimental social psychology, ed. Mark P. Zanna, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1-59.
44. Roseman, Ira J., Cynthia Wiest, and Tamara S. Swartz (1994), “Phenomenology, Behaviors, and Goals Differentiate Discrete Emotions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (2), 206-221.
45. Sanna, Lawrence J. and Kandi J. Turley (1996), “Antecedents to Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking: Effects of Expectancy Violation and Outcome Valence,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (9), 906-919.
46. Schwarz, Norbert and Herbert Bless (1992), “Constructing Reality and Its Alternatives: An Inclusion/Exclusion Model of Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Social Judgment,” in The Construction of Social Judgment, ed. Leonard L. Martin and Abraham Tesser, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 217-245.
47. Schweitzer, Maurice (1995), “Multiple reference points, framing, and the status quo bias in health care financing decisions,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63 (1), 69-72.
48. Shefrin, Hersh M. and Meir Statman (1986), “How Not to Make Money in the Stock Market. Psychology Today, 20 (2), 52-57.
49. Simonson, Itamar (1992), “The Influence of Anticipating Regret and Responsibility on Purchase Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (1), 105-118.
50. Sullivan, Kathryn and Thomas Kida (1995), “The Effect of Multiple Reference Points and Prior Gains and Losses on Managers’ Risky Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64 (1), 76-83.
51. Taylor, Kimberly (1997), “A Regret Theory Approach to Assessing Consumer Satisfaction,” Marketing Letters, 8 (April), 229-238.
52. Taylor, Shelley E. and Sherry K. Schneider (1989), “Copying and the Simulation of Events,” Social Cognition, 7 (2), 174-194.
53. Taylor, Shelley E., Joanne Wood, and Rosemary Lichtman (1983), “It Could Be Worse: Selective Evaluation as a Response to Victimization,” Journal of Social Issues, 39 (2), 19-40.
54. Thibaut, John W. and Harold H. Kelley (1959), The social psychology of groups, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
55. Tsiros, Michael (1998), “Effect of Regret on Post-Choice Valuation: The Case of More Than Two Alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76 (1), 48-69.
56. Tsiros, Michael and Vikas Mittal (2000), “Regret: A Model of Its Antecedents and Consequences in Consumer Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (4), 401-417.
57. Tykocinski, Orit E. and Noa Steinberg (2005), “Coping with Disappointing Outcomes: Retroactive Pessimism and Motivated Inhibition of Counterfactuals,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41 (5), 551-558.
58. Van den Bos, Kees, Henk A. M. Wilke, E. Allan Lind, and Riel Vermunt (1998), “Evaluating Outcomes by Means of the Fair Process Effect: Evidence for Difference Processes in Fairness and Satisfaction Judgments,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (6), 1493-1503.
59. Van Dijk, Wilco W., Marcel Zeelenberg and Joop van der Pligt (2003), “Blessed are Those who Expect Nothing: Lowering Expectations As a Way of Avoiding Disappointment,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 24 (4), 505-516
60. Van Dijk, Eric and Marcel Zeelenberg (2005), “On the Psychology of ‘If Only’: Regret and the Comparison Between Factual and Counterfactual Outcomes,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97 (2), 152-160.
61. Wells, Gary L., Brian R. Taylor, and John W. Turtle (1987), “The Undoing of Scenarios,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (3), 421-430.
62. Wood, Joanne V. (1996), “What Is Social Comparison and How Should We Study It? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (5), 520-537.
63. Yi, Sunghwan and Hans Baumgartner (2004), “Coping with Negative Emotions in Purchase-Related Situations,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (3), 303-317.
64. Zeelenberg, Marcel (1999), “The Use of Crying Over Spilled Milk: A Note on the Rationality and Functionality of Regret,” Philosophical Psychology, 12 (3), 325-340.
65. Zeelenberg, Marcel and Rik Pieters (2004), “Beyond Valence in Customer Dissatisfaction: A Review and New Findings on Behavioral Responses to Regret and Disappointment in Failed Services,” Journal of Business Research, 57 (4), 445-455.
66. Zeelenberg, Marcel and Rik Pieters (2006), “Looking Backwards with An Eye on the Future: Propositions Towards a Theory of Regret Regulation,” in Judgments Over Time: The Interplay of Thoughts, Feelings, and Behaviors, ed. Lawrence J. Sanna and Edward C. Chang, New York: Oxford University Press.
67. Zeelenberg, Marcel and Eric van Dijk (2005), “On the Ccomparative Nature of Regret,” in The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, ed. David Mandel, D. Hilton and P. Catelani, Routledge: London, 147-161.
68. Zeelenberg, Marcel, Wilco W. van Dijk and Antony S. R. Manstead (2000), “Rejoinder: Regret and Responsibility resolved? Evaluating Ord??ez and Connolly’s (2000) conclusions,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81 (1), 143-154.
69. Zeelenberg, Marcel, Keens van den Bos, Eric van Dijk, and Rik Pieters (2002), “The Inaction Effect in the Psychology of Regret,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (3), 314-327.
70. Zeelenberg, Marcel, Joop van der Pligt, and Antony S. R. Manstead (1998), “Undoing Regret on Dutch Television: Apologizing for Interpersonal Regrets Involving Actions and Inactins,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24 (10), 1113-1119.
71. Zeelenberg, Marcel, Wilco W. van Dijk, Joop van der Pligt, Antony S. R. Manstead, Pepijn van Empelen, and Dimitri Reinderman (1998), “Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions: The Role of Counterfactual Thought in the Experience of Regret and Disappointment,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75 (2), 117-141.
指導教授 林建煌(Chien-Huang Lin) 審核日期 2006-5-15
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明