參考文獻 |
西文
1. Gadamer, Hans-Georg, 1989, Hermeneutik I: Wahrheit und Methode-Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik,Gesammelte Werke, Band1, Tübingen: J. B. C. Mohr.
2. -----, 1977, Die Aktualitat des Schonen, Phillip Reclam Jr., Stuttgrat.
3. -----, Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall (tr.), 1989, Truth and Method, 2nd revised edition New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company.
4. -----, Robert Bernasconi and Nichoalas Walker (tr. and ed.), 1980, The Relevence of the Beautiful and other essays, London: Cambridge University Press.
5. -----, Kathleen Wright (ed.), 1990, Festivals of interpretation : essays on Hans-Georg Gadamer's work, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
6. -----, Jeff Malpas, Ulrich Arnswald and Jens Kertcher (eds.), 2002, Gadamer’s Century Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
7. -----, John M. Connolly and Thomas Keutner (trs.), 1988, Hermeneutics Versus Science? Indiana: University of Notre Dame press.
8. -----, Joel Weinsheimer (tr.), 1999, Hermeneutics, religion, and ethics. New Haven, CT :Yale University Press.
9. -----, David E. Linge (tr.), 1977, Philosophical Hermeneutics, LA: University of California press.
10. -----, Chris Dawson (tr.), 1998, Praise of theory: speeches and essays, New Haven: Yale Universtiy Press.
11. -----, Frederick G. Lawrence (tr.), 1993, Reason in the Age of Science, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
12. -----, Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), 1997, The philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
13. Dutt, Carsten, 2000, Hermeneutik-Ästhetik-praktische Philosophie: Hans-Georg Gadamer im Gespräch / hrsg. von Carsten Dutt, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter Heidelberg GmbH.
14. -----, Richard E. Palmer, (ed. and tr.), 2001, Gadamer in conversation : reflections and commentary / Hans-Georg Gadamer; with Carsten Dutt...[et al.], New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Hirsch, Eric Donald, 1967, Validity in interpretation, New York: Yale University Press.
16. Kant, Immanuel, J. H. Bernard (tr.), 1931, Kant's Critique of Judgement, London: Macmillan.
17. Schiller, Friedrich, Elizabeth M. Wilkinson and L.A. Willoughby (tr.), 1982, On The Aesthetic Education Of Man, Translated with London: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1982.
18. Grondin, Jean, Kathryn Plant (tr.), 2003, The Philosophy of Gadamer, London:Acumen Publisching Limited.
19. Weinsheimer, Joel. C., 1985, Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of Truth and Method, New Haven: Yale University Press.
20. Sullivan, Robert R., 1989, Political Hermeneutics: The Early Thinking of Hans-Georg Gadamer, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
21. Rorty, Richard, 1979, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
22. Altenbernd, Johnson Patricia, 2000, On Gadamer. C.A.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
中文書目
1. 《劍橋哲學辭典》,2002年,台北:貓頭鷹出版社。
2. 洪漢鼎(等編譯),Habermas Jüergen, Paul Ricoeur, Hans-Georg Gadamer (等著),2005年,《詮釋學經典文選(上)(下)》,台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
3. 王慶節,陳嘉映(譯),Heidegger, Martin (著),2002年,《存在與時間》(Sein und Zeit),台北: 桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
4. Michelfelder, Diane P. and Richard E. Palmer (eds.), Forget, Philippe (tr.), 孫周興,孫善春(編譯),2004年,《德法之爭:伽達默爾與德里達的對話》(Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter),上海:同濟大學出版社。
5. 陸敬忠著,2004年,《哲學詮釋學﹣歷史、義理與對話之「生化」辯證》,台北:五南圖書公司。
英文期刊
1. Seerveld, Calvin, 1978, “Reviewed Work(s): Turth and Method” in The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 489-490.
2. Zuniga, Joaquin, 1991, “Reviewed Work(s): The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays”in Noûs , Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 139-142.
3. Crowther, Paul, 1983, “Review: The Experience of Art: Some Problems and Possibilities of Hermeneutical Analysis” in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 347-362.
4. Bernstein, Richard J., 1988, “Reviewed Work(s): The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays”in The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 46, No. 3 pp. 421-423.
5. Dostal, Robert J., 1980, “Kantian Aesthetics and the Literary Criticism of E. D. Hirsch” in The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 299-305.
6. Shusterman, Richard, 1997, “The End of Aesthetic Experience” in The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 29-41.
7. Dorter, Kenneth, 1990, “Concept Truth and Aesthetics Truth” in The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 37-51.
中文期刊
1. 張鼎國,1997,〈海德格、高達美與希臘人〉,哲學雜誌編委會主編,《哲學雜誌》第21期,台灣:業強出版社,頁98-125。
2. 張鼎國,1997,〈義理詮釋、自我理解與文化診療〉,國立中央大學文學院哲學研究所編,《應用哲學與文化治療學術研討會論文集》,中壢:國立中央大學文學院哲學研究所,頁77-96。
3. 陳榮華,2002,〈從海德格的存在時間(existentiall time)到高達美的充實時間(fulfilled time)〉,哲學雜誌編委會主編,《哲學雜誌》第38期,台灣:業強出版社,頁98-115。
4. 陳榮華,1998,〈高達美《真理與方法》中的完整性先前概念(Vorgiff der Vollkommenheit)與真理概念〉 , 國立臺灣大學臺大文史哲學報編輯委員會, 《文史哲學報》 第49期,台北: 國立臺灣大學出版委員會,頁3-78。
5. 陳榮華,2000,〈論高達美詮釋學的文本與詮釋之統一性〉 , 國立臺灣大學臺大文史哲學報編輯委員會, 《文史哲學報》 第52期,台北: 國立臺灣大學出版委員會,頁1-297。
6. 陸敬忠,2000,〈高達美詮釋學與黑格爾辯證法-綜論高達美哲學詮釋學生成史中之黑格爾思想〉,彭文林編,《國立政治大學哲學學報》第6期,台北: 國立政治大學哲學系,頁135-172。
|