摘要(英) |
Drainage Pavements have been used in many countries for pavements and received positive reaction. In early times, Taiwan’s has used OGFC (open graded asphalt friction course) to designed Taiwan’s freeway. With the development of Polymer-Modified Asphalt, the quality of Drainage Pavements has much improved. Our research will focus on how the different factors can affect the Drainage Pavements such as size of particle, thickness of pavement, material of asphalt binder and fabric fiber Based on the long-term research on the experiment of pavement, In the future after from the test built in site, we now have to step forward for making an estimating of the road structural analysis, estimating the drainage system, estimating the sound level and the estimating of the service ability during the performance observation,which will be used as the instructions for the rules of National Construction and Standard of Materials.
According to the statistics of one-year experiment of pavement, no matter in the factor of rutting、permeable、pavement friction、roughness、distress survey、sound level, all the outcomes lead to good condition of the pavement. However, with access to only one-year statistic report and without any obvious difference from the contrast party, it still requires long-term observation to find out suitable combination. In order to get the result of how much Water Fog can be reduced by Drainage Pavement, we adopted Water Fog Quantification equation in the process of analysis. The result shows that best thickness for the lowest Water Fog level is 4cm which lowers Water Fog level two times than thickness of 2.5cm. Therefore, we come to conclusion that the thicker pavement we make, the safer driver will be. On the other hand, the shorter drainage route is the more quickly rain can be ruled out. On the condition of shorter drainage, the level of Water Fog caused by heavy car can be reduced. |
參考文獻 |
參考文獻
1. ASTM D3515-96〝Standard Specification for Hot-Mixed,Hot-Laid Bituminous Paving Mixtures〞ASTM annual book 2000,Vol.04.03
2. L.Allen Cooley,Jr.,E.Ray Brown,Donald E.Watson,〝Evaluation of OGFC Mixtures Containing Cellulose Fibers〞NCAT Report No.2000-05,2000.
3. Prithvi S.Kandhal,Rajib B.Mallick,〝Open Graded Asphalt Friction Course:State of the Practice〞NCAT Report No.98-7,1998.
4. Prithvi S.Kandhal,Rajib B.Mallick,〝Design of New-Generation Open-Graded Friction Courses〞NCAT Report No.99-3,1999.
5. Rajib B.Mallick, Prithvi S.Kandhal, L.Allen Cooley, Donald E.Watson,〝Design,Construction,and Performance of New-Generation Open-Graded Friction Courses〞NCAT Report No.2000-01,2000.
6. Walter J.Tappeiner,〝Open-Graded Asphalt Friction Course〞NAPA IS115.
7. Hibbs, B.O. and R. M.Larson, Tire Pavement Noise and Safety Performance, FHWA,Final Report, FHWA-SA-96-068,May 1996.
8. Shafik K.Hamdani,〝Open-Graded Surface Courses in Hot Climates〞AAPT Vol.52,1983.
9. 〝Hot Mix Asphalt Materials,Mixture Design,and Construction〞NAPA Education Foundation,1st ed.,1991.pp353~355
10. 〝Georgia’s Modified Open-Graded Friction Course〞GDOT,1992
11. Nelson, P.M. and S.M. Phillips, 〝Quieter Road Surfaces〞,TRL Annual Review,TRL Limited,UK,1997.
12. 〝Designing and Constructing SMA Mixtures—State-of-the-Practice〞NAPA QIS122,1999.
13. E.R.Brown and L.A.Cooley,jr.,〝Designing Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixtures for Rut-Resistant Pavements〞NCHRP Report 425,1999.
14. Sandberg,U., 〝A Road Surface for Reduction of Tie Npise Emission, 〞Inter-Noise 79,Warszawa,Poland,September 11-13,1979.
15. California Test 526,〝Operation of California Profilograph and Evaluation of Profiles,〞California DOT,1978
16. ASTM E303-93,〝Standard Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester〞ASTM annual book 1998,Vol.04.03
17. ASTM E1274-88,〝Standard Test Method for Measuring Pavement Roughness Using a Profilograph,〞ASTM annual book 1993,Vol.04.03
18. G.Van Heystraeten and C.Moraux,〝Ten Years’Experience of Porous Asphalt in Belgium〞TRR1265,1990,pp34~40
19. Thomas Isenring,Harald Koster,and Ivan Scazziga,〝Experiences with Porous Asphalt in Switzerland〞TRR1265,1990,pp41~53
20. Alain Sainton〝Advantage of Asphalt Rubber Binder for Porous Asphalt Concrete〞TRR1265,1990,pp69~81
21. Y.Decoene〝Contribution of Cellulose Fibers to the Performance of Porous Asphalts〞TRR1265,1990,pp82~86
22. Aurelio Ruiz,Roberto Alberola,Felix Perez.and Bartolome Sanchez〝Porous Asphalt Mixtures in Spain〞TRR1260,1990,pp87~94
23. J.Th.Van Der Zwan,Th.Goeman,H.J.A.J.Gruis,J.H.Swart,and R.H.Oldenburger〝Porous Asphalt Wearing Courses in the Netherlands:State of the Art Review〞TRR1260,1990,pp95~110
24. 日本道路協會,「鋪裝試驗法便覽」,昭和六十三年十一月。
25. 日本道路協會,「排水性鋪裝技術指針(案)」平成十一年七月。
26. 吉兼亨、中西弘光,「多孔隙排水鋪面工程技術」,台灣區國道高速公路局,1999.12。
27. 「環保鋪面工程學術研討會」論文集,國立中興大學土木系,民2000.11。
28. 張弘義、葉韓生,「多孔隙排水面層之設計與施工技術考察報告」交通部台灣區國道高速公路局,1999.7。
29. 房性中,「排水性鋪面使用材料規格暨基本性能需求說明」現代營建,251期、2000.11。
30. 祝錫智、劉明仁、高金盛,「高速公路多孔隙排水面層試鋪及績效評估研究」期末報告,交通部台灣區國道高速公路局,1999.10。
31. 「鋪面排水與行車安全研討會專輯」,台灣省土木技師公會,國立中央大學創新育成中心,1999.9。
32. 劉守益,「多孔隙瀝青混凝土成效之評估」國立中央大學碩士論文,1996.6。
33. 吳明宇,「改良型開放級配瀝青混凝土成效特性之研究」國立中央大學碩士論文,1999.8。
34. 蔡攀鰲、陳建旭,「嘉義市興業路石膠泥瀝青(SMA)試驗路面成效之評估」第一年成效評估報告書,內政部營建署,2000.12。
35. 劉霈、林嘉永,「高速公路路面摩擦層開放級配效能改進之初步研究」1996年瀝青混凝土路面及材料特性研討會專輯,國立中央大學,1996.5。
36. 黃博仁,「以Brookfield黏度儀選定瀝青拌合及夯實溫度」,土木工程技術,第三卷第二期,1999.6。
37. 交通部公路局材料試驗所,「公路工程材料手冊」,交通部公路局材料試驗所編印,1988。
38. 交通部國道高速公路局,「施工標準規範—施工技術規範」,1987.3。
39. 林冠州、陳永隆,「Excel 2000工程應用篇」,松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司,2000.7。
40. 交通部公路局,「公路工程施工說明書」,1997.6。
41. 交通部公路局,「台灣地區現行路面設計方法之評價與改良之研究」,1979。
42. 林志棟,「瀝青混凝土配合設計與其原理」,科技圖書公司,1983。
43. 余政儒,「瀝青混凝土添加石灰耐久性之研究」,國立中央大學土木研究所碩士論文,1994.6。
44. 廖溪堃,「材料對石膠泥瀝青混凝土成效特性之研究」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,1999.6。
45. 蔡弦志,「再生材料應用於道路鋪面工程之成本效益研究」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2003.6。
46. 高翰成,「再生瀝青混凝土試驗路段成效評估」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,1998.8。
47. 林元生,「智慧型鋪面檢測車應用於鋪面平坦度之研究」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2004.6。
48. 中央氣象局全球資訊網,http://www.cwb.gov.tw,2005。
49. 交通部高速公路局,「北二高龍潭收費站歷年收費紀錄」,2004。
50. 大有建設株式會社,「大有建設的排水性鋪裝-TAF-Porous」,2005。
51. 徐義人,應用水文學,大中國圖書公司,2003。
52. 建中工程股份有限公司,「國三線白河段試鋪排水性路面排水性能檢測報告」,2004。
53. 營建署全球資訊網站,http://www.cpami.gov.tw,2005。 |