博碩士論文 92421021 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:4 、訪客IP:3.237.178.91
姓名 黃金川(Chin-Chuan Huang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 品牌延伸評價研究 - 結構方程模式之應用
(The Evaluations of Brand Extensions - Application of Structural Equation Model)
相關論文
★ 由組織層面探討軟體程序成熟度★ 線上溝通平台融入概念圖合作學習之比較研究
★ 線上討論一定就會更好嗎?探討影響群體創造知識過程中知識分享與知識採用因素之研究★ 群體決策支援系統對團隊績效之影響-以時間壓力為調節因素
★ 在文化差異下,探討創新協同合作工具針對不同任務性質之績效★ Icon辨識與其設計屬性之關聯性探討
★ 創新協同合作工具之先導因素對績效的影響:強調工具特性與科技特性★ 以物件導向塑模未來研究方法配適於前瞻研究之系統架構
★ 在匈牙利文化下,探討Icon之設計屬性、主觀熟悉及辨識對其吸引力之影響★ Icon設計屬性吸引力與 情感、支配性認知、意義性認知之影響探討以匈牙利樣本為例
★ 在中國大陸文化下,Icon辨識、主觀熟悉與設計屬性對下載意願之關聯性探討★ 探討網路交友平台使用者之 交友機制使用意圖─以Dcard為例
★ 捷運乘客舒適度調查分析 以台北高運量板南-土城線為例★ 時依性路段暨時窗限制下單一車輛路線問題之研究
★ 飛航組員及客艙組員影響溝通協調關鍵因素之研究★ 廢棄機車回收廠區位選址之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 過去十年內有超過80%運用品牌延伸策略的商品推出以降低新品牌的上市風險。本研究以原品牌類別(服務性品牌、實體品牌)與品牌延伸商品類別(服務性商品、實體產品)之研究設計進行消費者對品牌延伸商品評估之研究,品牌的選擇以「統一超商」、「麥當勞」兩品牌作為服務性品牌之代表,「耐吉」、「新力」兩品牌則為實體品牌之代表,以結構方程模式探討原品牌態度、知覺契合度、產品知識、延伸產品評估以及延伸產品購買意圖等變項間彼此的關係。
本研究研究對象為中央大學管理學院學生,以問卷方式進行資料蒐集,採用STATISTICA 6套裝軟體作為統計分析的工具,研究結論如下:
一、當消費者對原品牌態度越佳,則消費者對於延伸產品評估將會越正向。
二、當消費者認為原品牌聯想形象與延伸產品越相似,亦即知覺契合度越高時,則消費者對於延伸產品同樣會有正向的評估。
三、當消費者認為其對延伸產品擁有越充足的產品知識,則消費者對於延伸產品的評估將會越正向。
四、當消費者對於延伸產品的評估越佳時,將會導致其有越高的購買意圖。
五、服務性與實體品牌延伸產品的評估均會受到原品牌態度與知覺契合度
影響,兩類品牌延伸的差異在於消費者對延伸產品類別的知識是否會對
延伸產品評估造成影響,在實體品牌延伸策略中,產品知識會影響延伸
產品的評估,在服務性品牌延伸策略則否。
摘要(英) In the last decade, more than eighty percent of commodities have been pushed into the market with brand extension to reduce the risk of introducing new brand. In this research, we explore brand extension evaluations of consumers by parent brand type and brand extension type. The parent brand type includes service and tangible brands; the brand extension type includes service and tangible extension products. We choose two brands 7-11, McDonalds as service brand and Nike, Sony as tangible brand. We use structural equation model to test the relationship among the attitude toward the parent brand, perceived fit, product knowledge, evaluation toward brand extension products and purchasing intension to the brand extension products.
The objects of our research are the students in the school of management in NCU. We collect data by using questionnaires and use STATISTICA 6 to analyze the data. The research concludes:
1. If consumers have the more positive attitude toward the parent brand, the more positive evaluation toward the brand extension products.
2. If consumers consider the parent brand associations and the extension products have more similarity, i.e. the more perceived fit, consumers would have more positive evaluation toward the extension products.
3. If consumers have more product category knowledge toward the extension products, consumers would have more positive evaluation toward the extension products.
4. If consumers have the more positive evaluation toward the extension products, the more purchasing intension toward the extension products.
5. The evaluation of extension products in service and tangible brand extension would affect by the parent brand attitude and perceived fit of consumers. The difference of the two brand extensions is whether the product knowledge of consumers would affect the evaluation of extension products or not. In the tangible brand extension, the product knowledge of consumers would affect the evaluation of extension products but in the service brand extension, the product knowledge of consumers would not.
關鍵字(中) ★ 品牌延伸
★ 結構方程模式
★ 知覺契合度
關鍵字(英) ★ Brand extension
★ Perceived fit
★ Structural equation model
論文目次 摘要 I
英文摘要 II
目錄 III
圖目錄 IV
表目錄 IV
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 1
第三節 研究程序 2
第貳章 文獻回顧 3
第一節 品牌的定義 3
第二節 品牌延伸的相關概念 3
第三節 影響延伸產品評估的因素 7
第四節 品牌態度的相關概念 14
第五節 產品知識相關概念 16
第六節 文獻回顧總結 17
第參章 研究方法 18
第一節 研究架構 18
第二節 研究假設 18
第三節 研究變數的操作性定義與衡量 19
第四節 研究設計 21
第五節 資料分析方法 31
第肆章 資料分析與結果 33
第一節 樣本結構分析 33
第二節 單一構面分析、信度分析與效度分析 34
第三節 品牌延伸模式檢驗 36
第伍章 結論與建議 41
第一節 結論 41
第二節 理論上的貢獻 42
第三節 管理意涵 43
第四節 研究限制與未來研究方向 44
參考文獻 45
附錄 52
參考文獻 一、中文部分
1. 2005消費者心目中理想品牌調查,突破雜誌,第234期,頁38-45。
2. 何蒼崧(2002),「品牌聯想形象與消費者特質對品牌延伸評估之影響」,義守大學管理研究所碩士論文。
3. 林建煌(2002),「消費者行為」,智勝文化事業有限公司。
4. 邱皓政(2003),「結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用」,台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。
5. 紀琇蓉(2002),「不同形式之產品線延伸以及所有權狀態對品牌評價的影響」,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
6. 陳正男、李勝祥(1997),「原品牌及延伸品牌認知對於品牌延伸購買意願之影響」,交大管理學報,第19卷,第1期,頁1-32。
7. 鄭英輝(1998),「品牌人格與產品類別對品牌延伸評價的影響」,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
8. 賴孟寬、李勝祥(1997),「品牌特性與產品知識對擬上市延伸產品購買意願之影響」,亞太管理評論,第2卷,第1期,頁99-121。
二、英文部分
1. Aaker, D. A. & Keller, K. L. (1990). “Consumer evaluations of brand extensions
”, Journal of Marketing, Chicago, 54(1), 27-41.
2. Aaker, D. A. (1990). “Brand extensions: the good, the bad, and the ugly”, Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 47-56.
3. Aaker, D. A. (1996). “Building strong brands”, New York: The Free Press.
4. Aaker, J. L. (1997). “Dimension of brand personality”, Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356.
5. Ahluwalia, R. & Gurhan-Canli, Z. (2000). “The effects of extensions on the family brand name: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 371–381.
6. Alba, J. W. & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). “Dimensions of consumer expertise”, Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411-454.
7. Alba, J. W. & Hutchinson, J. W. (2000). “Knowledge calibration: what consumers know and what they think they know”, Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 123-156
8. Allard, C. R., Jos, L. & Hans, O. (2001). “Consumer evaluation of service brand extension”, Journal of Service Research, 3(3), 220-231.
9. Anderson, J. & Gerbing, W. (1988). “Structural equation modelling in Practice: A review and recommended two stage approach”, Psychological Bulletin, 27(1), 5-24.
10. Baumgartner, H. & Homburg, C. (1996). “Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 139-161.
11. Beatty, Sharon E. & Smith, S. M. (1987). “External search effort: an investigation across several product categories”, Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 83-95.
12. Bei, Lien-Ti & Widdows, R. (1999). “Product knowledge and product involvement as moderators of the effects of information on purchase decisions: a case study using the perfect information frontier approach”, The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 33(1), 165-186.
13. Bentler, P. M. & Bonett, D. G. (1980). ”Significance tests and goodness of Bentler and Bonett fit in the analysis of covariance structures”, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
14. Bhat, S. & Reddy, S. K (2001).”The impact of parental brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation”, Journal of Business Research, 53(3), 111-122.
15. Bottomley, P. A. & Doyle, J. R. (1996). “The formation of attitudes towards brand extensions: testing and generalising Aaker and Keller’s model”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(4), 365-377.
16. Boush, David M. & Loken, B. (1991). “A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation”, Journal of Marketing Research, Chicago, 28(1), 16-28.
17. Bridges, S., Keller, K. L. & Sood, S. (2000). “Communication strategies for brand extensions: enhancing perceived fit by establishing explanatory links”, Journal of Advertising, 29(4), 1-11.
18. Broniarczyk, S. M. & Alba, J. W. (1994). “The importance of the brand in brand extension”, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 214-228.
19. Brucks, M. (1985). “The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1-16.
20. Brucks, M. (1986). “A typology of consumer knowledge content”, Advances in Consumer Research, 13(1), 58-63.
21. Buday, T. (1989). “Capitalizing on brand extensions”, The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(4), 27-30.
22. Byrne, B. (2001). “Structural equation modeling with AMOS”, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
23. Chen, K. J. & Liu, C.M. (2004). “Positive brand extension trial and choice of parent brand”, The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(1), 25-36.
24. de Ruyter, K. & Wetzels, M. (2000). “The role of corporate image and extension similarity in service brand extensions”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(6), 639-659.
25. Farquhar, P. H. (1990). “Managing brand equity”, Journal of Advertising Research, 30(4), 7-12.
26. Fishbein, M. (1963). “An investigation of relationship between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object,” Human Relation, 16, 233-240
27. Fiske, C. A. & Luebbehusen, L. A. (1994). “The relationship between knowledge and search: it depends”, Advances in Consumer Research, 21(1), 43-50.
28. Fornell, C. & Larker, D. (1981). “Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement errors”, Journal of Research Marketing, 27(3), 445-466.
29. Gerbing, D. & Anderson, J. (1988). “An update paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment”, Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186-192.
30. Glynn, M. S., & Brodie, R. J. (1998). “The importance of brand-specific associations in brand extension: further empirical results”, The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 7(6), 509-518.
31. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. & Black, W. (1998). “Multivariate data analysis with readings”, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall International.
32. Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J. & Coney, K. A. (2001). “Consumer behavior. Building marketing strategy”, Eight Edition, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
33. Holmes-Smith P (2001). “Introduction to structural equation modelling using LISREAL”, Perth: ACSPRI-Winter training Program.
34. John, D. R., Loken, B. & Joiner, C. (1998). “The negative impact of brand extensions: can flagship products be diluted?” Journal of Marketing, Chicago, 62(1), 19- 32.
35. Kapferer, J. N. (1992). “Strategic brand management: new approaches to creating and evaluating brand equity”, London: Kogan-Page.
36. Keller, K. L. (1993). “Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity”, Journal of Marketing, Chicago, 57(1), 1-22.
37. Keller, K. L. (1998). “Strategic brand management: building, measuring, and managing brand equity”, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
38. Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). “The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions”, Journal of Marketing Research, 29(2), 35-50.
39. Kiel, G. C. & Layton, R. A. (1981), “Dimensions of consumer information seeking”, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2):233-239.
40. Kim, J. Y. (2003). “Communication message strategies for brand extensions”, The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 12(7), 462-476.
41. Kotler, P. (1994). “Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation and control”, 7th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
42. Kotler, P. (2000). “Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation and control”, 10th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
43. Kumar, V. & Ganesh, J. (1995). “The state-of-the-art in brand equity research: what is known and what needs to be known”, Australasian Journal of Market Research, 3(1), 3-22.
44. Lassar, W. Mittal, B. & Sharma, A. (1995). “Measuring customer-based brand equity”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 11-19.
45. Loken, B. & John, D. R. (1993). “Diluting brand beliefs: when do brand extensions have a negative impact?” Journal of Marketing, Chicago, 57(3), 71–84.
46. MacInnis D. J. & Nakamoto K. (1990). “Examining factors that influence the perceived goodness of brand extensions”, Working Paper.
47. Marsh, H. W. & Hocevar, D. (1985). “The application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first and higher order factor structures and their invariance across age groups”, Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562-582.
48. Marsh, H.W., Balla, J. R. & McDonald, R. P. (1988). “Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size”, Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391-410.
49. Moorman, C. (1998). “Market-level effects of information: competitive responses and consumer dynamics”, Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 82-98.
50. Morrin, M. (1999). “The impact of brand extensions on parent brand memory structures and retrieval processes”, Journal of Marketing Research, 36(4), 517- 525.
51. Muthukrishnan, A.V. & Barton A. Weitz (1991). “Role of product knowledge in evaluation of brand extension”, Advances in Consumer Research, 18(1), 407-413.
52. Nijssen, E. J. & Hartman, D. (1994). “Consumer evaluations of brand extensions: an integration of previous research”, In J. Bloemer, J. Lemmink, & H. Kasper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23d Annual Conference of the European Marketing Academy, Maastricht, Netherlands: European Marketing Academy, 673-683.
53. Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I. (1994). “Psychometric theory”, New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
54. Park, C. S. & Srinivasan, V. (1994). “A survey-base method for measuring and understanding brand equity and extendibility”, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 271-288.
55. Park, C. W. & Parker, V. L. (1981). “Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics”, Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), 223-230.
56. Park, C. W., Milberg, S. & Lawson, R. (1991). “Evaluation of brand extensions: the role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency”, Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 185-193.
57. Park, C. W., Mothersbaugh, D. L. & Feick, L. (1994). “Consumer knowledge assessment”, Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 71-82.
58. Punj, G. N. & Staelin, R. (1983). “A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles”, Journal of Consumer Research, 9(4), 366-380.
59. Raju, P. S., Lonial S. C. & Mangold, W. G. (1995). “Differential effects of subjective knowledge, objective knowledge, and usage experience on decision making: an exploratory investigation”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4 (2), 152-180.
60. Rangaswamy, A., Burke, R. R. & Oliva, T. A. (1993). “Brand equity and the extendibility of brand names”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(1), 61-75.
61. Rao, A. R. & Monroe, K. B. (1988). “The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations”, Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 253-264.
62. Rao, A. R. & Olson, E. M. (1990). “Information examination as a function of information type and dimension of consumer expertise: some exploratory findings”, Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 361-366.
63. Reddy, S. K., Holak, S. L. & Bhat, S. (1994). “To extend or not to extend: success determinants of line extensions”, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 243-262.
64. Ries, A. & Trout, J. (1986). “Positioning: the battle for your mind”, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
65. Sandor, C. (2003). “Consumer attitude toward brand extensions: An integrative model and research propositions”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(1), 97-115.
66. Schiffman, L. G. & Kanuk, L. L. (1994). “Consumer behavior”, 5rd, Prentice-Hall.
67. Schmidt, J. B. & Spreng, R. A. (1996). “A proposed model of external consumer information search”, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 24(3), 246-256.
68. Schumacker, R. & Lomax, R. (1996). “A beginner guide to structural equation modelling”, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
69. Scribner, L. L. & Seungoog Weun (2001). “Developing a multidimensional subjective product knowledge scale”, Working paper.
70. Selnes, F. & Kjell G. (1986). “Subjective and objective measures of product knowledge contrasted”, Advances in Consumer Research, 13(1), 67-71.
71. Sengupta, J. & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2000). “The effects of analyzing reasons for brand preferences: disruption or reinforcement?” Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 318-330.
72. Sheinin, D. A. (2000). “The effects of experience with brand extensions on parent brand knowledge”, Journal of Business Research, 49(1), 47-55.
73. Sheth, J. N., Mittal, M. & B. I. Newman (1999). “Consumer behavior”, Orlando: The Dryden Press.
74. Shocker, A. D., Srivastava, R. K. & Ruekert, R. W. (1994). “Challenges and opportunities facing brand management: an introduction to the special issue”, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 149-158.
75. Smith, D. C. & Park, C. W. (1992). “The effects of brand extensions on market share and advertising efficiency”, Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 296-313.
76. Solomon, M. R. (2002). “Consumer behavior: buying, having, and being”, 5th Ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
77. Sullivan, M. (1990). “Measuring image spillovers in umbrella-branded products”, Journal of Business, 63(3), 309-329.
78. Sullivan, M. W. (1992). “Brand extensions: when to use them”, Management Science, 38(6), 793-806.
79. Sunde, L. & Brodie, R. J. (1993). “Consumer evaluations of brand extensions: further empirical results”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(1), 47-53.
80. Sureshchandar, G., Rajendran, C. & Anantharaman, R. (2001).”A holistic model for total quality service”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(2), 378-412.
81. Swaminathan, V., Fox, R. J., & Reddy, S. K. (2001). “The impact of brand extension introduction on choice”, Journal of Marketing, Chicago, 65(4), 1-15.
82. Tauber, E. M. (1981). “Brand franchise extensions: new products benefit from existing brand names”, Business Horizons, 24(2), 36-41.
83. Tauber, E. M. (1988). “Brand leverage: strategy for growth in a cost-controlled world”, Journal of Advertising Research, 28(4), 26-30.
84. Taylor, V. A. & Bearden, W. O. (2002). “The effects of price on brand extensions evaluation: the moderating role of extension similarity”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(2), 131-140.
85. Upshaw, L.B. (1995). “Building brand identity: a strategy for success in a hostile marketplace”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
86. Wilkie, W. (1986). “Consumer behavior”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
指導教授 謝浩明(How-Ming Shieh) 審核日期 2005-7-16
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明