博碩士論文 92428012 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:16 、訪客IP:18.219.112.111
姓名 詹乃磬(Nai-Ching Chan)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 財務金融學系
論文名稱 指數期貨操縱模型--以台灣股價指數為例
(A Model of Index Futures Manipulation with TAIEX Futures)
相關論文
★ 買賣價差之拆解-以台灣加權指數期貨與新加坡摩根台股指數期貨為例★ 在不同模型、分組方式以及貝他估計情況下之Fama和French三因子模型表現
★ 延長交易時間對台灣股市之日內影響★ 法人日內投資行為及跟隨法人投資策略
★ 結算制度與到期日效應★ 台灣股市系統性風險之檢定
★ 提前平倉與轉倉策略對股價指數期貨到期日效應之實證:以台灣股票市場為例★ 台灣股市日內效果之研究
★ 從日、美看台灣股市的資產定價實證研究★ 選擇權交易獲利性之分析:以交易資料為例
★ 資訊不對稱與公司特徵:市場微結構觀點★ 企業商業模式及品牌價值創造—以宏達電為例
★ 企業商業模式及品牌價值創造—以宏碁集團為例★ 法人期貨與選擇權交易量對市場報酬的影響
★ 台灣市場的關係公司與內部人交易★ 為什麼台灣公司的現金比率逐年增加?
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 由於經常可以在報章雜誌或期刊論文上看到有關期貨到期日或最後結算日時,其標的資產有劇烈波動的消息,
大多是人為操縱造成的。為了檢驗操縱者是否真的可藉由這樣的方式獲利,這篇論文以台股指數期貨為例建構一個操縱期貨的模型,討論操縱者在期貨面的利潤是否可以彌補現貨面操縱的的損失,以及他操縱的策略。若市場上只有一位操縱者時,我們發現,個股最適的購買量之不同主要是受到流通在外股票所影響。
另外,在個股的資金分配上並非只有依照其權重還需考慮其基本價格跟市場深度。並舉例說明當操縱者所持有的期貨部位增加時,模型會如何變化?
此外為使模型較符合真實情況,會放寬一些假設,使模型更貼近真實的世界,例如加入市場上其他的成交量,使得股價不再是由操縱者一人所決定的,或者是調整為不確定狀態下的模型來看結果會如何?
最後舉例說明,當加入市場上其他成交量後獨占力量的重要性。
摘要(英) The spot markets are often reported to be very volatile in the final settlement day or expiration day of the futures. The volatility is mostly due to manipulation. To examine the ways in which large traders make profit by manipulation, this article establishes the model of futures manipulation with the TAIEX Futures. This model demonstrates the strategies which the manipulators will take and whether manipulation
is worth it or not (i.e does the large trader earn positive expected profits by establishing a futures position and then trading in the spot markets to manipulate the spot price). If there is one manipulator in the markets, we find that the difference of the optimal quantity of each stock is their outstanding shares. We also show that the capital distribution on stocks is not only determined by the weight but also by the
basic price and market depth and what will happen when the manipulator increases his futures positions by an example. Furthermore, to adjust the model to fit the real world, we add the other trading volume of the stock markets and restructure the model under the uncertain state. Finally, this article provides another example for the model with the other trading volume and presents the importance of the monopoly power.
關鍵字(中) ★ 操縱
★ 期貨
★ 現金結算
★ 台股指數期貨
關鍵字(英) ★ futures
★ manipulation
★ cash settlement
★ the TAIEX Futures
論文目次 Contents
1 Introduction 1
2 The Model of Manipulation 4
2.1 Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2 Maximizing Objected Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.3 The Model with a Wealth Limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3 The Implication of Model 11
3.1 Manipulator’s Purchasing Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.2 Ratio of Buying Stocks to Futures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
3.3 Return Rate of Manipulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4 Using Data to Examine the Model 17
4.1 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
4.2 Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
5 Uncertain State 22
5.1 Model with Uncertainty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.2 Return Rate of the TAIEX and Manipulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5.3 Ratio of Buying Stocks to Futures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
6 Volume-weighted Settlement Price 26
7 Summary and Conclusions 34
References 35
A Contract of TAIEX Futures 37
B Compiling the Index 38
C Proof 40
D Cartan Formula 42
E Nonlinear Model 43
參考文獻 Easterbrook, Frank H. (1986), “Monopoly, Manipulation, and the Regulation of Futures Markets”, Journal of Business, 59(2), S103–S127.
Edwards, L. N. and F. R. Edwards (1984), “A legal and Economic Analysis of Manipulation in Futures Markets”, The Journal of Futures Markets, 4, 333–366.
Fackler, Paul L. (1993), “Delivery and Manipulation in Futures Markets”, The Journal of Futures Markets, 13(6), 693–702.
Johnson, Philip Mcbride (1981), “Commodity Market Manipulation”, Washington
and Lee Law Review, 38, 725–779.
Kumar, Praveen and Duane J. Seppi (1992), “Futures Manipulation with Cash Settlement”, Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1485–1502.
Kyle, Albert S. (1985), “Continuous Auctions And Insider Trading”, Econometrica, 53(6), 1315–1336.
N?s, Randi and Johannes A. Skjeltorp (2004), “Order Book Characteristics and
the Volume-Volatility Relation: Empirical Evidence from a Limit Order Market”,
Working paper, Norges Bank.
Pirrong, Craig (2001), “Manupilation of Cash-Settled Futures Contracts”, Journal of Business, 74(2), 221–244.
Stoll, Hans R. and Robert E. Whaley (1986), “Expiration Day Effects of Stock Index Options And Futures In Germany?”, Monograph Series in Finance and Economics.
指導教授 賴弘能(Hung-Neng Lai) 審核日期 2005-7-10
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明