| 摘要(英) |
The constructions of gas station in early Taiwan are not standardized, which result in a lot of poor quality gas station. Plus, most of the gas station owners are lack of the concept of gas leaking prevention, which leads to many serious contamination incidents. Once the underground storage tank is polluted, gas station owners usually face enormous recovery cost and operational loses. Therefore this research aims to investigate the difference between underground oil tank and oil tank stored in the basement through four different aspects including: economic cost, construction techniques, oil tank management and environmental impacts of the two methods. In addition, this paper also discusses the possibilities and implemental strategies of oil tank and pipelines in the underground.
According to the recent oil tank leaking data, the contamination accidents of underground oil tank outnumbers the oil tank stored in the basement. The financial loss and cost of underground oil tank are also much higher compare to the oil tank stored in the basement. From the economic cost and benefit analysis, it’s possible to reduce costs of recovery fee, time spend on recovery process and the risk of re-contamination through prevention management and planning of the oil tank and the pipelines in the early stage.
From the perspective of construction techniques in reducing the gas station leaking accidents, oil tank in the basement can overcome the restrictions of geography characteristics in the recovery process. A good example is the LPG gas station in the basement, oil tank in the basement is feasible in terms of construction, construction safety, fire control, hazards precautions and other relevant design and facilities.
Nevertheless, oil tank in the basement can prevent contamination and avoid second-contamination caused by lack of oil pipeline indications from the perspective of environmental concerns.
In terms of the legislations, oil tank in the basement is a more practical option as it’s easy to implement and can reduce management costs for both the government agencies and gas station owners. Under the current legislations, environmental agencies should not only supervising on the oil tank in order to make gas station owners become more self-managed, agencies should also play the role in channel the safety design of petrol-chemical stations to the infrastructures of the gas stations. Gas station owners can gradually implement oil tank in the basement as the oil pipelines become obsolete and need to be replaced.
Prevention of oil contamination occurs through oil tank and pipelines in the basement are cost effective compare to recover work after the pollution has already occurred. This finding can provide gas station owners to include infrastructure design in constructing new or refurbishing gas stations. In addition, this concept can also apply to other dangerous goods that can be stored in the underground and prevent pipeline pollutions. |
| 參考文獻 |
【1】40 CFR Part 280-Technical Standards and Corrective Action Requirements for Owners and Operators of Underground Storage Tanks（UST）, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1988.
【2】危険物の規制に関する政令，政令19号；平成16年2月6日，日本消防庁，2004
【3】U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Design and placement of vapor monitoring wells, EPA 600-9-90-044, October 1990.
【4】U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Design and placement of floating liquid monitoring wells, EPA 600-9-90-045, March，1993.
【5】黃冠良、方源鴻，加油站油氣監測井（測漏管）之規劃與設計，環境工程會刊，8：2，5/1996，第93~105頁。
【6】中國石油公司油品行銷事業部，環境保護手冊，2002，第73-82頁。
【7】Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metro District, Regular Facilities, Underground Storage Tanks, Leak Detection for Pressurized Piping, Tank/Underground/#3.12, August 2001.
【8】Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metro District, Regular Facilities, Underground Storage Tanks, Leak Detection for Suction Piping, Tank/Underground/#3.13, August 2001.
【9】中國石油公司桃園煉油廠，九五無鉛汽油物質安全資料表，NO.11：V1.0，01/01/2004。
【10】International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 1999.Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to man. Geneva: World Health Organization, IARC.
【11】Daniel, P. L.; Lloyd, R.; Wilson, G. A. Effect of gasoline formulation on methyltert-butyl ether (MTBE) contamination in private wells near gasoline stations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001,35,1050.
【12】Happel A. M., Beckenbach E.H. and Halden R.U.,”An evaluation of MTBE impacts to California groundwater resources” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Environmental Protection Department, Environmental Restoration Division, University of California.UCRL-AR-130897, 1998.
【13】Buckley,T.J., Ashley,J.D., Zweidinger,R.A., and Wallace,L.A.,1997, ”Body Burden Measurements and Models to Assess Inhalation Exposure to MTBE”, Jawma,47, pp.739~752.
【14】Richard J. Watts, 1998,”Hazardous Wastes: Sources Pathways Receptors”, John Wiley ＆ Sons, pp.77~82.
【15】環保署 毒理資料庫，http://www.epa.gov.tw/toxic/prog/database.asp。
【16】金相燦，環境毒物有機物污染化學，淑馨出版社，民87年
【17】The Merck Index，13th Edition.
【18】Philip H. Howard, Robert S. Boethling, William F. Jarvis, William M. Meylan, Edward M. Michalenko, Handbook of environmental degradation rates, Michigan;Lewis Publishers Inc., 1991.
【19】張添晉，「土壤物理化學復育之工程技術評估」，工業污染防治，第46期，第51~74頁(1993)。
【20】張添晉、陳致谷，「土壤污染復育工程技術」，工業染防治,第45期,第43~65頁(1993)。
【21】Clister, W. E. and B. D. Roberts,“Operating Principles and Case Histories of Soil Vapor Extraction Systems”, Preceedings of the llth National Conference of Superfund 90, pp. 646~657(1990)。
【22】蕭仁銘、謝青霖，「發展中的污染場址整治技術」，環保技術報導，第七期，第26~29頁(1992)。
【23】Robert，L.R., W. W. Richard, and K.M.Kevin.1995.Influence of salinityon of oil in soil.Envition Pollution, 90, pp.127~130。
【24】盧至人,1997,地下水的污染整治,國立編譯館。
【25】行政院環境保護署，加油站地下油槽管理辦法之研究期末報告（EPA-80-J205-09-27），06/1991
【26】行政院環境保護署，事業廢水管制標準及管理制度相關事宜研究-台灣地區加油站地下油槽之調查與評估期末報告（EPA-85-G202-09-11），06/1996
【27】行政院環境保護署，加油站卸油逸散污染之調查管制與儲油槽系統污染調查計畫期末報告（EPA-87-FA15-03），1998
【28】行政院環境保護署，全國十年以上加油站及大型儲槽潛在污染源調查計畫（乙子計畫）期中報告（EPA-91-GA13-03-91A171），11/2002。
【29】台北市環境保護局，台北市加油站地下儲油槽系統污染調查計畫，1990
【30】台北市環境保護局，台北市土壤及地下水污染地區調查計畫（92環勞004），11/2003
【31】董倫道，加油站防制漏油計畫-加油站防制漏油說明會講義及光碟-加油站測漏技術，經濟部能源委員會委員會，01/2003。
【32】翁榮洲、王瑞坤，國內加油站漏油原因分析與防治對策探討，工業材料；111期，03/1996，pp.123~125。
【33】Weston, Underground Storage Tanks Management Detailed Capabilities Statement, Weston, 1989.
【34】U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Underground Storage Tank: Building on the Past to Protect the Future, EPA 510-R-04-001, March 2004.
【35】消防庁危険物保安室，”平成17年中の危険物に係る事故の概要”，平成18年6月，2006
【36】U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Straight Tank on Tanks-Leak Detection Methods for Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks and Piping , EPA- 510-B-97-007, September 1997.
【37】林靜枝、翁榮洲，美國環保署地下儲槽系統保固法規介紹並探討國內加油站保固現況，工業材料；110期，02/1996，pp.121~128。
【38】斯克誠，地下儲槽管理與滲漏整治，石油季刊；第31卷第4期，1995，pp.33~42。
【39】中國石油公司油品行銷事業部，美、日兩國汽車加油站安全環保法規，03/1990
【40】危険物の規制に関する規則，総務省令；第143号；平成15年12月17日，日本消防庁，2003
【41】地下貯蔵タンク等及び移動貯蔵タンクの漏れの点検に係る運用上の指針について，消防危第33号；平成16年3月18日，日本消防庁危険物保安室，2004
【42】地下タンク等の定期点検の指導指針の一部改正について ，消防危第57号；平成11年6月15日，日本消防庁危険物規制課，1999
【43】危険物の規制に関する政令等の一部改正について，消防危第132号；平成15年12月17日，日本消防庁，2003
【44】財団法人全国危険物安全協会，定期点検事業者の認定，http://www.zenkikyo.or.jp/
【45】Jimmy H.C. Wang, Chin Hong Lim, Greg L. Nolen, Design of Remediation Systems, Lewis Publishers, p.75
【46】松島 巖，地下の配管やタンクになぜ孔があくのか，腐食 センターニュース；No.001，（社）腐食防食協会．腐食センター，平成5年（12/1/1993），pp.2。
【47】張大偉，台灣地區加油站地下儲槽系統洩漏偵測實務與管理之研究，2005
【48】 新華社，它山之石”英國加油站是怎樣管理”（新聞報導），5/27/2002
【49】平成15年中の危険物に係る事故の概要，日本危険物保安技術協会，http://www.khk-syoubou.or.jp |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit