融入效率衡量於評價模式之研究---以台灣電子產業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：16

、訪客IP：3.137.172.68

姓名

蘇宸霆(Chen-Ting Su) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

融入效率衡量於評價模式之研究---以台灣電子產業為例
(Incorporating Efficiency Measurement into Valuation Model---An Empirical Research of Electronics Industry in Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 從生態共生觀點發展組織合作模式	★ 影響產業垂直分工因素之探討
★ 發展台籍專業管家的人力派遣模式	★ 影響軍事機關審計品質之關鍵性因素及其相對效率衡量
★ 台灣光碟片設備供應商競爭策略分析	★ 國防科技研發機構組織向心力之研究
★ 衡量半導體零組件通路商之相對經營績效	★ 衡量半導體晶圓代工廠商生產單位之營運績效
★ 商業銀行營運型態與組織調整對分行營運效率的影響	★ 發展行動條碼為基礎的隨傳隨用視訊平台之應用
★ 飛機引擎定子零件維修之訂價調整方式	★ 國際化、創新活動與公司績效：台灣上市公司董事會結構論析
★ 探討網際網路事件達成關鍵多數之影響因素	★ 生態循環農業產銷策略個案研究
★ 探討以政策規範高耗能產業參與再生能源開發之綜效－以太陽光電發電系統為例	★ 適地性服務(LBS)之顧客體驗整合性設計—以中華電信行動導遊為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

企業評價乃是將所有已知資訊與預測性資訊納入考量以求得公司價值的過程。隨著財務理論的發展，評價模式亦日趨多元，其中，Ohlson於1995年以剩餘所得模型(Residual Income Model)為基礎，推衍出企業股價為帳面價值、異常盈餘與非會計資訊的線性組合評價模式。然而，此模式中對於「非會計資訊」未能明確的定義，導致模式的運用上有其未逮之處，因此，本研究導入營運效率的衡量於Ohlson模式中。
本研究利用資料包絡分析法來評估營運效率。而研究之標的為台灣電子業，研究期間為1998年第一季至2005年第三季；經過選樣過程後，計有73間公司、31季的季資料，共計有2263筆資料，運用靜態與動態縱橫資料分析法以觀測融入效率衡量於Ohlson模式的適切性與動態調整過程。
透過上述分析，本研究發現：（1）在靜態分析中，適用固定效果模式，且帳面價值、異常盈餘與效率值對股價都具有顯著的解釋力，其中，帳面價值與效率值對股價有正向影響。（2）在動態分析中，帳面價值、異常盈餘與效率值對股價依然都具有顯著的解釋力，且皆為正向關係；而求算遞延效果發現，遞延一期對當期股價有最大的影響力，之後呈現逐年遞減的現象，直至遞延六期之效果轉而為負。

摘要(英)

Valuation is the procedure of transforming current and predictive information into firm’s value. Ohlson (1995) derived from the residual income model (RIM) to deduce that market price of a firm is the linear relation composed of book value, abnormal earning, and non-accounting information. Despite of being comprehensively adopted, the “non-accounting information” item has not been explicitly defined. Therefore, the research introduces the concept of efficiency measurement to revise the Ohlson model.
The methodology of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is applied to make efficiency ratings. And the sample set is the companies of Electronics industry in Taiwan with research window spans from Q1 1998 to Q3 2005, 31 quarters totally. Through the selecting criteria, 73 companies are qualified. Hence, panel data are used to analyze not only static but also dynamic regression.
In static regression, fixed effects model is adopted. Book value, abnormal earning, and efficiency rating have statistic significance on market price; furthermore, book value and efficiency rating have positive relationship to market price. In dynamic regression, book value, abnormal earning, and efficiency rating all have statistic significance with positive relation on market price. Moreover, Lag 1 has the largest effect upon the current market price, and then declining year after year. Finally, the lag effects turn into negative until Lag 6.

關鍵字(中)

★ 遞延效果
★ 資料包絡分析法
★ Ohlson評價模式
★ 動態縱橫資料分析法

關鍵字(英)

★ Ohlson's model
★ Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
★ Lag effects
★ Dynamic panel data analysis

論文目次

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT... I
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS... III
TABLE OF CONTENTS... IV
List of Tables... VI
List of Figures... VI
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION... 1
Chapter 2 LITERATURE RIVIEW... 4
2.1 OHLSON MODEL... 4
2.2 DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS... 8
2.2.1 CCR MODEL... 9
2.2.1 BCC MODEL... 11
Chapter 3 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY... 13
3.1 EMPIRICAL MODEL AND VARIABLE DESCRIPTION... 13
3.2 SAMPLE SELECTION... 15
3.3 STATIC ONE-WAY PANEL DATA ANALYSIS... 15
3.3.1 FIXED EFFECTS MODEL... 16
3.3.2 RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL... 17
3.3.3 HAUSMAN TEST... 17
3.4 DYNAMIC PANEL DATA (DPD) MODEL... 18
3.4.1 ESTIMATION METHOD... 19
3.4.2 OVERIDENTIFYING RESTRICTION TEST AND SERIAL CORRELATION TEST... 21
3.4.3 LAGGED EFFECT... 22
Chapter 4 EMPIRICAL RESULTS AND ANALYSIS... 24
4.1 RELATIVE EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT... 24
4.2 STATIC PANEL DATA ANALYSIS... 27
4.3 DYNAMIC PANEL DATA ANALYSIS... 31
Chapter 5 CONCLUSIONS... 37
REFERENCE... 39
APPENDIX... 42
APPEXDIX I: SAMPLE COMPANIES... 42

參考文獻

Ahsan, H. (2004), “Accounting-based equity valuation techniques and the value relevance of dividend information: Empirical evidence from Japan,” Pacific Accounting Review, 16(2), 23-44.
Alam, I. S. and Sickles, R.C. (1998), “The relationship between stock market returns and technical efficiency innovations: Evidence from the US airline industry,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9, 35-51.
Alonso-Borrego, C. and Sánchez-Mangas, R. (2001), “GMM estimation of a production function with panel data: An application to Spanish manufacturing firms,” Statistics and Econometrics Working Papers: ws015527.
Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991), “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations,” Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
Baltagi, B. H. (2001), Economic Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons Ltd., England.
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A.S., and Cooper, W.W. (1984), “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Bernard, V. (1995), “The Feltham-Ohlson framework: Implication for empiricists,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 733-747.
Blundell, R. and Bond, S. and Windmeijer, F. (2000), “Estimation in dynamic panel data models: Improving on the performance of the standard GMM estimator,” IFS Working Papers: W00/12.
Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998), “GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions,” IFS Working Papers: W99/04.
Botosan, C. (1997), “Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital,” The Accounting Review, 72(3), 323-349.
Breusch, T. S. and Pagan, A. R. (1980), “The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics,” Review of Economic Studies, 47(146), 239-253.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E. (1978), “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
Negakis, C. J. (2005), “Accounting and capital markets research: A review,” Managerial Finance, 31(2), 1-23.
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone K. (2000), Data Envelopment Analysis-A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
Farrell, M. J. (1957) “The measurement of productive efficiency,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-281.
Francis, J., Olsson, P. and Oswald, D. (2000), “Comparing the accuracy and explainability of dividend, free cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity value estimates,” Journal of Accounting Research, 38(1), 45-70.
Frankel, R. and Lee, C. M. C. (1999), “Accounting valuation, market expectation and cross-sectional stock returns,” Journal of Accounting Research, 13(4), 289-319.
Füerst, O. and Kang, S. H. (2000), “Corporate governance, expected operating performance, and pricing,” Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven.
Gebhardt, W. and Lee, C. and Swaminathan, B. (2001), “Toward an implied cost-of-capital,” Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 135-176.
Greene, W. H. (2000), Econometric Analysis, 4th ed., Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Hansen, L. (1982), “Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators,” Econometrica, 50(4), 1029-1054.
Hausman, J. A., (1978), “Specification tests in econometrics,” Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271.
Lewin, A. Y. and Minton, J. W. (1986), “Determining organizational effectiveness: Another look, and an agenda for research,” Management Science, 32(5), 514-538
Lo, K. and Lys, T. (2000), “The Ohlson model: Contribution to valuation theory, limitations, and empirical applications,” Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance, 15(3), 337-367.
Myers, J. N. (1999), “Implementing residual income valuation with linear information dynamics,” The Accounting Review, 74(1), 1-28.
Ohlson, J. (1995), “Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-687.
Penman, S. and Sougiannis, T. (1998), “A comparison of dividend, cash flow, and earnings approaches to equity valuation,” Contemporary Accounting research, 15(3), 343-383.
Pope P. F., and Wang, P. (2005), “Earnings components, accounting bias and equity valuation,” Review of Accounting Studies, 10(4), 387-407.

指導教授

張東生(Dong-Shen Chang)

審核日期

2006-7-20

推文