| 參考文獻 |
1.莊奕琦、許碧峰(1999)，「研究發展對生產力的貢獻及產業間的外溢效果：台灣製造業實證」，經濟論文，第27卷，第3期，頁407-32。
2.楊志海、陳忠榮(2002)，「研究發展、專利與生產力—台灣製造業的實證研究」，經濟論文叢刊，第30輯第1期，頁27-48。
3.蔡光第與楊浩彥 (1996)，「多層次巢覆式R&D外溢效果與其對台灣製造業不同科技部門之貢獻」，經濟論文叢刊，第24輯第1期，頁29-59。
4.Andrews, D.W.K., W. Ploberger (1994), “Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative,” Econometrica, 62, 1383-1414.
5.Bernstein, J. I. (1989), “The structure of Canadian inter-industry R&D spillover and the rates of return to R&D,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 37, 315-28.
6.Branstetter L.G.(2001), “Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan,” Journal of International Economics,53, 53-79.
7.Bresnshan, T. F. (1986), “Measuring the Spillovers from Technical Advance: Mainframe Computers in Financial Services,” The American Economic Review, 76(4), 742-755.
8.Brenner,M.S. and Rushton,B.M.(1989), “Sales Growth and R&D in the Chemical Industry.” Research-Technology Management, 32(2) 8.
9.Chan, K. S.(1993), “Consistency and limiting distribution of the least squares estimator of a continuous threshold autoregressive model,” The Annals of Statistics, 21,520-533.
10.Comin, Diego (2004), “R&D: A Small Contribution to Productivity Growth,” Journal of Economic Growth, 9(4), 391-421.
11.Cockburn, I. and Griliches, Z. (1988), “Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Market's Valuation of R&D and Patents,” American Economic Review, 78(2), 419-423.
12.Cuneo, P. and J. Mairesse (1984), “Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level in French Manufacturing,” in Z. Griliches, ed., R&D, Patents, and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
13.Davies, R.B. (1987), “Hyopthesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative,” Biometrika, 74, 33-43.
14.Davies, R.B. (1977), “Hyopthesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative,” Biometrika, 64, 247-254.
15.D’Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin (1988), “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers,” American Economic Review, 78(5), 1133-7.
16.Evenson, R.E. and Y. Kislve (1973), “Research and Productivity in Wheat and Maize,” Journal of political economy, 81, 1309-1329.
17.Fazzari, S. M., R. Glenn Hubbard, B.C. Petersen (1988), “Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 0(1), 141-95.
18.Gorg, Holger and Strobl, Eric(2005), “ Spillovers from Foreign Firms through Worker Mobility: An Empirical Investigation,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(4), 693-709.
19.Goto, A and K. Suzuki (1989), “R&D capital, rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R&D in Japanese manufacturing industries,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(4), 339-374.
20.Griliches, Z. (1964), “Research expenditures, education and the aggregate agricultural production function,” American Economic Review, 44, 961-974.
21.Griliches, Z. (1986), “Productivity, R&D, and the Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970's,” American Economic Review, 76(1), 141-54.
22.Griliches, Z. (1998), “R&D and productivity: The econometric evidence,” NBER Monograph series. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 382.
23.Griliches, Z. (1998), “Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s,” The Econometric Evidence, 82-99.
24.Griliches, Z. and J. Mairesse (1979), “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92-116.
25.Griliches, Z., J. Mairesse (1984), “Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level,” in Z.Griliches, ed., R&D, Patents, and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
26.Griliches, Z., J. Mairesse (1990), “R&D and Productivity Growth: Comparing Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing Firms,” in C.R. Hulten ed., Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
27.Hansen,B.E.,(1996), “Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis,” Econometrica, 64, 413-430.
28.Hansen, B.E., (1999), “Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference,” Journal of Econometrics, 93, 345-368.
29.Jaffe, A. B. (1986), “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence From Firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value, The American Economic Review, 76(5), 984-1001.
30.Kim, H. Y. (1992), “The Translog Production Function and Variable Returns to Scale,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(3), 546-52.
31.Katz, M. L. and C. Shapiro (1985), “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility,” American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-40.
32.Levin, R. C. and P. C. Reiss (1984), “Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure,” R&D, Patent and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, 175-204.
33.Spence, M. (1984), “Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance,” Econometrica, 52(1), pp.101-122.
34.Taionas, E.G., Christopoulos, D.K. (2003), “Maastricht convergence and real convergence: European evidence from threshold and smooth transition regression models”, Journal of Policy Modeling 25, 43-52.
35.Tong, H. (1978), “On a Threshold Model in Patter Recognition and Signal Processing,” (ed. C.H. Chen). Amsterdam: Sijhoff and Noordoff.
36.Tsai, K. H., J.C. Wang(2004), “R&D Productivity and the Spillover Effects of High-Tech Industry on the Traditional Manufacturing Sector: The Case of Taiwan”, World Economy, 27(10), 1555-1570.
37.Uno, K. (1989), “Research and Development in an Input-Output Framework: A Methodological Exposition,” Measurement of Services in an Input-Output Framework, Amsterdam: North-Holland. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit