從隨機優勢觀點探究全球價值-成長策略

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：12

、訪客IP：3.17.28.48

姓名

蔡叔琪(Shu-Chi Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

從隨機優勢觀點探究全球價值-成長策略
(International Value-Growth Strategies:A Stochastic Dominance Perspective)

相關論文

★ 使用信用卡循環信用持卡人特性之研究	★ 證券商分公司經營績效-以元大證券為例
★ 經濟變數對十年期公債殖利率影響之研究	★ 從股務代理機構之角度探討全面發行無實體有價證券作業
★ 以KMV 及Logistic 模型計算發行公司違約機率-台灣股市實證研究	★ 財務比率與股價報酬關聯性之研究--以全球汽車產業為例
★ 以完全複製不定期調整方式建構指數股票型基金之績效研究	★ 投資組合理論在財富管理上之應用
★ 以存活分析法預測通信貸款之還款期限	★ 匯率風險與亞洲金融風暴之研究
★ 消費者情緒對股價報酬的預測能力	★ 因子或特徵:全球觀點
★ 台灣加權指數波動率之實證研究	★ 全球反向與動能策略
★ 套利訂價模型中未知因子之分析：全球實證研究	★ 選擇權交易與標的資產報酬及標準差之關係

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本論文利用Barrett and Donald (2003)之隨機優勢法來檢測股票是否有價值溢酬的現象。我們將股票市場分為全球、非美國及美國三種類型並使用BE/ME, E/P, D/P, 及C/P四個比率為基準來組成價值型投資組合(比率前30%)及成長型投資組合(比率後30%)。我們的研究期間為1981/07~2005/06。結果顯示除了投資組合用D/P比率組成時發現價值股與成長股沒有隨機優勢的關係外，其餘的結果均支持全球性股票存在價值優於成長的現象。此結果又以非美國股票最為顯著。我們的研究代表大多數投資人仍偏好持有價值型股票而價值溢酬的現象確實存在。

摘要(英)

This study follows Barrett and Donald’s (2003) stochastic dominant methods to test value premium on international stocks. We test global, non-US, and US markets respectively. We form value (top 30% of the ratio) and growth (bottom 30% of the ratio) portfolios based on BE/ME, E/P, D/P and C/P ratios form July 1981 to June 2005. We find that value portfolios stochastically dominate growth portfolios in the global market, except when portfolios are formed based on D/P. The results are most significant for non-US stocks. Our empirical evidence indicates that most of investors prefer value stocks to growth stocks and the value premium exists.

關鍵字(中)

★ 價值
★ 成長
★ 隨機優勢
★ 全球實證

關鍵字(英)

★ Value
★ Growth
★ Stochastic Dominance
★ Global Evid

論文目次

1. Introduction 1
2. Data and Methodology 5
2.1 Data 5
2.2 Methodology 6
3. Empirical Results 9
3.1 Global Market Results 10
3.1.1 Equally-Weighted Results 10
3.1.2 Value-Weighted Results 11
3.2 Non-US Market Results 13
3.2.1 Equally-Weighted Results 13
3.2.2 Value-Weighted Results 13
3.3 US Market Results 15
3.3.1 Equally-Weighted Results 15
3.3.2 Value-Weighted Results 16
4. Robustness Tests 18
4.1 Global Market Results 18
4.2 Non-US Market Results 19
4.3 US Market Results 19
5. Conclusion 20
References 22
Appendix A: Data Formation 25
Appendix B: Methodology Details 27

參考文獻

Anderson, G.., 1996. Nonparametric tests of stochastic dominance in income distributions. Econometrica 64, 1183-1193.
Asness, C.S., Friedman, J.A., Krail, R.J., and Liew, J.M., 2000. Style timing: Value versus growth. Journal of Portfolio Management 26, 50-60.
Barrett, G. and Donald, S. 2003. Consistent tests for stochastic dominance. Econometrica 71, 71-104.
Basu, S., 1983. The relationship between earnings yield, market value, and return of NYSE common stocks: Further evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 12, 129-156.
Black, A.J., and Fraster, P., 2004. The value premium: rational, irrational or random. Managerial Finance 30, 57-75.
Capaul, C., Rowley, I., and Sharpe, W.F. 1993. International value and growth stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, January/February, 27-36.
Chan, L.K.C., Hamao, Y., and Lakonishok, J. 1991. Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan. Journal of Finance 46, 1739-1764.
Chan, L.K.C., Hamao, Y., and Lakonishok, J. 1993. Can fundamentals predict Japanese stock returns? Financial Analysts Journal, July/August, 63-69.
Copeland, T.E., Weston, J.F., and Shastri, K. 2005. Financial Theory and Corporate Policy, 4th Edition, Pearson Addison Wesley.
Davidson, R. and Duclos, J.-Y. 2000. Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality. Econometrica 68, 1435-1464.
De Bondt, W.F.M. and Thaler, R. 1985. Does the stock market overreact? Journal of Finance 40, 793-805.
De Groot, C.G.M., and Verschoor, W.F.C., 2002. Further evidence on asian stock return behavior. Emerging Markets Review 3, 179-193.
Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. 1992. The cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Finance 47, 427-465.
Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3-56.
Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. 1995. Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. Journal of Finance, 131-155.
Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. 1998. Value versus growth: the international evidence. Journal of Finance 53, 1975-1999.
Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. 2000. Characteristics, covariances, and average returns: 1929-1997. Journal of Finance, 389-405.
Fong, W.M., Wong, W.K., and Lean, H.H. 2005. International momentum strategies: A stochastic dominance approach. Journal of Financial Markets 8, 89-109.
Harvey, C.R. and Siddique, A. 2000. Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. Journal of Finance 55, 1263-1294.
Joy, O.M. and Porter, R.B., 1974. Stochastic dominance and mutual fund performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 9, 25-31.
Kogan, L. 2004. Asset prices and real investment. Journal of Financial Economics, 411-431.
Kothari, S.P., Shanken, J., and Sloan, R.G. 1995. Another look at the cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 50, 185-224.
Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W. 1994. Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. Journal of Finance 49, 1541-1578.
Lo, A.W. and MacKinlay, A.C. 1990. Data-snooping biases in tests of financial asset pricing models. Review of Financial Studies 3, 431-468.
McFadden, D. (1989). Testing for stochastic dominance. In T.B. Fomby and T.K. Seo (Eds.), Studies in the Economics of Uncertainty: In Honor of Josef Hadar, New York, Berlin, London and Tokyo: Springer.
Petkova, R. and Zhang, L. 2005. Is value riskier than growth? Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming.
Porter, R.B. 1973. An empirical comparison of stochastic dominance and mean-variance portfolio choice criteria. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 8, 587-608.
Porter, R.B. and Gaumnitz, J.E. 1972. Stochastic dominance vs. mean-variance analysis: An empirical evaluation. American Economic Review 62, 438-446.
Post, T. 2003. Empirical tests for stochastic dominance efficiency. Journal of Finance 58, 1905-1931.
Rosenberg, B., Reid, K., and Lanstein, R. 1985. Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency. Journal of Portfolio Management 11, 9-11.
Tehranian, H. 1980. Empirical studies in portfolio performance using higher degrees of stochastic dominance. Journal of Finance 35, 159-171.
Zhang, L. 2005. The value premium. Journal of Finance 60, 67-104.

指導教授

何耕宇(Keng-Yu Ho)

審核日期

2006-6-20

推文