| 摘要(英) |
With the prosperous growth of semiconductor market in China, it is found that the supply chain is getting longer and harder to maintain. Therefore, semiconductor component distributor becomes more and more important and indispensable in this field. Today, there are more than hundred companies which play as distributors, but what kind of distributors could really satisfy both vendors and manufacturers?
In this research, raw data of each distributor is collected from public “Market Observation Post System” which is held by “Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation”. DEA method is adopted to evaluate all distributors’ performance in order to realize the relative positions for all being-estimated distributors. Furthermore, this research tries to classify each distributor’s management status by 5-year-long performance change. Then, using the conclusions we have from above, this research studies each distributor’s financial characteristics in order to look for if there is any remarkable difference between benchmark and non-benchmark distributors.
Here summarize the conclusions of this research:
1. Regarding to management performance, this research shows that good performance distributors are getting stronger and vice versa. The benchmark group includes 3 companies, which are Supreme, Edom and PCT. The members of fall-behind group are Frontek, SAC and Zenitron.
2. This research classifies distributors into six types by Malmquist Productivity Index and CCR. Among these six groups, PCT, whose scale of asset is the smallest, is the one with the best performance. However, some distributors with far bigger asset than other competitors are not good enough as people think, like WPI and Yosun.
3. Getting further to analyze the root causes which could affect distributors’ performance, this research finds that benchmark distributors are doing excellent on following aspects: Current Ratio/Quick Ratio and Inventory Turnover Ratio/Days-Inventory Turn.
4. To analyze the performance fall-behind distributors, it shows they are poor at following aspects: A/R Turnover Ratio/Average Collection Period, ROA, ROE, and Pre-Tax Income Capital ratio.
5. This research shows that there is no obvious difference between benchmark and non-benchmark distributors on following aspects: Company Setup Duration and Employee on-job Duration. It concludes that old distributors or distributors with long on-job employees are not certainly with better performance. |
| 參考文獻 |
一、中文部分
1. 行政院國家科學委員會(2006)，「政府科技發展策略規劃報告」
2. 交通部觀光局(1997)，「我國觀光系統發展評估指標建立之研究」
3. 交通部觀光局(1998)，「台灣地區國際觀光旅館營運分析報告」
4. 李仁(2005)，「IC設計業銷售代理之管理-以在台美商N公司為例」，淡江大學管理科學研究所企業經營碩士在職專班碩士論文
5. 李長歌(2004），「利用資料包絡分析法之標竿模式評選新興基金」，中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
6. 李健瑞(2003)，「以資料包絡分析法比較二十個國家科技競爭效率之評估」，中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文
7. 吳素敏(2005)，「TSIA 2005年第四季暨2005全年我國IC產業營運總體檢」，TSIA
8. 吳翉(2005)，「台灣中小型半導體通路商之成功關鍵因素探討」，台灣科技大學工業管理系EMBA碩士論文
9. 林純慈(2005)，「2006年半導體產業展望」，金鼎證券
10.林建煌(2004)，「行銷管理」，智勝文化
11.周正逸(2005)，「我國IC產業之績效評估探討」，銘傳大學應用統計資訊學系碩士班碩士論文
12.范自強(2003)，「IC設計公司購併目標之選擇---以策略與效率角度分析」，交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士班碩士論文
13.胡聖生(2001)，「我國半導體零件通路產業之競爭策略分析-以世平興業股份有限公司為例」，中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文
14.高強、黃旭男、Toshiyuki Sueyoshi（2003），「管理績效評估：資料包絡分析法」，華泰文化事業股份有限公司
15.高銘聰(2001)，「台灣半導體通路產業分析與通路商轉型創新研究」，政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文
16.張世其(2004)，「以資料包絡分析法探討台灣IC設計上市公司之經營效率」，彰化師範大學企業管理系碩士論文
17.陳文一(2002)，「我國電子通路產業之競爭策略研究-以半導體零組件通路商為例」，輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文
18.陳慧玲(2005)，「IC通路類股週報」，電子時報(2005/01/13)
19.鄧榮惠(2005)，「2005年台灣IC設計產業現況分析與未來展望」，電子工程專輯
20.蔡山和(2003)，「我國半導體零組件通路業之關鍵成功因素研究」，台北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
21.黃雯君(2001)，「兩岸半導體產品行銷通路管理之研究」，中山大學國際高階經營管理研究所碩士論文
22.童怡璇(2004)，「台灣電子業技術效率分析─三階段資料包絡分析法之應用」，中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文
23.簡肇頌(2004)，「半導體零組件通路商競爭策略探討及經營績效之研究--以我國上市櫃公司為例」，輔仁大學科技管理學程碩士在職專班碩士論文
24.龔明鑫(2006)，「2015台灣製造業發展願景與規劃」，台灣經濟研究院
二、英文部分
1. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. (1984) “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, Vol. 30
2. Cave, D. W., Christensen, L. R. and Diewert, W. E. (1982) “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity,” Econometrica, Vol. 50
3. Chang, D. S. and Lo, L. K. (2005) ”Measuring the Relative Efficiency of a Firm’s Ability to Achieve Organizational Benefits after ISO Certification,” Total Quality Management Business Excellence Vol. 16
4. Charles, W. L. Hill and Gareth R. Jones (2004) “Strategic Management Theory,” Houghton Mifflin Company
5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2
6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. (1979) “Short Communication: Measuring the Efficiency of Decision making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 3
7. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B. and Roos, P. (1992) “Productivity Changes in Swedish Pharmacies 1980-1989: A Non-Parametric Malmquist Approach,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 3
8. Farrell, M. J. (1957) “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol. 120
9. Farrell, M. J. and Feildhouse, M. (1962) “Estimating Efficient Production Under Increasing Returns to Scale,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol. 125 |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit