博碩士論文 93524015 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:12 、訪客IP:3.220.164.172
姓名 周永清(Young-Ching Chou)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 網路學習科技研究所
論文名稱 課程管理系統應用於輔助反思教學
(CurriculumTree V3.0 : A system to support reflective teaching)
相關論文
★ 探索電玩遊戲頻率對於視覺注意力表現能力的效應★ 代理表現學習模式—以動物同伴為例
★ 常用邏輯句型重組之學習★ 電腦支援國小數學文字題擬題活動初探
★ 解釋數學:透過科技支援創作與討論以增強小學生的數學溝通能力★ 提問式鷹架教學結合數位閱讀寫作系統對國小低年級學生語文能力的影響
★ 數學島:興趣驅動之國小數學線上平台設計與初步評估★ 以「猜擬題」活動增進學生數學文字題解題能力
★ 基於學生練習使用回饋之學習成效預測模型與動態題數練習機制★ 透過主題地圖與寵物同伴促進閱讀更深更廣的書籍
★ 具推薦書籍功能之閱讀島系統架構設計★ 透過學生影片創作進行國小數學學習:趣創者理論之應用
★ 英文單字樂園:學生自創字卡搭配複習機制強化英文字彙學習之系統設計及學習成效初探★ 設計與實作明日寫作系統增進國小學生寫作表現
★ 設計與實作數位化教室環境的教室伺服器★ 在亞卓市教案編輯系統中設計學校本位教案發展之模組
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究整理出反思教學的四個特性:一、分析行動過程以達成目的 (analyzing practices and achieving ends);二、收集教學所需的資料 (collecting teaching data);三、計畫及實際行動和評估教學行動 (planning, implementing and evaluating teaching action);四、反思必需不斷練習 (cyclic reflection)。依據反思教學的特性以及有助於反思的理念設計CurriculumTree3.0系統功能,提供六大功能模組:課程管理模組 (curriculum management module)、教學教材管理模組 (teaching material management module)、教學活動管理模組(teaching activity management module)、教學計畫管理模組(teaching plan management module)、反思教學模組(reflective teaching module)、學生歷程管理模組(students profile management module)。以CurriculumTree3.0系統做為教師反思的工具,並設計反思教學的實驗模式,進行六至八週的實驗過程,最後以反思的四個層次思考習慣 (habitual Action)、對教學的了解程度 (understanding)、教學反思 (reflection)以及批判性反思 (critical reflection)探討教師的反思情形。研究結果系統有助老師掌握並了解教師本身的教學方式,並且讓老師可以檢視並反思自己的教學實務,有助於老師獲得批判性思考的教學。
摘要(英) In this paper, I consider four points about reflective teaching: (1) analyzing practice and achieving ends, (2) collecting teaching data, (3) planning, implementing and evaluating teaching action, (4)cyclic reflection. According reflective teaching and related theory, I design six system modules of CurriculumTree V3.0 : Curriculum management module, Teaching material management module, Teaching activity management module, Teaching plan management module,.and Reflective teaching module, Students profile management module. By using CurriculumTree3.0 system tool to help teachers obtaining reflection and use the reflection teaching experiment model to do six to eight weeks experiment. At the end, the paper discusses about the result of teacher’s reflection by four-reflection levels: Habitual Action, Understanding, Reflection, and Critical reflection. The conclusion of the study is that CurriculumTree V3.0 can have the initiative of teachers’ hands in their teaching method and reflect oneself. By doing so, it can help teacher to acquire critical thinking in their teaching.
關鍵字(中) ★ 課程樹
★ 反思
★ 反思教學
★ 概念圖
★ 課程管理系統
關鍵字(英) ★ CurriculumTree
★ reflection
★ concept map
★ reflective teaching
★ curriculum management system
論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 2
1.3 研究步驟 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1 課程樹系統的演進 4
2.1.1 CurriculumTree V1.0 4
2.1.2 CurriculumTree V2.0 6
2.2 反思 (reflection) 9
2.2.1 反思 (reflection)名詞的起源 9
2.2.2 反思意義的廣泛解釋 10
2.2.3 反思在教學上的功能 10
2.3 反思教學 (reflective teaching) 11
2.4 反思的各種分類型態 14
2.5 反思工具的相關研究 17
2.6 反思教學(reflective teaching)與後設認知(metacognition) 18
第三章 系統設計與實作 22
3.1 系統設計重要觀念及優點介紹 22
3.1.1 樹狀架構的延伸 22
3.1.2 設定筆記 (另一型態的反思劄記) 23
3.1.3建立教學檔案 26
3.1.4幫助回憶 28
3.2 系統功能架構 29
3.3 系統操作畫面 32
3.3.1 系統登入 32
3.3.2 課程選擇 33
3.3.3 新增課程單元 33
3.3.4 觀看學生成績 35
3.3.5 教材管理 38
3.3.6 設定筆記 38
3.3.7 修改及刪除課程單元節點 39
第四章 實驗設計與研究變數 41
4.1實驗設計 41
4.1.1 前測問卷與系統介紹 42
4.1.2 實驗過程 42
4.1.3 反思練習 (reflection practice) 44
4.2 實驗設備 46
4.3 實驗對象 47
4.4 問卷設計 48
4.5 研究變數 49
4.5.1 系統構面 50
4.5.2 反思構面 52
4.6 研究問題 55
4.7 研究限制 55
第五章 資料分析 57
5.1 實驗對象個人資料分析 57
5.2 樹狀結構在不同使用者上的表現 59
5.3 系統面向的資料分析 70
5.4 實驗教師反思內容分析 73
5.5 反思教學的問卷分析 77
5.6 反思的實驗結果 80
第六章 結論與建議 84
6.1 研究結果 84
6.2 結論 85
6.3 未來研究方向 86
參考文獻 89
附錄、反思問卷 (變項分類) 95
參考文獻 英文部分:
Ashton, P.T. & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement, Nework York: Longman.
Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1: 3-38.
Bailey, K.M. (1997). Reflective teaching: Situating our stories. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 7:1-19.
Bennett & Peggy., D. (1992). Back to school with twelve resolutions. Music Educators Journal, 79 (1): 44-46. (EJ 461813).
Banville, B. & Rikard, R. (2001). Observational tools for teacher reflection. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 72 (4), 46-49.
Bandura A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
Bandura A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs”, NJ : Pretice Hall , Inc.
Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy:The experience of control, New York : Cambridge University Press.
Chan T.W. (1989). Learning Companion Systems. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champain.
Chan, T. W. (1992). Curriculum Tree: A knowledge-based architecture for intelligent tutoring systems, Intelligent Tutoring System: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 140-147.
Chou, Young-Ching, Wu,Y.T. Ku,Y.M, Chan,T.W,(2006). Curricular and Learning activity management system, Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on SCORM 2004 (IEEE), 1-6.
Clark, C.M.& Peterson, P.L. (1986).Teachers’ thought process. In M. C. Whittrok (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp.255-298). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Kember, D. (2000). Development of a Questionnaire to Measure the Level of Reflective Thinking, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (4), 2000, 381-395.
Dewey J. (1933) How We Think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (Boston, D.C. Heath).
Dembo, M.H.& Gibson, S. (1985). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement, The Elementary School Journal, 86,174-184.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In Weinert, F., and Kluwe, R. (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding, 21-29. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Freeman, R. T. & Yin, H (2004).Adaptive topological tree structure for document organization and visualization. Neural Networks 17 (2004) 1255–1271.
Freeman, R. T. and Yin, H. (2005). Web Content Management by Self-Organization. Nneural Networks, 16 (5),1256-1268.
Goldsmith, S. (1995). Journal reflection: A resource guide for community service leaders and educators engaged in-service learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED. 392 152).
Hatton, Neville, Smith & David (1994). Facilitating reflection ; Issues and Research. Conference of the asutralian teacher education association. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED375110).
Herdon, K. M. & Fauske, J. R. (1996). Analyzing mentoring practices through teachers' journals. Teacher Education Quarterly, 23 (4), 27-44.
Hold, S. & McEntee, G. H. (1999). Reflection is at the heart of practice. Educational Leadership, 56 (8), 34-37.
James, H. Korn (2002). Beyond Tenure: The Teaching Portfolio for reflection and change. Teaching of Psychology: Essays in Honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charlws L. Brewer. 203-213.
Jay, J. K. (1999, February). Untying the knots: Examining the complexities of reflective practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Washington, DC. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED431732).
Jacobs, J. E. & Paris, S.G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255-278.
Jenny, G. C. (2005). Email Journaling for Teacher Candidates. Association of Small Computer Users in Education (ASCUE), 12-16.
Kruse & Sharon (1997). Reflective activity in practice: Vignettes of teachers’ deliberative work. Journal of research and development in education,31 (1):46-60. (EJ557652).
Lorraine, C. Smith. (2001). Life history as a key factor in understanding teacher collaboration and classroom practive. Teacher education quarterly:111-125.
Nunan, D., & Lamb, C. (1996). The self-directed teacher: Managing the learning process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,120.
Mozen, D. (2005). Best Practices of Effective Student-Teacher Supervision Based on NASPE Standards. The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 76 (6), 40-45.
Mcalpine, L. & Weston,C. (2000). Reflection: Issues related to improving professors’ teaching and students’ learning. Instructional Science, 28, 363–385
Mezirow, J. (1991) Transformative dimensions of adult learning, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
Osterman, K. & Kottkamp, R. (1993). Reflective practice for educators: Improving schooling through professional development. California: Corwin Press.
Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B. K. (1982). The development of cognitive skills during childhood. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology, 333–349. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction 15– 51.
Paris, S. G. & Ayres L. R. (1994). Becoming Reflective Students and Teachers : With Portfolios and Authentic Assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Pennington, M. C. (1992). Reflecting on teaching and learning: A developmental focus for the second language classroom. Perspectives on Second Language Teacher Education.47-65.
Pultorak, E. G. (1993). Facilitating reflection through in novice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 44 (4), 288-295.
Ross, E. W. & Hannay, L. M. (1986). Toward a critical theory of reflective inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 37,9-15.
Rodriguez, Y. E.& Sjostrom, B. R. (1998). Critical Reflection for professional develop: A comparative study of nontraditional adult and traditional student teachers. Journal of teacher Education, 49 (3), 177-186.
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres,1-4.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460.
Shannon, David M. (1994). An Evaluation Approach for the Development of Preservice Teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of CREATE (Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation) National Evaluation Institute (3rd, Gatlinburg, TN, July 10-15, 1994).
Sharon, K. & Kathy, B. (2000). Reflection is not description: Cultivating reflection with pre-service teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO.ED440079).
Stahler, T. M. (1996). Early field experience: A model that worked. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED. 397 047).
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460
Taggart, G. L. & Wilson, A. P. (1998). Promoting reflective thinking in teachers 44 action Strategies. California, Corwin Press.
Van Mannen, M. (1997). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6,205-228.
Wu, YT., Ku Y-M., Chen,Y-H, Wu, J–F (2005). Curriculum Container Management System: A management system to support curriculum and learning activities, Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advance Learning Technologies.287-289
Wallace, M. J. (1991). Educating foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,49-56.
Zeichner, K.M. & Liston, D.P. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review. 57 (1), 23-48.
Zeichner, K.M. & Liston, D.P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ:Lawarence Erlbum.
中文翻譯書
Lazear, D. (2001)。落實多元智慧教學評量 (郭俊賢、陳淑惠譯)。台北:遠流出版。 (原著出版於1999 年)
Scott G. Paris & Rikard R. Ayres. (2000)。培養反思力 (林心茹譯)。台北:遠流出社。 (原著出版於1994 年)
中文參考文獻
陳美玉 (民88) 教師專業學習與發展。台北:師大書苑。
吳和堂 (民89) 國中實習教師教學反省與專業成長關係之量的研究。教育學刊,17,65-84.
林育瑋 (民85) 幼教教師的專業發展。國民教育,36,5,24-34。
王等元 (民89)「歷程檔案」概念及其在學習者支持系統之意涵。國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系社會教育學刊,29,249-274。
王妙里 (民91) 反思教學中教師內省智慧的探索,國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
歐用生 (民82) 反思性教學及其對師範學院教學革新的啟示。博雅教育文集,3。國立台北師範學院出版。
湯維玲 (民85) 反省取向的師資培育學程研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
黃譯瑩 (民86)Reflection and belief: How and What teachers change. 載於八十五學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集一,台東師院,419-439
指導教授 陳德懷(Tak-Wai Chan) 審核日期 2006-7-18
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明