| 摘要(英) |
A total of 18 reptiles, categorized into 5 families, had been found in this study, and road kills appeared in 15 reptiles of all. The first dominant species was Trimeresurus stejnegeri stejnegeri in this study and the second was Achalinus niger. During the investigation, 7 reptiles named Achalinus niger, Elaphe mandarinus, Elaphe taeniura, Pareas formosensis, Ovophis makazayazaya, Bungarus multicinctus, and Trimeresurus gracilis were ranked as secondary rare species on the List of Wild Animal Reservation.
The reptiles found on Yi Zhuan first road (15 species) were more diversified than those found on Cui Feng forest road (7 species). The active density of reptiles on Yi Zhuan first road averaged 3.69 sights/100 kilometers, while that of Cui Feng forest road was 2.68 sights/100 kilometers. The roadkilled density on Yi Zhuan first road reached 1.94 sights/100 kilometers, while that of Cui Feng forest road was 1.28 sights/100 kilometers. However, the road killed density of rare species was higher on Cui Feng forest road, which was 2.69 times as many as that of Yi Zhuan first road. The reptiles were primarily nocturnal on both Cui Feng forest road and Yi Zhuan first road, but road kills were found more serious during the day. Achalinus niger and Elaphe mandarinus were the two species most seriously affected and nighttime control measures posted on Cui feng forest road were effective for Trimeresurus gracilis, but not for Achalinus niger.
In the analysis of distribution pattern for each of the species, the species and spots of road kills were more scattered and equally distributed along Yi Zhuan first road. On the contrary, three hotspots where road kills peaked were found, which are in sections of 0.0 to 3.0k, 7.4 to 8.6k, and 15.0 to 16.5k along Cui Feng forest road. The section of 0.0 to 3.0k topped with a death toll of 9 in 15 records of rare species, which made this section a hotspot with the most serious casualty.
Reducing driving speed has been an effective way to decrease road kills. An ecological education classroom can be set up at the checking point at the beginning of Cui Feng forest road, where tourists are lectured before they follow the guiding car on to the road. Only after passing the hotspot of section 0.0 to 0.3k was the guiding car withdrawn, thus accomplishing the goal of controlling car speed and reducing the road kills of reptiles. Furthermore, extending the control time of Cui Feng forest road and setting up arresting warning signals and animal passages in each hotspot are also effective ways to reduce the threat of road kills. |
| 參考文獻 |
1. 大泰司紀之、井部真理子、增田泰，1998，野生動物的交通事故對策，北海道大學圖書刊行會，196頁。
2. 呂光洋、杜銘章、向高士，1999，台灣兩棲爬行動物圖鑑，中華民國自然生態保育協會，343頁。
3. 巫奇勳，2005，綠島陸棲兩棲爬行動物的現況與危機，自然保育季刊第50期，41-46頁。
4. 巫奇勳，2007，被忽略的一群道路開發犧牲者，生態台灣季刊第16期，31-36頁。
5. 林世強、林鎮洋，2006，動物車禍機率模式實證研究，第三屆生態工程學術研討會，28-43頁。
6. 林務局羅東林管處，2004a，雲海灌溉的森林，林務局羅東林管處出版，166頁。
7. 林務局羅東林管處，2004b，http://www.forest.gov.tw。
8. 林清池，1996，太平山開發史，浮崙小築文化出版。
9. 林華慶，1997，台灣蛇類的商業利用、獵捕與保育，海峽兩岸珍稀動物保育研討會，台北市動物園之友協會，120-140頁。
10. 林德恩、趙仁方、林登榮、黃永慶，2006，綠島地區道路殺手效應之研究，綠島生物多樣性保育研討會，26-41頁。
11. 姚鶴年，2003，台灣林業歷史課題系列（三）-台灣林道設施大檢討，台灣林業第29卷第5期，44-67頁。
12. 許海龍、孫元勳2004，九十三年度墾丁國家公園陸蟹產卵生態廊道技術探討，墾丁國家公園管理處委託，94頁。
13. 黃光瀛，2006，陽明山國家公園野生動物穿越道路涵洞微型生態廊道系統，2006生態工程博覽會生態廊道講習會，陽明山國家公園管理處，49-58頁。
14. 觀察家生態顧問有限公司，2007，二高沿線環境特性調查及國道計劃環境復育之研究（第一期），交通部國道新建工程局委託。
15. Aaris-Sorensen, J.,(1995), Road-kills of badgers (Meles meles) in Denmark. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 32, 1: 31-36.
16. Chamberlain,B(ed.) .,(2006), Wildlife Roadkill Mitigation Information Kit. Sustainable Living Tasmania. 36pp.
17. Clarke, G. B., White, P. C. L. and Harris, S., (1998), Effects of roads on badger Meles meles populations in south-west England. Biol. Conserv. 86, 117-124.
18. De Vries, J.G., (2004), Eco-Roads: Safe and Sound for People and Nature, International Conference on Eco-Technology.
19. Forman, R. T. T., Sperling, D., Bissonette, J. A., Clevenger, A. P., Cutshall, C. D., Dale, V. H., Fahrig, L., France, R., Goldman, C. R., Heanue, K., Jones, J. A., Swanson, F. J., Turrentine, T., Winter, T. C., (2003), Road Ecology – Science and Solution. Island Press. 481pp.
20. Göransson, G., Karlsson, J. and Lindgren, A., (1978). Vägers inverkan på omgivende natur. II Fauna. Technical report. Statens Naturvårdsvärk, Stockholm. (In Swedish.)
21. Groot Bruinderink, G.W.T.A. and Hazebroek, E.(1996), Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conservation Biology 10, 1059-1067.
22. Jaren, V., Andersen, R., Ulleberg, M., Pedersen, P.H. and Wiseth, B., (1991), Moose-Train Collisions: The Effects of Vegetation Removal with a Cost-Benefit Analysis. Alces 27, 93-99.
23. Lavsund, S. and Sandegren, F., (1991), Moose-Vehicle Relations in Sweden: a review. Alces 27, 118-126.
24. Müller, S. and Berthoud, G., (1997), Fauna and traffic safety. Lausanne, CH:LAVOC.
25. Oxley, D. J., Fenton, M. B. and Carmody, G. R., (1974), The effects of roads on populations of small mammals. J. Appl. Ecol. 11, 51-59.
26. Seiler, A., (2002), Effects of Infrastructure on Nature. In Trocmé, M., Cahill, S., De Vries, J. G., Farrall, H., Folkeson, L., Fry, G., Hicks, C. and Peymen, J.(Eds.) COST341 – Habitat Fragmentation due to transportation Infrastructure: The European Review, pp. 31-50. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
27. Stoner, D., (1925), The toll of the automobile. Science 61:56-58.
28. Trombulak, S. C. and Frissell, C. A.,(2000), Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14,18-30.
29. Van der Zee, F. F., Wiertz, J., Ter Braak, C. J. and Van Apeldoorn, R. C., (1992), Landscape change as a possible cause of the badger Meles meles L.decline in the Netherlands. Biol. Conserv. 61, 17-22.
30. Van Gerder, J. J., (1973), A quantitative approach to the mortality resulting from traffic in a population of Bufo bufo. Oecologia 13, 93-95. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit