維基百科知識分享現象之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：15

、訪客IP：3.15.21.48

姓名

黃俊宇(Chun-yu Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

維基百科知識分享現象之研究
(A Study of Phenomena of Knowledge Sharing in Wikipedia)

相關論文

★ 企業多角化經營策略之研究 ─以某機構拓展資訊應用服務市場為例	★ 某中小企業執行政府專案計畫之社會網絡關係分析
★ 學習型組織與價值創造的探討	★ 以社會行動研究法探討組織內的社會網絡關係-以C研究中心為例
★ 以個案研究探討半導體封測業CIM之導入	★ 消費者特性與網路使用經驗對網路購物之影響－以上海、台北學生為例
★ 醫院資訊系統應用實踐歷程之社會效果分析－以醫令資訊系統為例	★ 關係連結對網路顧客忠誠度影響之研究
★ 虛擬社群成員再訪意圖之探討-以 Fashion Guide 社群為例	★ 利用feature-opinion pair建立向量空間模型以進行使用者評論分類之研究
★ 區隔綠色消費者及探討影響綠色產品的態度與願付價格之心理決定因子	★ 消費者對仿冒品態度的前因與後果之研究-以電子產品為例
★ 角色壓力源、焦崩對組織承諾的影響－兩岸資訊從業人員之比較研究	★ 組織公民行為意圖影響因素之研究－以兩岸資訊從業人員為例
★ 資訊人員的工作特性、創造力人格特質與工作滿足的相關性研究	★ 網路購物意願影響因素之研究－以北京、台北在職班學生為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

維基百科是一網路百科全書，提供廣泛的知識給使用者，其內容是由所有使用者共同編輯而得，並非由專家學者制定。維基百科出現之後，以很快的速度成長，幾年之間已有超過250個語言版本，內容更是包羅萬象。相較於其他提供知識的網站，維基百科提供更多且更正式的內容。而編輯維基百科需要耗費個人時間精力，奉獻個人所知，沒有金錢作回報，卻有越來越多人加入編寫行列，本研究針對這一群在維基百科上分享知識的人，以及其他使用維基百科的人為研究對象，以計畫行為理論、社會認同理論以及交換行為理論等，探討其知識分享的影響因素。
本研究以維基百科使用者為樣本，發放網路問卷，共回收181份問卷，有效問卷156份。經過分析後發現，聲譽和利他主義對知識分享態度有正向顯著的影響，而期望報酬對知識分享態度是負向顯著的；而知識分享態度對知識分享行為的影響是不顯著的。結果顯示對維基百科的使用者而言，聲譽和利他主義會影響其知識分享態度，但是知識分享態度卻不必然影響其知識分享行為，維基百科的使用者認為分享知識是好的，可能存在其他因素導致使用者無法進行分享的行為。本研究提出外部控制和社群認同為調節變數，發現外部控制和社群認同對於知識分享態度和知識分享行為之關係具有調節效果。

摘要(英)

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia on the Internet. It provides a lot of knowledge for the user. The first Wikipedia appeared in 2001 and was only in English. After six year of development, there are now various versions in more than 250 languages. Contents in Wikipedia were contributed and edited not by authorities, but by users of Wikipedia. As long as one wants, one can contribute to the contents of Wikipedia. Many users spent their time and energy to devote themselves to Wikipedia. Wikipedia gives no monetary reward to its contributor, but there are more and more users sharing their knowledge to Wikipedia. Does this reveal a massive pro-social phenomenon? This study thus attempts to look into factors that effect knowledge sharing of these sharing individuals.
A web based questionnaire was designed, and known Wikipedia users were invited as informants. 156 valid samples were tallied out of a total of 181 returns. Empirical results reveal that reputation and altruism have positive effects on attitude of knowledge sharing, while expected reward has significant but negative effect on attitude of knowledge sharing. External control and community identification have moderating effect on the relationship between attitude of knowledge sharing and behavior of knowledge sharing. However, we failed to find evidence that support the effect of attitude of knowledge sharing on behavior of knowledge sharing. This is an issue that calls for more studies.

關鍵字(中)

★ 利他主義
★ 社會交換理論
★ 社會認同理論
★ 計畫行為理論
★ 維基百科

關鍵字(英)

★ Social Exchange Theory
★ Social Identity Theory
★ TPB
★ Wikipedia
★ Altruism.

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景 1
第二節研究動機與目的 4
第三節研究流程 5
第二章文獻探討 7
第一節維基百科 7
第二節計畫行為理論 12
第三節社會認同理論 15
第四節知識分享態度影響因素 19
第三章研究方法 23
第一節研究架構 23
第二節研究假設 24
第三節研究變數之定義與操作化 28
第四節研究設計 34
第四章資料分析與結果 39
第一節樣本特性分析 39
第二節信度效度分析 42
第三節研究假說檢定 46
第四節調節效果分析 52
第五章結論與建議 54
第一節討論 54
第二節管理意涵 59
第三節研究限制 61
第四節後續研究建議 62
參考文獻 63
附錄一學生問卷 71
附錄二非學生問卷 74

參考文獻

一、英文部份
1. Ajzen, I. (1989), “Attitude Structure and Behavior,” In Attitude Structure and Function, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler and A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), 241-274, Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Ajzen, I. (1985), “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior,” In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, J. Kuhl and J. Beckman (Eds.), Heidelberg: Springer.
3. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Andreoni, J. (1990), “Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving,” The Economic Journal, 100, 464–477.
5. Anderson, S. P., Goeree, J. K. and Holt, C. A. (1998), “A Theoretical Analysis of Altruism and Decision Error in Public Good Games,” Journal of Public Economics, 70, 297–323.
6. Ashforth, B. E. and Mae
l, F. (1989), “Social Identity Theory and the Organization,” Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
7. Bandura, A. (1969), Principles of Behavior Modification, NY: Holt, Rineheart and Winston Inc.
8. Bar-Tal, D. (1976), Prosocial Behavior: Theory and Research, New York:John Wiley.
9. Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A. and Goldberg, M. (1982), “Helping Behavior among Preschool Children: An observational study,” Child Development, 53, 396-402.
10. Bartel, C. A. (2001), “Social Comparisons in Boundary-Spanning Work: Effects of Community Outreach on Members’ Organizational Identity and Identification,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 379–413.
11. Bentler, P.M. and Bonnet, D.G. (1980), “Significance Tests and Goodness-of-Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structure,” Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
12. Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social life, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
13. Bock, G. W. and Kim Y.G. (2002), “Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing,” Information Resources Management Journal, 14, 14-21.
14. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim Y.G. and Lee J.N. (2005), “Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate,” MIS Quarterly, 29, 87-112.
15. Bronfenberner, U. (1960), “Freud: A Theories of Identification and Their Derivatives,” Child Development, 31, 15-40.
16. Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1993), “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit,” in Testing Structural Equation Models, K.A. Bollen and J.S. Long (Eds.) , 136-192, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
17. Chattopadhyay, P. (1999), “Beyond Direct and Symmetrical Effects: the Influence of Demographic Dissimilarity on Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273-287.
18. Conner, M. and Armitage, C. J. (1998), “Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A review for Further Research,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429–1464.
19. Constant, D. K. and Sproull, L. (1994), “What’s Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing,” Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400-421.
20. Constant, D., Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1996), “The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulmess of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Adcice,” Organization Science 7(2), pp. 693-703.
21. Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
22. Donath, J. S. (1999), “Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community,” In Communities in Cyberspace, M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (Eds.), 29-59, Routledge, New York.
23. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M. and Harquail, C. V. (1994), “Organizational Images and Member Identification,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.
24. Eisenberg, N.and Fabes, R.A. (1991), “Prosocial behavior and empathy: A multimethod developmental perspective,” In Prosocial Behavior, Park, N. and Clark, M.S. (Ed.), CA: SAGE.
25. Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P. and Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999), “Self-Categorisation, Commitment to the Group and Group Self-Esteem as Related but Distinct Aspects of Social Identity,” European Journal of Social Psychology, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol, 29, 371-389.
26. Emerson, R. M. (1972), “Exchange Theory, Part I: A Psychological Basis for Social Exchange,” In Sociological Theories in Progress, edited by J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr. and B. Anderson, Boston, 2, 38-57, MA:Houghton-Mifflin.
27. Feilitzen, C.V. and Linne, O. (1975), “The Effects of Television on Children and Adolescents Identifying With Television Characters,” The Journal of Communication, 25(4), 31-55.
28. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. Foa, U. G. and Foa, E. B. (1980), “Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange,” In Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis( Eds,), 77-94, New York: Plenum.
30. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39-50.
31. Frith and Simon (1996), “Music and Identity,” In Question of Cultural Identity, Hall, S. and Gay, P. D. (Eds), 18-27, London: Sage Publications.
32. Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. K. (2002), “Private Costs and Public Benefits: Unraveling the Effects of Altruism and Noisy Behavior,” Journal of Public Economics, 83, 255–276.
33. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Thatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th Edition, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34. Hall, S. and Gay, P. D. (1996), “Introduction: Who Needs Identity,” Question of Cultural Identity, 1-17, London: Sage Publications.
35. Hamilton, D. L. (1981), Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Haruvy, E., Prasad, A. and Sethi, S. P. (2003), “Harvesting Altruism in Open-Source Software Development,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 118(2), 381–416.
37. Hindriks, J. and Pancs, R. (2002), “Free Riding on Altruism and Group Size,” Journal of Public Economic Theory, 4, 335–346.
38. Hogg, M. A. (2000), “Social Identity and Social Comparison,” In Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research, J. Suls and L. Wheeler (Eds.), New York: Plenum.
39. Hogg, M. A. and Terry, D. J. (2000), “Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts,” Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.
40. Homans, G.C. (1958), “ Social Behavior as Exchange,” The American Journal of Sociology, 597-606.
41. Homburg, C. and Fürst, A. (2005), “How Organizational Complaint Handling Drives Customer Loyalty: An Analysis of the Mechanistic and the Organic Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 69, 95-114.
42. Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1989), LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications, Chicago: SPSS Inc.
43. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S. and Borgatti, S. P. (1997), “A General Theory of network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms,” Academy of Management Review, 22(4), pp. 911-945.
44. Kagan, J. (1958), “The Concept of Identification,” Psychological Review, 65(5), 296-305.
45. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., and Chervany, N. L. (1999), “Information Technology Adoption across Time: a Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs,” MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213.
46. Kramer, R. M. (1993), “Cooperation and Organizational Identification,” In Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research, J. K. Murnighan (ed.), Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
47. Lakhani, K. and von Hippel, E. (2003), “How Open Source Software Works: ‘Free’ User-to –User Assistance,” Research Policy, 32(6), 923-943.
48. Ledyard, J. O. (1995), “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research,” In Handbook of Experimental Economics, J. H. Kages and A. E. Roth, Eds., Princeton University Press.
49. Liker, J. K., Sindi, A. A. (1997), “User Acceptance of Expert Systems: a Test of the Theory of Reasoned Action,” Journal of Engineering and Technology management (14), 147-173.
50. Lusk, J. L., Nilsson, T. and Foster, K. (2007), “Public Preferences and Private Choices: Effect of Altruism and Free Riding on Demand for Environmentally Certified Pork” Environmental & Resource Economics, 36, 499–521
51. MacIver J.P. and Carmines E.G. (1981), Unidimensional Scaling, California: Sage publication.
52. Mael, F. A., and Ashforth, B. E. (1992), “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.
53. Nunnally, J. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd Edition, NY: McGraw-Hill.
54. O’Reilly, C. and Chatman, J. (1986), “Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492–499.
55. Organ, D. W. (1988), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
56. Parsons, T. (1951), The Social System, NY: Free press.
57. Roloff, M. E. (1981), Interpersonal Communication: The Cocial Exchange Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58. Schroeder, D., Penner, L., Dovidio, J. and Piliavin, J. (1995), The Psychology of Helping and Altruism. New York: McGraw Hill.
59. Shaffer, D.R. (1994), “Early Social and Emotional Development Ⅰ, II,” In Social and Personality Development. Pacific Grove, Shaffer, D.R., California: Boors/ Cole Publishing Inc.
60. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J. and Warshaw, P. R. (1988), “The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta- Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325-343.
61. Smith, V. H., Kehoe, M. R. and Cremer, M. E. (1995), “The Private Provision of Public Goods: Altruism and Voluntary Giving,” Journal of Public Economics, 58, 107–126.
62. Staub, E. (1978), Positive social Behavior andMmorality: Vol. 1. Social and Personal Influences, New York: Academic Press.
63. Stryker, S. and Serpe, R. T. (1982), “Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior: Theory and research example,” In Personality, roles, and social behavior, W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.), 199-218, New York: Springer-Verlag.
64. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P. and Flament, C. (1971), “Social categorization and intergroup behaviour,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
65. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1979), “An Integrative Theory of Social Conflict,” In TheSsocial Psychology of Intergroup Relations, W. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds), 7-24, California: Brooks/Cole.
66. Tajfel, H. (1982), “Instrumentality, Identity and Social Comparisons,” In Social Identity and Intergroup Relationships, H. Tajfel (Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1985), “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior,” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, S. Worcehl and W. G. Austin (eds.) (2nd ed.), Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
68. Thibaut, J. W. and Kelly, H. (1959), The social Psychology of Groups, New York: Wiley.
69. Tidwell, M. V. (2005), “A Social Identity Model of Prosocial Behaviors Within Nonprofit Organizations,” Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(4), 449-467.
70. Turner, J. C. (1982), “Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group,” In Social Identity and Intergroup Relationships, H. Tajfel (Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Woodward, K. (1997), Identity and Difference, London: Sage Publications.
72. Zahn-Waxler, C. and Radke-Yarrow, M. (1982), “The development of altruism: Alternative research strategies,” In The Development of Prosocial Behavior, Eisenberg, N. (ed.), New York: Academic Press.
二、中文部份
1. 朱龍祥 (1997)，流行歌曲歌迷與偶像崇拜的行為與心理觀察，高雄醫學院行為科學研究所碩士論文。
3. 邱皓政 (2004)，結構方程式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用，台北：雙葉書廊。
4. KJ, (2006)，維基百科攻略，電腦人文化。
三、網頁資料
1. 維基百科 (2007)，http://www.wikipedia.org。
2. 中文維基百科 (2007)，http://zh.wikipedia.org。
3. 台灣雅虎奇摩 (2007)，http://tw.yahoo.com。

指導教授

宋鎧(Kai Sung)

審核日期

2007-7-7

推文