台灣地區大學教育所得分配及過度教育問題之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：68

、訪客IP：3.144.35.234

姓名

楊琇淳(Hsiu-chun Yang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

台灣地區大學教育所得分配及過度教育問題之研究
(Income Distribution and Overeducation of Tertiary Education in Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 公平交易法對多層次傳銷定義之研究－「給付一定代價」是否應予保留	★ 產業群聚與ICT、電子商務技術擴散－以臺灣製造業為例
★ 人力資本與經濟成長：以TIMSS測驗分數作為人力資本代理變數可行性之探討	★ 個人預計退休年齡的決定
★ 租稅幻覺與已婚婦女勞動供給之影響	★ 宗教認知對修行投入時間影響之探討
★ 退休金給付制度及強制退休時點與員工互動之探討	★ 台灣管理階層薪資結構 Tournament Theory 之實證研究
★ 人才移動、家庭遷移與技術移轉－以台商在上海地區就職為例	★ 電子商務消費者行為計量分析
★ 台灣B2C電子商務市場商品價格變動因素之探討—兼論虛擬市場與實體市場間之整合	★ 高科技產業垂直分工與群聚效果之分析—以新竹科學園區為例
★ 電信不對稱管制之研究	★ 臺灣地區大學教育報酬率時間變化趨勢之分析
★ 肢體障礙勞工教育與就業狀況之探討－以傳訊理論與歧視理論為基礎	★ 教育的信號功能分析─以國內事業單位為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本文目的為探討台灣地區大學教育擴張對大學及其它各級教育所得分配之影響，資料來源為行政院主計處所提供之「人力資源運用調查」原始資料。研究方法採用分量迴歸法，並以Mincer薪資所得模型為基礎設定本文實證模型。
研究結果發現，台灣地區大學教育快速擴張使得大學及其它各級教育的所得分配差距擴大，且教育程度愈低所得分配差距擴大的情形愈嚴重，顯示大學教育擴張對其它各級教育所造成的漣漪效果。研究所及博士教育的所得分配差距卻呈現縮小的情形，可能是由於學歷門檻的限制，使得大學教育對兩者的影響較小，其中博士教育的報酬在各分量間的變化相當穩定，為本文發現的特殊之處。其次，大學教育過度擴張也使得大學畢業生因找不到合適的工作而產生過度教育的問題，本文估計台灣地區大學及專科教育過度教育的比例都各達20%。表示即使接受較高的教育，也無法使得這群人的所得有所提升，甚至低於相鄰較低教育程度者之所得，過度教育不僅拉低各群組中低所得者的所得水準，也使得所得分配的問題更加嚴重。因此，單靠教育政策來改善所得分配的問題是不夠的，應與其他社會福利措施及經濟發展相配合，才能夠有效改善所得分配問題。

摘要(英)

The purpose of this study is to explore the impacts of tertiary educational expansion on income distribution of each educational level during 1990-2005 in Taiwan. The data source used here were the National Survey of Human Resource and Employment. We use quantile regression to estimate rates of return to education and the empirical model is based on Mincer equation.
Most of the literature in this field has estimated the effects of educational expansion on income distribution. We find that the income distribution in each education level is more inequality after rapidly expansion in tertiary education and we call this effect as “ripple effect”. We also find that 20% of tertiary education and junior college graduates were overeducated. One will lose earnings from overeducation and debase the income level of the overeducated.

關鍵字(中)

★ 所得分配
★ 教育擴張
★ 過度教育

關鍵字(英)

★ income distribution
★ educational expansion
★ overeducation

論文目次

目錄......................................................I
圖目錄..................................................III
表目錄...................................................IV
第一章序論...............................................1
1.1 研究動機與目的........................................1
1.2 研究內容與架構........................................5
第二章文獻回顧...........................................6
2.1 人力資本..............................................6
2.1.1 人力資本概念........................................6
2.1.2 人力資本理論的建立..................................6
2.1.3 人力資本與教育投資..................................7
2.2 Mincer薪資所得模型....................................8
2.2.1 Mincer薪資所得模型..................................8
2.2.2 理論模型............................................9
2.3 國內外文獻回顧.......................................13
2.4 大學教育擴張的影響效果...............................17
2.5 本章小結.............................................19
第三章研究方法..........................................20
3.1 計量方法.............................................20
3.1.1 分量迴歸與OLS之比較................................20
3.1.2 分量迴歸模型.......................................21
3.2 資料來源.............................................23
3.3 模型設定.............................................24
3.4 基本統計量...........................................26
3.5 本章小結.............................................27
第四章實證結果分析......................................29
4.1 各級教育實證結果.....................................29
4.2 教育擴張對所得分配之影響.............................37
4.3 過度教育問題.........................................38
4.4 本章小結.............................................42
第五章結論與建議........................................43
5.1 結論.................................................43
5.2 政策建議.............................................45
5.3 未來研究方向.........................................46
參考文獻.................................................47
附錄一...................................................53
附錄二...................................................56

參考文獻

王心妙(2005)，「影響新生兒體重的因素分析：分量迴歸的應用」，政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
阮國強(1995)，「影響我國製造業工資決定因素之研究」，文化大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
邱麗芳(2004)，「台灣地區大學教育報酬率時間變化趨勢之分析」，中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
吳家聲(1986)，「台灣地區個人薪資決定因素分析」，《台灣銀行季刊》，第37卷，第4期，第175-217頁。
吳慧瑛(2003)，「二十年來教育發展之經濟評估，1978-2001」，《台灣經濟預測與政策》，第33卷，第2期，第97-130頁。
岳昌君(2004)，「教育對個人收入差異的影響」，《經濟學季刊》，第3卷增刊，第135-150頁。
高希均(1985)，《教育經濟學論文集》，台北：聯經出版事業公司。
莊家彰、管中閔(2005)，「台灣與美國股市價量關係的分量迴歸分析」，《經濟論文》，第33卷，第四期，第379-404頁。
廖仲仁、張金鶚(2004)，「搜尋成本與定錨行為對於購屋者價格貼水之影響」，《住宅學報》，第13卷，第二期，第47-62頁。
邊裕淵(1983)，「教育與薪資所得分配之研究－台灣地區之實證分析」，《台灣經濟》，第78期，第20-37頁。
Abadie, A., Angrist, J., and Imbens, G. (2002), “Instrumental Variables Estimates of the Effect of Subsidized Training on the Quantiles of Trainee Earnings,” Economertica, 70, 91-117.
Arias, O., Hallock, K., Sosa-Escudero, W. (2001), “Individual heterogeneity in the returns to schooling： instrumental variables quantile regression using twins data,”Empirical Economics, 26, 7-40.
Ashenfelter, O. and Rouse, C. (2000), “Schooling, Intelligence and Income in America. In: Arrow, K., Bowles, S., Durlauf, S. (Eds.), Meritocracy and Economic Inequality. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
Beaulieu, L. J. and D. Mulkey (1995), “Investing in the People: The Human Capital Needs of Rural America,” Oxford: Westview Press.
Becker, G. S. (1962), “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis,” Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), pt. 2, 9-49.
Becker, G. S. (1964), Human Capital, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Becker, G. S. (1993), Human Capital, 3rd Edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bjorklund, A. and Kjellstrom, C. (2002), “Estimating the Return to Investments in Education: How Useful is the Standard Mincer Equation?” Economics of Education Review, 21, 195-210.
Buchinsky, M. (1994), “Changes if the U.S. Wage Structure 1963-1987: Application of Quantile Regression,” Economertica, 62, 405-458.
Card, D. (1994), “Earnings, Schooling and Ability Revisited,” NBER Working 4832.
Chiswick, B. R. and Mincer, J. (1972), “Time-Series Changes in Personal Income Inequality in the United States from 1939, with Projections to 1985,” The Journal of Political Economy, 80, 34-66.
Chamberlain, G. (1994), “Quantile Regression, Censoring and the Structure of Wages,” in C. Sims and J.J. Laffort (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress of the Econometrics Society, Barcelona, Spain. New York: Cambridge University Press, 171-209.
Dolton, P. and Vignoles, A. (2000), “The incidence and Effects of Overeducation in the U.K. Graduate Labour Market,” Economics of Education Review, 19, 179-198.
Gannicott, K. (1986), “Woman, Wages, and Discrimination: Some Evidence from Taiwan,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 34, 721-730.
Gindling, T. H., M. Goldfarb, and C.-C. Chang (1995), “Changing Returns to Education in Taiwan: 1978-1991,” World Development, 23, 343-356.
Hartog, J., Pereira, P. T., Vieira, J. A. C. (2001), “Changing Returns to Education in Portugal During the 1980s and Early 1990s: OLS and Quantile Regression Estimators,” Applied Economics, 33, 1021-1037.
Heckman, J. J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,” Econometrica, 47, 153-161.
Hirsch, B. T. (1978), “Earnings Inequality across Labor Markets: a Test of the Human Capital Model,” Southern Economic Journal, 1, 32-45.
Knight, K., Bassett, G. and Tam, Mo-Yin S. (2000), “Comparing Quantile Estimation for the Linear Model,” Perprint.
Koenker, J. and Bilias, Y. (2001), “Quantile Regression for Duration Data: A Reappraisal of the Pennsylvania Reemployment Bonus Experiments,” Empirical Economics, 26, 199-220.
Koenker, J. and Basserr, G. (1978), “Regression Quantiles,” Economertica, 46, 33-50.
Koenker, J. and Hallock (2001), ”Quantile Regression,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 143-156.
Kuo, S.W. Y., Rains, G., and Fei, J. C. H. (1981), The Taiwan Success Story: Rapid Growth with Improved Distribution in the Republic of China, 1952-1979, Boulder: Westview Press.
Levin, J. (2001), “For Whom the Reductions Count: A Quantile Regression Analysis of Class Size on Scholastic Achivement,” Empirical Economics, 26, 46-221.
Martins, P. S. and Pereira, P. T. (2004), “Does Education Reduce Wage Inequality? Quantile Regression Evidence from 16 Countries,” Labour Economics, 11, 355-371.
Mincer, J. (1958), “Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution,” Journal of Political Economy, 66, 281-302.
Mincer, J. (1962), “On-the-Job Training: Costs, Returns, and Some Implication,” Journal of Political Economy, 70, 50-79.
Mincer, J. (1970), “The Distribution of Labour Incomes: A Survey with Special Reference to the Human Capital Approach,” Journal of Economic Literature, 8, 1-26.
Mincer, J. (1974), Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, New York & London: Columbia University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research.
Mueller, R. (2000), “Public- and Private-Sector Wage Differentials in Canada Revisited,” Industrial Relations, 39, 375-400.
Plotnick, R. D. (1982), “Trends in Male Earnings Inequality,” Southern Economic Journal, 48, 724-32.
Poterba, J. and Rueben, K. (1995), “The Distribution of Public Sector Wage Premia: New Evidence Using Quantile Regression Methods,” NBER Working Paper No. 4734.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1985), “Return to Education: A Further International Update and Implications,” Journal of Human Resources, 20, 583-604.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1994), “Return to Investment in Education: A Global Update,” World Development, 22, 1325-1344.
Solow, R. M. (1957), “The Range of Education Benefits,” in Psacharopoulos, G. (ed.), Economics and Statistics, 39, 312-320.
Schultz, T. W. (1960), “Capital Formation by Education,” The Journal of Political Economy, 68, 571-583.
Schultz, T. W. (1961), “Investment in Human Capital: Reply” The American Economic Review, 50, 1035-1039.
Schultz, T. W. (1962), “Reflections on Investment in Man,” The Journal of Political Economy, 70, 1-8.
Schultz, T. W. (1963), “The Economic Value of Education,” New York: Columbia University Press.
Tilak, J. B. G. (1989), “Rates of Return to Education and Income Distribution,” De Economist, 197, 454-465.

指導教授

單驥、劉孟俊
(Gee San、Meng-chun Liu)

審核日期

2007-6-27

推文