在營收分享契約下之影片出租業存貨水準與新片期間之決定

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：28

、訪客IP：18.118.164.187

姓名

潘仲川(Chung-Chuan Pan) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

在營收分享契約下之影片出租業存貨水準與新片期間之決定
(Determining Videotape Rental Inventory Level and New Tape Duration under the Revenue-Sharing Contract)

相關論文

★ 以類神經網路探討晶圓測試良率預測與重測指標值之建立	★ 六標準突破性策略—企業管理議題
★ 限制驅導式在製罐產業生產管理之應用研究	★ 應用倒傳遞類神經網路於TFT-LCD G4.5代Cell廠不良問題與解決方法之研究
★ 限制驅導式生產排程在PCBA製程的運用	★ 平衡計分卡規劃與設計之研究-以海軍後勤支援指揮部修護工廠為例
★ 木製框式車身銷售數量之組合預測研究	★ 導入符合綠色產品RoHS之供應商管理-以光通訊產業L公司為例
★ 不同產品及供應商屬性對採購要求之相關性探討－以平面式觸控面板產業為例	★ 中長期產銷規劃之個案探討 -以抽絲產業為例
★ 消耗性部品存貨管理改善研究-以某邏輯測試公司之Socket Pin為例	★ 封裝廠之機台當機修復順序即時判別機制探討
★ 客戶危害限用物質規範研究-以TFT-LCD產業個案公司為例	★ PCB壓合代工業導入ISO/TS16949品質管理系統之研究-以K公司為例
★ 報價流程與價格議價之研究–以機殼產業為例	★ 產品量產前工程變更的分類機制與其可控制性探討-以某一手機產品家族為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

影片出租業者該如何去決定其新片的庫存水準？由於影片出租業的需求隨著時間的變化一直在遞減，所以有關於這種情況的訂貨策略可分為兩方面來探討：(i) 期初的影片訂購數量及(ii) 新片在新片架上的擺放時間應訂為多長才能使得利潤最大。在租片的期間為已知情況下及需求為確定型的線性需求函數下，本研究將發展出一基本的數學模型去描述新片期間訂定的長短會如何去影響到影片出租商的利潤。之後將會把基本模型擴充，即在基本模型中加入營收分享契約並探討加入營收分享契約後是否能夠達成雙贏的局面。本研究將使用quasi-gradient演算法去求得最佳的期初新片訂購量、新片期間及利潤分享係數以最大化整個供應鏈的利潤。
最後，本研究將透過數學實驗分析去探討營收分享契約是否能夠去整合供應鏈及對於整個供應鏈利潤的影響為何，並討論利潤分享係數該如何訂定才能使得供應鏈中的成員達成雙贏的局面。

摘要(英)

How should a video rental shop replenish its stock of new tapes over time? Any such policy should consist of two key dimensions: (i) the number of tapes purchased initially; and (ii) when to remove a videotape from the front shelves and replace it by a newly released one. Consider a retailer that rents videotapes to customers for a pre-specified rental duration. By the deterministic linear rental demand and return process, we first develop a basic model that is intended to analyze the impact of new tape rental period on the retailer’s profit in this study. Then we extend this basic model to the case in which a supplier offers a revenue sharing contract to a retailer. In the extension model, we investigate whether the revenue-sharing contract can achieve the win-win conditions or not.
We use the quasi-gradient algorithm to determine the optimal initial inventory level and the new tape rental period to maximize the supply chain’s profit under basic model and extension model.
In numerical experiment, we investigate the impact of the revenue-sharing contract and whether the revenue-sharing contract can achieve the win-win conditions or not. Then, we show that the value of have an exact range to achieve the win-win conditions. Finally, we will show that revenue sharing contract can optimize the chain and bring win-win conditions to the players in the video rental industry.

關鍵字(中)

★ 營收分享
★ 影片出租
★ 供應鏈

關鍵字(英)

★ revenue sharing
★ video rental
★ supply chain

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
Contents iii
List of figures iv
List of tables v
Chapter 1　Introduction 1
1.1 Research background and motivation 1
1.2 Problem description 3
1.3 Research objectives 3
1.4 Research framework 4
Chapter 2　Literature review 6
2.1 Revenue-sharing contract 6
2.2 The video rental industry 8
Chapter 3　Mathematical model 16
3.1 Model structure 17
3.1.1 Assumptions and notations 17
3.1.2 The rental demand 19
3.2 Model formulation 21
3.2.1 Basic model 21
3.2.2 Extensions 29
Chapter 4　Numerical experiment and sensitivity analysis 35
4.1　Data setting 35
4.2　Numerical example 36
4.2.1 The economics of revenue-sharing 36
4.2.2 The effect of new tape rental period 39
4.2.3 The effect of revenue-sharing rate 40
4.3　Sensitivity analysis 42
4.3.1 The effect of holding cost 43
4.3.2 The effect of demand function’s parameter: 46
4.3.3 The effect of demand function’s parameter: 49
Chapter 5　Conclusions and future research 53
5.1　Conclusions 53
5.2　Future research 54
Reference 55

參考文獻

1. Andrew, A., D. Xavier., Z. Fred. 2005. Modeling movie life cycles and market share. Marketing Science. 24(3) 508-517.
2. Barry, A. 2001. The capacitated newsboy problem with revenue sharing. Journal of applied mathematics and decision sciences. 5(1) 21-33.
3. Cachon, G., M. Lariviere. 2001. Turning the supply chain into a revenue chain. Harvard Business Review. (March) 20-21.
4. Cachon, G. 2002. Supply chain Coordination with contracts. Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
5. Cachon, G., M. Lariviere. 2005. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: strengths and limitations. Management Science. 51 30-44.
6. Dana, J., K. Spier. 2001. Revenue sharing and vertical control in the video rental industry. Journal of Industry Economics. 59(3) 223-245.
7. Giannoccaro, I., P. Pontrandolfo. 2004. Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts. International Journal of Production Economics. 89 131-139.
8. Gerchak, Y., R.K. Cho., S. Ray. 2006. Coordination of quantity and shelf-retention timing in the video movie rental industry. IIE Transactions. 38 525-536.
9. Koulamas, K. 2006. A newsvendor problem with revenue sharing and channel coordination. Decision sciences. 37 91-100.
10. Lehmann, D., C. Weinberg. 2000. Sales through sequential distribution channels: an application to movies and videos. Journal of Marketing. 64 18-33.
11. Luo, S., M. Cakanyildirim. 2005. Pricing and production games under revenue sharing and information updates. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management. 4 270-301.
12. Mortimer, J.H. 2002. The effects of revenue-sharing contracts on welfare in vertically-separated markets: evidence from the video rental industry. Working paper, Harvard University.
13. Melville, J.U. 1971. The limitaions of revenue sharing. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 397 48-59.
14. Neil, K., J. Kalvenes. 2005. The market for video on demand. Working paper, Southern Methodist University, Dallas.
15. Pasternack, B., Z. Drezner. 1999. The videotape rental model. Journal of Applied Mathematics & Decision Sciences. 3(2) 163-170.
16. Satyaveer, S.C., P. Jean. 2005. Analysis of a supply chain partnership with revenue sharing. International Journal of Production Economics. 97 44-51.
17. Sarang, D., S.T. Christopher. 2005. Optimal procurement, disposal and pricing policies for managing rental goods. International transactions in operational research. 12 595-629.
18. Tang, C.S., C. Deo. 2004. Issue arising from managing a rental store: rental duration, inventory, rental price and competition. Working paper, UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles, CA.
19. Timmer, J.B. 2004. The effects of win-win conditions on revenue-sharing contracts. Working paper, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
20. Timmer, J.B. 2005. The effects of outside opportunity profits on the implementation of revenue-sharing contracts. Working paper, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
21. Tainiter, M. 1964. Some stochastic models for rental situations. Management Science. 11(2) 316-326.
22. Varian, H.R. 2000. Buying, sharing and renting information goods. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 48(4) 473-488.
23. Venugopal, V. 2005. Using revenue sharing to create win-win in the video rental supply chain. Journal of Operational Research Society. 56 757-762.
24. William, D.W. 1967. A stochastic inventory model for rented equipment. Management Science. 13(9) 640-647.
25. Zhaoqiong, Q., Y. Jian. 2004. Analysis of a revenue-sharing Contract in supply chain management. Working paper, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark.

指導教授

沈國基(Gwo-Ji Sheen)

審核日期

2007-7-21

推文