公共資本與台灣經濟成長

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：4

、訪客IP：3.140.185.147

姓名

許晉輔(Chin-Fu Hsu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

公共資本與台灣經濟成長
(Public Capital and Taiwan Economic Growth)

相關論文

★ 我國LED照明產業技術進步之研究:可計算一般均衡模型之應用	★ 亞洲國家石油消費之實證研究
★ 1999-2010年影響臺灣家庭貧窮現象之因素	★ 台灣區域GDP估計與都會區發展研究
★ 從產業關聯表檢視美國再工業化成效	★ 從產業關聯表檢視中國大陸進口替代之情形
★ 事業廢棄物清除處理之分析：綠色國民所得帳與CGE模型之應用	★ 空氣污染防制政策與綠色國民所得之一般均衡分析
★ 台灣水污染防治效果的一般均衡分析	★ 開放體系下之資本移動性與貨幣政策目標效果
★ 解構證券交易所成功要素--跨國性研究，兼論台灣與香港證交所之競爭	★ 臺指期貨選擇權套利效率性之研究
★ 制度與經濟成長	★ 台灣領先指標對景氣循環預測能力的探討
★ 國外波動對台灣經濟的影響：動態隨機一般均衡模型之應用	★ 三篇能源經濟的應用

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

內生成長理論知名學者Paul Romer與Robert Lucas，認為人力資本係重要成長引擎，Aghion-Howitt與Grossman-Helpman著重於研究發展及知識技術創新在經濟成長中所扮演的角色，而Barro與Fisher-Turnovsky則認為政府扮演成長中重要的角色。本文修改 Sedgley模型，同時考慮上述諸項目，亦即人力資本、知識資本與公共資本，將此三種資本與民間部門資本共列後，再加上「公共政度」 (以貪污指數表示)之影響，進行實證分析。
由於生產力是一種長期的現象，不應受到短期的暫時性衝擊影響，本文先採用由黃鍔所提出的Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT)方法中的經驗模態分析法 (Empirical Mode Decomposition)處理，將短期影響由變數中分離出來，其後，考慮內生性問題的存在，本文使用向量誤差修正模型 (vector error correction model, VECM)作為實證分析工具。OLS實證結果發現公共資本之產出彈性為0.026，而VECM結果發現經濟成長與上述諸變數間存有共整合關係，而由共整合向量可看出，知識資本的產出彈性為0.234，民間部門資本產出彈性為0.446，公共資本產出彈性為0.577，人力資本產出彈性為0.185，政府制度產出彈性為0.146，除公共資本產出彈性較文獻稍偏高外，其餘變數之產出彈性與文獻相比皆落在合理範圍內。

摘要(英)

Paul Romer and Robert Lucas, the famous economist in endogenous growth theory, assume human capital is the primary growth engine. Aghion-Howitt and Grossman-Helpman focus on the role of R&D and innovation in growth. Barro and Fisher-Turnovsky assume the government is the important role in growth. In empirical analysis, this paper modify Sedgley’s model and join above-mention capitals (i.e. human capital, knowledge capital and public capital), private capital and institution (substituted by corruption index) simultaneously.
Because productivity is a long-term economy phenomenon, the short-term impulse can not influence it. This paper also use the Empirical Mode Decomposition, the primary method of Hilbert-Huang Transform developed by Huang, to decompose the short-term impulse from the original data. In order to avoid the endogeneity problem, I use the vector error correction model as the empirical analysis tool. With the OLS empirical result, the output elasticity of public capital is 0.026. With the VECM empirical result, we can conclude that these six variable are cointegrated and the cointegration vector present that the output elasticity of knowledge capital is 0.234, private capital is 0.446, public capital is 0.577, human capital is 0.185 and institution is 0.146. Except the output elasticity of public capital is larger than literatures, the elasticity of other variables which compared to literatures are in the reasonable range.

關鍵字(中)

★ 公共制度
★ 向量誤差修正模型
★ 經驗模態分析
★ 內生成長理論

關鍵字(英)

★ VECM
★ EMD

論文目次

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
壹、緒論及文獻探討 1
一、緒論 1
二、人力資本與經濟成長 4
三、知識資本與經濟成長 6
四、公共資本與經濟成長 7
五、政府制度與經濟成長 10
貳、理論模型與研究方法 13
一、理論模型 13
二、經驗模態分析法 16
三、實證方法 19
參、實證資料與實證結果 26
一、實證資料 26
二、實證結果 33
肆、結論 38
參考文獻 40

參考文獻

1. 行政院主計處 (2006)，「93年國富統計報告」。
2. 行政院主計處 (1991)，「台灣地區資本生產力統計衡量之研究」。
3. 行政院主計處 (2006)，「多因素生產力趨勢分析報告」。
4. 行政院主計處 (2005)，「國民所得統計年報」。
5. 徐宜霙 (1996)，「財政支出對經濟成長之影響的研究－台灣之實證經驗」，國立政治大學財政研究碩士論文。
6. 郭鳳純 (2004)，「公共基礎建設與經濟成長－台灣之實證研究」，國立台北大學財政研究所碩士論文。
7. 莊奕琦、趙振英 (1999)，「人力資本與經濟成長外生性檢定與因果分析-以台灣實證為例」，中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書， 46， 79-107。
8. 楊亦農 (2005)，「時間序列分析－經濟與財務上之應用」。
9. 趙振瑛 (1998)，「人力資本與經濟成長關係之研究」，國立政治大學經濟研究所博士論文。
10. 謝麗真 (2003)，「人力資本影響台灣經濟成長之再探討」，淡江大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
11. Aschauer, D.A. (1989), “Is Public Expenditure Productive?”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 177-200.
12. Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1992), “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction”, Econometrica, 60, 323-351.
13. Barreto, R. A. (2000), “endogenous Corruption in a Neoclassical Growth Model”, European Economic Review, Vol.44, 63-76.
14. Barro, R. J. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth', Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 103-117.
15. Barro, R. J. (1991), “Economic growth in cross section of countries”, Quarterly Journal of Economic, 106, 407-443.
16. Barro, R. J. and J.W.Lee (1993), “International comparisons of educational attainment”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 363-394.
17. Barro, R. J., and X.Sala-i-Martin.(1992c), “Public Finance in Models of Economic Growth”, Review of Economic Studies, 59, 645-661.
18. Cashin, P. (1995), “Government Spending, Taxes and Economic Growth”, IMF Staff Papers, 42(2), 237-269.
19. Domer, E.D. (1946), “Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment”, Econometrica, 137-147.
20. Engelbrecht, H. (2003), “Human capital and economic growth: cross-section evidence for OECD countries”, Economic Record,79, 40 – 51.
21. Walter, E. (1995), “Applied Econometric Time Series”, 2nd ed., New York: Wiley.
22. Etsuro, S. (2001), “Public Capital and Economic Growth : A Covergence Approach”, Journal of Economic Growth, 6, 205-227.
23. Evans, P. and Karras, G. (1994), “Are Government Activities Productive? Evidence from a Panel of U.S. states”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(1), 1-11.
24. Fisher, T. and Turnovsky, S. (1998), “Public Investment, Congestion, and Private Capital Accumulation”, Economic Journal, 108, 399-413.
25. Futagami, K., Y., Morita, and Shibata, A. (1993), “Dynamic Analysis of an Endogenous Growth Model with Public Capital”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 607-625.
26. Garcia-Milà A. T., McGuire, T. J. and Porter, R. H. (1995), “The Effectsof Public Capital in State-Level Production Functions Reconsidered”, Review of Economics and Statistics.
27. Glomm, G. and Ravikumar, B. (1994), “Public Investment in Infrastructure in a Simple Growth Model”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18, 1173-1187.
28. Glomm, G., and Ravikumar, B. (1997), “Productive Government Expenditures and Long-run Growth”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21, 183-204.
29. Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991a), “Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy”, (Cambridge: MIT Press.)
30. Gwartney, J. D., Holcombe R. G. and Lawson, R. A. (2006), “Institutions and the Impact of Investment on Growth”, International Review for Social Sciences, Vol. 59, 2, 255–273.
31. Gwartney, J. and Lawson, R. (2003), “The concept and measurement of economic freedom”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 19, 3, 405-430.
32. Harrod, R. F. (1939), “An Essay in Dynamic Theory”, Economic Journal, 14-33.
33. Huang, N.E., Shen, Z., Long, S.R., Wu, M.C., Shih, E.H., Zheng, Q., Tung, C.C. and Liu, H.H. (1998), “The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis”, Proceedings of the Royal Society London, A454, 903-995.
34. Huang, N.E., Wu, M.L., Qu, W. , Long, S. R. and Shen S. S. P. (2003), “Applications of Hilbert-Huang transform to non-stationary financial time series analysis”, Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, Vol. 19, 3, 245-268.
35. Huntington, Samuel P. (1968), “Political Order in Changing Societies,” New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. Jones, C. I. (1995a), “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 759-784.
37. ——— (1995b), “Time series tests of endogenous growth models”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 495-525.
38. ——— (1999), “Growth: With or without Scale Effects?”, American Economic Review, Paper and Proceedings, 139-144.
39. Leff, N. (1964), “Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption”, American Behavioral Scientist, 8-14.
40. Lin, T. C. (2004), “The role of higher education in economic development: an empirical study of Taiwan case”, Journal of Asian Economics, 15, 355-371.
41. Lucas, R. E. (1998), “On the mechanics of economic development”, Journal of Monetary economics, 22, 3-42.
42. Mankiw, N. G., Romer D. and Weil, D. N. (1992), “A contribution to the empirics of economic growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407-438.
43. Mauro, P. (1995), “Corruption and Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 3, pp. 681–712.
44. ——— (1996), “The Effects of Corruption on Growth, Investment, and Government Expenditure”, IMF Working Paper 96/98 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
45. Murphy, K., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1991), "Allocation of Talent: Implications for Growth", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106.
46. Romer, P. M. (1986), “Increasing returns and long-run growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.
47. ——— (1990), “Endogenous technological change”, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-103.
48. Solow, R. (1956), “A contribution to the theory of economic growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.
49. Segerstorm, P. (1998), “Endogenous Growth without Scale Effect”, American Economic Review, 88(5), 1290-1310.
50. Sedgley, N. H. (2006), “A Time Series Test of Innovation-Driven Endogenous Growth”, Economic Inquiry, 44(2), 318-332.
51. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1993), “Why Is Rent-Seeking So Costly to Growth?”, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 83, No. 2, 409–14.
52. Swan, T. W. (1956), “Economic growth and capital accumulation”, Economic Record, 32, 334-361.
53. Tallman, E.W. and Wang, P. (1994), “Human capital and endogenous growth:evidence from Taiwan”, Journal of Monetary Econ0mics, 34, 101-124.
54. Tullock, G. (1996), “Corruption Theory and Practice”, Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol.24, No.3, 6-13.

指導教授

朱雲鵬(Yun-Peng Chu)

審核日期

2007-7-15

推文