組織變革與技術別薪資差異之關係：以臺灣製造業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：13

、訪客IP：18.224.64.226

姓名

林世杰(Shih-Chieh Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

組織變革與技術別薪資差異之關係：以臺灣製造業為例
(Organizational Change and Wage Differential of the Different Skill Level：Evidence of Taiwan Manufacturing Industries)

相關論文

★ 國際貿易對勞動需求彈性之影響分析－以臺灣上市櫃製造業公司為例	★ 心理資本、薪資水準與工作努力程度關係之研究：以某跨國企業為例
★ 人口政策與生男偏好之城鄉分析	★ 臺灣本籍與外籍配偶生育差異之分析
★ 全民健保與少子高學歷對台灣老人居住安排之影響分析	★ 會計師執照價值及其薪資不均之研究
★ 效率工資理論測試--離職率模型台灣之實証研究	★ 台灣學用配合度與經濟成長關係之研究
★ 工作風險對世代間行業選擇之影響－以製造業為例	★ 長期照護機構之勞動要素需求探討
★ The Impact of Unemployment on Crime in Europe	★ 中國大陸薪資不均、教育溢酬與貿易開放關係之研究
★ 三角貿易、利潤分享與薪資成長:以台灣製造業為例	★ 職業區隔程度對男女薪資差異之影響分析
★ Phillips Curve from Psychological Perspectives	★ 台灣景氣循環對勞動市場影響之探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來企業組織在因應快速變遷與競爭激烈的國際市場，進行了所謂的業務電子化與技術升級的相關策略，並且針對組織的型態也做了相當的調整與變革。本文利用臺灣經濟部製造業經營實況調查資料與行政院主計處人力運用調查報告資料，作為主要的研究資料庫，並以製造業為主體來估計組織變革的情況與高/低技術階層勞工薪資變化的關係。本研究以二元（binary）與排序（ordered）兩種Probit 模型估計製造業二分類行業實施組織變革的決定因素，並依據勞工就業的產業別引入Mincerian 的薪資方程式，以期瞭解組織變革對於高/低技術水準勞工之薪資差異的影響。實證結果發現，影響組織變革的因素中，廠商規模的大小、產業R&D的比率、對外競爭國家的先進程度以及電子商務的使用對於組織變革存在著正向顯著的影響；另外，廠商著重於銷售的策略的調整以及推展業務電腦化的困難程度對於組織變革則會造成負向顯著的影響。而組織變革之發生對於高技術勞工之薪資具正向但不顯著的結果，但是，組織變革對低技術勞工的薪資則呈現負向顯著的影響。因此，吾人認為臺灣企業組織型態之改變將造成高/低技術勞工薪資差距變大的結果，換言之，臺灣製造業高/低技術勞工薪資之不均度可能因為企業組織的改造與變革而擴大。

摘要(英)

In an era of rapid technological improvement, business is facing an increasingly competitive international market. Many corporations have adopted necessary adjustments on their organization, such as electronic business and technological upgrading. The main goal of this paper is to investigate the determinants of the changes in organizational change, as well as its impact on wage inequality between workers of different skills. As such, two databases were employed for empirical research, i.e., the Operations Strategies of the Manufactures Surveys and Manpower Utilization Survey in Taiwan. At the first stage, I estimate the probability of organizational change (OC) for Taiwan’s manufacture firms by the binary and ordered probit model. It is then being employed in the wage determination equation which aims to study the impact of OC on wage equation and wage differential. Empirical result shows that firm size, internet use, industry’s R&D, exporting competitor and electronic commerce are of significant positive influence on a firm’s probability of adopting the OC policy. However, as long as the firms suffer from the difficulties of technological upgrading or business computerization problem, they are less likely to adopt the OC policies. In addition, increases in the OC probability will lower the wages of the low skilled but not the wages of the high skilled. In sum, the adoption of the OC policies in Taiwan’s manufacture firms will raise the wage differential between workers of different skills.

關鍵字(中)

★ 技術變動
★ 薪資差異
★ 組織變革

關鍵字(英)

★ technical change
★ organizational change
★ wage differential

論文目次

壹、緒論 1
1.1 組織變革的發展與沿革 1
1.2 組織變革與技術需求的轉變 2
1.3 研究目的 3
1.4 研究架構說明 3
貳、文獻回顧與說明 4
2.1 組織變革的定義與利弊 4
2.2 組織變革的決定因素 6
2.3 技術變動、組織變革與薪資之關係 7
參、實證模型設定 13
3.1 資料來源說明 13
3.1.1 製造業經營實況調查 14
3.1.2 民國93年製造業經營實況調查B表 14
3.1.3 民國94年製造業經營實況調查A表 15
3.2 組織變革模型－The Binary Probit Model 15
3.2.1 以ISO來定義組織變革 16
3.2.2 以業務電腦化所帶來的變革效果來定義 19
3.3 組織變革模型－The Ordered Probit Model 20
3.3.1 以ISO來定義 21
3.3.2 以業務電腦化所帶來的變革效果來定義 22
3.4 薪資方程式 23
肆、變數之基本統計說明 25
4.1 製造業經營實況調查 25
4.2 人力運用調查資料 27
伍、實證結果 33
5.1 組織變革之實證結果－The Binary Probit Model 33
5.1.1 以ISO定義組織變革 33
5.1.2 以業務電腦化帶來的變革效果定義組織變革 35
5.2 組織變革之實證結果－The Ordered Probit Model 36
5.3 薪資方程式之實證結果 37
5.3.1 以職業類別作為技術與非技術勞工之分類 38
5.3.2 以教育程度別作為技術與非技術勞工之分類 41
陸、結論與建議 54
6.1 影響組織變革相關因素 54
6.2 組織變革相關變數對於實質薪資的影響 55
6.3 對企業組織的建議 56
6.4 對政府政策的建議 57
6.5 研究限制與未來研究建議 57
柒、參考文獻 61
捌、附錄 64

參考文獻

林世杰與黃麗璇（2007），「組織變革對技術別薪資差異之影響」，第八屆全國實證經濟學論文研討會，臺南：國立成功大學經濟學系主辦。
林欽榮，（2004），組織理論與管理，臺北：揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
陳光榮（1999），「組織變革之探討-以高科技產業為例」，《經濟情勢暨評論季刊》，第5卷第3期， 57-79頁。
黃臺心（2005），計量經濟學，臺北：雙葉書廊有限公司。
鄒孟文與劉錦添（1999），「先進技術與工資報酬: 臺灣電子業之實證」，《經濟論文叢刊》，第27輯第3期， 285-309頁。
Acemoglu, D.（2002）, “Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 40, No. 1., pp. 7-72.
Aitchison, J. and S. D. Silvey（1957）, “The Generalization of Probit Analysis to the Case of Multiple Responses,” Biometrika, Vol. 44, No. 1/2., pp. 131-140.
Ashford, R.（1959）, “An approach to the analysis of data for semi-quantal responses in biological response,” Biometrics, Vol. 15, No. 4., pp. 573-581.
Autor, D., L. F. Katz and A. B. Krueger（1998）, “Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market?,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 113, No. 4, pp. 1169-1213.
Bauer, T. and S. Bender（2001）, “Flexible Work Systems and the Structure of Wages: Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data,” The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Discussion Paper, No. 353, pp. 1-38.
Bauer, T. and S. Bender（2004）, “Technological Change, Organizational Change, and Job Turnover,” Labour Economics, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 265–291.
Berman, E., J. Bound and Z. Griliches（1994）, “Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U.S. Manufacturing: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufacturers,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, No.2, pp. 367-397.
Bertschek, I. and A. Spitz（2003）, “IT, Organizational Change and Wages,” Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW Mannheim), Discussion Paper, No. 03-69, pp. 1-27.
Bertschek, I. and U. Kaiser（2004）, “Productivity Effects of Organizational Change: Microeconometric Evidence,” Management Science, Vol. 50, Issue 3, pp. 394–404.
Black, S., L. M. Lynch, and A. Krivelyova（2004）, “How Workers Fare When Employers Innovate,” Industrial Relations, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 44-66.
Bresnahan, T., E. Brynjolfsson and L. M. Hitt（2002）, “Information Technology, Workplace Organization, And The Demand For Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 117, Issue 1, pp. 339-376.
Caroli, E. and J. V. Reenen（2001）, “Skill-Biased Organizational Change? Evidence From A Panel Of British And French Establishments,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 4, pp. 1449-1492.
Caroli, E., N. Greenan and D. Guellec（2001）, “Organizational Change and Skill Accumulation,” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 481-506.
Cappelli, P.（1996）, “Technology and Changing Skill Requirements: Implications for Establishment Wage Structures,” New England Economic Review, Special issue, pp. 139-154.
Cappelli, P. and S. L. Wilk（1997）, “Understanding Selection Processes: Organization Determinants and Performance Outcomes,” mimeo, Wharton School, U. Pennsylvania.
Daft, R.（2001）, “Organization theory and design,” Cincinnati, Ohio : South-Western College Publishing.
Falk, M.（2001）, “Organizational Change, New Information and Communication Technologies and the Demand for Labor in Services,” Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW Mannheim), Discussion Paper, No. 01-25. pp. 161-189.
Falk, M.（2002）, “Endogenous organizational change and the expected demand for different skill groups,” Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 9, Issue 7, pp. 419-423.
Goldberger, S.（1964）, “Economic Theory,” John Wiley ＆ Sons, Inc., New York, USA.
Levitt, J.（1965）, “Applied Organizational Change in Industry: Structural, Technological and Humanistic Approaches,” in Handbook of Organizations, ed. James G., pp.1144-1168.
Osterman, P.（1994）, “How Common Is Workplace Transformation And Who Adopts It? ,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 173-188.
Thesmar, D. and M. Thoenig（2000）, “Creative Destruction and Firm Organization Choice, ” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 115, No. 4, pp. 1201-1237.

指導教授

黃麗璇(Li-hsuan Huang)

審核日期

2007-7-2

推文