博碩士論文 944301028 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:5 、訪客IP:34.231.21.123
姓名 黃秀米(Hsiu-mi Huang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系在職專班
論文名稱 以AHP法探討伺服器品牌大廠的供應商遴選指標的權重決定分析
(To analyze the criteria and weight of vendor selection for worldwide server brand companies by AHP model)
相關論文
★ 在社群網站上作互動推薦及研究使用者行為對其效果之影響★ 以AHP法探討智慧型手機產業營運中心區位選擇考量關鍵因素之研究
★ 太陽能光電產業經營績效評估-應用資料包絡分析法★ 建構國家太陽能電池產業競爭力比較模式之研究
★ 以序列採礦方法探討景氣指標與進出口值的關聯★ ERP專案成員組合對績效影響之研究
★ 推薦期刊文章至適合學科類別之研究★ 品牌故事分析與比較-以古早味美食產業為例
★ 以方法目的鏈比較Starbucks與Cama吸引消費者購買因素★ 探討創意店家創業價值之研究- 以赤峰街、民生社區為例
★ 以領先指標預測企業長短期借款變化之研究★ 應用層級分析法遴選電競筆記型電腦鍵盤供應商之關鍵因子探討
★ 以互惠及利他行為探討信任關係對知識分享之影響★ 利用資料探勘技術探討北台灣地區機動車輛稅費繳納模式
★ 以資料挖礦方法發掘臍帶血品質診斷規則★ 自企業資料庫挖掘和彙整商情規則之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 在國際化及愈趨競爭的環境裡,企業為提昇整體績效與利益,擴大市佔率並加強競爭力,對供應商的角色已重新定位,不再視其為敵人,並開始建立長久的策略夥伴關係。夥伴關係需建立強而有力的基礎,才能長久持續。因此成功的供應商管理必須建立在選擇有競爭潛力的供應商。在此種策略觀點下,由於供應商只有少數的買方,使得供應商免於在市場上與其它供應商競爭。而對於買方,則可享受垂直整合的利益,而不必做相對等的投資與承擔經營風險。簡言之,供應商的獲利和成長與其市場競爭不再相關,而是與買方同享獲利與成長。
由此可知,如果要想在國際企業上的競爭力有所提升,那麼供應商管理是一個不可避免的重要課題。知名國際品牌大廠如何選擇具有競爭潛力的供應商變得非常重要,選擇供應商的標準需符合企業的需求,但是供應商的選擇標準眾多,而且每家企業所重視的選擇標準也不盡相同,因此本研究極欲尋找出伺服器知名國際品牌大廠評選供應商的標準為何及所重視的優先順序,並以此為出發點來深刻探討並進行相關的分析與研究。
本研究初期經由文獻探討,及伺服器知名國際品牌大廠採購專家訪談後,將供應商選擇標準分為:一.成本;二.品質; 三.交貨; 四.技術;五.售後服務,在五個重要的準則之下共有十九個子因素。運用分析層級程序法(AHP),針對實務界專家進行問卷調查,匯集專家意見後,歸納出於準則及屬性之間的權重高低,以供伺服器品牌大廠於評選供應商之參考,同時亦提供給伺服器的供應商於內部資源分配及接單準備時應注意之事項。
摘要(英) In the international and more competitive environment ,the role of suppliers is re-defined by the enterprise in order to increase the performance & benefit, broaden market share and enhance competitiveness. The supplier is not regarded as an enemy and the enterprise turn to develop long-term and strategic partnership. The partnership develops on a robust base and can be continue to extend. Therefore, successful supplier management is base on competitive vendor selection. In terms of strategy, suppliers only focus on keeping business relationship with a few buyers, which can avoid to compete with other suppliers. The buyers corresponsive can gain benefit of vertical integration without making equivalent investment and bearing operation risk. In brief, both suppliers and buyers can gain benefit and grow together.
Therefore, in order to enhance the competitiveness in the international enterprise, vendor management is an essential. It is very important to select competitive suppliers for the worldwide brand companies .The criteria of vendor selection has to comply with the companies’ demand. There’s too much criteria of vendor selection and the demand to each company is also different. Therefore, the research is investigating the criteria of vendor selection for the worldwide brand companies and understands the priority. The analysis and research will be made based on the above criteria.
In the research, the vendor selection criteria are generated based on the reference and comments from the procurement experts in worldwide brand server companies. It includes five main key factors :“ cost, quality, delivery, technology and after service” and 19 sub factors under the main key factors. Through the collection of questionnaires and the analysis of AHP, the priority of each criteria will be turned out. The analysis result can be not only for the reference of famous brand server companies to do vendor selection, but also provided to server suppliers for internal resource allocation and further business preparation.
關鍵字(中) ★ 供應商管理
★ 供應商遴選標準
★ 分析層級程序法
關鍵字(英) ★ vendor management
★ Vendor selection criteria
★ The Analysis Hierarchy Process
論文目次 中文摘要i
英文摘要ii
誌謝辭iv
目錄v
圖目錄vii
表目錄ix
第一章 緒論1
1-1 研究背景1
1-2 研究動機6
1-3 研究目的8
1-4 研究流程9
第二章 文獻探討11
2-1 供應商選擇標準11
2-1-1 供應商與客戶關係的演變11
2-1-2 供應商評選的方法13
2-1-3 供應商評選的要素18
2-2 分析層級研究法22
2-2-1 分析層級層序法之概念22
2-2-2 分析層級層序法之基本假設23
2-2-3 分析層級層序法之評估尺度24
2-2-4 分析層級研究法應用範圍25
第三章 研究設計與方法27
3-1 研究架構27
3-2 供應商評選要素之問卷設計30
3-3 究方法與過程39
4-1 伺服器品牌大廠的供應商遴選指標的準則分析45
4-2 伺服器品牌大廠的供應商遴選指標考量屬性分析48
4-3 結論驗證63
第五章 結論與建議64
5-1 研究結果與討論64
5-2 未來建議66
參考文獻68
中文部分68
英文部分69
附錄73
參考文獻 中文部分:
1. 山口孝逸(葉彬)著,購買對象之選定, 民國71年。
2. 何秉衡,「政府採購法下資訊技術委外決策支援系統之研究」,銘傳大學資訊管理研究所,碩士論文,民國88年。
3. 林千仁,「供應商選擇標準與供應商發展活動對製造績效影響之研究」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國89年。
4. 林英峰,生產與作業管理講義-全球供應鏈管理之趨勢與運用,民國89年。
5. 柯特(Kolter,P.)著,行銷學原理,王志剛編譯,華泰書局,台北,民國73年。
6. 陳啟政,「運用總品質成本分析之供應商績效評估模式」,中原大學,博士論文,民國92年。
7. 陳曉琪,「供應商遴選之決策支援系統之研究」,義守大學,碩士論文,民國90年。
8. 粘珊珊,「以AHP 法探討CRM 系統遴選決策準則」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國94年。
9. 曾國雄、鄧振源,「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)」,中國統計學報,第二十七卷第六期,5-22頁,民國78年。
10. 黃子賢,「供應商遴選模式之建立」,國立雲林技術學院工業管理技術系國科會大學生參與專題研究計畫成果報告,民國86年。
11. 黃智偉,「供應鏈管理下供應商選擇評估之研究─以台灣地區中衛體系之汽機車業與電腦資訊業為例」,國立雲林科技大學,碩士論文,民國89年。
12 賴宣名,全球供應鏈管理,遠擎管理顧問股份有限公司,民國91年。
英文部分
1. Choi, T. Y., Hartley, J. L., “An Explortation of Supplier Selection Practices Across the Supply Chain”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 14, pp.333-343, 1996.
2. Collins, T., “Striking it big together, Supply Management”, Vol 4, Iss 18, pp.28-30, 1999.
3. Dickson, G. W., “An Analysis of Vendor Selection System and Decisions”, Journal of Purchasing 2/1, pp. 5-17,1966.
4. Ellram, L. M.,“ The supplier selection decision in strategic
partnership”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials
Management,26(4), pp.8-14, 1990.
5. Fitzgerald, K. R.,“ For Superb Supplier Development-Honda Wins”, Purchasing, pp.32-40, 1995.
6. Grittner, P., “Four key ways to manage suppliers”, Management Review, American Management Association, New York, Oct 1996.
7. Hahn, C. K., Watts, C.A. and Kim, K. Y. ,“ The supplier
development program: a conceptual model”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26(2), pp.2-7, 1990.
8. Hokey, Min, “International Supplier Selection: A Multi-attribute Utility Approach”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol.24, No.5, pp.24-33, 1994.
9. Khurrum, S. Bhutta, Faizul Huq, Journal: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, ISSN: 1359-8546, Vol 7, Iss 3, pp.126–135, 2002.
10. Krause, D.R., Ellram, L.M., “Critical elements of supplier development – The buying-firm perspective”, European Journal Of Purchasing & Supply Management, 3(1), pp.21—31, 1997.
11. Krishnamurty, M. and Rick L. Wilson, “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Informatation System Project Selection”, Information & management, Vol.18,pp.87-95, 1990.
12. Landeros, R. and Monczka, R. M.,“ Cooperative buyer/seller relationship and a firm’s competitive posture”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 25(3), pp.9-18, 1989.
13. Leavy, B.,“ Two strategic perspective on the buyer-supplier relationship”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, 35(2), pp.47-51, 1994.
14. Lehmann, D. R., and j. O’ Shaughnessy., “Decision Criteria Used in Buying Different Categories of Products”,Journal of Purchasing and Materials, 1982.
15. Maloni, Michael J. and Benton,W. C., ”Supply chain partnerships: Opportunities for operations research”, European Journal of Operational Research 101, pp. 419-429, 1997.
16. Maurizio, B., Alberto, P., “From Traditional Purchasing to Supplier Management: A Fuzzy Logic-based Approach to Supplier Selection”, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol.5, No.3, pp.235-256, 2002.
17. Mummalaneni, Khalid, M. Dubas, Chiang-nan Chao, “Chinese Purchasing Managers’ Preferences and Trade-offs in Supplier Selection and Performance Evaluation”, Industrial Marketing Management, 25, pp.115-124, 1996.
18. Nydick, R. L. and Hill, R. P., “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure the Supplier Selection Procedure”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol 28, No 2, pp.31-36, 1992.
19. Pearson, J. N., Ellram, L. M., “Supplier Selection and Evaluation in Small versus Large Electronics Firms”, Journal of Small Business Management, October 1995.
20. Reck, R.F. and Long, B.G.,“ Purchasing: A Competitive Weapon”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, pp.2-8, 1998.
21. Romero, B. P., “The other side of JIT in supply management”, Production and Inventory management Journal,30(4), pp.1-2 , 1991.
22. Ross David F., “Competing through Supply Chain Management: Creating Market-Winning Strategies Through Supply Chain Partnerships”, London: Chapman & Hall, 1997.
23. Saaty, T. L., The Analysis Hierarchy Process, New York:McGraw Hill, 1980.
24. Stevenson,W. J., Operation Management, New York:McGraw Hill, 2003.8d.
25.Stuart, I. F. and Muller, P. J. ,“ Total quality management
and supplier partnership”, International Journal of Purchasing and
Materials Management, 30(1), pp.14-20, 1994.
26. Swift, C. O., “Preferences for Single Sourcing and Supplier Selection Criteria”, Journal of Business Research,Vol.32,No.2,pp.105-111, 1995.
27. Thompson, K. N. ,“Vendor Profile Analysis”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,Vol.26,Iss.1, pp.11-19, 1990.
28. Timmerman, E., “An Approach to Supplier Performance Evaluation”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management , Vol.22, No.4, pp.72-78, 1986.
29. Trent and Monczka, ”Purchasing and Supply Management: Trends and Changes Throughout the 1990s”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, pp2-11, 1998.
30. Weber, C. A., Current J. R., Anand Desai, “Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection”, European Journal of Operation Research, 108, pp.208-223, 1998.
31. William J. Stevenson. Production/Operations management 4th edition. Boston : Irwin/McGraw-Hill, c1999.
32. Zahedi, F. ,“The Analytic Hierarchy Process-A Survey of The Method and Its Applications”, Interfaces, pp96-108, 1986.
指導教授 許秉瑜 審核日期 2007-12-26
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明