| 摘要(英) |
In Taiwan, high-Tech industry category had transferred from the former traditional manufacturing into design and research step by step. It was called design house mode. The mode not only conforms to the trend of industrial development in this stage, but also matches the current government’’s industrial policy. Although the design house in Taiwan have sprung up in vast numbers, but the real success of the design company does not have much. Why is there such a phenomenon?
Case company (A company) was merged due to the original parent company’s wrong investment strategy. The new parent company analyzed the GPU that it will have large market and potential development, so the A company was set up. In the primary stage, A company had plentiful fund、GPU based design technology, and have experience with the development team over several integration resources, it would be reasonable that the company’s development is boundless. However, having gone through three years of development, through the efforts of the founding period, had to abandon the development of GPU and then transformed into a consumer-oriented product design and development. The NT dollar spent 3 billion yuan of investment, ultimately ended in failure.
Of course, we realize there are many reasons result in fail when we study the case, the thesis uses various theory to analyze the unsuccessful reason of the company, as five competitiveness analysis, SWOT analysis, the Balanced Scorecard analysis, strategy analysis, and so on. And given the case if the company came out once again which can make use of the direction and strategy. The research objectives are as below:
(1), To discuss A Company’s process on the establishment and development, and its product and organization strategy when the company is in the face of various internal and external difficulties and challenges.
(2), Through the study of the theory and literature, the thesis uses various organizations theory、development of the cause of the growth of new steps、five competitiveness analysis、SWOT analysis and balanced scorecard framework as the basis to analyze the unsuccessful reasons about the case company’’s products and organization strategy.
(3), Through the study, we can realize the relationship between the product development strategy and the organizational ability in a start-up company. We can provide related experiences to relevant domestic enterprises when they are in the face of similar market conditions what business strategies they can do.
The research uses the case study method to explore the start-up company in various stages of implementation by the organization and product strategy. In addition to the traditional literature collection methods (related research institutions industry research reports, magazines or books, periodicals, news clippings, References), the most important method is actual to interview the high-ranking executive of the company, Through the way to understand the company’’s strategy actually use at the various stages can avoid to add too much personal subjective judgment of author and to lose the significance of the research.
Many internal start-up companies get used to a customary rule of thumb for investment evaluation. But living environment for the rapid changing era, a start-up companies for investment evaluation need to recourse to modern expertise and organizational management concepts, and the need for market analysis and business management ability to develop and set for operating strategy. The most important point is that we must be preceded with a detailed evaluation before we are in putting in a lot of manpower, material and financial resources.
The thesis referred to the various theories and practices diagnosis, and the company actually case diagnosis methods echo each other. In the future, the start-up company can follow the mode to process when it plans the new product and the direction. I believe that can reduce the undue risk in the start-up company process. The results are as follows:
(1), A start-up company must execute a detailed technological and market analysis before it was set up, and it must use own advantage in product and market positioning, not to set strategies hastily just from their own experience or based on the current market situation without addressing technical measure,
(2), The start-up company wants to succeed, not only by virtue of the capital and technology, but it should be more specific techniques to assess whether it can keep up with today’’s technology manufacturers competition; Meanwhile, we must do overall understanding about the current market’’s competitors to avoid that we are to overestimate to ourselves, and misjudged the situation in the status.
(3), The start-up company for their own internal organization and management must be able to fully utilize and grasp, personnel can bring ability into fully play specifically. Inefficient use of manpower, not just waste human cost, but also whether or not the important factor to success.
(4), The start-up company must have cost control ability, each cent spends on where it is needed most.
The research uses the method of case study, be supplemented by literature analysis methods to diagnose the case company. Although it is only a company’s diagnosis, the research results it is absolutely help for the start-up company form and develop. |
| 參考文獻 |
中文參考書目：
1. Development Dimensions International Company(DDI), Abeam Consulting, The Balance Scorecard 簡報資料 (2006)
2. Tom’s Hardware硬體評測網站, http://www.big5.tomshardware.com/channel/station.asp?id=3
3.王天鴻，2003，「在生技產業之行銷研究—以L醫療檢驗公司為例」，中山大學高階經營碩士班未出版之碩士論文。
4.王泰允，1991，「企業購併實用」，台北 源流出版社。
5.左明，2002，「創業評估分析工具之探索性研究」，私立大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士班碩士論文。
6.司徒達賢，1995，「策略管理」，遠流出版公司。
7.外貿協會市場拓展處網站：http://www.taiwantrade.com.tw/MandA/c_8.htm
8.朱道凱譯，1995，「平衡計分卡」(Robert S.Kaplan & David P. Norton, 1992, The Balance Scorecard)，台北 臉譜出版社。
9.李明軒、邱美如譯，1999，「競爭優勢（上）」（Michael E. Poter, 1985, Competitive Advantage），台北 天下文化。
10.李華夏譯，梭羅(L. Thurow)著，1998，「資本主義的未來」，太平洋世紀叢書，立緒文化事業有限公司。
11.余建志，2003，「組織內外部因素、進入模式及競爭策略與海外市場經營績效之關聯性研究」， 國立成功大學企業管理學系碩博士班之碩士論文
12.官坤林，2004，「台灣晶圓代工產業分析與競爭策略之研究」，國立交通大學管理科學研究所之碩士論文。
13.姜水傳，2002，「台灣多功能事務機廠商競爭策略分析」，國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版之碩士論文
14.財團法人工業技術研究院，2005，「國際合作知識分享網 專業知識-產業分析」， http://www.ipc.itri.org.tw/content/menu-sql.asp?pid=76
15.財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策與資訊中心，2003，「科技產業資訊室網站-產業策略評析」。
16.財團法人國家政策研究基金會，2006，「國政研究報告」。http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/CL/095/CL-R-095-044.htm
17.涂瑞勝，2003，「產品生命週期不同階段廠商採取之策略與其能力之探討-以臺灣主機板產業為例」，臺灣大學會計學研究所之碩士論文。
18.唐淑芬，2002，「我國發光二極體上游廠商的經營策略與競爭優勢之研究 – 以A公司為例」，國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
19.孫名毅，2004，「非營利組織組織功能、工作特性與生命週期之研究--以義勇消防隊為例」，南華大學非營利事業管理研究所碩士論文。
20.個案公司2003~2005年歷屆董事會資料
21.鍾從定，2002，國政研究報告：政府組織再造--組織生命週期與變革，憲政(研)091-053號。
22.黃文喜，2006，「企業構建以自有研發為發展策略之探討-以A公司為例」， 國立中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班未出版碩士論文。
23.莊皓宇，2005，「影響新創事業績效因素之探討-以台灣中小企業為例」， 私立朝陽科技大學企業管理所碩士班未出版碩士論文。
24.郭光料，2005，「新技術基礎廠商的策略定位 以電容式觸控面板產業為例」， 國立中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士學程碩士在職專班未出版碩士論文。
25.許士軍，1981，「管理學」，東華書局。
26.陳永鑫，2002，「台灣新中藥產業價值鏈中價值活動的SWOT分析與發展方向之研究」，國立政治大學經營管理研究所之碩士論文。
27.陳光榮，2002，「提昇傳統產業競爭力之策略與政策建議」，經濟情勢暨評論月刊。
28.湯明哲，2003，「策略精論-基礎篇」，天下遠見出版公司。
29.詹昇峰，2006，「新事業發展策略探討--以E公司進入噴墨頭產業為例」， 國立中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班未出版碩士論文。
30.詹姆斯.萊禮，2004，「組織變革10解」，培生(創智)出版社。
31.楊仁壽、許碧芬、俞慧芸譯，2005，「組織理論與管理：理論與個案」，（Gareth R. Jones, Organizational Theory, Design, and change-Text and Cases(Fourth Edition)），台北 雙葉書廊。
32楊幼蘭譯，1994，「企業再造」，.(Hammer, Michael & Champy, James, Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, New York: Harper Business, 1993.)，牛頓出版社。
33管康彥，1996/02，「國家基礎資訊建設與二十一世紀企業再造」，經濟情勢暨評論月刊。
34.蔡戊鑫，2003，「建構台灣大型企業財務危機預警模式」，國立中正大學國際經濟研究所之碩士論文。
35.鄧欣豪，2003，「創業策略、創業團隊特性與根源對新事業績效之影響-以IC設計業為例」，實踐大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
36.應國卿，1992，「我國企業國際併購之失敗因素研究」，國立台灣科技大學碩士論文。
37.嚴文巧，2003，「產品生命週期之決策模式研究」，國立成功大學工業管理研究所之碩士論文。
英文參考書目：
1. Ansoff, 1957, ”Strategies for Diversification”, p.114.
2. Ansoff, H.I. , 1965, “Corporate Strategy” , New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Barney, D.F. , 1991, “Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations” , Macmillan, Landon, p100.
4. Block, Z. and I. C. MacMillan, 1985, ”Milestones for Successful Venture Planning “, Harvard Business Review, 63(5), pp.184-196.
5. Brockhoff, K. & A. K. Charkabart ,1988, “R&D/Marking Linkage and Innovation Strategy: Some West German Experience” , IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management 35(3), pp.167-184.
6. Daft, R. L. , 2004, “Organization Theory and Design”, (8th Ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South- Western Publishing.
7. Fontes, M. &Coombs, R, 2001, “Contribution of new Technology-based Firms to the strengthening of technological capabilities in intermediate economics Research Policy”, Vol.30(1), p79~p97
8. Galbraith, J. R., 1986, ”Stage of Growth, Journal of Business Strategy”, 3(1), pp. 70-79.
9. Hammer, Michael & Champy, James, 1993, ”Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution”, New York: Harper Business.
10. Heydebreck, P.& Maier, J.C.& Klofsten, M., 2000, ”Innovation Support of New Technology-based Firms. The Swedish Teknopol Approach R&D Management”, Vol.30(1), pp.89-p100.
11. I. Adizes, 1979, ”Organizational Passages: Diagnosing and Treating Life Cycle Problem of Organizations, Organizational Dynamics”, Vol.8, pp.3-25.
12. Jon Paddy Research (JPR), 2005.
13. Johnson, P., 1986, ”New firms: An economic perspective, London, Allen and Un- win.Kay, J.”, 1993. “The Structure of Strategy, Business Strategy Review”, 4(2), Summer, pp.17-37.
14. Kazanjian, R.K., 1988, ”Relation of Dominant Problems to Stages of Growth in Technology-Based New Venture Academy of Management Journal”, 31(2), pp257-279.
15. Kelley, A.J. & Campanella, F.B. & McKiernan, J., 1971, “Venture Capital: A Guidebook for New Enterprises, Mass. “,The Management Institute, School of Management, Boston College, pp33-34.
16. Lussier, R. N., 1995, “A Nonfinancial Business Success Versus Failure Prediction Model For Young Firms”, Journal of Small Business Management, 33(1), pp.7-20.
17. Miles, R.E. and C.C. Snow, 1978, ”Organization Strategies, Structure and Process“, N.Y. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
18. Midgley, D. F., 1981, “Toward a Theory of The Product Life Cycle: Explaining Diversity”, Journal of Marketing, 45(4), pp. 109-115.
19. Michael, E. Porter, 1980, ”Competitive Strategy”, pp.39-41
20. Michael E. Porter, 1985, ”Competitive Advantage”, pp.15-17.
21. Modesto, A. Maidique. and Peter Patch , 1982, “Corporate strategy and Technology Policy”, In Tushman & Moore Eds. , Management of Innovation, Pitman Books Ltd.,pp.283-285.
22. Rickne, A. & Jacobsson, S., 1996, ”New Technology-based Firms-A Exploratory Study of Technology Exploitation and Industrial Renewal”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol(3/4),pp.239-257.
23. Storey, D.J. & Tether B.S., 1998, ”Public Policy Measure to Support New Technology-based Firms in the European Union”, Research Policy ,Vol.26(9), pp.1037-1057.
24.Storey, D.J. & Tether, B.S., 1998, ”New Technology-based Firms in the European Union: An introduction”, Research Policy, Vol.26(9), pp933-946.
25.Weihrich, H., 1982, ”The TOWS Matrix-A Tool for Situational Analysis”, Long Range Planning, April, p60. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit