博碩士論文 944307017 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:45 、訪客IP:3.21.97.51
姓名 石雅雯(Ya-wen Shih)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所在職專班
論文名稱 研發單位對組織管理重視程度與組織研發績效之關聯
(The relation between the attention degree of R&D organization management and R&D performance)
相關論文
★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯-以IC設計產業為例★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響 以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 企業為了提升研發優勢維持其競爭力,而台灣企業面臨全球化市場及大陸低人力成本的挑戰,為了提升競爭力也紛紛轉型致力於研發、設計。統計數字發現各國對於研發資源投入逐年成長,然而研發成果不確定性極高,結果卻常常不如預期。研發組織是一個知識密集的組織,其組織成員、構想、資金來源、組織文化使得其有別於其他部門,管理工作主要是整合許多研發人員的專業、個別單位/部門的協調工作,研究組織管理如何與組織研發績效相關聯,是一個日益重要的主題,也是本研究所探討的主軸。因此本研究希望探討研發單位對組織管理重視程度與組織研發績效之關聯,並分析研發組織規模與研發經費之投入是否干擾研發組織管理與組織研發績效之關係,
本研究透過問卷調查方式,以台灣上市上櫃企業為調查對象,共有136家企業研發單位主管填答,另依據公司公開財報資訊進行分析研究,以組織研發績效—2006年專利數、營業收入作為依變項,研發組織管理為自變項,並將產業別、資產、員工人數作為控制變項,研發組織人數及研發經費投入為研究發展投入變數,探討各變項間的相關性,以及研發組織管理與研發資源投入交戶作用進行階層迴歸分析,以瞭解其對於組織研發績效之關聯,研究結果指出:
(一)填答之研發主管有74%的人認為組織管理為其重要工作任務
(二)研發組織規模及研發經費投入與組織研發績效有顯著相關
(三)研發組織管理對組織研發績效影響之主效果不顯著,但會與研發組織資源產生交
互作用而影響組織研發績效
摘要(英) Enterprises improve the advantage of research and development to maintain their competitiveness. Those of Taiwan face the challenges of the globalization market and China low labor cost. They make the transition and devoted to research, development and designing in order to advance the competitiveness in such a highly changeable circumstance.
The statistic finds various countries increase the investment on R&D resources year by year. But, the uncertainty of research and develop is extremely high, and the result is often not so good as anticipated. R&D organization is a knowledge-intensive organization. Its members, ideas, capital sources, organization culture make it different from other departments in the company. The topic of how organizational management is related with R&D performance is increasingly important, and is the primary objective of this study.
1. to study the relation between the attention degree of R&D organization management and R&D performance
2. to analysis the relation between R&D performance and the interaction of R&D organization scale, expenditure and organization management
Through the research results from the survey of 841 R&D managers of TSEC/GTSM Listed Companies and the return of 136 effective copies were analyzed by means of using hierarchical regression analysis. In this study three significant results are found:
1. 74% of the R&D managers agree that organization management is one of their important
tasks
2. The scale of R&D organization and the R&D expenditure have significantly positive
influence on R&D performance.
3. The organization management has no significant influence on R&D performance, but the
interaction with R&D organization scale and expenditure will influence the R&D performance
關鍵字(中) ★ 研發組織管理
★ 研發經費投入
★ 組織研發績效
關鍵字(英) ★ R&
★ D performance
★ R&
★ D expenditure
★ R&
★ D organization management
論文目次 第一章 緒論..............................................................................................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機....................................................................................................1
第二節 研究目的................................................................................................................4
第二章 文獻探討....................................................................................................................5
第一節 企業研發組織及管理的興起與變化....................................................................5
第二節 研發組織管理與研發績效....................................................................................7
第三節 研發經費與研發組織規模對組織研發績效之影響.............................................11
第三章 研究設計與方法......................................................................................................14
第一節 研究架構………………………….…………………………………………………14
第二節 研究變項及衡量工具……………………………………………….………………15
第三節 資料分析方法……………………………………………………………………… 16
第四章 資料分析與討論........................................................................................................17
第一節 樣本特性分析......................................................................................................17
第二節 相關分析..............................................................................................................21
第三節 迴歸分析.............................................................................................................22
第五章 結論與建議................................................................................................................29
第一節 結論.........................................................................................................................29
第二節 管理意涵.................................................................................................................31
第三節 研究限制及後續研究建議.....................................................................................32
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………..… 37
附錄—問卷………………………………………………………………………………….. 40
參考文獻 一、中文部份
1.行政院國家科技委員會2006年全國科技動態調查。http://www.nsc.gov.tw/tech/pub_data_main.asp
2.曹克、劉立,”論R&D(研究與發展)的企業內部化過程”,(自然辨證法研究), 29-32頁, 1997。
3.薛求知、王輝,”西方企業R&D的演進及其啟示”,(研究發展管理),16(3),28-33頁,2004
4.柳卸林,”不連續創新的第四代研究發展—兼論跨越發展”,(中國工業經濟),150,53-58頁,2001
5.陳松柏,”評估研發績效的新方法—研發槓桿程度衡量法”,國立空中大學管理與資訊學系管理與資訊學》,8,43-58頁,2003
6.吳思華,策略九說,臉譜出版社,民國89年,pp.127-134
7.曾碧芬,「研發主管管理才能與部門績效之研究」,國立中山大學,碩士論文,民國92年
8.張恩浩,「研究發展之影響因素及其與績效關係之研究」,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,民國80年
二、英文部分
1.Alok K. Chakrabarti, “The Competition in High Technology: Analysis of Patents of U.S., Japan, U.K., France, West Germany and Canada”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol 38(1), pp. 78-84, Feb 1991
2.Bean, Alden S., “Why some R&D organizations are more productive than others”, Research Technology Management, Vol 38(1), pp.25-29, Jan-Feb 1995
3.Chandler, G.N. & Hanks, S.H., “Founder Competence, the Environment and Venture Performance”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol18(3), pp.77-89, 1994
4.Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt E. J., ”Winning Business in Product Develop: The Critical Success Factors” , Research Technology Management, Vol 39(4), pp. 19-29, 1996
5.Debra M. Amidon, “The Challenge of Fifth Generation R&D”, Research-Technology Management, Vol 39(4), pp. 33-41, Jul/Aug 1996
6.Golder, P.N. and Tellis, G.J., “Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend”, Jounal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30, pp. 158-170, 1993
7.Grant, Rober M., “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, Vol 33(3), pp. 114, 1991
8.Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J., “Structure Inertia and Organizational Change”, American Sociological Review, Vol 49, pp. 149-164, 1984
9.Hounshell, D.A., “The Evolution of Industrial Research in the United States” , Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1996
10.Jain, R.K. and Triandis, H.C., Management of Research and Development Organizations- Managing the Unmanageable, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., U.S.A, 1997, p18
11.Larson, F. Charles, ”50 Years of Change in Industrial Research and Technology Management”, Research Technology Management, Vol. 50(1), pp.26-31, Jan/Feb, 2007
12.Lev B., Sougiannis T., “The Capitalization, Amortization, and Value-relevance of R&D”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol 21(1), pp. 107-138, Feb 1996
13.Liebermann, M. and Montgomery, D., “First-mover advantages”, Strategic Management Journal, pp. 41-58, 1998
14.Miller, William and Morris, Longdon, Fourth Generation R&D—Managing Knowledge, Technology and Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Canada, 1999
15.Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss and Roger Calantone.(1994), “Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol 11(5), pp. 406, 1994.
16.Morbey, G., “R&D Expenditures and Profit Growth,” Research Technology Management, Vol.32, No.3, pp.20-23, 1989
17.Pearson, Alan W., “Management development for Scientists and Engineers”,
Research Technology Management, Vol 36, pp. 45-48, Jan/Feb 1993。
18.Robert Szakonyi, “Measuring R&D Effectiveness”, Research Technology Management, Vol 37, Mar/April 1994
19.Roussel, Philip, Saad Kamak and Erickson, Tamara, Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy, Arthur D. Little, Inc., U.S.A., 1991
20.Thomas, Patrick and McMillan, G. S., “Using Science and Technology Indicators to Manage R&D as a Business”, Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 13(3), Sept. 2001
指導教授 劉念琪(Nien-Chi Liu) 審核日期 2007-7-18
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明