| 參考文獻 |
參考文獻
劉子鍵和林怡均（2006年10月）。以二階段迷思概念診斷測驗探究高中生之「相關」迷思概念。劉佩雲（主持人），與學習有關之情感與態度。台灣心理學會第45屆年會，台北市東吳大學。
鄭惟厚（2007）。你不能不懂的統計常識。台北市：天下文化。
蕭錦玲（2005)。以模擬為基礎的統計學習軟體之初探性評估研究。中央大學學習與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33, 131-152.
Ainsworth, S., & Van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241-255.
Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 317-337.
Biemans, H. J. A., Deel, O. R., & Simons, P. R. J. (2001). Differences between successful and less successful students while working with the CONTACT-2 strategy. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 265-282.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
Childers, T. L., Houston, M. J., & Heckler, S. E. (1985). Measurement of individual differences in visual versus verbal information processing. The Journal of Consumer Research, 12(2), 125-134.
Cumming, G., Thomason, N., & Zangari, M. (1995). Designing software for cognitive change: StatPlay and understanding statistics. World Conference on Computers in Education (WCCE) IV, Liberating the learner, 753-765.
Curry, L. (1983, April). An organization of learning styles theory and constructs. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
Darley, W. K. (1999). The relationship of antecedents of search and self-esteem to adolescent search effort and perceived product knowledge. Psychology and Marketing, 16(5), 409-427.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.
Effken, J. A., & Doyle, M. (2001). Interface design and cognitive style in learning an instructional computer simulation. Comput Nurs, 19(4), 164-171.
Heckler, S. E., Childers, T. L., & Houston, M. J. (1993). On the construct validity of the SOP scale. Journal of Mental Imagery, 17(3), 119-132.
Hegarty, M. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 343-351.
Jonassen, D. & Grabowski, B. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates,.
Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., Noh, T., & Koh, H. (2005). The influence of students’ cognitive and motivational variables in respect of cognitive conflict and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1037-1058.
Kaput, J. J. (1987). Representation systems and mathematics. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 19–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Keil, F. (1999). Conceptual change In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (1999). The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. pp. 179-182. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kirby, J.R., Moore. P.J., and Schofield, N.J. (1988). Verbal and visual learning styles. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 169-184.
Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949-968.
Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (Sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65-100.
Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 177-189.
Leutner, D., & Plass, J. L. (1998). Measuring learning styles with questionnaires versus direct observation of preferential choice behavior in authentic learning situations: the visualizer/verbalizer behavior observation scale (VV-BOS). Computers in Human Behavior, 14(4), 543-557.
Liu & Kinshuk. (in preparing). Development and evaluation of the Simulation Assisted Learning Statistics (SALS) environment to detect and change students’ statistical misconceptions.
Liu, T. C., & Lin, Y. C. (2005, June). Applying the concept mapping method to explore high school students’ understanding and misconceptions about the “correlation”Paper presented at the meeting of 2005 International Conference on Learning, Teaching and Assessment, Taiwan, Taipei.
Liu, T. C., Chen, Y. C., Hsiao, C. L., & Lin, Y. C. (2006, June). Exploring the effects of simulation based learning on college students’ statistical understanding, misconception, and attitude. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Global Conference on Computers in Education, GCCCE2006(CD), Beijing, China. (In Chinese)
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. London: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R.E., and Moreno, R. (1998). A split attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing system in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312-320.
Morris, E. J., & Scanlon, E. (2000). Active learning of statistics: A case study. Journal of the Association of Learning Technology Journal, 8(1), 80–91.
Morris, E. (2001). The design and evaluation of link: A computer-based learning system for correlation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 39-52.
Morris, E. J., Joiner, R., & Scanlon, E. (2002). The contribution of computer-based activities to understanding statistics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 116-126.
Moore, D. S. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 65(2), 123-137.
Novak E. (1988). Deterministic and Stochastic Error Bounds in Numerical Analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1349, Springer-Verlag, New York: Berlin.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston..
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach, USA: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian journal of psychology, 45(3), 255-287.
Paivio, A., & Harshman, R. (1983). Factor analysis of a questionnaire on imagery and verbal habits and skills. Canadian journal of psychology, 37(4), 461-483.
Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2004). Dynamic visualisations and learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 235-240.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
Riding, R. J. (2001). The nature and effects of cognitive style. In R. J. Sternberg & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 47–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Riding, R.J., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles - An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
Riding, R. J., Grimley, M., Dahraei, H., & Banner, G. (2003). Cognitive style, working memory and learning behaviour and attainment in school subjects. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 149-169.
Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behaviour, London: David Fulton Publishers.
Riding, R. J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). Cognitive style and learning strategies: Some implications for training design. International Journal of Training and Development, 1(3), 199-208.
Sadler-Smith, E., & J Smith, P. (2004). Strategies for accommodating individuals' styles and preferences in flexible learning programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 395-412.
Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Scaifeand, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? Int. J. Human–Computer Studies, 45, 185-213.
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141-156.
Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. P., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student’s evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. Advances in instructional psychology, 4, 55–175.
Schuyten, G., & Dekeyser, H. M. (2007). Preference for textual information and acting on support devices in multiple representations in a computer based learning environment for statistics. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2285-2301.
Seufert, T. (2003). Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 227-237.
Seufert, T., & Brunken, R. (2006). Cognitive load and the format of instructional aids for coherence formation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 321–331.
Snell, J. L. (1995). The Journal of Statistics Education Information Service and Other Internet Resources for Statistics Teachers. The American Statistician, 49(4), 372-375.
Someren, M. W. V., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). A capsule history of theory and research on styles. In R. J. Sternberg & Li-fang Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles (pp. 1-22). London, NJ: Erlbaum.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 211–231). Orlando FL: Academic Press.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive science and educational theory and practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
Tabachneck-Schijf, H. J. M., Leonardo, A. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). CaMeRa: A computational model of multiple representations. Cognitive Science, 21(3), 305-350.
van der Meij, J., & de Jong, T. (2006). Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 199-212.
von Roten, F. C. (2006). Do we need a public understanding of statistics? Public Understanding of Science, 15(2), 243-249.
Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45-69.
Yerushalmy, M. (1991). Student perceptions of aspects of algebraic function using multiple representation software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(1), 42-57. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit