博碩士論文 954201016 詳細資訊


姓名 楊惠蓉(Hui-Jung Yang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 團隊成員連結程度對知識分享之影響-- 以新產品開發為例
(A study on tie strength and knowledge sharing ─A empirical study of the R&D Department)
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 在經營環境日趨激烈、企業本身的資源又有限的情況下,企業必須透過知識分享和其他組織合作獲得知識,進而提升組織本身的競爭優勢。然而有些組織能有效率的從事知識分享,有些組織卻無法如此順利,因此本研究據此對知識分享做進ㄧ歩的研究。
過往學者在探討知識分享大多從社會資本下雙方的連結程度著手,認為彼此的互動程度與緊密關係便決定組織是否能有效的從事知識分享,然而,有些學者認為單純用連結程度來解釋過於簡單,因此他們認為除了考慮連結程度外,還加上了社會資本下的關係構面─即信任,來探討知識分享。因此,本研究利用此兩構面來對知識分享做更進ㄧ歩的研究。其中,在關係構面本研究使用鑲嵌的觀念,至於知識分享則是將其區分為兩個動作─搜尋知識以及轉移知識,且分別以獲得不同類型知識代表之。
實證分析係針對台灣前兩千大電子產業為研究主題,而將填答者設定為組織內部研發部門經理填寫。本研究採用郵件方式進行問卷調查,經催收與整理後,共得183份,有效回收率達38.95%。應用結構方程式模型實證的研究結果顯示,本研究的衡量模型與結構模型皆具備良好的配適度,模型中共有6條假說,在P<0.05的情況下,共有5條獲得支持。
本研究藉由對知識分享做更詳細的探討,應更能正確且完整的說明組織應如何有效率的透過知識分享獲得知識,俾以作為後續從事知識分享的研究者和實務界之參考。
摘要(英) A organization gains competitive strength through knowledge-sharing in the competitive market. Some of them can share knowledge effectively, but some can’t. Therefore, we will study the issue for detail according the situation.
Most studied knowledge-sharing from the structure dimension of social capital in previous literature, which thought that the degree of interaction and closeness between them will decide to share knowledge successfully. However, some scholars thought it was too simple to explain knowledge-sharing successful clearly, so they added the relational dimension of social capital-trust- to discuss. Therefore, we will use the two dimensions to do our research further. There are two points in our study: one is that embeddedness relationship represents relational dimension, the other is that different kinds of knowledge represent the result of knowledge-sharing.
The empirical study aims at top 2000 electronic enterprises selected from the
directories of the 2005 Chinese Credit top 2000 firms in Taiwan. The research unit is R&D department, and mailing of questionnaire is distributed to the R&D manager. Raising the total response to 183, this produced a final response rate of 38.95%. 11.85%. After using structural equation model (SEM) to analyze returned questionnaires, the results show fine goodness of fit in structural model. In addition, 5 hypotheses are supported in p-value<0.05.
In conclusion, the theoretical framework model concerning the influence of the knowledge-sharing shall be measured by understanding relationship between teams. We hope this research will contribute to further studies and provide some suggestions for implementing management of the knowledge-sharing.
關鍵字(中) ★ 連結程度
★ 鑲嵌關係
★ 知識分享
關鍵字(英) ★ tie strength
★ embeddedness relationship
★ knowledge sharing
論文目次 第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機.................................... ....... ....1
第二節 研究目的與預期貢獻................. .......................... 2
第三節 研究方法.................... ................. ............... 2
第四節 研究範圍與限制................. ................. .............3
第五節 研究流程............................... .......... ........... 4
第六節 章節架構............................... .......... ........... 5
第貳章 文獻回顧............................... .......... ........... 6
第一節 連結程度............................... .......... ...........6
第二節 鑲嵌............................... .......... .............. 9
第三節 知識分享............................... .......... ..........13
第四節 各構面之影響因素................. ................. .........16
第五節 結構方程式模式................. ................. ...........23
第参章 研究設計............................... .......... ...........27
第一節 觀念信架構............................... .......... ....... 27
第二節 研究假說............................... .......... ..........28
第三節 衡量變數定義............................... .......... ......30
第四節 連結程度、鑲嵌與知識類型之結構方程模型......................36
第五節 抽樣方法與問卷設計................. .......................45
第肆章 實證分析................. ................. ................46
第一節 樣本基本資料分析................. ........................46
第二節 產品開發團隊間之連連程度與不同類型知識衡量模型的評估...... 48
第三節 新產品開發團隊間之連結程度與不同類型知識結構模型的評估....58
第四節 連結強度與不同類型知識研究假說分析................. .......64
第伍章 結論與建議................. ................. ......... .....66
第一節 結論………………………………………………………………………..66
第二節 建議……………………………………………………………………. 69
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………… 70
附錄 問卷……………………………………………………………………………78
參考文獻 Adler, P. S. and Kwon, S. W. (2002)“Social capital: Prospects for a new concept,” Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
Ancona, D.G.and Caldwell, D.F. (1992) “Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634-635.
Anderson and Gerbing, D.W. (1988) ”Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach,”Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Andrews, K.M.and B.L. Delahay (2000) “Infuences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter,” Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 797-810.
Asheim, B.amd Dunford, M. (1997) “Regional Futures,” Regional Studies, 31(5), 445-456.
Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1988)“On the Evaluation for Structural Equation Models,” Academy of Marketing Science. Journal. 16(1), 74-94.
Bentler (1992) “On the Fit of Models to Covariance and Methodology to the
Bulletin,” Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404.
Bill McEvily and Alfred Marcus (2005) “Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities,” Strategic Management Journal, 26(11), 1033.
Bollen, K.A.(1989) Structural Equation Modeling with Latent Variables. New York:John Wiley.
Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. 1(993) ” Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit”, in Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park:Sage, 136-162.
Burt (1992) “Structural Holes: The Social Science of Competition,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Carley, K. (1991) “A theory of group stability,” American Sociological Review, 56(3), 331-354.
Chin, W.W. and Todd, P. (1959) “On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of
Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution,” MIS
Quarterly, 19(2), 237-246.
Coleman, James S. (1988)“Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-120.
Constant, D., L. Sproull and S.Kiesler (1996) “The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice,” Organization Science,7(2), 119-135.
Crone, M.and Roper, S. (2001) “Local Learning from Multinational Plants: Knowledge Transfers in the Supply Chain,” Regional Studies, 35(6), 535-548.
Currall, S.,T. Judge. (1995) “Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processe, 64(2), 151-170.
Dacin, M. T., Ventresca, M. J.anf Beal, B. D. (1999) “The embeddedness of organizations: Dialogue & directions,” Journal of Management, 25(3), 317.
Dirks, K. T.and D. L. Ferrin (2001) “The role of trust in organizational settings,” Organization Science, 12(4), 450-467.
Eccles, R.G. (1981)“The quasifirm in the construction industry,”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2, 335-357.
Egelhoff, W.(1993) “Information processing theory and the multinational corporation.” S. Ghoshal and D. E. Westeny, eds. Organization Theory and The Multinational Corporation. St. Martin’s Press, New York, 182-210.
Farjoun, M.(1998) “The independent and joint effects of the skills and physical bases of relatedness in diversification,” Strategic Management Journal,19(7), 611-630.
Foray D. and Lundvall B. A. (1996) “The Knowledge-Base Economy: From the Economics of Knowledge to the Learning Economy,” In OECD (Eds.), Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy, OECD Paris,11-32.
Ford, D., Hakansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1986) “How Do Companies Interact?”Industrial Marketing and Purchasing, 1(1), 26-41.
Frenzen, Jonathan and Kent Nakamoto (1993) ”structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3),360-375.
Galbraith, J. (1973) “Designing Complex Organizations,” Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
Ghoshal, S.and C. Bartlett. (1988) “Creation, adoption, and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations,” International Business Studying, 19(3), 365-388.
Ghoshal, S., H. Korine and G.Szulanski (1994) ”Interunit communication in multinational corporations,” Management Science, 40(1), 96-110.
Granovetter, M. (1973) “The strength of weak ties,” American Journal Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M. (1982) “The strength of weak ties: A network theory,” revisited. P. Marsden, N. Lin, eds. Social Structural and Network Analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 105-129.
Granovetter, M. (1985) “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481.
Granovetter, M., and Richard S., (1992) “The Sociology of Economic Life,” Colorado: Westview Press.
Gulati and Sytch (2007) “Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: effects of embeddedness on a manufacture’s performance in procurement relationships,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 32.
Gupta, A. K.and V. Govindarajan. (2000) “Knowledge flows within multinational sorporations,”Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-496.
Hair, Jr. J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Hansen, M. T.(1999) “The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
Hansen,M. T.(2002) “Knowledge Networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies,” Organization Science,13(3), 232-250.
Hansen, Mors and Lovas (2005) “Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases,” Academy of management journal,48(5), 776.
Hatcher, L.(1994), A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Heide JB and Miner AS.(1992) “The shadow of the future: effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation,” Academy of Management Journal, Special Issue 35(2), 265-291.
Helper, Susan. (1990) ”Comparative Supplier Relations in the US and Japanese Auto Industries: An Exit-Voice Approach.”Business Economic History, 19,153-162.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970) “Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states” Harvard University Press.
Jöreskog, K.G., and Sörbom, D. (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Scientific Software International.
Krackhardt, D. (1992) “The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations,” N. Nohria, R. Eccles, eds. Networks and Organizations: Structures, Form and Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 216-239.
Larson, Andrea. (1992) “Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial settings: A Study of the Goverance of Exchange Process.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1),76-104.
Levin, D.Z. (1999) “Transferring knowledge within the organization in the R&D arena,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. 292.
Levin and Cross (2004) “The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer,” Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1491.
Maccallum, R.C., Roznowski, M., Mar, C.M., and Reith, J.V. (1994) “Alternative Strategies For Cross-Validation of Covariance Structure Models,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(1), 1-32.
Markides, C.and P. Williamson.(1994) “Related diversification, core competencies and corporate performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 15, 149-167.
Marsden, P.and K. Campbell. (1984) “Measuring tie strength,” Social Forces, 63, 482-501.
Mayer,R. C.,J.H. Davis and F.D. Schoorman. (1995) “An integration model of organizational trust,” Academy of Management, 20(3), 709-734.
Morgan, K. (1997)“The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal,” Regional Studies, 31(5), 491-504.
Nahapiet, Ghoshal,(1998) “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and The Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp. 242-266.
Nobel, R.and J. Birkinshaw.(1998) “Innovation in multinational corporations: Control and communication patterns in international R&D operations,”Strategic Management Jouranl, 19(5), 479-496.
Nonaka,I.(1994) “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
Penley, L.E.and B. Hawkins. (1985) “Studying interpersonal communication in organizations: A leadership application,” Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 309-326.
Polanyi, K., C., Arensberg and H. Pearson (1957)” Trade and Markets in the Early Empires” N.Y.: Free Press.
Polanyi, M.(1962) “Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy,”Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, M.(1996) “The Tacit Dimension.” Anchor Day Books, New York.
Reagans, R.and McEvily, B. (2003) “Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240-267.
Rindfleisch and Moorman (2001) “The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of- ties perspective.” Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 1-19.
Rogers, E. (1995) “Diffusion of Innovations”, 4th ed. Free Press, New York.
Rumelt, R.(1974) Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.
Srinivas, V. (2000) Individual investors and financial advice: A model of advice-seeking behavior in the financial planning context. Unpublished doctoral, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.
Szulanski, G.(1996) “Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.
Teece,David J.(1997)“Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how.”Economic Journal,87,242-261.
Tsai and Ghoshal (1998). “Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks,” Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
Tsai, W. (2002) “Social structure of “coopetition”within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing,”Organization Science, 13(2), 179-190.
Tushman, M.(1997) “Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin,”Science Quarterly, 22(4), 587-605.
Uzzi,B. (1996) “The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect,” American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674-698.
Uzzi,B. (1997) “Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
Uzzi, B.and R. Lancaster.(2003) “Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients,” Management Science, 49(4), 383-399.
Verdin, P.J. and P. J. Williamson(1994), " Core Competences , market Analysis and Competitive Advantage:Forging the Links ", In G. Hamel and A. Heene(eds.), Sustainable Competitive Advantage Through core Competence, Wiley, New york.
Warkentin, M., Sugumaran, V., and Bapna, R. (2001) “E-Knowledge Networks For Inter-Organizational Collaborative E-Business,” Logistics Information Management, 14(1/2), 149-162.
Zand, D.E. (1972) “Trust and managerial problem solving” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229-239.
Zander, U.amd B. Kogut, (1995) “Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test,” Organizational Science, 6(1), 76-92.
Zaheer, A.,B. McEvily and V. Perrone. (1998) “Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance,”Organization Science, 9(2), 229-159.
指導教授 陳炫碩(ken chen) 審核日期 2008-7-18
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡