摘要(英) |
In the information age, the importance of information technology to the business community is growing. Meanwhile, the importance of information technology to the Taiwanese small and medium enterprises (SMEs) has been emphasized recently. In order to reduce the national digital divide, the Taiawnese Ministry of Economic Affairs has allocated 1 billion NT dollars to electronicalize the SMEs, and assisted the SMEs in coping with different information needs, as well as identified the applied software solutions to effectively reduce the digital divide in the industry.
Among the policies that attempt to solve the digital divide problem of the industry, there exists a lack of awareness of the real meaning of the digital divide. It is found that the hardware digital divide is overemphasized, but the software digital divide is neglected. The software digital divide is related to whether an individual is able to use information effectively and efficiently, which is regarded as an important key factor in the E-learning arena.
Because there are a variety of resources for self-learning on the Internet and many instructional materials from different subject areas have available digitally, the learners’ abilities to use computer hardware and software effectively and efficiently remain key factors that determine the success of their learning. The degree of the information literacy may affect an individual’s work performance, their future academic achievement, and also impact their learning within the enterprises.
Generally speaking, we need to prevent “the poor from being poorer,and the rich from being richer” situation in the information age, the information literacy training is a necessity. Specifically, the information literacy is an essential ability of an indivudal to learning, and it is an integral part of the life-long learning. In the era of rapid dissemination of information, the information literacy to enterprise employees is of great value.
In this study, relevant literature was reviewed. Through content analysis, the research attempted to identify the major dimensions of information literacy. They included 13 dimensions, including the basic traditional knowledge, the information cognitive ability, the information retrieval and search capabilities, the capacity for the assessment and analysis of information, the ability to integrate information, the ability to apply information, the ability to present relevent information, the decision-making ability, the information communicative skill, the information dissemination ability, the ability to use computer equipment, the ability to use of Internet tools, the ability to use multimedia tools, etc.
This research used a well-designed questionnaire to investigate the current situation of the Taiwanese SMEs, to explore the condition of electronization and to probe the the current level of information literacy of the SME staffs. Seven hundred and eighty seven questionnaires were sent; 199 questionnaires were responded and valid. The response rate was 32.3 percent. The data were analyzed using SPSS13.0.
The results indicated that:
(1) The gender distribution of the higher-level workforce in Taiwanese SMEs was uneven.
(2) The industrial electronization had more impact on the women’s information literacy than on the men’s information literacy.
(3) The impact of the enterprise knowledge management electronization (e-learning) on the staff’s information literacy was found to be the most significant.
Hence whether the company can improve an individual’s information literacy in their staff training remain an important element in the implementation of e-learning. |
參考文獻 |
1. 徐志明,「向數位落差宣戰-另一項誇越個人、家庭、企業、社會的資訊貧富差距」,電子化企業經理人報告,民國93.04-06,2004。
2. 經濟部中小企業處,中小企業白皮書,2005。
3. 王健全,「台灣的中小企業何去何從」,國家政策研究基金會,2001。
4. 財團法人資訊工業策進會,「資訊國力年鑑2005~2006」,行政院科技顧問組,http://www.etaiwan.nat.gov.tw。
5. 曾淑芬,「台灣地區數位落差問題之研究」,行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究,2002。
6. 業俊榮,「台灣的數位落差與政策」,研考雙月刊,民國95.02,2006
7. 謝宜芳,「資訊素養的相關概念」,國立中央圖書館台灣分館館刊7卷4期,2001
8. 王奐敏,「不利偏遠地區學校資訊素養教育推動因素之研究」,國立交通大學碩士論文,民國94年6月。
9. 曾淑芬,「數位落差」,資訊社會研究,卷2,2002。
10. 「台閩地區九十一年數位落差調查報告」,行政院研究開發考核委員會, 2003。
11. 呂執中,「小企業對ASP需求之證實研究」,立成功大學碩士論文,2004。
12. 溫嘉榮、郭勝煌,「臺灣中小企業e化內容分析之研究--探討經濟部2003~2005年e化輔導案例」,中小企業發展季刊,頁57-86,民96.09
13. 「數位落差」,EC研究報告, 2002年3月份。
14. 卓志銘,「中小企業數位落差評量模式之建構-以台灣製造業為例」,國立中正大學碩士論文,民國95年6月。
15. 中小企業白皮書,經濟部中小企業處,2007。
16. 郭宏彬,「資訊素養與數位落差」,馬偕護理專科學校學報2民91.05,2002
17. 財團法人資訊工業策進會,2004數位學習內容產業白皮書,經濟部工業局,台北,2004。
18. 余霖,「內容分析法與研究教育」,師友月刊,第271期16-18頁,1990。
19. 楊孝爃,「內容分析」,社會及科學研究法,809-831頁,東華書局,台北1989。
20. 黃佳珊,台灣縣市政府機關數位化落差成因與對策之研究,世新大學碩士論文,民國94年6月。
21. 劉仲冬,「民族誌研究方法及實例」,質性研究,頁173~194,台北,巨流圖書公司。
22. 王梅素,「問卷設計」,食品工業,頁10~16,民國90年7月。
23. 陳妍伊,「資訊素養對數位學習推導影響之研究」,中國文化大學碩士論文,民國96年1月。
24. 寇玉娥,「問卷設計DIY」,市場與行情,頁28-32民88.04。
25. 王梅玲,「從數位落差探討台灣地區公共圖書館網際網路服務」,資訊傳播與圖書館學9卷4期,2001。
26. 林勤敏,「縮減城鄉數位落差的理念與實務-以公共圖書館推展全民數位學習為 例」,台北市利圖書館館訊,22卷4期,2005
27. 顏淑芬,「從資訊差距因素探討網路資訊時代公共圖書館之任務與角色」,國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文,1998。
28. 曾淑芬、吳齊殷,「先近各國消弭數位落差之政策分析」,資訊社會與數位落差研討會,台北,2001。
29. 項靖,「邁向資訊均富:我國數位落差現況之探討」,東吳政治學報,卷16,2003。
30. 曾淑芬、李孟壕,「數位落差再定義與衡量指標之研究」,資訊社會研究第九期,2005。
31. 郭麗玲,「學習社會中讀者終身學習的內容」,中國圖書館學會會報,61期,1999。
32. 莊道明,「以資訊素養為基礎的圖書館利用教育」,書苑,35期,1998。
33. 李德竹,「資訊素養的意義、內含與演變」,圖書與資訊學刊,35,1-25,2000。
34. 賴苑玲,「如何將Big Six技能融入國小課程」。書苑48,23,2001
35. 吳美美,「資訊素養與媒體素養—數位時代的素養與素養教育」,台灣教育,民93.10,2002
36. 李德竹,「由圖書館資訊服務規劃我國圖書館資訊素養之培育方針與評量指標」,台北市:行政院國科會研究報告,民國84年,頁2~14,1995
37. 李志強、黃雲龍、劉慧玲,「網路學習的多元資訊素養需求與現況探索」,第十屆資訊管理與實務研討會,2004
38. 崔家蓉,「從學習者觀點探究網路社會公民資訊識讀教育的內涵」,2002網路與社會研討會,2002
39. 林美和,「資訊素養與終身學習的關係」,社教雙月刊73期,民85,1996。
40. 王貴珠,「資訊素養融入課程教學之探討」,中央警察大學警學叢刊,民95.9,2006。
41. K.E. McHenry, J.T. Stewart, and J.L. Wu. ”Teaching Resource-Based Learning and Diversity,” in the information Literacy: Developing Students as Independent Learners. ed. By D.W. Farmer, T.F. Mech ﹝San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992﹞
41. O.E.C.D.,Understanding the digital divide,2001.
42. B.M.Compaine,”The digital divide:facing a crisis or creating a myth?”,MIT Press,2001.
43. “The Digital Best”,The digital divide,http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/chu/digdiv/,1999.
44. Yap,C.S,Soh,CPP.,and Roman K.S.,”Information Syatems Success Factors in Small Business”,International Journal of Information Management,Vol.20,No.5/6, 597-609,1992.
45. American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Final Report﹝Chicago:American Library Association,1989﹞
46. Webber, S. and Johnston, B.”Conception of information literacy: new perspectives and implications ”,Journal of Information Science,2000.
47. McClure, C. ,“Network literacy: a role for libraries?”, Information Technology and Libraries. 13(2), 114-7125,1994.
48. Bernard Berelson, Content analysis in communication research, Free Press, New York, 1952.
49. Doyle,C.S.,”Information Literacy in an Information Society: A concept for the Information Age”, Clearinghouse in Information & Technology, Syracuse, N.Y.U.S.A. ,1994
50. L.B. Jones, ”Linking Undergraduate Education and Libraries: Minnesota’s Approach,” in the information Literacy: Developing Students as Independent Learners, ed. By D.W. Farmer, T.F. Mech﹝San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992﹞,1992.
51. J.K. Olsen. “The Electronic Literacy ,” in the information Literacy: Developing Students as Independent Learners, ed. By D.W. Farmer, T.F. Mech ﹝San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992﹞.
52. C. Curran, “Information Literacy and the Public Librarian,” Public Libraries﹝Nov/Dec 1990﹞.
53. H.B. Rader, ”Bibliographic Instruction or Information Literacy,” College & Research Literacy News ,1990
54. H.B. Rader, “Information Literacy: A Revolution in the Library,” RQ,1991.
55. Plotnick, Eric, Information Literacy.﹝ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427777﹞,1999.
56. Association of College and Research Libraries,Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education,p2,2000
57. Mark Warschauer,Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide,2003.
58. Cartwright,D.P.,”Analysis of qualitative material”,Research methods in the behavioral sciences,pp.421-470,in L.Festinger & D.Katz(Eds),Dryden,New York,1953.
59. Brian D Loader,”Cyberspace Divide: Equality”,Agency and Policy in the Information Society,Publisher:Routledhe(UK) ,1998. |