 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：19 、訪客IP：18.119.253.93
姓名 柯政男(Cheng - Nan Ko) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 資訊管理學系 論文名稱 有機企業系統：以Google服務發展過程探索企業經營模式演進之研究
(Organic Business System:A Study of the Business Model Evolution through the Service Development of Google)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中) 自從網際網路商業化之後，網際網路相關技術以及使用者人數開始有了爆炸性的成長。隨著使用者數量的增加，網路上資訊搜尋以及資料取得之需求急劇增加，因而造就了搜尋引擎產業的誕生。以搜尋引擎公司而言，Google從1998年成立至今，每年皆以優異的成長率表現成長，在短短十年期間（1998年至2009年），已獲得近80%的全球搜索引擎市場之市佔率，且收入高達210億美元。Google的成長提供了公司所需要之資本，而其智慧和技術使企業能快速擴張。因此本研究問題為：當Google的財務狀況改變時，其商業模式如何演進以支持其服務發展的過程？據此本研究建立有機經營系統分析架構，藉以探討Google經營模式演進與環境改變之關係。透過個案分析方法，將Google發展過程分為四時期，收集每一時期Google主要的商業行為，並加以分析。成果包含：有機經營系統分析架構之發展、Google服務平台發展過程之整理與Google經營模式演進之分析。藉由對個案公司之經營模式演進過程之整理，從中尋找出網路服務平台之演進概念，以提供處於不同發展時期之網路公司其經營模式演進時之一個參考範本。
摘要(英) After the commercialization of internet, internet industry grew at an explosive rate in both user population and technology advancement. As the number of users grows, the demand for information search and retrieval over internet increased dramatically, thus search engine industry was born. As a search engine company, Google has achieved remarkably growth since its founding in 1998. In about ten year’s time (2009), Google already obtained nearly 80% of world’s search engine market, with the revenue of $21 billion. The growth of Google has provided the company with the capital, smarts and technology for its expansion. This research examines how has Google’s business model evolved to supports its service development process when the financial resources available to Google changes. Organic Business System Analysis Framework is developed to study the relationship between business model revolution and environmental changes. Case study method is used for in depth study of Google. Google’s development is divided into four phases and data regarding Google’s major business activities for each phase is collected then analyzed with Organic Business System Analysis Framework. This research has three results: 1) Development of Organic Business System Analysis Framework, 2) Description of the development process of Google’s services and service platform, 3) Analysis of the evolution process of Google’s business model. Through the analysis of the evolution process of Google’s business model, this research has find nine propositions that could be used as guidelines for other internet platform companies when they needs to change their business model.
關鍵字(中) ★ 有機經營系統分析架構
★ 經營模式演進關鍵字(英)
★ Organic Business System Analysis Framework
★ Business Model Evolution論文目次 Table of Contents
Abstract i
List of Tables vii
List of Figures viii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.1.1 Internet, Search Industry and Search Engine 1
1.1.2 Search Engine Market Share 3
1.2 Research Motivation and Research Question 4
1.3 Research Purposes 5
1.4 Research Importance 6
1.5 Thesis Structure 6
Chapter 2 Theoretical Foundation for Analysis Framework 7
2.1 Business System 7
2.1.1 Conceptual Framework for Business System Analysis - Three Layer Architecture 7
2.1.2 Static Business System - Components in each layer 9
2.1.3 Dynamic Business System - Driving force of Recursive Relationship 11
2.2 System Perspective on Organizational Design 16
2.2.1 Interactive Management 16
2.2.2 Interactive Planning Process 16
2.3 Three-Layers Business Model Analysis Framework 19
2.4 Strategy Analysis and Competitive Advantage 23
2.4.1 Competitive Advantage 23
2.4.2 Strategic Analysis and Planning Process 23
2.5 Business Model and its Components 26
2.5.1 Definition of Business Model 26
2.5.2 Components of Business Model 27
Chapter 3 Research Methods 32
3.1 Qualitative Research Method: Case Study 32
3.2 Data Collection 33
3.2.1 Data Collection Principle 33
3.2.2 Data Source 33
3.2.3 Data Analysis Methods 34
Chapter 4 Google’s Developmental Phases 35
4.1 Foundation Phase – Development of Core Technology (1996 ~ 1999) 36
4.1.1 Major Activities 36
4.1.2 Services Released and Categorization 37
4.1.3 Evolution of Google’s Service Platform 38
4.2 Exploration Phase – Building User Population and Development of Business Model (2000 ~ 2001) 39
4.2.1 Major Activities 39
4.2.2 Services Released and Categorization 40
4.2.3 Evolution of Google’s Service Platform 40
4.3 Enhancement Phase – Building User Population and Extension of Service (2002 ~ 2004) 42
4.3.1 Major Activities 42
4.3.2 Services Released and Categorization 43
4.3.3 Evolution of Google’s Service Platform 44
4.4 Rapid Expansion – Acquisition and Integration of Technology (2005 ~ 2009) 46
4.4.1 Major Activities 46
4.4.2 Services Released and Categorization 51
4.4.3 Evolution of Google’s Service Platform 52
Chapter 5 Analysis of Google’s Services 54
5.1 Foundation Phase – Development of Core Technology (1996 ~ 1999) 54
5.2 Exploration Phase – Building User Population and Development of Business Model (2000 ~ 2001) 57
5.3 Enhancement Phase – Building User Population and Extension of Service (2002 ~ 2004) 62
5.4 Rapid Expansion – Acquisition and Integration of Technology (2005 ~ 2009) 67
Chapter 6 Conclusion 73
6.1 Results 73
6.2 Managerial Implication 74
6.3 Limitations 75
References 77
參考文獻 References
(I) English Materials:
[1] Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Re-creating the Corporation: A Design of organizations for the 21st century. Oxford Univ Pr.
[2] Afuah, A. (2004). Business Models: A strategic management approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill College.
[3] Billout, G. (2008). Is Google Making Us Stupid? Atlantic Online, July/August.
[4] Bossidy, L., Charan, R., & Burck, C. Execution: The discipline of getting things done. Random House.
[5] Brown, S. & Eisenhardt, K. (1998). Competing on the edge. Boston: HBS Press
[6] Chen, R., Lam, O. & Kraemer, K. (2007). Strategic Use of Information Technology - Google. University of California.
[7] Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A. (2002). The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(3): 51-58.
[8] Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2007). Catalyst code: The strategies behind the world’s most dynamic companies. Client Distribution Services.
[9] Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publication.
[10] Gasser, U. (2006). Regulating search engines: Taking stock and looking ahead. Havard Law School.
[11] Greenwald, B. & Kahn, J. (2005). Competition demystified: A radically simplified approach to business strategy. Commonwealth Publishing Co., LTD.
[12] Hill, C. & Jones, G. (2008). Strategic management theory (8th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
[13] Keen, P. & Sajda, Q. (2006). Organizational transformation through business models:A framework for business model design. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
[14] Magretta, J. (2002). What management is: How it works and why it’s everyone’s business. Commonwealth.
[15] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Pubication.
[16] Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur's business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6):726-735.
[17] Myers, M., & Avision, D. (2002). Qualitative Research in Information System. London: Sage Publication.
[18] Neri, M. (2007). Historical analysis of the microeconomic processes associated with the development of the internet. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos.
[19] Randall, S. (2008). Planet Google: One company’s audacious plan to organize everything we know. New York: Free Press.
[20] Rijsbergen, C. (1978). Information Retrieval. London: Butter Worths.
[21] Shafer, S. M., Smith, H. J., & Linder, J. C. 2005. The power of business models.Business horizons, 48(3): 199-207.
[22] Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1998). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press.
[23] Siggelkow, N. (2002). Evolution toward fit. Administrative Science Quarterly,47(1): 125-159.
[24] Tapscott, D. (2001). Rethinking strategy in a networked world (or why Michael Porter is wrong about the internet). Strategy+Business, 4
[25] Tapscott, D. , Ticoll, D. & Lowy, A. (2000). Digital Capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs. HBS Press Book.
[26] Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6): 730-743.
[27] Su, Y. & Wu, C. (2009). Business Model Analysis Framework with Quality Assurance. Working Paper.
[28] Zott, C. (2002). Measuring the performance implications of business model design: evidence from emerging growth public firms. Working Paper.
(II) Chinese Materials:
[29] 黃詩婷，2005，「經營模式創新之探索性研究—以台積電為例」，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
[30] 劉雅妍，2005，「商業智能與經營模式設計之文獻研究--兼論與突破式創新
進入策略之關係」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[31] 顏君安，2005，「經營模式、進入策略、主宰設計關係之文獻研究－兼論商
業智能之前導作用」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[32] 李定宇，2005，「突破式創新與經營模式互動關係之文獻研究—兼論商業智
能之前導作用」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[33] 張景翔，2005，「商業智能與經營模式設計之文獻研究-兼論與突破式創新演化之關係」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[34] 劉乙興，2005，「突破式創新與經營模式對主宰設計之影響的文獻研究—兼
論商業智能之前導作用」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[35] 張曉環，2006，「電子設計自動化工具供應商與晶圓專製廠互動關係演進之探索性研究」，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學商學研究所。
[36] 陳銑鈞，2006，「經營模式元件及其間關係之紮根研究」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[37] 徐嘉淳，2006，「 廠商進入市場時機、發展策略與獲利來源之關係 -以搜尋引擎Google 及Yahoo 為例」，碩士論文， 國立交通大學傳播研究所
[38] 李興益，2007「經營模式元件角色之分析」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[39] 楊峰豪，2007，「經營模式元件僑街關係之分析」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[40] 范揚君，2007，「經營模式階次區塊之分析」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[41] 林裕得，2008，「雙基因平衡企業系統：Google 演進中經營模式結構之探索性研究」，碩士論文，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所。
(III) Web Sites:
[42] comScore. 2009. http://www.comscore.com/
[43] Google. 2009. http://googlepress.blogspot.com/
[44] Google Finance.2009. http://www.google.com/finance
[45] Google Milestone.2009. http://www.google.com/corporate/history.html
[46] ZDNet Tech News, 2009.http://www.zdnet.com.tw/
[47] New York Times. 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/
[48] The Bloomberg. 2009. http://www.bloomberg.com/
[49] Net Application. 2009. http://www.netapplications.com/
[50] Webology. 2009. http://www.webology.ir/index.html
指導教授 蘇雅惠(Yea-Huey Su) 審核日期 2009-7-22 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit