博碩士論文 954206009 詳細資訊


姓名 柯閔淵(Min-yuan Ke)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 工業管理研究所
論文名稱 應用設計結構矩陣與影響矩陣分析產品協同設計流程模式
(Applying DSM and Influence Matrix for Analysis and modeling of Collaborative Product Design)
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 企業目前都致力於快速回應市場需求、縮短產品的前置時間、產品發展成本和風險以維持競爭優勢。而資訊科技快速的發展和顧客需求導向的興起,產品協同設計專案是目前產品發展趨勢,企業之間必須根據顧客需求而共同合作發展新產品。然而此模式下新產品開發專案複雜度較高,設計流程中資訊重覆傳遞和複雜性會造成規劃排程困難。因此我們研究致力於簡化產品協同設計活動資訊傳遞,規劃有效率的協同設計流程。
在方法上,首先透過設計結構矩陣(DSM)來分析協同產品設計活動之間資訊傳遞關係,並且規劃出最佳化的協同設計活動流程順序。在規劃完最佳化設計流程之後,我們再應用影響矩陣(Influence Matrix)建構設計流程中各個設計活動對於產品評估因子的影響關係,我們可以應用此結果當作未來回應顧客需求的基準。
  本研究結合DSM和Influence Matrix方法在產品協同設計專案模式之下,定義最佳化新產品發展專案流程和設計活動對於產品特性之間關係,加快產品協同設計專案的發展時程,減少不必要資訊遞回達到時間的節省,成功快速進入市場
摘要(英) Most industries are devoted to responding to the markets’ demand quickly and to shortening the lead time and product costs to keep competitiveness. At present, information technology develops so fast, and the customer-oriented concept emerges so that the collaborative product design project (CPDP) becomes a development trend. According to the requirement of customer, enterprises are involving more than one co-developed products. However, this way makes development projects of new products more complicated, and the iterative information of the design process makes the planning and schedule design tasks harder. For this reason, the thesis is to simplify the iterative information of collaborative design process and to schedule an efficient process of collaborative design.
At first, in order to reduce the product design iteration we adopt Design Structure Matrix (DSM) to build a design process model, which defines the design tasks and its information requirement, and optimizes the sequence of the tasks. Subsequently, we adopt the Influence Matrix to analyze the relationship that design tasks relate to the product evaluation factors. We can utilize this result to respond to the requirement of customer.
The research will present a methodology applying the collaborative product design project (CPDP) for optimizing the design processes, defining the relationship that the design tasks relate to the product evaluation factors. The objective of our thesis is to accelerate of the schedule of the collaborative product design project (CPDP), to reduce the time of iterative information and to enter the market successfully.
關鍵字(中) ★ 影響矩陣
★ 協同產品設計
★ 協同設計流程
★ 設計結構矩陣
關鍵字(英) ★ Influence matrix
★ Collaborative product design
★ Collaborative design process
★ Design structure matrix
論文目次 Abstract……………………………………………………………………………I
摘要……………………………………………………………………………III
Table of Contents List of Figures …………………………………………………V
List of Figures…………………………………………………………………VII
List of Table…………………………………………………………………………IX
Chapter I Introduction………………………………………………………………1
1.1 Background………………………………………………………………1
1.2 Motivation ………………………………………………………………3
1.3 Thesis Goal………………………………………………………………4
1.4 Thesis Overview…………………………………………………………4
Chapter II Literature Review………………………………………………………6
2.1 New Product Development (NPD) ………………………………………6
2.1.1 Process of NPD…………………………………………………………7
2.1.2 Methodology of NPD…………………………………………………10
2.2 Collaborative product design………………………………………………13
2.2.1 The concepts of collaborative product design…………………………13
2.2.2 Early Supplier involvement (ESI) ……………………………………13
2.2.3 Design chain operations reference (DCOR) model……………………16
2.3 Project Management tools ……………………………………………21
2.3.1 Directed Graph…………………………………………………………21
2.3.1 CPM, PERT and Gantt chart…………………………………………22
2.3.2 Flow Chart……………………………………………………………23
2.3.3 Design Structure Matrix ……………………………………………24
Chapter III Product Development for Collaborative Product Design Project..26
3.1 Overview of Collaborative Product design Project…………………………26
3.1.1 Challenge of Collaborative Product Design Project……………………27
3.1.2 Product planning for CPDP……………………………………………28
3.2 Methodological Framework………………………………………………30
3.3 DSM Fundamental…………………………………………………………32
3.3.1 The Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Model…………………………32
3.3.2 Traditional analysis of the DSM………………………………………35
3.3.3 Feedback Loop of Tasks………………………………………………36
3.3.4 The Algorithms for DSM- Sequence and Partition……………………37
3.4 Influence Matrix Fundamental……………………………………………39
3.4.1 Construction of Influence Matrix………………………………………39
3.4.2 Influence matrix modeling procedure…………41
Chapter IV Illustrative Example…………………………………………………44
4.1 Description of Case…………………………………………………………44
4.2 Pre-Analysis………………………………………………………………47
4.2.1 Assumption……………………………………………………………47
4.2.2 Data collection…………………………………………………………48
4.3 Construct a Methodology for CPDP………………………………………50
4.3.1 Construct the Collaboration of DSM modeling for the case…………50
4.3.1.1 Construct Collaboration of IO DSM for CPDP………………52
4.3.1.2 Simplifying Process of Collaboration………………………60
4.3.1.3 Partition………………………………………………………66
4.3.2Construct the Influence Matrix for the Case……………………………72
4.3.2.1 Influence Matrix modeling…………………………………74
4.3.2.2 Formation of Total Influence Matrix…………………………74
4.3.2.3 Define characteristic parameter………………………………78
4.3.2.4 The analysis result of influence matrix………………………79
Chapter V Conclusion……………………………………………………………83
5.1 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………83
5.2 Future Research……………………………………………………………84
Reference……………………………………………………………………………85
參考文獻 Batallas, D.A. & Yassine A. (2006), “Information Leaders in Product Development Organizational Networks: Social Network Analysis of the Design Structure Matrix,” IEEE Transaction On Engineering Management, VOL. 53, NO. 4
Browing, T.R. (2001), “Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems,” IEEE Transaction On Engineering Management, Vol. 48, pp. 292-306.
Brown, S.L. & Eisenhardt, K.M. (1995). “Product Development: Past Research, Present Finding, and Future Directions,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.18, pp. 343-378.
Carles, R. (2005), “A Concurrent Approach to Design of Reconfigurable Machine Tools to Process Bamboo,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 210-217
Clarkson, J. & Eckert, C. (2005), Design process improvement: A review of current practice, Springer-Verlag London Limited.
Choo, H.J., Hammond, J., Tommelein, I.D., Austine, S.A. & Ballard, G. (2004), “DePlan: a tool for integrated design management,” Automation in Construction, Vol. 13, pp.313– 326.
Cooper, R.G. (1983), “A Process Model for Industrial New Product Development,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 2–11.
Dong, Q. (2002), “Predicting and Managing System Interactions as early phase of the Product development Process,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.
Dougherty, D. (1990), “Understanding new markets for new products,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 59-78.
Eliashberg, J., Lilien, G.L. & Rao, V.R. (1997), “Minimizing Technological Oversights: A Marketing Research Perspective,” ISBM REPORT, 9-1995
Eppinger, S.D. (2001), “Patterns of Product Development Interactions,” International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 01, titled Design Research Theories, Methodologies, and Product Modelling, pp. 283-290.
Gittens, A., Seepersad, S., Chowdary, & Rao, U.R.K. (2005), “An Integrated Design, Manufacturing and Maintenance Approach to Product Development: A Case Study,”
Himmelman, A.T. (1996), “On the Theory and Practice of Transformational Collaboration: From Social Service to Social Justice,” Creating Collaborative Advantage, London: Sage Publications.
Hori, S., Shimizu, Y. (1999), “Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems,” Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 7, pp.1413-1419
Huang, G.Q., Huang, J. & Mak, K.L. (2000), “Early Supplier Involvement in New Product Development on the Internet: Implementation Perspectives,” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Vol. 8, pp. 40-49
Karlsson, C., Nellore, R. & Soderquist, K. (1998), “Black Box Engineering: Redefining the Role of Product,” Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 15, pp. 534-549.
Kazuo, N. (2005), “A framework for the development of collaborative commerce application,” Issues in Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 2
Klein, M., Sayam, H., Faratin, P. & Bar-Yam, Y. (2006), “The Dynamics of Collaborative Design: Insights from Complex Systems and Negotiation Research,” Understanding Complex Systems, pp.158-174.
Kusar, J., Duhovnik, J., Grum, J., Starbek, M. (2004), “How to reduce new product development time,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 20, pp.1–15.
Laseter, T.M. & Ramdas, K. (2002), “Product Types and Supplier Roles in Product Development: An Exploratory Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 49, pp. 107-118.
Lindemann, U. & Maurer, M. (2006), “Early evaluation of product properties for Individualised products,” International Journal of Mass Customisation, Vol.1, pp. 299 – 314.
Maheswari, J.U. & Varghese, K. (2005), “A Structured Approach to Form Dependency Structure Matrix for Construction Projects,” International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction.
Nellore, R. & Balachandra, R. (2001), “Factors influencing success in integrated product development (IPD) projects,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 48, pp. 164-174
Prasad, B. (1997), Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals, Vol. 2: Integrated Product Development, PTR Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
Ragatz, G.L., Handfield, R.B. & Scannell, T.V. (1997), “Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development,” Journal of Production Innovation Management, Vol. 14, pp. 190–202.
Ragatz, G.L., Handfield, R.B. & Petersen. K.J. (2002), “Benefits Associated with Supplier Integration into New Product Development under Conditions of Technology Uncertainty,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55, pp. 389–400.
Sharif, S.A. & Kayis, B. (2007), “DSM as a knowledge capture tool in CODE environment,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol.18, pp. 497-504.
Sequeria, M.W. (1991), “Use of the Design Structure Matrix in the improvement of an Automobile Development Process,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Thesis.
Shinno, H., Yoshioka H., Marpaung, S. (2006), “A structured method for analysing product specification in product planning for machine tools,” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 347–356.
Shinno, H., Yoshioka, H., Marpaung, S. & Hachiga, S. (2006), “Quantitative SWOT analysis on global competitiveness of machine tool industry,” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol.17, pp.251 – 258.
Shinno, H., & Hashizume, H. (2002), “Structured method for identifying success factors in new product development of machine tools,” Annals CIRP - Manufacturing Technology, Vol.51, pp. 281–284.
Shinno, H., Hashizume, H., Yoshioka, H. & Itoh, K. (2002), “Product development methodology for machine tools,” JSME International Journal, Series C, Vol. 45, pp.815-820.
Shtub, A., Bard, J.F. & Globerson, S. (2004). Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 2nd Ed. Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited, London.
Starbek, M., Kusar, J. & Jenko, P. (1988), The influence of concurrent engineering on launch-to-finish time, Proceedings of the 31st CIRP International Seminar on Manufacturing System, Berkeley, USA.
Steward, D.V. (1981), Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy, and Design, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Steward, D. V. (1981), “The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 71–74
Storey, C. & Easingwood C. (1999), “Types of new product performance: evidence from the consumer financial services sector,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 46, pp. 193-203
Suh, N.P., (2000), Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications, Oxford University Press.
Shtub, A., Bard, J.F. & Globerson, S. (2004), Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 2nd Ed. Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited, London
Twigg, D. (1998), “Managing Product Development within a Design Chain,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 18, pp. 508-524.
Ulrich, K.T. & Eppinger, S.D. (1995), Product Design and Development, MacGraw-Hill
Vliet, J.W. (2001), “Design for Manufacturing: Development and application of a process-based design support methodology,” Ph.D. Dissertations, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.
Yassine, A., Whitney, D.E. & Zambito, T. (2001), “Assessment of rework probabilities for simulating product development process using the design structure matrix (DSM),” ASME 2001 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
Yassine, A., Whitney, D.E., Lavine, J. & Zambito, T. (2006), “Do-it-right-first-time (DRFT) approach to design structure design (DSM) restructuring,” International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Compute and Information in Engineering Conference.
Yassine, A. (2004),“ An Introduction to Modeling and Analyzing Complex Product Development Processes Using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Method,” Quad-erni di Management.
Yassine, A. (2006),“ Investigating product development process reliability and robustness using simulation,” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 8, pp.545–561
Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J. & Pardasani, A. (2002), “Collaborative Conceptual Design-state of the Art and Future Trends,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 34, pp. 981-996.
Winner, R.I. (1988), “The role of concurrent engineering in weapons system acquisition,” IDA Report R-338, Institute for Defence Analysis, Alexandria
Wu, W.H., Yeh, S.C. & Fang, L.C. (2006), “ The development of a collaborative design chain reference model for the motorcycle industry,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 35, pp.211-225.
Zhang, K. & Zhou, J. (2004), “Design and Development of a Platform for internet-based Collaborative Product Development,” The Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Vol. 4, pp.115-120
指導教授 高信培(Hsing-pei Kao) 審核日期 2008-6-27
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡