博碩士論文 954208004 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:10 、訪客IP:35.175.121.230
姓名 陳寶如(Pao-ju Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 財務金融學系
論文名稱 分析師股票推薦行為與投資人反應─從公平揭露法案探討
(The Impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on Analysts' Recommendation Distribution)
相關論文
★ 上市公司財務主管異動宣告對股價報酬與企業經營績效之影響★ 國內綜合證券商轉投資海外子公司內部控制實務探討
★ IPO承銷新制對市場波動性、效率性及流動性之影響★ 探討影響本益比之各項變數-IC設計產業之實證研究
★ 避險基金交易策略在台灣市場獲利性之研究★ 財富管理業務與顧客行為之研究-以本國銀行業為例
★ 購併活動與資訊揭露—以公開收購為例★ 臺灣證券期貨市場後台作業整合模式之研究
★ 道瓊指數、日經225指數、美國及日本10年期公債利率與日圓匯率之相互關係★ 金融商品會計對資訊攸關影響之探討
★ 建築業財務報表之剖析★ 銀行投資公債業務之探討分析
★ 跨國企業重複課稅與租稅規劃★ 所得稅法新制對債券流通市場之影響
★ 私募基金入主國內銀行之認購價格實證研究-以凱雷入主大眾銀行為例★ 虛擬銀行之可行性分析 -以HSBC為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 本研究探討(1)公平揭露法案對證券分析師股票推薦評等分配是否有所影響,(2)公平揭露法案對於不同類別證券分析師所發布之股票推薦評等分配是否有不同的影響,(3)公平揭露法案實施後,市場投資人對於不同類別證券分析師所發布之股票推薦評等的股價反應是否有所不同。
  實證結果顯示,公平揭露法案對於全部分析師股票推薦評等分配有顯著影響。特別是,對獨立研究機構分析師所發布股票推薦評等分配之影響大於對非獨立研究機構分析師股票推薦評等分配之影響。然而,公平揭露法案對非承銷商所屬分析師股票推薦評等分配之影響並未大於對承銷商所屬分析師股票推薦評等分配之影響。另一方面,相較於非獨立研究機構,獨立研究機構所發布之股票推薦評等對股票異常報酬的影響較大。而相較於承銷商所屬之證券分析師,非承銷商所屬之證券分析師所發布股票推薦評等對股票異常報酬的影響較大。
摘要(英) This paper examines the impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on analysts’ stock ratings distribution, especially for independent research firms and investment banks. We also investigate the impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on analysts’ stock ratings distribution for their underwriting and non-underwriting firms. Besides, we investigate whether the market responds significantly to recommendations issued by independent research firms or unaffiliated analysts after the implementation of Regulation Fair Disclosure.
  Our results show that the stock ratings distribution of all analysts significantly changes after the implementation of Regulation Fair Disclosure. The impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on stock ratings distribution of independent research firms is significant larger than that of investment banks. However, the impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on stock ratings distribution of unaffiliated analysts is not significantly larger than that of affiliated analysts. This paper also posits and shows that the average daily abnormal return to the recommendations issued by independent research firms exceeds those issued by investment banks. On the other hand, the average daily abnormal return to the “strong buy” and “buy” recommendations issued by unaffiliated analysts exceeds those issued by affiliated analysts.
關鍵字(中) ★ 承銷關係
★ 獨立研究機構
★ 市場反應
★ 公平揭露法案
★ 分析師股票推薦分配
關鍵字(英) ★ Market Reaction
★ Underwriting Relations
★ Regulation Fair Disclosure
★ Independent Research Firms
★ Stock Ratings Distribution
論文目次 目錄
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目錄 III
圖目錄 IV
表目錄 V
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機及目的 1
第二節 研究貢獻 3
第三節 研究架構 4
第二章 文獻回顧 7
第一節 股票推薦評等分配偏頗的原因 7
第二節 NASD RULE 2711 8
第三節 公平揭露法案 10
第三章 研究設計及方法 13
第一節 研究假說 13
第二節 樣本選取與資料來源 15
第三節 實證模式與統計方法 16
第四章 實證結果及分析 19
第一節 敘述統計量分析 19
第二節 實證結果分析 21
第五章 結論與建議 38
第一節 研究結論 38
第二節 研究建議 39
參考文獻 Agrawal, A. and S. Chadha. 2004. Who is afraid of Reg. FD? The behavior and performance of sell-side analysts following the SEC’s fair disclosure rules. Working paper.
Bagnoli, M., S. G. Watts, and Y. Zhang. 2006. Regulation FD and competitiveness of All-star analysts. Working paper, Purdue University.
Bailey, W., H. Li, C. Mao and R. Zhong. 2003. Regulation Fair Disclosure and earnings information: market, analyst and corporate responses. The Journal of Finance 63: 2487-2514.
Barber, B. M., R. Lehavy, M. McNichols, and B. Trueman. 2006. Buys, holds, and sells: the distribution of investment banks’ stock ratings and the implications for the profitability of analysts’ recommendations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 41: 87-117.
Barber, B. M., R. Lehavy, and B. Trueman. 2007. Comparing the stock recommendation performance of investment banks and independent research firms. Journal of Financial Economics 85: 490-517.
Clarke, J., A. Khorana, A. Patel and P. R. Rau. 2004. Analyst Behavior at Independent Research Firms, Brokerage Houses, and Investment Banks: Conflicts of Interest or Better Information? Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Cornett, M., H. Tehranian, and A. Yalcin. 2004. Regulation Fair Disclosure and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations. Working paper, Boston College.
Findlay, S. and P. G. Mathew. 2006. An examination of the differential impact of regulation FD on analysts’ forecast accuracy. The Financial Review 41: 9-31.
Francis, J., and D. Philbrick. 1993. Analysts' decisions as products of a multi-task environment. Journal of Accounting Research 31(2): 216-230.
Gadarowski, C. and P. Sinha. 2005. On efficacy of Regulation Fair Disclosure: theory and evidence. Working paper. Cornell University.
Gintschel, A. and S. Markov. 2004. The effectiveness of Regulation FD. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37: 293-314.
Heflin, F., K. Subramanyam and Y. Zhang. 2003. Regulation FD and the financial information environment: early evidence. The Accounting Review 78: 1-37.
Jacob, J., S. Rock and D. P. Weber. 2007. Do non-investment bank analysts make better earnings forecasts? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, forthecoming.
Jegadeesh, N., K. Joonghyuk, S. Krische and C. Lee. 2004. Analyzing the analysts: when do recommendations add value? The Journal of Finance 59: 1083-1124.
Ke, B. and Y. Yu. 2005. Do analysts merely serve as a conduit for management’s private information? Evidence from their stock recommendations around Regulation FD. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University.
Lim, T. 2001. Rationality and analysts' forecast bias. The Journal of Finance 56(1): 369-385.
Lin, H.-W. and M. McNichols. 1998. Underwriting relationships, analysts’ earnings forecasts and investment recommendations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25: 101-127.
Lin, H.-W., M. McNichols and P. C. O’Brien. 2005. Analyst impartiality and investment banking relationships. Journal of Accounting Research 43: 623-650.
Michaely, R., and K. L. Womack. 1999. “Conflicts of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations”, Review of Financial Studies 12: 653-686.
Mohanram, P. S. and S. V. Sunder. 2006. How has Regulation Fair Disclosure affected the functioning of financial analysts? Contemporary Accounting Research 23(2): 491-525.
Zitzewitz, E. 2002. Regulation Fair Disclosure and the private information of analysts. Working paper, Stanford University.
指導教授 周冠男、陳慧玲
(Robin K. Chou、Huei-ling Chen)
審核日期 2008-6-25
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明