360 度回饋系統對企業主管行為改變意圖的影響-以跨國飲料 SC 公司為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：62

、訪客IP：18.226.98.89

姓名

呂宗憲(Tsung-Hsien Lu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

高階主管企管碩士班

論文名稱

360 度回饋系統對企業主管行為改變意圖的影響-以跨國飲料 SC 公司為例

相關論文

★ 溝通與領導課程訓練成效之分析	★ 母國企業直線主管領導風格與國際人力資源管理措施對外派人員績效之影響
★ 豐田管理模式之人才培育對品質與成本之影響-以某汽車公司為例	★ 兩岸研發人員職能發展應用研究－以M公司為例
★ 企業併購過程中的人力資源角色	★ 組織變革成功個案分析 - John P. Kotter 領導變革八大步驟之觀點
★ 社群網站經營模式分析－以『BB-BOX』網站為例	★ 觸控IC經營策略之個案研究－以Ａ公司為例
★ 科技研發單位實施接班人計畫之探討─以國內某科技研發單位為例	★ 面對數位匯流，傳統媒體代理商應對策略探討─以安吉斯集團偉視捷媒體公司為例
★ 台灣光電產業選擇產品認證外包廠商的決定因素─以發光二極體照明產品為例	★ 團隊激勵獎金與團隊績效關連性之研究
★ 晶圓代工業關鍵成功因素的探討—以台積公司為例	★ 員工潛能與績效對員工晉升的影響--以營造建築業為例
★ 建構整合性智慧健康照護網絡─以中壢天晟醫院醫療小管家為例	★ 高爾夫球場經營策略之研究─以台北高爾夫俱樂部為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

360 度回饋又稱之為「多元來源回饋」(multiple – source feedback)，其主要的概念是指針對特定的個人，以包含受評者在內的多位評量者來進行評鑑。亦即根據當事人的領導行為或管理才能，由員工自己、上司、直接部屬、同事甚至外部顧客等進行全方位的評量，並在評量之後給予回饋。
基於360 度回饋功能，本研究的目的是探討企業採用360 度回饋系統那些因素(自變數)會影響受評核主管態度(依變數 ) ? 另外亦探討評量訓練(干擾因子)是否會與自變數項產生交互作用進而對依變數項產生影響 ? 當企業能夠了解這些自變數、依變數與干擾因子三者之間的相關性後，在採用360 度回饋系統時可以有更周詳的規劃，如此所得的評核結果會更容易被受評核主管所接受。
本研究是以一家外商跨國飲料公司為例，探討其在台灣分公司的經理級(含)以下的主管，在接受 360度主管管理才能評鑑後的結果分析與其行為改變的態度分析。
本研究發現 : 評核來源能力認知、評核結果正確性知覺、主管內外控人格特質對評核結果接受性知覺是具有顯著性影響的。評核來源能力認知和主管內外控人格特質對主管管理才能改善意圖是具有顯著性的影響。另外在評量訓練
的交互作用效果分析結果顯示 : 評量訓練會與主管的內外控人格特質產生交互作用進而影響主管對評核結果接受性知覺與主管管理才能改善意圖。針對分析之結果，本研究在結論中亦提出管理實務上的意涵並針對研究個案之擴大、研究對象之擴大、研究變數之增加、研究主題之擴充，提出進一步研究的建議。

摘要(英)

360 degree feedback is also named multiple – source feedback, which aimed at the specific person, including many of the people assessing and assessed, In another word, according to the leader behavior or managerial competency of the persons involved, those employees, chief, directly subordinate, colleague even external customer proceed a complete assessment and return the feedback after the assessment.
On the basis of the function for the 360 degree feedback, the purpose of the research is to probe into the enterprise which adopts those independent variable from 360 degree feedback system will effect the attitude and behavior of those chiefs , when they received the assessment. In addition, we also consider if 360 degree assessment train will result in the interaction with the independent variable and then influence the depend variable. After the enterprises realizes the relationship of the independent variable, dependent variable as well as the interfere factor, they will make the plan more carefully whenever adopting the feedback system. Thus, the result will be more acceptant by those chiefs assessed.
The research is made in accordance with a foreign beverage company which is probed into those superintendents involved the managers and below to analyze the result and attitude changes after taking the 360 degree managerial competency assessment
Something discovered in this research: 1) The quality & fairness of the critics, perceived rating accuracy, internal / external control of the superintendents personality speciality have a correlate significantly to acceptance perceived of rating result. Besides. 2) The quality & fairness of the critics, internal / external control of the superintendents personality speciality have a correlate significantly to the intention of leader managerial competency improvement.
Furthermore, the analysis result of the interaction of 360 degree assessment train reveals that the 360 degree assessment train will result in an interaction with the internal / external control of the superintendents personality speciality, and then influence the acceptance perceived of rating result and the intention of leader managerial competency improvement of the superintendents.
According to the result of the analysis, this research also mentions the intention of the practical management and brings up a suggestion for further research on the expanded study case, the expanded research objects, the increased variable of research and expanded subject of research.

關鍵字(中)

★ 管理才能
★ 360度回饋
★ 評核來源的能力認知
★ 評核結果接受性知覺
★ 主管管理才能改善意圖

關鍵字(英)

★ Managerial competency
★ Acceptance perceived of rating result
★ The quality &
★ fairness of the critics
★ The intention of leader managerial competency im

論文目次

第一章概論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 6
第三節名詞釋義 7
第二章文獻探討 8
第一節管理才能的探討 8
第二節 360度多元評量制度探討 15
第三節組織對 360 度回饋系統的支持 28
第四節對評量正確性的認知 31
第五節主管的內外控人格特質 33
第六節評量訓練的干擾效果 36
第三章研究方法 38
第一節研究架構與研究假設 38
第二節研究樣本與研究流程設計 41
第三節研究工具 45
第四節變項操作性定義 49
第五節個案研究公司的管理才能的需求 51
第六節 360 度職能評量問卷分析 55
第七節 360 度態度評量問卷的分析 57
第八節資料分析方法 62
第四章資料分析與研究結果 63
第一節樣本與統計變項描述 63
第二節研究變項的敘述性統計分析 66
第三節問卷的信度分析 69
第四節研究變項間之相關分析 72
第五節自變數與依變數的階層迴歸分析 75
第五章結論與建議 83
第一節研究結論 84
第二節研究結果討論 89
第三節研究限制 91
第四節研究建議 93
第五節研究貢獻 96
參考文獻 97

參考文獻

中文部份 :
許士軍（民79），管理學。東華書局，頁17-19
嚴秀茹（民86），「360度績效評鑑方法之初探－多角化評鑑與管理才能發展」，1997年企業管理國際研討會論文集，頁75-84。
張裕隆（民87），我國「管理才能評鑑工具」發展及信效度分析研究，國科會專題研究報告。
張裕隆，民 87b ,360 度回饋。國魂月刊，626 期，頁 82-84。
鄧國宏（民89），主管管理才能評鑑量表之建立與信、效度分析－以某商銀為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理碩士論文。
劉麗華（民89），主管管理才能評鑑360度回饋對受評者態度之影響。國立中央大學人力資源管理碩士論文
徐崇文，2000 年，以 360 度回饋探討影響主管人員行為改變意圖相關因素之實證研究，國立政治大學心理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
紀原欽（民國90年），人力資源專業人員對專業才能評量多源回饋之態度影響因素探討-以電子業為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
蔡慶堂，2002 年，主管管理才能評鑑 360 度回饋對受評者態度之影響以在臺某外商化工廠為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
沈富鈞 2006年，實施多源評量成功因素、受評者接受度知覺與受評者自我才能發展意圖關聯性之研究
吳明隆，2007 : SPSS 12 統計建模與應用實務 , P 277 – P335
英文部份 :
Antonioni, D, (1996). Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process, Organizational Dynamics, 25(3):24-38.
Atwater, L.E, Waldman, D.A, Atwater, D, Cartier, P, (2000). An upward feedback field experiment: supervisors' cynicism, reactions, and commitment to subordinates, Personnel Psychology, 53(2):275-297.)
Atwater, L.E., & Yammarino, F.J. (1992). Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance prediction? Personnel Psychology, 45,141-164.
Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K.（1988）. Transfer of training: A review and direction for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63-105.
Bannister, B.D. (1986). Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: Interactive effects on recipient responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 203-210.
Barclay, J.H., & Harland, L.K. (1995). Peer performance appraisals: The impact of rater competence, rater location, and rating correct ability on fairness perceptions. Group & Organization Management, 20, 39-60.
Becker, T.E., & Klimoski, R.J. (1989). A field study of the relationship between the organizational feedback environment and performance. Personnel sychology, 42, 343-358.
Benassi, V. A., Sweeney, P. D., & Dufour, C. L. (1988). Is there a relation between locus of control orientation and depression? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 357-367.
Bernardin, H.J, Dahmus, S.A, Redmon, G, (1993). Attitudes of first-line supervisors toward subordinate appraisals, Human Resource Management, 32(2-3):315-324.
Bernardin, J.H., & Beatty, R.W. (1987). Can subordinate appraisal enhance managerial productivity Sloan Management Review, 28(4), 63-73.
Bettenhausen, K.L, Fedor, D.B, (1997). Peer and upward appraisal: A comparison of their benefits and problems, Group & Organization Studies, 22(2):236-264.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bohl, D.L. (1996). Minisurvey: 360-degree appraisals yield superior results, survey shows. Compensation and Benefits Review, Septembe/ October, 16-19.
Borman, W.C. (1974). The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12,105-124.
Boulter, N., Dalziel, M., & Hill, J., (1996), People and Competencies, N.Y.: Kogan
Boyatzis, R. E., (1982), The Competence Manager: A Model for Effective Performance, New York : John Wiley & Sons.
Brinberg, D., & Castell, P.（1982）. A resource exchange approach to interpersonal attractions：A test of Foa's theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 260-269.
Cascio, W.F. (1995). Managing Human Resource. McGraw-Hill.
Chong, H., White, R. E., & Prybutok, V. (2001). Relationship among organizational support, JIT implementation, and performance. Industrial management., 101(6): 273-280.
Church, A.H, Bracken, D.W, (1997). Advancing the state of the art of 360-degree feedback, Group & Organization Management, 22(2):149-160.
Dalton, M. (1997). Are competency models a waste? Training and Development, 46-49
Deleon, L. & Ewen, A.J. (1997). Multi-source performance appraisals. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 17(1), pp. 22-36.
Dessler, G. (1996). Human Resource Management. N.J.: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1): 51-59
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3): 500-507
Findley, M. J., & Cooper, H. M. (1983). Locus of control and academic chievement: A literature review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 419- 427.
Funderburg, S.A, Lvey, P.E, (1997). The influence of individual and contextual variables on 360-degree feedback system attitudes, Group & Organization Studies, 22(2):210-236.
Guglieliemino, P. J., (1979),"Developing the top-level executive for the 1980's and beyond", Training and Development, pp.12-14.
Halperin, K., & Snyder, C.R., Shenkel, R.J., & Houston, B.K. (1976). Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(1), 142-147.
Hammer, T.H., & Vardi, Y. (1981). Locus of control and career self-management among nonsupervisory employees in industrial settings, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 13-29.
Hazucha, Fisher Joy, Hezlett, A. Sarah, & Schneider J. Robert（1993）. The impact of 360-degree feedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management, Vol. 32, No. 2&3, 325-351.
Hazucha, J.F, Hezlett, S.A, Schneider, R.J, (1993). The impact of 360 degree feedback management skills development, Human Resource Management, 32(2-3):325-352.
Hazukua, J.F., Healett, S.A. & Schneider, R.J. (1993). The impact of 360-degree feedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management, 32, 325-351.
Hellervik, L.W., Hazucha, J.F., & Schneider, R.J. (1992). Behavior change: Models ,methods, and a review of the evidence .
Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., & Taylor, M.S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.
Ilgen. D. R., Fisher, C. A., & Taylor, M. S.（1979）. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.
Joe, V.C. (1971). Review of the internal -external control construct as a personality variable, Psychology Reports, April, 619-40.
Kalpan, R.E. (1993). 360-degree feecback plus: Boosting the power of coworker ratings for executives. Human Resource Management, 32, 299-314.
Katz, R.L. (1995). Skill of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 33, 33-42.
Katz, R.L. (1996). Skill of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 33, 33-42.
Kinicki, A.J., & Vecchio, R.P. (1994). Influences on the quality of supervisor- subordinate relations: The role of time pressure, organizational commitment, and Locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 75-82.
Klimoski, R.J., & London, M. (1974). Role of the rater in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 369-381.
Kochanski, T. J., & Ruse, H. D., (1996),"Designing a competency-based human resources organization", Human Resource Management, pp.19-33.
Lazer, R.I., & Wikstrom , W.S. (1979). Appraising managerial performance: Current practices and future directions. NY: Conference Board.
Lefcourt, H.M. (1982). Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrator Science Quarterly, 9: 370-390.
London & Beatty, 1993 , 360 degree feedback as a competitive advantage, Human Resource Management, 32:352-373.
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A.（1958）.Organizations. New York：Wiley. McCall, M. W., Jr., Lombardo, M. M., & Morrison, A. M.（1988）.The lessons of experience：How successful executives develop on the job. Lexington, MA：Lexington Books.
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence review discussion: Making it constructive. Personnel Journal, 56, 508-511.
McEovy, G.M., & Buller, P.F. (1987). User acceptance of peer appraisals in an industrial setting. Personnel Psychology, 40, 785-797.
Meyer, H.H. (1991). A solution to the performance appraisal feedback enigma. Academy of Management Executive, 5(1), 68-76.
Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee's perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6): 1543-1567.
Moses, J., Hollenbeck, G.P. & Sorcher, M. (1993). Other people's expectations. Human Resource Management, 32, 283-297.
Moulton, H.W. (1993). Executive Development: Preparing for the 21th Century. N.Y.:Oxford University Press.
Muchinsky, P.M. (1997). Psychology Applied to Work: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4th ed., California: Brooks/Cole.
Murphy, K.R. & Cleveland, J.N. (1995). Understanding Performance Appraisal. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Phares, E. J. (1976). Locus of control in personality. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Raymond, A. N. (1999). Employee Training & Development, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
Reynolds, A., (1993), The Trainer's Dictionary: HRD Terms, Abbreviations, Acronyms, HRD Press.
Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (Whole No. 609).
Rousseau, D. M.（1989）. Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121-139.
Rousseau, D. M.（1990）. New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizstional Behavior, 11, 389-400.
Rousseau, D. M., & Parks, J. M.,（1993）. The contracts of individuals and organizations. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw(eds.). Research in organizational behavior, vol. 15, 1-43. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Rowland and G. R. Ferris（Eds.）,Research in personnel and human resources management Vol. 6（pp.81-124）. Greenwich, CT：JAI Press. Nadler（1977）
Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N. & Linda, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3): 219-227
Sevy, B.A., Olson, R.D., McGuire, D.P., Fraser, M. & Paajanen, G. (1985). Management Skills Profile Research Report and Technical Manual, Minneapolis MN: Personnel Decision, Inc.
Shore, L. M., & Terick, L. E. (1991). A construct validity study of the survey of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5): 637-643.
Smither, P.C. (1976). Behaviors , results, and organizational effectiveness: The problem of criteria. In Dunnette MD (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial andOrganizational psychology (2nd ed., 745-755). Chicago: Rand-Mcnally.
Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482-497
Spencer, L. & Spencer, M. (1993). Competence At Work: Models for Superior Performance, N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Taylor, M. S., Fisher, C. D., & Ilgen, D. R.（1984）. Individual's reactions to performance feedback in organization：A control theory perspective. In K. M.
Tornown, 1993, Perception or reality：Is multi-perceptive measurement a mean or an end？Human Resource Management, 32(2&3), 223-229.
Van Velsor E., Taylor, S., & Leslie, J.（1993）. An examination of the relationships among self-perception accuracy, self-awareness, gender, and leader effectiveness. Human Resource Management, 32, 249-264.
Van Velsor, E. & Leslie, J.B. (1991). Feedback to managers 1991, reports #149R & #150R. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
Waldman, A. David, & Atwater, E. Leanne（1998）. The power of 360o feedback: How to leverage performance evaluations for top productivity. Houston, TX: Gulf.
Waldman, D.A, Bowen, D.E, (1998). The acceptability of 360 degree appraisals: a customer-supplier relationship perspective, Human Resource Management, 7(2):117-130.
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 82-111.
Wexley, K. N., & Klimoski, R. J.（1984）. Performance appraisal：An update. In G. R. Ferris & K. M. Rowland（eds.）.Research in personnel and human resource management, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT：JAI Press.
Wexley, K.N., & Baldwin, T.T. (1986). Performance appraisal: An update, In Rowland KM, Ferris GR (Ed.). Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Greemwocj, CT: JAI Press. 2, 35-79.
Witt, L. A. (1991). Exchange ideology as a moderator of job attitudes-organizational citizenship relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21: 1490-1501.
Yammarino, F. & Atwater, L.E. (1993). Understanding self-perception accuracy: implications for human resources management. Human Resource Management, 32, 231-249.
Yammarino, F. & Atwater, L.E. (1997). Do managers see themselves as others see them? Implications of self-other rating a agreement for human resource management. Organizational Dynamics, 25(4), 35-44.
Yeung, K. A., (1996),"Competencies for HR professionals: An interview with Richard E. Boyatzis", Human Resource Management, pp.119-131.
Yukl, G.A. (1987). A new taxonomy for integrating diverse perspectives on managerial behavior, American Psychological Association Meeting, New York.
Yukl, G.A. (1989). Managerial leadership: A new of theory and research,. Journal of Management, 251-89.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin)

審核日期

2008-7-2

推文