以動態能力觀點探討傳統企業轉型－以SK化纖公司為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：12

、訪客IP：3.144.109.5

姓名

徐瑞昌(Jui-Chang Hsu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

高階主管企管碩士班

論文名稱

以動態能力觀點探討傳統企業轉型－以SK化纖公司為例

相關論文

★ 電子零件通路商在不確定的環境中之經營策略研究	★ 企業建立專屬線上競標B2B交易平台之研究-----以國內某汽車廠為例
★ 筆記型電腦產品開發策略之探討 -- 以某公司為例 --	★ 高齡化社會居住空間之探討
★ 世界級電信設備製造商的競爭策略研究	★ 政府推動習型組織現況探討 -以輔導會各服務機構為例
★ 企業競爭商情教育發展之研究－先進國家與海峽兩岸之比較	★ 中國土地開發決策之內在與外在因素-以南京白鷺湖土地開發與經營為例
★ 女性創業家精神研究—以天成醫療體系個案為例	★ 台灣電腦代工業國際採購管理系統—以A公司為例
★ 大陸台資企業員工離職意願與組織公民行為研究—以A公司為例	★ 製鞋化工業在中國之經營策略探討—超強化工公司個案
★ 海峽兩岸工程師逆境商數分析-以某公司為例	★ 海峽兩岸傳統製造業管理主管之決策風格比較研究－以Ａ公司為例
★ 機會導向創業家之人格特質研究	★ 科技型創業家人格特質研究－ADD與創新之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

台灣傳統產業面臨中國急遽擴充的競爭壓力，在低廉勞力與土地成本的競爭下，產品在國際市場的比較利益漸失。貿易上又遭遇保護主義，歐美國家動輒祭出反傾銷控訴，競爭環境激烈。在世界性競爭環境的快速變化下，勞力密集產業外移尋求生存之道，競爭已從區域走向全球化。這些變化對國內企業帶來更大的挑戰與經營危機，但仍有企業能持續成長獲利，即便一直沒有離開自己固有的產業，總會在一段時間改變事業經營的內容或投入全新的領域，透過轉型為企業延續生命力。
個案企業為典型的傳統產業，經歷最嚴峻的二次石油危機與週期性景氣循環下仍維持健全的體質，經營領域由化纖、塑膠再到光電產業，其成功的關鍵在於持續不斷的企業轉型。
本研究透過動態能力理論架構下探索及驗證，發現企業經營未以Teece(1997)的動態能力做決策，但卻有Teece動態能力理論的決策行為，在程序、定位與路徑執行上符合Teece動態能力理論。企業高階主管透過此理論架構，可以瞭解自身競爭優勢或執行不足之處，更可透過此理論協助企業作為決策的分析工具。

摘要(英)

With increasing competitive pressure from China due to low cost of labor and land, traditional industries in Taiwan are facing declining profits in international markets. Trade protectionism along with anti-dumping restrictions are pervasive in western countries. These two new common scenarios are now making the situation worsen, intensifying competition. In an environment of competition and rapid change, high labor-intensive industries are relocating themselves or sending plants off-shore to find ways to survive. Competition is not just confined to a certain region. It is now global. These changes have caused a great impact and a sense of crisis for domestic companies, but some of them still remain in growth and profitable. Some companies haven’t left their original industry, but instead have adjusted their business operational model or invested and devoted themselves to new fields. Through business model shifting (business transformation), they add new life to an old soul.
The case study company of this research is a traditional enterprise that has twice experienced harsh oil crises and repeated periodic cycles of economic prosperity. It has not been eliminated through crisis and competition; on the contrary, it remains in healthy condition and continues expand itself from originally chemical fibers and plastics supplying trade to newly-invested opto-electronics field. The key to its success is its continued transformations to keep up with the times and current trends.
This study utilizes the theoretical framework of Dynamic Capabilities and verifies the result and procedure based on the theory, finding that though business operators who do not adopt Teece’s theory on making strategic decisions; their decision-making procedure, positioning, and route execution are still in accordance with Teece’s theory. Through the Dynamic Capabilities Theory, upper management of a company not only be enabled to gain a better understanding of their competitive advantage as well as to self operational inadequacies, but also will find it to be an analytical tool in a company’s decision making

關鍵字(中)

★ 動態能力
★ 企業轉型

關鍵字(英)

★ Dynamic capabilities
★ Business transformation

論文目次

第一章緒論.............................................................1
1.1 研究背景與動機................................................. 1
1.2 研究目的....................................................... 2
1.3 研究流程....................................................... 3
第二章文獻探討........................................................ 5
2.1 動態能力....................................................... 5
2.2 企業轉型.......................................................18
2.3 本章小結.......................................................23
第三章研究方法........................................................24
3.1 研究方法......................................................24
3.2 研究架構.......................................................24
3.3 研究對象.......................................................25
第四章個案研究與分析..................................................27
4.1 產業概況................................................................27
4.2 SK企業介紹 .................................................... 39
4.3 SK企業組織發展、成長與轉型............................. .... 46
4.4動態能力配置…………….………………………............. 51
4.5 SK企業轉型歷史.................................................62
4.6 SK企業轉型優勢與困難...........................................66
4.7 SK企業轉型的成效..................................................69
4.8 本章小結...................................................................70
第五章結論與建議......................................................71
5.1 結論........................................................71
5.2 研究限制.......................................................73
5.3 建議...........................................................74
附錄一全球人造纖維技術的演進.............................................................76
附錄二常用塑膠產品介紹................................................................... 79
附錄三各種常用塑膠容器編號.................................................................85
附錄四台灣平面顯示器產業之群聚.......................................................86
附錄五 PET光學基材膜在LCD產業之應用範圍................................87
附錄六個案公司產品簡介...................................................................88
附錄七 SK企業經營策略...................................................................95
參考文獻.........................................................................102

參考文獻

中文
1. Yano(2007) ，”高機能Film市場展望與策略”。
2. 大前研一(2007)，”新企業參謀”，商周出版。
3. 工研院(2006)，IEK/ITRI
4. 卡特．佩蘭、哈倫．普烈特(2002)，”鳳凰效應 The phoenix effect”(葛立書譯)，臉譜出版。
5. 司徒達賢(2007)，”策略管理新論”，智勝出版。
6. 伍忠賢(2000)，”策略轉型的策略方案抉擇”，管理雜誌，第314期，pp.106-110。
7. 伍忠賢(2002)，”實用策略管理”，遠流出版。
8. 吳思華(2003)，”策略九說:策略思考的本質”，臉譜出版。
9. 吳錦錩(2006)，”企業持續性競爭優勢構面—以台灣自有品牌企業為例”中華管理評論，第九卷二期。
10. 巫立宇(2006)，”資源、社會資本、路徑相依與動態能力之研究”，管理評論，第一期，p121-140。
11. 彼得．杜拉克(2002)，”管理的使命 Management : Tasks, responsibilities, practices”(李芳齡譯)，天下文化出版。
12. 林公泰(1999)，“虹光如何建立與維持其動態能力”，碩士論文，國立清華大學：新竹市。
13. 林明杰(2007)，”企業經營策略”，中大管院EMBA上課講義。
14. 范瑞祥(2006)，”頂尖管理”，讀品文化出版。
15. 格林沃德、康恩(2007)，”沒有對手的競爭 Competition demystified”(楊幼蘭譯)，天下文化出版。
16. 紡織中心ITIS計畫(2003)
17. 張宏哲(2002)，“虹光的策略研究” ，碩士論文，國立清華大學：新竹市。
18. 麥可．波特(2001)，”競爭論 On competition”(高登第、李明軒譯)，天下文化出版。
19. 麥可．波特(2007)，”競爭策略 Competitive strategy”(高登第、周旭華譯)，天下文化出版。
20. 喬治．戴伊、大衛．雷伯斯坦(2005)，”動態競爭策略 Wharton on dynamic competitive strategy”(李璞良譯)，商周出版。
21. 楊耀傑(2003)，” 影響組織動態能力因素之研究-以知識管理觀點來探討”`,碩士論文，國立中山大學：高雄市。
22. 經濟部技術處(2003)，”高分子工業年鑑” 。
23. 詹姆．柯林斯(2002)，”從A到A+ Good to great”(齊若蘭譯)，遠流出版。
24. 雍惟畬、洪世章(2006)，“以動態能力觀點探討明基的興起”，管理與系統，第十三卷第一期，pp.99-120頁。
25. 劉維寧(2004)，”全球化知識管理能耐、企業動態能力與競爭優勢間關係之研究”，碩士論文，國立中山大學：高雄市。
26. 歐智生(2005)，”動態能力的前因及其對企業經營型態影響之研究－以台灣流行服飾產業為例”，碩士論文，國立第一科技大學：高雄市。
27. 張旭男(2002)，”運用動態能力架構探討企業發展途徑”，碩士論文，東海：台中市。
英文
1. Amit, R. & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993), “Strategic assets and organizational rent,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No.1, pp.33-46.
2. Argyres, N. (1995), “Tehcnology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 28, pp.337-358.
3. Barney, J. B. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, Vol.17, pp.99–120.
4. Bishop, P. & Wiseman, N. (1999) “External ownership and innovation in the United Kingdom”, Applied economics. Vol, 31,No.4, pp.443-450.
5. Collis, D. J.,(1996).” Organizational learning and competitive advantage,” London: Sage.
6. Deeds, D. L., DeCarolis, D. D. and Coombs, J. (1999), “Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An emperical analysis of new biotechnology firms,” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 15, pp.211-229.
7. Doz, Y. & A. Shuen (1995), ” From intent to outcome: The evolution and overnance of interfirm partnerships” . Insead, pp. 1–42.
8. Eisenhardt, M. K. and Martin, A. J.,(2000). “Dynamic capabilities: What are they?,” Strategic Management Journal. Vol.21, No.10/11, pp.1105-1121.
9. Garvin, D. A. & Levesque, L. C. (2006) , ”Meeting the challenge of corporate entrepreneurship”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84, No. 10, pp.102-112.
10. Govindarajan, V. & Trimble, C. (2005). ”Building breakthrough businesses within established organizations”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 83, No. 5, pp.58-68.
11. Grifﬁth, D. A. and Harvey, M. G. (2001). ‘A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities’.Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 3, 597–606.
12. Helfat, E. C.,(1997). “Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D,” Strategic Management Journal. Vol.18, No.5, pp.339-360.
13. Henderson, R. and Cockburn, I., (1994).“Measuring competence? Exploiting firm effects in pharmaceutical markets research,” Strategic Management Journal. Vol.15 (winter special issue), pp.63–84.
14. Kotter, J. P. (1995). ”Leading change: Why transformation failed”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp.59-67.
15. Langlois, R. (1994), “Cognition and capabilities: Opportunities seized and missed int he history of the computer industry,” Conference on Technological Oversights and Foresights, Stern School of Business, New York, 11-12.
16. Lee, J., Lee, K. and Rho, S. (2002). ‘An evolutionary perspective on strategic group emergence: Agenetic algorithm-based model’. Strategic Management Journal 23, 8, 727–47.
17. Louise O’Brien & Stewart, T. A. (2005). “Transforming an industrial giant,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, pp.114-122.
18. Luo, Y.,(2000). “Dynamic capabilities in international expansion,” Journal of World Business. Vol.35, No.4, pp.355-378.
19. McGahan, A. M. (2004). ”How industries change,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82, No. 10, pp.86-94.
20. Mody, A. (1993), “Learning through alliances,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.151-170.
21. Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. (1982), “An evolutionary theory of economic change,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Pitelis C. (1993), Transaction costs, markets and hierarchies, Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Porter, M. (1980) " Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance,” Free Press, New York.
24. Richardson, G. B.,(1972). “The organization of industry,” The Economic Journal. Vol.82, No.3, pp.883-896.
25. Rindova, V. and Taylor, S. (2002). ‘Dynamic capabilities as macro and micro organizationalevolution,”. www.rhsmith.umd.edu/hcit/docs/dynamic.pdf.
26. Shaker, A. Z., Sapienza, H. J. ,& Davidsson, P. (2006). ” Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda,” Journal of Management Studies, Volume 43, No. 4, pp.917-955.
27. Shapiro, C. (1989). “The theory of business strategy,” Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 20, pp.125-137.
28. Stewart T. A. & Hemp, P. (2004). ”Leading change: When business is good,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82, No. 12, pp.60-70.
29. Teece, D. J., Gary, P. & Amy, S. (1997). ” Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic management journal, Vol. 18, pp.509–533.
30. Verona, G. and Ravasi, D., (2003). “Unbundling dynamic capabilities: An exploratory study of continuous product innovation,” Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol.12, No.3, pp.577-606.
31. Wernerfelt Jr, B. (1984). ” A resource-based view of the firm source,” Strategic Management Journal, vol 5,, No. 2,pp.171.
32. Winter, S. G. (2003). ‘Understanding dynamic capabilities’. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 10,991–5.
33. Zahra, S. and George, G. (2002). “Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization and extension,” Academy of Management Review, 27, 2, 213–40.
34. Zollo, M. & Winter, S. G. (2002). ” Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities,” Organization Science, vol 13, pp.339-351.
35. Zott, C., (2003).“Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.24, No.2, pp.97-125.

指導教授

林子銘(Tzu-Ming Lin)

審核日期

2008-6-18

推文