博碩士論文 954307012 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:9 、訪客IP:18.232.99.123
姓名 朱國鴻(Kuo-Hung Chu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所在職專班
論文名稱 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例
(The impact of sales representative’s personality and core competency on job performance, example from a pharmaceutical company )
相關論文
★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項
★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯-以IC設計產業為例
★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例
★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響 以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項★ 便利商店服務氣候對組織公民行為之影響
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 影響業務人員績效的表現有許多因素,從個人的角度來看有人格特質、職能、態度等因素。過去的學者大都分別針對人格質與工作績效,或職能與工作績效進行探討,並未同時探討人格特質與職能對工作績效的影響。本研究主要探討業務人員五大人格特質及核心職能對於工作績效--業績達成率及年度考績的影響。
本研究針對某藥廠四個事業單位年資在半年以上的155位業務代表作為研究的樣本,其中五大人格特質量表採業務代表自評方式進行;而核心職能量表為個案公司所使用,由主管針對所屬的業務代表進行評核。透過這二種方式分別搜集五大人格特質及核心職能相關研究資訊,實際回收140份問卷,剔除無效問卷後的有效樣本為110份。經由迴歸分析統計方法整理分析後,有以下發現:
一、 業務代表的核心職能與工作績效—業績達成率及年度考績達到顯著水準,此顯示業務人員核心職能分數愈高,其工作績效的表現也愈好。
二、 業務代表的五大人格特質與工作績效—業績達成率及年度考績並未達到顯著水準,此顯示五大人格特質並無法預測業務人員的工作績效。
摘要(英) From an individual’s perspective, the factors related to sales representative’s job performance include personality, core competency, job attitude and etc. Instead of discussing both the personality’s and core competence’s impact on job performance in one study, past researches usually only dealt with one topic. The study is to explore the impact of “Big Five” personality traits and core competences of sales representative on job performance - sales achievement rate and year end performance.
The research sample, 155 sales representatives, came from four business units of the sales department in one Pharmaceutical company. A brief version of Goldberg’s Unipolar Big-Five Markers was distributed to sales representatives for self evaluation. The core competency survey developed and adopted by the Pharmaceutical Company was distributed to district managers for evaluating their sales representatives. The effective sample is 110 after deleting ineffective questionnaire. The findings after regression analysis are as follows.
1. The relationship between core competency of sales representative and performance - such as sales achievement rate and year end performance rating is significant. This means the higher score of the sales representative’s core competency, the higher of sales achievement rate and year end performance rating.
2. The relationship between “Big Five” personality traits of sales representative and performance - such as sales achievement rate and year end performance rating is not significant. This means that the personality traits have no impact on sales representative’s sales achievement rate and year end performance rating.
關鍵字(中) ★ 業務代表
★ 人格特質
★ 核心職能
★ 工作績效
關鍵字(英) ★ Performance
★ Sales Representative
★ Personality
★ Core competency
論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 工作績效的意涵 4
第二節 人格特質 6
第三節 職能 13
第三章 研究設計與研究方法 22
第一節 研究架構與假說 22
第二節 研究變項操作型定義及衡量 23
第三節 研究對象與施測過程 26
第四節 分析方法 28
第四章 資料分析與研究結果 30
第一節 描述性統計 30
第二節 迴歸分析 35
第五章 討論與建議 38
第一節 研究結論 38
第二節 管理意涵 40
第三節 研究限制 41
第四節 後續研究建議 42
參考文獻 43
附錄一 研究問卷 47
附錄二 業務代表能力—行為範例手冊 50
附錄三 研究問卷 67
參考文獻 一、中文:
李美玉(1999),西藥業務人員專業核心職能之研究—以某製藥公司為例,桃園:國立中央大學人力資源研究所未出版之碩士論文。
李樹中(2001),業務人員專業職能需求研究以某辦公家具公司為例,桃園:國立中央大學人力資源研究所未出版之碩士論文。
吳信如(2002),資訊軟體業業務人員專業核心職能量表之建立,桃園:國立中央大學人力資源研究所碩士論文。
詹益民(1996),個人屬性、人格特質與內滋激勵與外附激勵關聯性之研究—以交通部數據通訊所員工為例,新竹:國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
許士軍(1981),現代行銷管理(三版),台北: 帝略印書館。
黃同圳(2000),人力資源管理的十二堂課, 台北, 天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
魏金梅(2002),才能評鑑法,台北:商周出版社。
二、英文:
Allport,G.W, 1961. Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K., 1991. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performances: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M.K., & Strauss, J. P., 1993 Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 715-722
Behling, O. 1998. “Employee Selection: Will Intelligence and Conscientiousness Do the Job?” Academy of Management Executive 12: 77-86.
Bing, M. N. and J. W. Lounsbury. 2000. “Openness to Experience-Performance Relationship.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 17 (8): m712-722.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The Competence Manager: A Model for Effective Performance, New York John Wiley & Sons.
Chevalier, R.D.(1993). “The Salesperson as Consultant”, American Salesman, 38(11), PP. 22-24
Costa, P.T.Jr. & McCrae, R.R., 1992. An Introduction of the Five-Factor Modeland its Applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.
Costa, P. T., Jr. and R. R. McCrae. 1995. “Domains and Facets: Hierarchical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.” Journal of Personality Assessment 64: 21-50
David V. Day and Stanley B. Silverman. (1989). “Personality and Job Performance: Evidence of Incremental Validity, “ Personnel Psychology, 42, pp.25-36.
Digman JM. (1989). Five robust trait dimensions: Development, stability, and utility. Journal of Personality, 57, 195-214.
Digman JM. (1990). Personality Structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
Gerard Saucier 1994 Mini-Markers: A brief Version of Goldberg’s Unipolar Big-Five Markers, Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3). 506-516.
Hogan, J. and B. Holland. 2003. “Using Theory to Evaluate Personality and Job-Performance Relations: A Socioanalytic Perspective.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88(1): 100-112.
Judge, T. A. and R. Ilies. 2002. “Relationship of Personality to Performance Motivation: A Meta-analytic Review.” Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (4): 797-807.
McClelland, David C. (1973). “ Testing for Competence Rather Than Intelligence” American Psychologist, 28(1), pp.1-14.
Motowidlo, S. J. Van Scotter. 1994. “ Evidence that Task Performance Should Be Distinguished from Contextual Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology 79: 475-480
Nguyen, N.T, L., C. Allen and K. Fraccastoro. 2005. “ Personality Predicts Academic Performance: Exploring the Moderating Role of Gender .” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (1):105-116.
Nikolaou, I. 2003. “Fitting the Person to the Organization: Examining the Personality-Job Performance Relationship from a new Perspective.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 18 (7): 639-648.
Parry, S.B.(1998), “Just What is a Competency? And Why Should You Care?” Training , 35(6), pp.58-64.
Patricia C. Smith & Lorne Kendall L M. 1963, “Retranslation of expectations; an approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. J. Appl. Psychol. 47:149-55
Pervin, L.A., John,O.P., 1997. Personality: theory and research. New York: John Wiley.
Thoreson, C., J. Bradley, P. Bliese and D. Thoreson, 2004. “The Big Five Personality Traits and Individual Job Performance Growth Trajectories in Maintenance and Transitional Job Stages.” Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (5): 835-853.
Robie, C., Brown and P. Bly. 2005. “The Big Five in the USA and Janap.” Journal of Management Development 24 (8): 720-737.
Sackett, P.R. and C. J. Devore. 2001. “Counterproductive Behaviors at Work.” Chapter in Handbook of Industrial, work, and Organizational Psychology, vol. 1. Eds. N. Andeerson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil and C. Viswesvaran. London, UK: Sage. Pp. 145-164.
Salgado, J. F., 1997 The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
Salgado, J.F. 2003. “Predicting Job Performance using FFM and Non-FFM Personality Measures.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology76(3): 323-346.
Smith GM. (1967). Usefulness of peer ratings of personality in educational research. Educational and Psychological measurement, 27, 967-984.
Scott R. Ross, M. Karega Rausch, and Kellie(2003). Competition and Cooperation in the Five-Factor Model: Individual differences in achievement orientation. The journal of Psychology, 2003, 137(4), 323-337
Spencer, L. M. & Spencer, S.M., 1993, Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance, N.Y. : John wily & Sons, Inc
Stanton. W. J., 1975. Fundamentals of Marketing, 4th ed., New York, Mcgraw-Hill Book Co., 499.
Taylor, T.C.(1978). Sales and Marketing Management, New York: Pergamon Press Co.
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M., 1991. Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44 (4), 703-742.
Tupes, E.C. & Christal, R.E., 1961. Recurrent Personality factors based on trait rating (ASTD-TR-61-97). Lackland Air Force Base, TX: Aeronautical System Division, Personnel Laboratory.
Wiggins N, Blackburn M, Hackman JR. (1969). The prediction of first-year success in psychology: Peer ratings. Journal of Educational Research, 63, 81-85.
指導教授 辛炳隆、劉念琪
(Ping-lung Hsin、Nien-chi Liu)
審核日期 2008-7-17
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明