博碩士論文 954403009 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:11 、訪客IP:54.173.214.227
姓名 黃國權(Kuo Chuan Huang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 外部規範改變對企業及產業之影響-以台灣銀行業因應個資法為例
(The Impact of Regulatory Changes on Enterprise and Industry – A Study on Taiwanese Banks Responding to the Personal Information Protection Act)
相關論文
★ 以個案研究法探討機械式組織之資訊系統導入★ 製藥業的成本會計評估研究─ 一個ABC成本制度的應用
★ 銀行企業內部網路導入TCP/IP通信協定之研究★ 後金控時代臺灣地區金融服務業 薪資決策支援系統之設計研究 --以一家中型證券商為例
★ 影響數位在職訓練之學習態度及行為意向研究★ 一個保險業的資料採擷應用--業務員的薪酬制度分析
★ 農漁產品電子化交易中分類分級管理之研究★ 應用類神經網路建構壽險核保決策支援之研究
★ 台灣銀行業導入電子商務線上金流訊息標準之研究★ 國防訓儲軍士官制度評估
★ 以關係承諾角度探討組織中軟體專案開發之個案研究★ 企業導入ERP之關鍵成功因素-個案研究
★ 體外診斷醫療器材滿足CE及GMP驗證要求之個案研★ 企業工作流程再造之研究─以銀行發卡流程為例
★ 企業資訊系統委外研究-以個案銀行為例★ 以個案研究法探討B2B電子商務導入之研究—以汽車售後服務件製造商為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 個資法實施國內的經營環境正面臨個資法施行的衝擊與挑戰,企業組織若違反個資法,將會面臨損害賠償及團體訴訟等問題。其中銀行業者因持有大量的客戶資料更是政府與社會各界高度關注的行業之一。當企業面臨無法避免之外部環境變化與壓力時,該何去何從?是適應環境還是選擇環境?整個組織調適與變革的過程,在眾多的理論當中,是否有切合之理論可以獲得解答呢?因許多組織的變革壓力往往來自於外部環境,了解組織所面臨的外部環境,企業才能進行組織內部的調整,當環境變得愈來愈不確定,企業必須要花費更多的時間了解環境的變化,並且創造內部配適以因應外在的改變壓力。
本研究首先從組織變革文獻中提出了三個命題,並推演出分類矩陣,再以國內個人資料保護法的施行做為外部環境的改變壓力,藉由銀行業者因應個資法施行及後續所面臨的挑戰與改變,如何做組織的變革與調整以適應外部環境的變化做為研究資料的來源。本研究之目的是以組織理論為依據提出研究的命題,利用深度訪談方法探索外部環境與組織內部之間的關係,研究結果發現外部環境的壓力與改變,確實會造成組織內部的壓力並隨之做調適,組織也會取得外部資源的協助,來降低內部所面臨的壓力並希望能尋求組織間的共識來減少外部環境的壓力,從個案銀行在分類矩陣的流動中發現了銀行會因採取的因應措施不同而產生不同的流動路徑。
摘要(英) In Taiwan, the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) took effect in October 2012. This severely impacted the domestic business environment. Organizations were confronted with the challenges of responding to the new regulation, and faced with the repercussions of violations, including class litigation, liability in damages, among others. As custodians of large amounts of sensitive customer data, the banking industry in particular is at the frontline, facing scrutiny from the government, and the society at large.
What should an organization do when confronted with unavoidable external pressures and changes? Should they adapt to the change in environment, or select their environment? In the process of adaptation and change, are there suitable theories that can provide practical guidance? The pressure for change often arises from the environment, and therefore it is imperative to understand the environment changes so that an organization can take effective actions. When the environment becomes increasingly uncertain, organizations must spend more resources to understand the changes and plan for suitable responses to ease the pressures.
The purpose of this study is to utilize organizational theories as a foundation to explore the issue of how organizations change and adjust when facing environmental changes. This study begins by examining the related theories and proposes three propositions as a framework. It then carried out an exploratory case study on five banks in Taiwan, addressing organization changes in response to PIPA, using in-depth interview and examination of related documents. Results indicate that pressures and changes originating from the external environment do lead to stress within the organization and to subsequent adjustments. In addition, organizations will seek external resources as assistance in order to reduce the internal pressures they are facing, and they hope to seek consensus among competing organizations so as to reduce the pressures of the external environment. Finally, different banks with different conditions take totally different paths of change in the process of adaptation.
關鍵字(中) ★ 個人資料保護法
★ 外部環境
★ 內部組織
★ 組織變革
關鍵字(英) ★ Personal Information Protection Act
★ external environment
★ internal organization structure
★ organization change
論文目次 目錄 ……………………………………………………………… vii
圖目錄 …………………………………………………………… x 表目錄 …………………………………………………………… xi 第一章、 緒論…………………………………………………… 1
1.1 研究背景與動機…………………………………………… 1
1.2 研究目的…………………………………………………… 7
1.3 研究流程…………………………………………………… 7
1.4 論文架構…………………………………………………… 8
第二章、 文獻探討……………………………………………… 10
2.1 個資法國外相關的研究…………………………………… 10
2.2 金融業實施個資法概況…………………………………… 11
2.3 組織變革理論……………………………………………… 12
2.4 資源依賴理論……………………………………………… 19
2.5 組織生態理論與資源依賴理論之差異…………………… 20
2.6 組織與環境的關係………………………………………… 21
2.7 個案研究…………………………………………………… 23
第三章、 研究方法……………………………………………… 24
3.1 質性研究…………………………………………………… 24
3.2 研究命題…………………………………………………… 29
3.3 分類………………………………………………………… 31
3.4 個案分析…………………………………………………… 32
3.5 命題修正…………………………………………………… 37
3.6 次級資料…………………………………………………… 43
3.7 探索性深度訪談…………………………………………… 46
3.8 編碼資料分析……………………………………………… 51
3.9 三角交叉檢定法…………………………………………… 52
第四章、 個案分析……………………………………………… 54
4.1 個案銀行背景……………………………………………… 54
4.2 銀行因應策略……………………………………………… 55
4.3 個案比較…………………………………………………… 60
4.4 個資法公布前後差異……………………………………… 60
4.5 個案綜合彙總比較………………………………………… 65
第五章、 結論與建議…………………………………………… 66
5.1 研究發現…………………………………………………… 66
5.2 結論………………………………………………………… 67
5.3 管理意函…………………………………………………… 70
5.4 研究限制與未來建議……………………………………… 70

參考文獻 ………………………………………………………… 71
附錄 個案文本…………………………………………………… 78
參考文獻 英文文獻
Agrawal, V. K., & Haleem, A, 2003, “Culture, environmental pressures, and the factors for successful implementation of business process engineering and computer-based information systems,” Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 4(1/2) , 27-47.
Aldrich, H.E, & Wiedenmayer, G, 1993, “From traits to rates: An ecological perspective on organizational foundings,” In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.). Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, 1 , 145-195.
Aldrich, H. E, 1999, Organizations evolving, London: Sage Publications.
Anderson, D., & Anderson, L. A., 2001, Beyond change management, San Francisco , Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.
Anderson, L. A., 1986, “Development, transition or transformation: The question of change in organizations,” OD Practitioner, 18(4).
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G., 1999, “Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s,” Journal of Management, 25(3), 293-315.
Barnett, W. P., 1997, “The Dynamics of Competitive Intensity,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 128-160.
Barnett, W. P., 1990, “The Organizational Ecology of a Technological System,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 31-60.
Boone, C. & Witteloostuijn, A. v., 1995, “Industrial Organization and Organizational Ecology: The Potentials for Cross-fertilization,” Organization Studies, 16, 265-298 .
Brin David, 1998, The transparent Society: Will technology force us to choose between privacy or freedom? New York: Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.
Brittain, J. W., & Wholey, D. R., 1989, “Assessing organizational ecology as sociological theory: Comment on Young,” American Journal of Sociology, 95,439-444.
Burnes, B., 2004, Managing Change (The fourth edition), Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Carroll,G.R.,1984,“Dynamics of publisher succession in newspaper organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 93-113.
Carroll, G. R., and M. T. Hannan., 2000, The Demography of Corporations and Industries, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Champy, J., 2008, Outsmart! How to Do What Your Competitors Can′t, FT Press.
Creswell, John W, 1998, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Traditions, Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Dey, Ian., 1993, Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-friendly guide for social scientists, London and New York: Routledge.
Dohan, Daniel and Martin Sanchez-Jankowski., 1998, “Using Computers to Analyze Ethnographic Field Data: Theoretical and Practical Considerations,” Annual Review of Sociology, 24,477-98.
Dowling, J., and J. Pfeffer, 1975, “Organizational Legitimacy, Social Values and Organizational Behavior,” Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122-136.
Glaser,Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss., 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory, New York, Aldine Publishing Company.
Gobo, Giampietro, 2005, “The Renaissance of Qualitative Method,” Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6,(3).
Hage,J.T., 1999, “Organizational innovation and organizational change,” Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 597-622.
Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J., 1984, “Structural inertia and organizational change,” American Sociological Review, 49(April) , 149-164.
Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J., 1980, Organizational Ecology, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hannan, M. T., and Freeman, J., 1977, “Population Ecology of Organizations,” American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964.
Hannan, M. T., and J. H. Freeman., 1989, Organizational Ecology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harvey, M., Novicevic, M. M., & Kiessling, T., 2001, “Hypercompetition and the future of global management in the twenty-first century,” Thunderbird International Business Review, 43(5), 599.
Henderson, R. and K. B. Clark., 1990, “Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
Hirsch, P. M., 1975, “Organizational effectiveness an the institutional environment,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 20,327-344.
Holsti, O. R., 1969, Content Analysis for the Social Science and Humanities, Massachusetts Menlo Park, California: Addison-Westly Publishing Company.
Kimberly, J. R., & Quinn, J. B., 1984, Managing organizational transition, Homewood, Illinois, Jessey Base.
Leavitt, H. J., 1965, “Applying organizational change in industry: Structural, technological and humanistic approaches,” In Handbook of organizations, Rand McNally, Skokie, IL., 1144-1170.
Leavitt, H. J., 1964, Applied organizational change in industry: Structural, technical and human approaches, In W. W. Cooper, H. J. Leavitt, and M. W. Shelly (Eds.), New perspectives in organizational research, New York: Wiley.
MacMillan, Katie, 2005, “More Than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts,” Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6, (3).
Mascarenhas, B. & Sambharya, R. B., 1996, “The Pattern of Density Dependence in Two Global Industries,” Management International Review , 36 , 331-354.
Meyer, A. D., 1982, “Adapting to environmental jolts,” Administrative Science Quarterly , 27, 515-537.
Miles, Matthew B. and A. Michael Huberman, 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Newman, K. L. & Nollen, S. D., 1998, Managing radical organizational change, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Patton, M. Q. , 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, California: Sage Publications.
Patton, M. Q., 2002, Qualitative research & evaluation method, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H., 1982, In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies, New York: Harper & Row.
Pfeffer, J., 1992, Management with Power, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Pfeffer, J., 1973, “Size, Composition, and Function of Hospital Boards of Directors: A Study of Organizational-Environment Linkage,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 349-364.
Pfeffer, J., 1977, “The Ambiguity of Leadership,” Academy of Management Review , 2, 104-112.
Pfeffer, J., and H. Leblebici, 1973, “Executive Recruitment and the Development of Inter firm Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 449-461.
Pfeffer, J., and P. Nowak, 1976, “Joint Ventures and Interorganizational Interdependence,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 398-418.
Pfeffer, J. & G. R. Salancik, 1978, Social Control of Organizations, The external control of organization: A resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
Pieters, G. R. & Young, D. W, 2000, The ever-changing organization, New York, St. Lucie Press.
Reger, R. K., Mullane, J. V., Gustafson, L. T., & DeMarie, S. M., 1994, “Creating earthquakes to change organizational mindsets,” Academy of Management Executive, 8(4), 31-42.
Richards, Lyn, 2005, Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide, Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage.
Scott, W. R., 1981, Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems Perspectives, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Scott, W. R., 1992, Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems Perspectives, 3rd Ed, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Shapiro, Andrew L., 1999, “Thinkagain: The Internet, Foreign Policy,”Iss, 155, Summer, 14-27.
Smith, A., Oczkowski , E ., Noble, E., & Macklin, R., 2004, “The impact of organizational change on the nature and extent of training in Australian enterprises,” International Journal of Training and Development, 8(2), 94-110.
Strauss, A & Corbin, J., 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research:Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A & Corbin, J., 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research:Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Van de Ven, A. H. & Poole, M. S., 1995, “Explaining development and change in organizations,” Academy of Management Review,” 20(3), 510-540.
Vidich, Arthur J. and Stanford M. Lyman., 1994, “Qualitative Method: Their History in Sociology and Anthropology,” Denzin and Yvonna S, Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research, London: Sage, 23-59.
Weber, R. P., 1990, Basic Content Analysis, 2nd (ed.), California: SAGE Publications.
中文文獻
Berger, Asa Arthur, 2000, Media and Communication Research Methods, Sage Publications, 黃光玉、 劉念夏、陳清文譯,2004,媒介與傳播研究方法:質化與量話研究途徑,風雲論壇,台北。
Boyatzis, Richard E., 1998, Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development, Sage Publications, 王國川、翁千惠譯,2005,質性資料分析:如何透視質性資料,五南圖書,台北。
Champy, Jim, 1994, Case Study Research, Sage Publications, 李宛蓉譯,2010,企業進化論:順勢應變求存,8個智勝對手、創新成長的贏家金律,商周出版,台北。
Lessig, Lawrence, 1999, Code and other Laws of Cyberspace, Basic Books, 劉靜怡譯,2002,網路自由與法律,商周出版社,台北。
Miles, Matthew B. and A. Michael Huberman,1994, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook., Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications. 張芬芬譯,2005,質性研究資料分析,雙葉書廊,台北。
Pfeffer, Jeffrey & Gerald R. Salan, 1978, The external control of organizations-a resource dependence perspective, Harper and Row, 俞慧芸譯注,2007,組織的外部控制—資源依賴觀點,聯經出版社,台北。
王仕圖、吳慧敏, 2003,年深度訪談與案例演練,南華大學教育社會所,嘉義。
王石番,1991,傳播內容分析法—理論與實證,幼獅文化事業公司,台北。
台灣金融服務業聯合總會,2011,「下載專區:個人資料保護法規對金融業影響之探討-研討會會議實錄摘要」,http://www.tfsr.org.tw/static_list.php?section=23,取用日期:2014年1月。
吳定等,2005,組織發展應用技術,智勝文化出版,台北。
周平、齊偉先,2006,文化研究的越界:文化現象研究與質性研究方法,南華大學教育社會所,嘉義。
林本炫,2007,不同質性研究方法的資料分析比較,南華大學教育社會所,嘉義。
林本炫、何明修,2004,質性研究方法及其超越,南華大學教育社會所,嘉義。
林本炫、周平,2005,質性研究方法與議題創新,南華大學教育社會所,嘉義。
法務部,2013,「個人資料保護法專區」,http://pipa.moj.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1,取用日期:2014年3月。
胡幼慧,1996,質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例,巨流圖書公司,台北。
范錚強,2006,資訊管理領域中的質性研究,未出版手稿。
孫譪彬、王凱、范錚強,2002,「台灣資訊軟體產業發展之生態演進分析」,資訊管理研究,4卷,1期, 67-70頁。
徐宗國,1996,紮根理論研究法,載於胡幼慧主編,質性研究,巨流,台北年。
徐宗國譯,1997,質性研究概論,巨流,台北。
徐聯恩,1996,企業變革系列研究,華泰書局,台北。
袁方編,2002,社會研究方法,五南出版,台北。
陳介玄,2004,企業研究的深度訪談與資料分析,南華大學教育社會所,嘉義。
陳光榮,2003,精省後中部辦公室就地安置之公務人員的心理知覺、工作滿足與組織承諾之研究,人事行政局出版,台北。
陳向明,2002,社會科學質的研究,五南圖書,台北。
黃俊英,1999,行銷研究:管理技術,華泰書局,台北。
黃政傑,1998,質化研究的原理與方法,質的教育研究:方法與實例,漢文,台北。
黃政傑,1998,質的教育研究:方法與實例,漢文,台北。
勤業眾信聯合會計師事務所,2012,個資法最新動態分享與因應之道,勤業眾信通訊,台北。
楊仁壽、卓秀足、俞慧芸,2009,組織理論與管理:個案、衡量與產業應用,雙葉書廊,台北。
熊愛卿,2000,「網際網路個人資料保護之研究」,臺灣大學法律學研究所博士論文。
管康彥,2000,企業變革轉型,載於周旭華譯、科特等人合著,哈佛商業評論精選-變革,天下文化,台北。
趙琪,2001,「資源依賴與交易成本對海外子公司控制機制之影響—台灣企業與大陸子公司之實證研究」,中山管理評論, 9卷, 1期,87-109頁。
齊力、林本炫,2003,質性研究方法與資料分析,南華大學教育社會所,嘉義。
劉惠琴,1996,社會變遷中的夫妻衝突與影響歷程,國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC85-2417-H-031-002G6。
潘淑滿,2002,質性研究:理論與應用,心理出版社,台北。
蕭瑞麟,不用數字的研究:鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究,培生集團,2006年。
指導教授 范錚強、范懿文
(C.K. Farn、Fan, Y.W)
審核日期 2014-7-21
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明