The Uses of ��Men who have Sex with Men�� in Taiwan's Official AIDS Discourse

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：75

、訪客IP：3.15.202.4

姓名

李佳霖(Chia-lin Li) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

英美語文學系

論文名稱

(The Uses of "Men who have Sex with Men" in Taiwan's Official AIDS Discourse)

相關論文

★ 情感裂隙與酷兒（對抗）位置性：當代台灣男同志E藥文化中的性與親密關係	★ 性平治理與友善校園：兒少保護主義的含蓄政治
★ 越南和台灣媒體的同性戀羞恥	★ 男色為何物：晚明小說《弁而釵》、《宜春香質》、《龍陽逸史》中「情」作為文人意識的探討
★ 「行為的論述」：翻譯朱迪斯·霍伯斯坦的《女性陽剛》

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本論文探討「男性間性行為者 (MSM)」一詞在台灣官方的愛滋論述中如何被使用。科學家與公共衛生官員通常認為MSM一詞是被醫學淨化的以及政治立場中立。但批評家Paula A. Treichler 指出男同志的身體在一個特定的社會文化脈絡中被生物醫學論述建構為愛滋故事的主要文本。基於此，我將把MSM一詞的創造視為深深鑲嵌在論述涵義與社會文化規範之中。本文分析以及批判的目標是建構MSM身體的台灣官方愛滋防治論述。
Treichler 主張如果沒有認知到愛滋的物質和語意上的雙重性 (the duality of AIDS)，那麼就無法做出穎睿的介入行動。基於此，我將透過檢視MSM一詞的語意/論述層面並且批判它的問題涵義來介入台灣的愛滋政治。藉由指出MSM的身體所涉及的涵義不同於男同志的身體，我企圖揭示與批判台灣官方愛滋防治行動中使用MSM一詞所產生的規訓效應。換句話說，本論文將會透過論述和文化的角度切入檢視MSM身體在官方論述中的形構與效應。我將聚焦在台灣本地男同志三溫暖流行病學研究以及血液安全政策之中所浮現的MSM身體。我企圖批判性地分析當台灣衛生主管機關佈署此名詞所衍生的問題涵義。透過這個批判分析，不僅能夠揭示國家公權力在MSM一詞的名義之下介入本地男同志的社交空間，並且標示出對於官方愛滋論述中MSM做出批判反思與質問的重要性。

摘要(英)

This thesis investigates the uses of "Men who have Sex with Men (MSM)" in Taiwan’’s official AIDS discourse. Scientists and public health officials generally assume that the term MSM is medically sanitized and politically neutral. But following critic Paula A. Treichler’’s proposition that the body of gay men was constructed by biomedical discourse as the major text of AIDS stories in a specific socio-cultural milieu, I will approach the invention of the term MSM as deeply embedded with discursive connotations and socio-cultural codes. The target of my analysis and critique is Taiwan’’s official AIDS prevention discourse that constructs the MSM body.
Following Treichler’’s argument that intelligent interventions cannot be formulated without recognizing the "duality of AIDS" as both material and linguistic, I will intervene into Taiwan’’s AIDS politics by examining the linguistic/discursive aspect of the term MSM and critiquing its problematic implications. By proposing that the meanings entailed by "the MSM body" differ from that of the gay male body, I intend to expose and critique the disciplinary effects produced by the official deployment of the term MSM in the state’’s AIDS prevention moves. In other words, my thesis will examine the MSM body through discursive and cultural lenses. I will focus on the MSM body as it appears in Taiwan’’s local gay bathhouse epidemiology research and in the blood safety policy. I intend to critically analyze the problematic implications entailed by the term MSM when it is deployed by Taiwanese health authority. The critical analyses of these implications not only expose the intervention of state power into the local gay socializing space under the rubric of MSM, but also mark out the importance of a critical reflection on and interrogation of MSM in the official AIDS discourse.

關鍵字(中)

關鍵字(英)

★ MSM
★ AIDS

論文目次

Table of Contents
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………….…i
Chinese Abstract……………………………………………………………………...ii
Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………..iii
Chapter One: Introduction: Inventing “Men who have Sex with Men”……………....1
Chapter Two: The MSM Body and Sexual Tropics………………………………….16
Chapter Three: The Blood Ban on MSM in Taiwan………………………………....41
Chapter Four: Conclusion: Toward a Critical Reflection on MSM………………….63
Works Cited………………………………………………………………………….68

參考文獻

Altman, Dennis. “HIV, Homosexuality, and Vulnerability in the Developing World.” AIDS in the World II. Ed. Jonathan M. Mann and Daniel Tarantola. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
AVERT. “HIV, AIDS and men who have sex with men.” , accessed on 3 Nov. 2010.
Bennett, Jeffrey A. Banning Queer Blood: Rhetorics of Citizenship, Contagion, and Resistance. The University of Alabama Press, 2009.
CDC 疾病管制局. Drug Party and Home Party Have Become the Hot Bed of AIDS. CDC Calls on Rejecting Drug Party. Do Not Flying into the Fire Like a Moth〈毒趴、轟趴已成愛滋感染溫床疾管局呼籲拒毒拒轟趴，切勿飛蛾撲火〉CDC 疾病管制局21 Feb. 2007 , accessed on 1 Nov. 2010.
CDC 疾病管制局. The 8th Taipei International AIDS Conference, Explore MSM and AIDS Prevention Issues, Calling on the Public to See AIDS Problems〈第八屆台北國際愛滋病研討會，探討「男性間性行為(MSM)與愛滋病防治」議題，呼籲大眾正視愛滋病問題〉CDC疾病管制局 10 Sep. 2006 , accessed on 19 May 2010.
CDC 疾病管制局. Developing the Structural Intervention of STDs and AIDS Prevention Applicable to Gay Bathhouses〈發展應用在男同性戀三溫暖之防治性病及愛滋病的結構式介入措施〉CDC疾病管制局2005 , accessed on 17 May 2010.
CDC 疾病管制局. The Long-Term Tracking Research on the Sexual Behaviors and the Condition of HIV Infection among Gay Bathhouse Customers in the Middle and Northern Regions of Taiwan〈台灣中、北部地區男同志三溫暖顧客之性行為及感染HIV情形之長期追蹤研究〉疾病管制局 2004 , accessed on 6 Apr. 2010.
Chen, Jun-Kai　陳鈞凱. The Standard of Blood Donation Discriminates Gay. Human Rights Groups Ask for Amendment〈捐血標準歧視同志人權團體抗議要求修法〉. 中央社19 Sep. 2005 , accessed on 3 Nov. 2010.
Chung, Dau-Chuan 鍾道詮. Is Gay Men’s Blood Dirty?: A critique on the regulation “Gay and bisexual men are not allowed to be blood donors” 〈男同志的血是污毒之血?—試論「男同性戀與雙性戀者永遠不得捐血」之規定〉. 《婦女與兩性學刊》12 (2001): 167-90.
Crimp, Douglas. “How to Have Promiscuity in an Epidemic.” AIDS: Cultural Analysis/Cultural Activism. Ed. Douglas Crimp. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1988. 237-71.
DOH 衛生署. The DOH Stipulates the Criteria for Donor Selection (draft), To Secure the Safety of Blood Transfusion〈衛生署訂定捐血者健康標準 (草案)，為輸血安全把關〉台灣性別人權協會19 Sep. 2005a , accessed on 4 June 2010.
DOH 衛生署. There is no Specific Risk Group, but Specific Risk Practice in AIDS Infection〈愛滋感染無「特定危險族群」，只有「特定危險行為」〉台灣性別人權協會12 Sep. 2005b , accessed on 4 June 2010.
DOH 衛生署. The Epidemiological Research on Female Sex Works and Male Homosexuals/Bisexuals who are Infected with HIV and other STDs in Taiwan〈台灣地區女性性工作者及男同性戀者/雙性戀者感染HIV及其他性病之流行病學研究〉，CDC疾病管制局 2000 , accessed on 6 Apr. 2010.
Dowsett, Gary W. “The ‘Gay Plague’ Revisited: AIDS and Its Enduring Moral Panic.” Moral Panics, Sex Panics: Fear and the Fight over Sexual Rights. Ed. Gilbert Herdt. New York: New York University, 2009. 130-56.
Fan, Shun-Yuan 范順淵. Gender Analysis of HIV/AIDS Prevention Policy in Taiwan〈台灣愛滋防治政策之性別分析〉. 第一屆酷兒飄浪國際研討會, 台北：國立台灣大學法律學院, 11-12 June 2010.
Grover, Jan Z. “AIDS; Keywords.” AIDS: Cultural Analysis/Cultural Activism. Ed. Douglas Crimp. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1988. 17-30.
GSRAT 台灣性別人權協會. Protesting the DOH, the Criteria for Donor Selection〈抗議衛Draft Discriminates the Sexual Minority Groups生署「捐血者健康標準」草案歧視少數性身份族群〉台灣性別人權協會19 Sep. 2005 , accessed on 5 June 2010.
Huang, Hans 黃道明. “AIDS Feeling Public and the Politics of Remembrance in Taiwan.” Dissident Citizenship: Queer Postcolonial Belonging, University of Sussex, 10-11 June 2010.
Huang, Hans 黃道明. Queer Politics and Sexual Modernity in Taiwan. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press, forthcoming.
Huang, Xiao-Pei　黃筱珮. The Screening of Blood Centers. Over 60 HIV-infected Blood Bags Last Year〈捐血中心篩檢　去年60餘袋愛滋血〉. 中國時報13 Feb. 2004 , accessed on 3 Nov. 2010.
IRIN News. “Cambodia: Focus on MSM and the spread of HIV/AIDS.” IRIN 3 Jan. 2007. , accessed on 12 Oct. 2010.
Ke, Fei 喀飛. Gay Men’s Home Party Trend Entangling AIDS Stigma〈糾葛愛滋汙名的男同志轟趴風潮〉。《酷兒新聲》，何春蕤編。中壢：中央大學性/別研究室，2009。頁181-196。
Lai, An-Chi 賴安琪. The Epidemiological Analysis of the HIV Infection among MSM in Taiwan〈台灣男性間性行為者HIV感染流行病學分析〉. 《愛之關懷》63 (2008): 4-11.
Lai, Shu-Fen 賴淑芬, Liao, Jhe-Fong 廖哲鋒, Chen, Yi-Ming 陳宜民. The Epidemiology on the HIV Infection among MSM〈曾與男性發生性行為之男性 (MSM) 感染愛滋病毒之流行病學〉. 《愛之關懷》63 (2008): 14-23.
Li, Shu-Ren　李樹人. “Gay Men are Forever Prohibited from Donating Blood” Induces Protest. The Rephrasing of “Homosexuals” as “MSM” to be Forbidden Group in the New Version of the Criteria. Human Rights Criticize. The DOH: Response of Good Intention to Gay Groups 〈‘男同志永不得捐血’引發抗議衛署新草案從‘同性戀’修改成‘男性間性行為者’不得捐血　人權團體批歧視　衛署：對同志團體已善意回應〉. 聯合晚報/9版/大社會19 Sep. 2005 , accessed on 3 Nov. 2010.
Li, Wai 李暐. The Exploration of AIDS Prevention Problems in Taiwan〈臺灣愛滋病預防問題之探討〉. MA thesis國立臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文，2000.
Lupton, Deborah. Moral Threats and Dangerous Desire: AIDS in the News Media. Taylor & Francis, 1994.
MSMGF. “ABOUT MSMGF.” MSMGF 2006 , accessed on 3 Nov. 2010.
Patton, Cindy. Globalizing AIDS. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2002.
Patton, Cindy. Inventing AIDS. Routledge, 1990.
Redick, Alison. “Dangerous Practices: Ideological Uses of the “Second Wave.” Policing Public Sex: Queer Politics and the Future of AIDS Activism. Ed. Dangerous Bedfellows. South End Press, 1996. 91-104.
Qiu, Yi-Ling　邱依翎. Not One Less: Governing Risk in AIDS Screening and HIV antibody Testing in Taiwan 〈一個也不能少：台灣愛滋篩檢的風險治理〉. MA thesis國立清華大學社會學研究所, 2006.
Rabinowitz, Dorothy. “The Secret Sharer.” New York. 26 Feb. 1990. 103-12.
Scott, Peter. “Beginnig HIV prevention work with gay and bisexual men.” Healthy Alliances in HIV Prevention. Ed. B. Evans, S. Sandberg, S. Watson. Health Education Authority, London, 1993.
Treichler, Paula A. “AIDS, Homophobia, and Biomedical Discourse: An Epidemic of Signification.” AIDS: Cultural Analysis/Cultural Activism. Ed. Douglas Crimp. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1988. 31-70.
UNAIDS. “HIV and Sex between Men.” UNAIDS. 1 Aug. 2006 , accessed on 24 Jan. 2010.
UNAIDS. “Men who have sex with men.” UNAIDS , accessed on 12 Oct. 2010.
UNAIDS/WHO. Guidelines for Second Generation HIV Surveillance: The Next Decade. UNAIDS/WHO. May 2000. , accessed on March 27, 2010.
Waldby, Catherine. AIDS and the Body Politic: Biomedicine and sexual difference. Routledge, 1996.
Wang, Gong-Ren 王躬仁. “Current Seroepidemiology of HIV Antibody in Taiwan.” Chinese Journal Microbiology Immunology 21.1 (1988): 50-59.
Warner, Michael. The Trouble With Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. Free Press, 1999.
Watney, Simon. “Emergent sexual identities and HIV/AIDS.” Imagine Hope: AIDS and Gay Identity. New York: Routledge, 2000. 63-80.
Watney, Simon. Policing Desire: Pornography, AIDS and the Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 1987.
Wu, Huei-Fen　吳慧芬. A Bag of Blood Endangers A Person’s Life? 60 HIV-positive Blood Donors were Screened out Last year〈捐血一袋害人一命? 去年篩檢出60愛滋捐血人〉. 中時晚報12 Feb. 2004 , accessed on 3 Nov. 2010.
Wu, Xiu-Ying　吳秀英. AIDS and Human Rights〈愛滋病與人權〉. 《愛滋病防治季刊》10 (1995): 5-12.
Xu, Mei-Ling 徐美苓. Overall AIDS Prevention. Eliminate Stigma and Discrimination〈全面防治愛滋排除烙印與歧視〉. 《愛之關懷》40 (2002): 30-35.
Yang, Chin-Hui 楊靖慧, Hui-Rong Liu劉慧蓉, Ying-YanChen陳盈燕, Yen-Fang Huang 黃彥芳. The Policy, Condition, and Future of Taiwan’s HIV Anonymous Testing〈台灣愛滋病毒匿名篩檢之政策、現況與展望〉. 《愛之關懷》62 (2008): 6-17.
Yang, Chin-Hui 楊靖慧, Pei-Ling Liu 劉姵伶, An-Chi Lai 賴安琪, and Yen-Fang Huang 黃彥芳. “The Reasons for Blood Donation of HIV-infected Patients Detected from Blood Center, January—June 2009.”〈2009年1至6月捐血中心通報愛滋個案捐血原因調查報告〉. 《疫情報導》25.12 (2009): 775-81.
Zhang, Bo-Ya 張博雅. Public Health: AIDS Prevention Policy and Future〈公共衛生：愛滋病的防治政策與展望〉. 《科學月刊》24.4 (1993): 294-298.
Zhang, Jia-Fang　張嘉芳. Sex Workers and Gay Homosexuals are not Allowed to Donate Blood. Human Rights Groups Protest〈性工作與男同性戀者不得捐血人權團體齊抗議〉.中央廣播電台19 Sep. 2005 , accessed on 3 Nov. 2010.
Zhang, Ting-Shuo 張廷碩. “Sissy or Not?”: Homophobia in HIV Medical Knowledge and Prescription Writing 〈「娘不娘有差？」: HIV醫學知識與病歷書寫中的恐同意識〉. 《文化研究月報》94 (2009).
Zheng, Xue-Yong　鄭學庸. MSM are forever Prohibited from Blood donation. Contestation Broke Out〈男性間性行為者永禁捐血爆爭論〉. 自由時報20 Sep. 2005 , accessed on 3 Nov. 2010.
Zhong, Xin-Xin 鍾信心. The HIV Anonymous Testing and Health Education Counseling among the AIDS High-risk Groups of MSM in Kaohsiung 〈高雄地區與同性發生性行為之男性愛滋病高危險群之匿名篩檢及衛教諮商〉. 疾病管制局 1999 , accessed on 4 Oct. 2010.
Zhuang, Zhe-Yan 莊哲彥. AIDS Prevention Direction〈愛滋病防治方向〉. 《衛生報導》2.1 (1992): 9-12.
Zhuang, Zhe-Yan 莊哲彥. AIDS Prevention. Proceed the HIV Screening among Blood Donors〈防治愛滋進行捐血者愛滋病毒抗體篩檢〉. 《愛之關懷》40 (2002): 18-19.

指導教授

黃道明(Dao-ming Huang)

審核日期

2011-1-25

推文