博碩士論文 961207010 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:17 、訪客IP:3.16.47.14
姓名 郭彥婷(Yen-ting Kuo)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 學習與教學研究所
論文名稱 編織生命樣貌—一位工藝藝術師與研究生共同勾勒美的故事
(Weaving Patterns of Life:The Story between A Craft Artist and A Graduate Student to Portray the Beauty of Life)
相關論文
★ 國民小學教師創新接受傾向與資訊科技 融入教學接受程度之相關因素研究 -以台北市資訊重點學校為例★ 內外在動機、創造力工作環境與創造力之相關研究 -以第八屆創思設計與製作競賽之參賽學生為例
★ 台北市國小教師教學信念、學校環境因素與資訊科技融入教學實施成效之相關研究★ 教師情緒智慧、教師權能與教師效能感之相關研究─以桃園縣公立國民小學教師為例
★ 一位大學優良教師的教育實踐—女研究生與主角的共同敘說★ 敘說一位研究型大學教師之自我座落
★ 書法教學現況及教師書法教學意願之研究—以台北市國小為例★ 影響實習教師實習困擾之相關因素研究-以九十四學年度半年制實習教師為例
★ 敘說實習教師之教師認同★ 工科研究生的學習樣貌—一個情境學習的觀點
★ 探究「一位教學傑出教師的生命與特質」—以外甥與研究生角色進行探究★ 用心傾聽一段永不停止的關係-一位大學傑出教師與學生關係之敘說
★ 影響國小學童家長送子女參加課後補習之相關因素研究---以桃園縣中壢市為例★ 脫下假面:敘說一位穿梭於舞蹈班與普通班之間的初任教師之蛻變
★ 以故事、合作、對話、反省融入國中生數學學習的行動研究★ 經驗的聆聽、凝視與回觀─我在沈昭良的攝影課上
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 一位來原本將「文化」與「美」定位在藝術活動當中的研究生,採用了敘說
的研究方式對於一位屢屢獲獎的工藝藝術師,玉盤老師,進行探究。探究的內容
包含了一位工藝藝術師的創作歷程以及影響視覺創造力的因素。另外,自我導向
學習對於一位工藝藝術師不斷提升創作技巧的過程當中所扮演的角色之探討也
是此份研究的重點。
研究者藉由訪談法、參與觀察法等方式,對於研究對象的成長背景、創作歷
程、以及作品進行資料的蒐集。在長期的訪談(總數十四次的訪談)與三次的參
與觀察(課堂教學、友人聚會、以及研習課程)當中,研究者發現了彼此某些共
同的背景,但卻帶給了兩位不同的影響與發展。這讓研究者開始藉由工藝藝術師
的經驗對自己的生命進行回憶與反思。
本研究將由工藝藝術師與研究生兩人的故事,藉著關係的建立與不斷地對話,
共同編織出生命的樣貌。也從創作藝術品的工藝之美,進而思考「文化」與「美」
的樣貌。為期四個學期的探究,不只在於記錄故事,更是生命的發現、實踐、與
改變的過程。
摘要(英) The researcher who limited the meaning of culture and beauty, now uses
narrative inquiry as the research method to do a craft artist (Tsai Yupan) research. The research intends to know Tsai’s create process and if there is any factor to influence the visual creativity. Self directed learning is also the issue of raising the creating skills.
Interview and observation are the ways to know Tsai’s background, create
process, and to collect the relevant data. During the 14 interviews and the 3
observations, the researcher finds out certain connections between her and Tsai and therefore the different influences. Because of the differences, it helps the researcher to recall her life’s story and to do self examination.
Making relationship and conversation with Tsai are the ways to weaving lives’
patterns. It is not only to learn how to appreciate the objects of art, but also to think deeper about the meaning of culture and beauty. During the four semesters research, it is really a procedure of discovering, practicing, and changing of life.
關鍵字(中) ★ 敘說探究
★ 自我導向學習
★ 視覺創造力
關鍵字(英) ★ Narrative Inquiry
★ Visual Creativity
★ Self Directed Learning
論文目次 中文摘要 .................................................................................................................. I
英文摘要 ................................................................................................................. II
誌謝....................................................................................................................... III
簡明目錄 ................................................................................................................ V
目錄....................................................................................................................... VI
表目錄 .................................................................................................................. XII
圖目錄 .................................................................................................................XIII
第一章 看不見的養分 ...................................................................................... 1
第二章 文獻探討 ............................................................................................... 5
第三章 生命中的作品,作品中的故事 ..................................................... 31
第四章 播種 ...................................................................................................... 45
第五章 結縭 .................................................................................................... 129
第六章 不停止的學習,自己來 ................................................................ 169
第七章 美,可以靠近一點 ......................................................................... 213
第八章 穿越光陰,不一樣的故事............................................................ 233
第九章 尾聲 .................................................................................................... 243
參考文獻 ........................................................................................... 249
參考文獻 參考文獻
英文參考書目:
Agar, M. & Hobbs, J. R. (1982). Interpreting discourse: Coherence and the analysis of
ethnographic interviews. Discourse Proccesses, 5, 1-32.
Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York:
Springerverlag.
Bach, H. (2007). Composing a visual narrative inquiry. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.),
Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp.280–307).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by
researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and
Instruction, 7(2), 161–186.
Bolhuis, S. (2000). Naar zelfstandig leren. Wat doen en denken docenten? [Toward self-directed learning.What do teachers do and think?]. Doctoral dissertation. University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen. Garant: Leuven/Apeldoorn.
Bolhuis, S.(2003) “Towards process-oriented teaching for selfdirected lifelong learning: a multidimensional perspective.”Learning and Instruction , 13, 327–347.
Bolhuis, S., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2001). Toward self-directed learning: What do
teachers do? Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 837–855.
Boud, D. (1988). “Moving towards autonomy”. In Boud D. (Ed.). Developing student autonomy in learning,2nd edition. London: Kogan Page (pp.17-39).
Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Wilss L., and Mutch S.(1996). Teachers as adult learners: their
knowledge of their own learning and implications for teaching. Higher
Education, 32, 89-106.
Brockett, R.G. , & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.
Brookfield, S. (1985). Analyzing a critical paradigm of self-directed learning: A response. Adult Education Quarterly, 36(1), 60-64.
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought asin other knowledge processes.Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.
Candy, D.J. (1989). Utilization of fuels by the flight muscles. In: Goldsworthy, G.J.,Wheeler, C.H. (Eds.), Insect Flight. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (pp.305–319).
Candy, P.C. (1991) Self-direction for Lifelong Learning.San Francisco, CA,
Jossey-Bass.
Caffarella R. (1983). Fostering self-directed learning in post-secondary education:
The use oflearning contracts. Lifelong Learning, 7(3), 25-6.
Capfarella, R. & Caffareli&, P. (1986) Self-directedness and learning contracts in adult education, Adult Education Quarterly, 36, 226-234.
Carr, P. B. (1999). The measurement of resourcefulness intentions in the adult autonomous learner (Doctoral dissertation, George Washington University,1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60,38-49.
Chene, A. (1983). The concept of autonomy in adult education: A philosophical discussion. Adult Education Quarterly, 34(1), 38-47.
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.
Collins A. (2006). How society can foster self-directed learning.s Human
Development. 49, 225-228.
Connelly F. M. & Clandinin D. J. (1990).Stories of Experience and Narrative
Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14.
Clandinin, J. & Connelly, M. (1994). Personal experience methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Clandinin, D. J. & Huber, J. (2002). Narrative inquiry: Toward understanding life’s artistry. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(2), 161-169.
Clandinin, D. J. (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Coutts, G. & Dougall, P. (2005). Drawing in Perspective: Scottish Art and Design Teachers Discuss Drawing, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 24 (2), 138–48.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: A psychology for the third
millennium. New York: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Collins.
Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Derrick, M. G. (2001). The measurement of an adult’s intention to exhibit persistence
in autonomous learning (Doctoral dissertation, GeorgeWashington University,
2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 25-33.
Dewey, J.(1934). Art as Experience. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.
Diaute, C. & Lightfoot, C. (2004). Narrative analysis: Studying development of
individuals in society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Feist, G. F. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity (pp.273-296). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Giampietro M. & Cavallera G.M. (2007) Morning and Evening Types and Creative Thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 453–463.
Getzels, J., & Csikszentimihalyi, M. (1976). The Creative Vision: Alongitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art. New York: Wiley.
Ghiselin, B. (Ed.). (1952). The Creative Process. New York: Mentor.
251
Gibson, R. (2003). Learning to be an art educator: Student teachers’ attitudes to art and art education. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 22(1), 111-120.
Gombrich, E. H. (1969). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). Development of the Self-Directed Learning Readiness
Scale. Doctoral Dissertation, Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American: phychologist
Holly M. A. & Bal M.(2007)Reading, writing, filming, dreaming, dressing. Art History, 30(3), 406-417.
Houle, C. O. (1961). The Inquiring Mind. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Knapper, C., & Cropley, A. (2001). Lifelong learning in higher education (3rd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed Learning. A guide for teachers and learners.
Chicago: Follett.
Kolb, D. A. (1976). Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual, Boston, MA:
McBer and Company. In Halsouniversitetet, Linkoping. (1994). Learning Style
Inventory: A Self-description of Preferred Learning Modes, abridged and
excerpted from Kolb (1976).
Kreber, C. (1998)“The relationships between self-directed learning, critical
thinking, and psychological type, and some implications for teaching in higher education,”Studies in Higher Education,23(1), 71-86.
Kreber, C. (2005). Charting a critical course on the scholarship of university teaching movement. Studies in Higher Education, 30(4), 389-405.
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M.(1980). Metaphors we live by. Chiago Press, in progress.
Langness, L.L. & Frank, G. (1981). Lives: An Anthropological Approach to
Biography. Novato, CA: Chandler and Sharp.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1985.
Lindstrom, Lars (2006). Creativity: What Is It? Can You Assess It? Can It Be Taught?
Journal of Art & Design Education, 25, 53-66.
Long, H. B. and Agyekum, S. K.,(1983). "Guglielmino's Self-Directed Learning
Readiness Scale:A validation study," Higher Education, 12, 77-87.
Long H. B. & Agyekum S. K.(1984).“Teachers ratings in the validation of
Guglielmino’s self-directed learning readiness scale,”Higher Education, 13,
709-715.
Long, H. B. (1989). Self-directed learning: Emerging theory and practice. In H. B. Long & Associates(Eds.), Self-directed Learning: Emerging Theory and Practice (pp.1-11). Norman: University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education.
Long, H. B. (1991). Challenges in the study and practice of self-directed learning. In H. B. Long & Associates (Eds.), Self-directed Learning:Consensus & Conflict.
Oklahoma, OK: Oklahoma Research Center for continuing professional and
higher education of the University of Oklahoma.
Lyons, N., & LaBoskey, V. K. (Eds.). (2002). Narrative Inquiry in Practice. New
York: Teachers. College Press.
Mocker, D. W., and Spear, G. E.(1982). Lifelong Learning: Formal, Non-Formal, Informal and Self-Directed. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult,
Career and Vocational Education.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue: A study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN:
University of Notre Dame Press.
Merriam, S. B., and Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in Adulthood (2nd ed.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miles M, Huberman AM.(1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed.. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.
Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. NY: Association Press.
Oddi, L. F. (1986) “Development and Validation of an Instrument to Identify
Self-Directed Continuing Learners.” Adult Education Quarterly, 36(2), 97–107.
Pirrto, J. (1998). Understanding Those who Create (2nd Ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Pirrto, J. (2004). Understanding Creativity. Scottsdale , AR: Great Potential Press.
Pokinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. NY: State university of New York Press.
Pollock G. A. (2007)What does a woman want? Art investigating death in Charlotte Salomon’s leben? Oder theater? Art History, 30(3), 383-405.
Policastro, E. & Gardner, H. (1999) From case studies to robust generalizations: an approach tothe study of creativity, in R. J. Sternberg, (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity (pp.213-223) .Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Ponton, M. K. (1999). The measurement of an adult’s intention to exhibit personal initiative in autonomous learning (Doctoral dissertation, GeorgeWashington University, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 39-33.
Ponton, M.K., Derrick M. G. and Carr P. B(2005).” The Relationship between
Resourcefulness and Persistence in Adult Autonomous Learning,” Adult
Education Quarterly, 55, 116.
Ponton, M. K., Carr, P. B., & Confessore, G. J. (2000). Learning conation: A
psychological perspective of personal initiative and resourcefulness. In H. B.
Long & Associates (Eds.), Practice & Theory in Self-directed Learning (pp.
65-82). Schaumburg, IL: Motorola University Press.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in School and Out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.
Riessman, C. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Runco, M. A., & Sakamoto, S. O. (1999). Experimental studies of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp.62-92). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sarbin, T. R. (1986). Narrative psychology: The stories nature of human conduct. NT: Prager Special Studies.
Schofield, J.W.(1990). Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing
debate(pp. 201-232). New York: Teachers College Press.
Silen, C. & Uhlin, L.(2008)“Self-directed learning - a learning issue for students and faculty!”Teaching in Higher Education 13(4), 461-475.
Simons, P. R. J. (1989). Leren leren: naar een nieuwe didactische aanpak. [Learning to learn: towards a new approach in teaching]. In P. R. J. Simons, & J. G. G. Zuylen (Eds.), Handboek huiswerkdidactiek en geı‥ntegreerd studievaardigheidsonderwijs, [Handbook of Homework Didactics and the
Integrated Teaching of Study Skills] (pp. 46–69). Heerlen: MesoConsult.
Simonton, D. K.(2007)“FEATURED ARTICLE: The Creative Process in Picasso's
Guernica Sketches:Monotonic Improvements versus Nonmonotonic
Variants',Creativity Research Journal, 29-344.
Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth: Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis. NY: Norton.
Spence, D. P. (1986). Narrative Smoothing and Clinical Wisdom. In T. R. Sarbin (ed.),
Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct. New York:Times Books.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge Unicersity Press.
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concept of Creativity: prospects and
paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of Creativity (pp.3-15).
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sullivan, E. (1990). Critical psychology and pedagogy. NY: Bergin & Garvey.
Tough, A. M. (1989). Self-directed learning: Concepts and practice. In C. J. Titmus
(Ed.) Lifelong Education for Adults-An International Handbook. NY: Pergamm
press.
Treffinger, D. (1987). Research on creativity assessment. In S. Isaksen (ED.),
Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp.103-119). Buffalo, NY:
Bearly, Ltd.
Van der Hoeven-van Doornum, A. A., & Simons, P. R. J. (1994). Transfervermogen
en instructie. [Transfer competence and Instruction]. Nijmegen: ITS.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the Field. On Writing Ethnography. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1988.
Vermunt, J. D. H. M. (1994). Design principles of process-oriented instruction. In F.
P. C. M. De Jong, & B. H. A. M. Van Hout-Wolters (Eds.), Process-Oriented
Instruction and Learning from Text. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of Thought. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Wilson, G. D. (1990). Personality, time of day and arousal. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(2), 153–168.
Wloodkowskil, R. J. (1985). Enhancing adult motivation to learn. San Francisco:Jossey-bass Publishers.
中文參考書目:
王勇智、鄧明宇合譯(2003)。敘說分析。台北:五南書局。
石雪杏(2007)。圖畫敘說過動兒的成長。國立臺北教育大學藝術學系碩士班論
文。
朱耀明(2003)。 自我導向學習在行動學習設計上的啟示,WISCS 2003 網路
教學系統平台與內容標準化研討會,136-141。
余德慧(2003)。生命史學。台北:心靈工坊。
林平勺(2003)。 問題導向學習在成人科技教育的應用。生活科技教育月刊 36
卷,8,29-41。
邱惟真、丁興祥(1999)。朱光潛多重自我的對話與轉化:一種敘說建構取向。
應用心理研究,2,211-249。
邱皓政、 林碧芳、 陳育瑜(2002)創造力的人情困局:人際關係的遠近親疏對
於創意表現之影響 。中國心理學會第四十一屆學術研討會,1-9。
吳慎慎(2006)。藝術人的終身學習:生命故事敘說的教學實踐。藝術教育研究,
12,1-38。
徐世瑜(2003)。自導學習取向之學習角落規劃研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,
34,21-40 。
孫治民(1999)。成人的學習特性及其在教學上的應用。南亞學報,19,205-216。
高熏芳、林盈助、王向葵合譯(2001)。質化研究設計:一種互動取向的方法。
台北:心理。
陳欣蘭(2006)。從諾爾斯的自我導向學習看成人學習者在創意教學中的學習 成
效之個案研究。明新學報,32,51-63。
陳昭儀(1994)。傑出表演藝術家藝術生涯歷程之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,
第35 卷,2,71-90。
陳昭儀、陳琦、張素華譯(1995)瞭解創意人。台北,台灣:心理。
莊舒婷(2005)。女性特質與視覺設計之關係研究 以台灣女性設計師為例。國
立高雄師範大學視覺傳達設計研究所碩士班論文。
黃瑞琴(1994)。質的教育研究方法。台北:心理。
曾志朗(2005)。原創力之探源,猶如摸象?!科學人11 月號。
張芬芬譯(2005)。質性研究資料分析。台北:雙葉。
葉俊顯(2005)。將生活經驗化為故事的教學研究。國立新竹教育大學進修部美
勞教學碩士班論文。
葉慧凰(2003)。一位熱愛繪畫女孩繪畫歷程與生命故事之敘說分析 。臺北市
立師範學院視覺藝術研究所碩士班論文。
詹志禹(2002)。影響創造力的相關因素 從小學教育環境與脈絡來考量。學生
輔導,79,32-47。
詹彩雲(2005)。藝術教育與環境-淺談法國賈克。隆時代的藝術教育政策。臺
灣教育,633,26-31。
趙榮景(1998)。談有效增強成人學習動機的策略。北縣成教:輔導季刊,10,
50-53。
蔡玉盤 (1991)。反璞歸真話天人—蜜蠟、琉璃、珠飾。台中:尚哲。
蔡玉盤 (1999)。大珠小珠落玉盤—蔡玉盤飾品設計。台中:和禾。
蔡玉盤 (2007)。在美色間穿梭-蔡玉盤飾品設計。台中市文化局。
蔡敏玲、余曉雯譯(2003)。敘說探究—質性研究中的經驗與故事。台北市:心
理。
指導教授 林信榕(Shinn-Rong Lin) 審核日期 2009-7-9
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明