博碩士論文 964201001 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:17 、訪客IP:3.238.96.184
姓名 黃育權(Yu-quan Huang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 組織間鑲嵌程度在不同情境下對績效的影響
(Exploring the Impact on Interorganizational Relationship between Embeddedness and Supply Chain Performance Under the Different Scenarios)
相關論文
★ 以第四方物流經營模式分析博連資訊科技股份有限公司★ 探討虛擬環境下隱性協調在新產品導入之作用--以電子組裝業為例
★ 動態能力機會擷取機制之研究-以A公司為例★ 探討以價值驅動之商業模式創新-以D公司為例
★ 物聯網行動支付之探討-以Apple Pay與支付寶錢包為例★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例
★ B2C網路黏著度之探討-以博客來為例★ 組織機制與吸收能力關係之研究-以新產品開發專案為例
★ Revisit the Concept of Exploration and Exploitation★ 臺灣遠距醫療照護系統之發展及營運模式探討
★ 資訊系統與人力資訊科技資源對供應鏈績效影響之研究-買方依賴性的干擾效果★ 資訊科技對知識創造影響之研究-探討社會鑲嵌的中介效果
★ 資訊科技對公司吸收能力影響之研究-以新產品開發專案為例★ 探討買賣雙方鑲嵌關係影響交易績效之機制 ─新產品開發專案為例
★ 資訊技術運用與協調能力和即興能力 對新產品開發績效之影響★ 團隊組成多元性影響任務衝突機制之研究─ 以新產品開發專案團隊為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 摘 要
組織間的監理機制的選擇長久以來一直是個重要課題。許多文獻提出透過社會關係可以影響績效。然而大部分文獻中並沒清楚交代以社會關係為監理機制是否適用在每一種情境當中都可以提升績效。
本文以鑲嵌理論和交易成本理論為出發點。首先探討是否社會控制的鑲嵌程度是否能夠影響交易成本中的績效,進一步探討在各種不同情境中,鑲嵌程度對績效的影響。本文選擇了三種情境,市場不確定、獲利影響、供應風險。
結果證明鑲嵌程度與談判績效有負相關,與假設有差異。而與生產績效有正相關。而在不同情境中,市場不確定性,對生產績效有負影響。獲利影響對談判績效有負影響。其他因素則無干擾效果。
鑲嵌關係的提升會造成談判效率的降低,與過去文獻結果不大一致。本文認為過度的鑲嵌關係造成彼此太過熟悉對方的生產和作業流程及產能,因此容易要求對方做價格或數量上的折讓,致使談判無效率。而市場不確定高時,過度鑲嵌致使外在訊息無法進入,而無法影響談判效率。供應風險高時,買賣雙方受限於市場體制的力量,無法透過關係來影響。
摘要(英) Abstract
The selection of interorganizational governance is always an important issue. There are many papers assert that social relationship has great influence on performance. However, most of those papers did not clearly describe under what kind of scenarios the social relationship could promote the performance.
This study is based on embeddedness theory and transaction cost theory and tries to explore whether the degree of embeddedness has impacts on supply chain performance (Negotiation and Production efficiency) .Further, this study develops three scenarios, namely market uncertainty, profit impact and supply risk, and further examines the moderator effect of which between embeddedness and supply chain performance.
After empirical analysis, the results are not totally the same as the expected assumptions. Embeddedness has a negative influence on negotiation efficiency and a positive impact on production efficiency.
Under the different scenarios, market uncertainty has a moderating effect between embeddedness and production efficiency. In addition, profit impact has a moderator effect between embeddedness and the negotiation efficiency. However, the result found that the supply risk has no significant moderator effect.
The greater the relationship embedded, the worse the performance became. This is different from the past results. We considered that the fine understanding of production and operation detail between trading party will has a negative effect on performance .Because each of them tend to ask for concessions on price or volume. Under market uncertainty, there is no effect on performance arise from overembeddedness which leads to the shortage of innovative and abundant information. As for supply risk, the power of market limit the effect of relationship on performance.
關鍵字(中) ★ 談判績效
★ 生產績效
★ 交易成本
★ 鑲嵌
關鍵字(英) ★ negotiation efficiency
★ production efficiency
★ transaction cost
★ embeddedness
論文目次 目錄
目錄I
圖目錄II
表目錄III
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景和動機1
第二節 研究目的3
第三節 研究流程4
第四節 論文結構5
第二章 文獻探討6
第一節 供應鏈6
第二節 鑲嵌8
第三節 交易成本理論11
第四節 物料分類16
第五節 市場不確定性17
第六節 各構面之影響因素18
第七節 研究方法19
第三章 研究設計23
第一節 觀念性架構23
第二節 研究假說24
第三節 衡量變數定義27
第四節 鑲嵌與績效之結構方程模型31
第五節 抽樣方法與問卷設計34
第四章 實證分析35
第一節 樣本基本資料分析35
第二節 鑲嵌與績效衡量模型的評估37
第三節 鑲嵌與績效衡量模型的評估44
第四節 干擾測詴48
第五節 鑲嵌與談判、生產績效研究假說分析 51
第伍章 結論與建議53
第一節 結論53
第二節 研究貢獻56
第三節 研究建議57
第四節 研究限制58
參考文獻59
附錄67
參考文獻 英文部分
Afuah, A. N. (2000). “How much do your co-opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change?” Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 21, pp.387-404.
Alchian AA, Demsetz H. (1972). “ Production, information costs, and economic organization.” American Economic Review ,62(5),pp 777–795.
Artz K, Brush T. (2000). “ A transaction cost examination of performance in collaborative strategic alliances” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 41, pp.337-362.
Balakrishnan, S. , Wernerfelt, B. (1986). “Technical change, competition and vertical integration” Strategic Management Journal, 7, pp 347–359. Beamon, Benita M. (1998). “Supply Chain Design and Analysis : Models and Methods” International Journal of Production Economics, 55, pp. 281-294.
Bensaou, M. , Venkatraman N. (1995). “Configurations of interorganizational relationships: a comparison” Management Science , 41(9), pp. 1471–1493.
Bovet, D., J. Martha, and K. Kramer (2000). “Breaking the supply chain to unlock hidden profits” John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R. (1993). “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit” In Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park:Sage, pp.136-162.
Burt, R. S. (1992). “Structural holes: the social structure of competition” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Coase, R. H.(1937).“The Nature of the Firm” ,Economica N.S.G, 4, pp.386-405. Coleman, J. S. (1988). “Social capital in the creation of human capital” American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp.95-120.
Cusumano, M.A., and Takeishi, A. (1991). "Supplier relations and management: A Survey of Japanese, Japanese transplant and U.S. Auto Plants" Strategic Management Journal ,12 , pp 563-588.
Davis, T., (1993). “Effective supply chain management” Sloan Management Review, 34(4), pp. 35–46. Duncan, R. B. (1972). “Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, pp.313-327.
Dyer, H. J. , K. Nobeoka (2000).“Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case” Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), pp.345-367.
Dyer, H. J.(1996). "Specialized Supplier Networks As A Source Of Competitive Advantage Evidence From The Auto Industry" Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), pp.271-291.
Dyer, J. H.,(1997). “Effective Interfirm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Transaction Costs and Maximize Transaction Value”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp.535-556.
Dyer, J.H. (1997). "Effective Interfirm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Transaction Costs and Maximize Transaction Value," Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp. 535-556.
Ganesan, S. (1994).“Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships” Journal of Marketing, 58, pp.1-19.
Gomes-Casseres, B. (1996). “The alliance revolution: the new shape of business rivalry” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Granovetter, M. (1985).“Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness” American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), pp. 481–510.
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). “Economic action & social structure: the problem of embeddedness” American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), pp. 481-510.
Gulati, R. (1995). “Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances” Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), pp.85–112.
Gulati R, Singh H. (1998). “The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances” Administrative Science Quarterly ,43, pp.781–794.
Gulati, R., M. Gargiulo (1999).“Where do interorganizational networks come from?” American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), pp. 1439-1493.
Gulati, R., Sytch, M., (2007). “Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Interorganizational Relationships: Effects of Embeddedness on a Manufacture’s Performance in Procurement Relationships” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1),pp.32-69.
Hahn, Chan K., Charles A.Watts & Kee Young Kim (1990).“The Supplier Development: A Conceptual Model” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26(2), pp. 2-7.
Hair, Jr. J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). “Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings” 4th Edition.
Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Helper, S. (1991). "How much has really changed between U S automakers and their suppliers?" Sloan Management review, 32(4), pp.15-27.
Hirschman, A. 0. (1970). “Exit, voice, and loyalty: Re- sponses to decline in firms, organizations, and states” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holm, D. B., K. Eriksson ,& J. Johanson (1999). “Creating value through mutual commitment to business to business network relationships” Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp.467-486.
Holmstrom B. (1982). “Moral hazard in teams. Bell Journal of Economics” 13(2), pp.324–341.
Houlihan, J.B (1984). "Supply chain management" Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference, BPICS, pp.101-10.
Iansiti M. (1998). “Technology Integration: Making Critical Choices in a Dynamic World“ Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D. (1993). “LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language” Scientific Software International.
Kale, P., H. Singh , & H. Perlmutter (2000).“Learning and protection of proprietaryassets in alliance: building relational capital” Strategic Management Journal, 21,pp.217-237.
Koopmans, T. C. (1965). “On the concept of optimal economic growth” Pontificde Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia (Amsterdam: North Holland), 28, 225-300. Kraljic,P. (1983). “Purchasing Must Become Supply Management”Harvard Business Review ,61, pp.109-117.
Kumar, N., Scheer, L.K., & Steenkamp, J. (1995).“The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes” Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 348-356.
Kumar, S. , A. Seth (1998). “The design of coordination and control mechanisms for managing joint venture-parent relationships” Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), pp.579-599.
Larson,A. (1992). “Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange processes” Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, pp.76-104.
Maccallum, R.C., Roznowski, M., Mar, C.M., & Reith, J.V. (1994). “Alternative Strategies For Cross-Validation of Covariance Structure Models” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(1), pp.1-32.
Milgrom P, Roberts J. (1990). “The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy, and organization” American Economic Review 80(3), pp.511–528.
Mcevily, B., Marcus, A., (2005). “Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities” Strategic Management Journal, 26,pp. 1033–1055.
Mesquita LF, Brush TH. (2008). “Untangling safeguard and production coordination effects in long-term buyer-supplier relationships” Academy of Management , 51(4), pp.758-607
Milgrom P, Roberts J. (1995). “Complementaries and fit strategy,structure, and organizational change in manufacturing” Journal of Accounting and Economics ,19(2/3), pp.179–208.
Monczka, R.M., Peterson, K.J., & Handfield, R.B. (1998). “Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: The buying company perspective" Decision Sciences , 29(3), pp.553-577.
Monteverde K. (1995). “Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry” Management Science, 41(10), pp.1624–1638.
Nahapiet, J., S. Ghoshal (1998). “Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage” Academy of Management Review, 23, pp.242-266.
Noordewier, T. G., John, G., & Nevin, J. R. (1990). “Performance outcomes of purchasing agreements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships” Journal of Marketing, 54(4), pp. 80–94.
Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., and Grewal, D., (2007)“A Comparative Longitudinal Analysis of Theoretical Perspectives of Interorganizational Relationship Performance” Journal of Marketing, 71( 4), 172-194,
Petersen T. (1992). “Individual, collective, and systems rationality in work groups: dilemmas and markettype solutions” American Journal of Sociology ,98(3), pp 469–511.
Polanyi, K., C., Arensberg & H. Pearson (1957). “ Trade and Markets in the Early Empires” N.Y.: Free Press.
Poppo, L., T. Zenger (2002). “Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Functions as Substitute or Complement?” Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp. 707-725.
Portes, A., J. Sensenbrenner (1993). “Embedeness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinantes of Economic Action” American Journal of Sociology, 98, pp.320-350.
Powell, W. (1990), “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, pp. 295-336.
Olsen ,R.f , Ellram ,L.M. (1997) “A Portfolio Approach to
Supplier Relationships” Industrial Marketing Management , 26, pp. 101-113.
Rindfleisch, A., C. Moorman (2001). “The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: a strength-of-ties perspective” Journal of Marketing, 65, pp.1-18.
Ring, P. S., A. H. Van De Ven (1992). “Structuring Cooperative Relationships between Organizations” Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 483-498.
Romo, F. P., M. Schwartz (1995). “Structural Embeddedness of Business Decisions: A Sociological Assessment of The Migration Behavior of Plants in New York State Between 1960 and 1985” American Sociological Review,60(6), pp.874-907.
Rowley, T., D. Behrens, & D. Krackhardt (2000). “Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural & relational embeddedness in the steel & semiconductor industries” Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.369-386.
Rubin, P. A., Carter, J. R. (1990).“Joint optimality in buyer-supplier negotiations” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26(2), pp 20–26.
Scheer, L. K., Stern, L. W. (1992). “The Effect of Influence Type and Performance Outcomes on Attitude Toward the Influencer”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29(1), pp.128-42.
Scott, W. R. (1992).“Organizations- rational, natural, & open systems” (3ed) Prentice Hall. Slater, S.F., Narver, J.C., (1994). “Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation–performance relationship?” Journal of Marketing 58, pp.46–55.
Steele, P. T., Court, B. H., (1996). “Profitable Purchasing Strategies: A Manager’s Guide for Improvement Organizational Competitiveness Through the Skills of Purchasing, McGraw-Hill,London.
Stevens, G. C. (1989).“Integrating the supply chain” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management, 19(8) pp.3-8.
Takeishi, A. (2001). "Bridging inter- and Intra- Firm Boundaries: Management of Supplier Involvement in Automobile Product Development" Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), pp.403-433.
Tan, Keah Choon, Vijay R. Kannan, & Robert B. Handfield (1998). “Supply Chain Management: Supplier Performance and Firm Performance” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34(3), pp. 2-9.
Thomas, Douglas J., Paul M. Griffin (1996), “Coordinated Supply Chain Management,” European Journal of Operational Research, 94, pp.1-15.
Thomas G. Noordewier,(1990). “George John and John R. Nevin Performance Outcomes of Purchasing Arrangements in Industrial Buyer-Vendor Relationships” The Journal of Marketing, 54(4), pp.80-93.
Thompson JD. (1967). “Organizations in Action” McGraw-Hill: New York. Uzzi, b. (1997). “Social structure & competition in interfirm network: the paradox of embeddedness” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp. 35-67.
Uzzi, B., J. J. Gillespie (2002).“Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks : embeddedness and the firm’s debt performance” Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp. 595-618.
Watts, Charles A., Chan K. Hahn (1993). “Supplier Development Programs: An Empirical Analysis” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,29(2), pp. 10-18.
Watts, Charles A., Kee Yung Kim, & Chan K. Hahn (1995), “Linking Purchasing to Corporate Competitive Strategy” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 31(2), pp. 3-8.
Williamson, O. E. (1975).“Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications” New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). “The economic institutions of capitalism” New York: Free Press. Williamson, O. E.(1985).“ the economic institutions of capitalism:firms, markets, relational contracting” new york:free press.
Williamson, O. E. (1991).“Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp.269-296.
Zukin, S. & P. Dimaggio (1990).“Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Zaheer, A., and Venkatraman, N.,( 1995)“Relational Governance as An Interorganizational Strategy: An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust in Economic Exchange”, Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), pp.373-392.
中文部分
陳順宇,多變量分析,四版,華泰文化,台北市,民國九十四年。
莊育維,「供應鏈組織間關係利益與策略品質之研究」,國立雲林科技大學資訊管理學系研究所,碩士論文,民國九十五年。
張連生,「組織內外在特質、事業網路鑲嵌與創新績效之關聯研究-交易成本理論、資源基礎觀點與組織學習理論」國立成功大學企業管理研究所,博士論文,民國九十三年。
指導教授 陳炫碩(Ken Chen) 審核日期 2009-7-16
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明