參考文獻 |
中文文獻
1. Rosenberg, M. J.(2002)。提昇個人競爭力、強化企業優勢的終極學習策略(樂為良譯)。台北:美商麥格爾。
2. 王裕鈜(2007)。公部門訓練機構推動數位學習策略之研究:以行政院人事行政局地方行政研習中心為例。國立政治大學碩士論文,台北市。
3. 行政院國科會(2002)。數位學習國家型科技計畫總體規劃書。數位學習國家型科技計畫網站
4. 吳文雄(2002)。電腦技能學習者過去的績效、目標認同、電腦自我效能及電腦績效因果關係之驗證–社會認知理論與目標設定理論的整合。師大學報,第47期,39-54。
5. 吳明隆(1997)。電腦態度的意義及其量表內涵的探究。資訊與教育,第65期,48-55。
6. 吳明隆(2007)。結構方程模式:Amos的操作與應用,初版。台北,五南書局。
7. 吳欣蓉(2010)。2010數位學習科技趨勢分析。資策會數位教育研究所。
8. 李文彬(2006)企業線上學習服務品質與接受度之實證研究–以C.S.與T.P.公司為例。國立中山大學碩士論文,高雄市。
9. 李威德(2008)。網路線上學習之顧客滿意度及使用意圖研究。國立東華大學碩士論文,花蓮縣。
10. 李業成(2001)。企業導入網路學習系統(e-Learning)關鍵因素之探討。義守大學碩士論文,高雄縣。
11. 沈旭豐(2008)。以科技接受模式探討數位學習之學習滿意及購買意願。國立東華大學碩士論文,花蓮縣。
12. 林震央(2006)。多變量分析SPSS的操作與應用,初版。台北,智勝書局。
13. 胡維中(2008)。從人力銀行網站觀點探討科技接受模型對於使用者之影響。國立台北大學碩士論文,台北市。
14. 張秀娟(2005)。我國高中行政人員數位學習滿意之結構化模式分析–以台北縣高中為例。玄奘大學碩士論文,新竹市。
15. 梁世安、余國瑋(2005)。以科技接受模式探討二輪式電動代步車消費者接受程度。行銷評論,第2卷,第2期,135-148。
16. 許慶祥(2006)。以科技接受模式探討與發展公路客運動態資訊技術之研究。國立成功大學碩士論文,台南市。
17. 郭慧中(2010)。2009數位學習產業現狀與產值調查分析。資策會數位教育研究所。
18. 陳年興與楊錦潭(2006)。數位學習理論與實務。台北市:博碩。
19. 陳育民(2003)。學習風格與學習模式對中學生電子化學習成效之影響。國立中正大學碩士論文,嘉義縣。
20. 陳盈儒(2002)。數位學習環境與未來發展。RUN!PC,106 期。
21. 陳郁芬(2004)。企業員工e-Learning系統之使用意願影響因素研究。國立中山大學碩士論文,高雄市。
22. 陳廣哲(2009)。東協加一的機會與挑戰印尼投資商機介紹。外貿協會雅加達台灣貿易中心。
23. 陳麗慧(2006)。企業推動數位學習關鍵成功因素探討–以國內J金控為例。東吳大學碩士論文,台北市。
24. 游光昭、李大偉(2003)。網路化教育訓練概論。台北:師大書苑。
25. 馮天韻(2009)。台灣3G應用服務之採用影響因素的探討。國立交通大學碩士論文,新竹市。
26. 經濟部工業局(2006)。我國數位學習產業發展措施具體建議報告。臺北市:經濟部工業局。
27. 榮泰生(2009)。Amos與研究方法,三版。台北,五南書局。
28. 臺灣經建會人力規劃處(2001)。 電子學習(e-Learning)現況及未來展望。 經建會人力規劃處90年12月25日新聞稿。 民92年5月30日,取自:http://www.cepd.gov.tw/service/news/2001/1225.htm
29. 劉光隆(2002)。影響電子化學習績效因素之研究–以嘉義縣教育網路之非同步遠距教學為例。國立中正大學碩士論文,嘉義縣。
30. 謝靜慧(2000)。國民中小學教師之電腦焦慮、電腦自我效能、電腦因應策略與電腦素質之相關研究。國立中山大學碩士論文,高雄市。
31. 魏世華(2000)。國小教師電腦焦慮與因應方式之研究。國立花蓮師範學院碩士論文,花蓮縣。
英文文獻
1. Aboelmaged, M. G. (2010). "Predicting e-Procurement Adoption in A Developing Country; An Empirical Integration of Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behaviour." Industrial Management + Data Systems. 110(3): 392.
2. Adams, D. A., R. R. Nelson, et al. (1992). "Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology A Replication." MIS Quarterly 16(2): 227-247.
3. Adkins, S. S. (2010). "The Worldwide Market for Self-paced eLearning Products and Services: 2009-2014 Forecast and Analysis." Ambient Insigh.
4. Afzaal H Seyal and M. N. A. Rahman (2003). "A Preliminary Investigation of e-Commerce Adoption in Small & Medium Enterprises in Brunei." Journal of Global Information Technology Management. 6(2): 6.
5. Almutairi, H. (2007). "Determinants of Information System Usage in Public Service Organizations: A Structural Equation Investigation." International Journal of Management. 24(3): 436-455.
6. Alshare, K. A., R. Freeze, et al. (2009). "Student Intention to Use Expert Systems An Exploratory Study." The Journal of Computer Information Systems 49(4).
7. Anderson, J. C. and D. W. Gerbing (1988). "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach." Psychological Bulletin 103(3): 411-423.
8. ASTD. (2002). "E-learning." Retrieved January 20, 2010, from http://www.learningcircuits.org/glossary.
9. Attewell, P. (1992). "Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing." Organization Science 3(1): 1-19.
10. Bagozzi, R. P. and Y. Yi (1988). "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models." Academy of Marking Science 16: 76-94.
11. Blili, S., L. Raymond, et al. (1998). "Impact of Task Uncertainty, End-User Involvement, and Competence on the Success of End-User Computing." Information & Management 33(3): 137-153.
12. Chang S, Tung F.(2008). "An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites." British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 71-83.
13. Chorng-Shyong Ong, Jung-Yu Lai, et al. (2004). "Factors Affecting Engineers’ Acceptance of Asynchronous e-Learning Systems in High-Tech Companies." Information & Management 41(6): 795-804.
14. Chou, H.-W. (2001). "Effects of Training Method and Computer Anxiety on Learning Performance and Self-Efficacy." Computers in Human Behavior 17(1): 51-69.
15. Compeau, D. R. and C. A. Higgins (1995). "Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills." Information Systems Research. 6(2): 118-144.
16. Compeau, D. R. and C. A. Higgins (1995). "Computer Self-Efficacy Development of a Measure and Initial Test." MIS Quarterly. 19(2): 189-212.
17. Comrey, A. L. and H. B. Lee (1992). A first course in factor analysis, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
18. Conference Board of Canada. (2001). E-learning for the workplace: creating Canada’s lifelong learners. www.conferenceboard.ca/elearning
19. D. Gefen, D.W. Straub. (1997) "Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model." MIS Quarterly 21 (4) 389-400.
20. Davis, F. D. (1989). "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Accep." MIS Quarterly. 13(3): 319-341.
21. Downey, S., R. M. Wentling, et al. (2005). "The Relationship Between National Culture and the Usability of an E-Learning System." Human Resource Development International, 8(1): 47-64.
22. Fagan, M. H., S. Neill, et al. (2004). "An Empirical Investigation into The Relationship Between Computer Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, Experience, Support and Usage." The Journal of Computer Information Systems 44(2).
23. Fornell, C. and D. Larcker (1981). "Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error." Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39-50.
24. Fuller, R. M., C. Vician, et al. (2006). "E-Learning and Individual Characteristics the Role of Computer Anxiety and Communication Apprehension." The Journal of Computer Information Systems 46(4).
25. Ghadah Essa Ali and R. Magalhaes (2008). "Barriers to Implementing e-Learning: A Kuwaiti Case Study." International Journal of Training and Development 12(1): 36-53.
26. Goodhue, D. L. and R. L. Thompson (1995). "Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance." MIS Quarterly 19(2): 213-236.
27. Gregor Polančič, Marjan Heričko, et al. (2010). "An Empirical Examination of Application Frameworks Success Based on Technology Acceptance Model." Journal of Systems and Software 83(4): 574-584.
28. Guus G M Pijpers and K. v. Montfort (2006). "An Investigation of Factors that Influence Senior Executives to Accept Innovations in Information Technology." International Journal of Management. 23(1): 11-24.
29. H. Yang, Y. Yoo (2004) "It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model." Decision Support Systems 38 (1) 19-31.
30. Hambrecht, W. R. and Co. (2000). "Corporate E-learnig: Exploring a New Frontier." from http://www.wrhambrecht.com/research/coverage/elearing/ir/ir_explore.html.
31. Hasan, B. (2007). "Examining the Effects of Computer Self-Efficacy and System Complexity on Technology Acceptance." Information Resources Management Journal 20(3): 76-88.
32. Hasan, B. and J. Ali (2004). "An Empirical Examination of A Model of Computer Learning Performance." The Journal of Computer Information Systems 44(4).
33. Hasan, B. and J. Ali (2006). "The Impact of General and System-Specific Self-Efficacy on Computer Training Learning and Reactions." Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal 9(1): 17.
34. Hee-dong Yang and Y. Yoo. (2004). "It's All about Attitude: Revisiting The Technology Acceptance Model." Decision Support Systems 38(1).
35. Hill, A. Y. (2001). The Influence of Task Uncertainty, Cognitive Complexity, Users' Perceptions and Implementation Factors on Information Technology Acceptance: The Case of ABCM.
36. Hofstede and Geert (1983). "National Cultures in Four Dimensions-A Research-Based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations.", Int. Studies of Man. and Org13(1-2): 46-74.
37. Hofstede, G. (1980), "Culture’s consequence international difference in work-relate values." London: Beverly.
38. Hu, P. J.-H., T. H. K. Clark, et al. (2003). "Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study." Information and Management 41(2): 227-241.
39. Hussein, R., U. Aditiawarman, et al. (2007). E-Learning acceptance in a developing country: A case of the Indonesian Open University. German e-Science Conference. Baden-Baden.
40. Igbaria, M. and J. Iivari (1995). "The Effects of Self-Efficacy on Computer Usage." Omega. Oxford 23(6): 587-605.
41. Igbaria, M., N. Zinatelli, et al. (2003). "Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model." Information and Management 40(4): 269-285.
42. Igbaria, M., S. Parasuraman, et al. (1996). "A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage." Journal of Management Information Systems. 13(1): 127-144.
43. Igbaria, M., T. Guimaraes, et al. (1995). "Testing The Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via A Structural Equation Model." Journal of Management Information Systems 11(4): 87-115.
44. International, B. M. (2010). Indonesia Information Technology Report Q1 2010 Including 5-year industry forecasts by BMI.
45. Janet H Marler, Sandra L Fisher, et al. (2009). "Employee Self-Service Technology Acceptance: A Comparison of Pre-Implementation and Post-Implementation Relationships." Personnel Psychology 62(2): 327-359.
46. Kim, B. G., S. C. Park, et al. (2006). "A Structural Equation Modeling of the Internet Acceptance in Korea." Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 6(4): 425-435.
47. Kim, C., K. Suh, et al. (1998). "Utilization and User Satisfaction in End-User Computing: A Task Contingent Model." Information Resources Management Journal 11(4): 12-24.
48. King, W. R. and J. He (2006). "A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model." Information and Management 43(6): 740-755.
49. Leila A Halawi, Sandra Pires, et al. (2009). "An Evaluation of E-Learning on the Basis of Bloom's Taxonomy An Exploratory Study." Journal of Education for Business. 84(6): 374-381.
50. Liu, Y. and H. Wang (2009). "A Comparative Study on e-Learning Technologies and Products from the East to the West." Systems Research and Behavioral Science 26(2).
51. Long, L. K., C. Z. DuBois, et al. (2008). "Online Training: the Value of Capturing Trainee Reactions." Journal of Workplace Learning 20(1): 21-37.
52. Mark Turner, Barbara Kitchenham, et al. (2010). "Does The Technology Acceptance Model Predict Actual Use? A Systematic Literature Review." Information and Software Technology 52(5): 463-479.
53. Marler, J. H., S. L. Fisher, et al. (2009). "Employee Self-Service Technology Acceptance: A Comparison of Pre-Implementation and Post-Implementation Relationships." Personnel Psychology 62(2): 327-358.
54. Martins, L. L. and F. W. Kellermanns (2004). "A Model of Business School Students' Acceptance of a Web-based Course Management System." Academy of Management Learning and Education 3(1): 7-26.
55. McCoy, S., D. F. Galletta, et al. (2007). "Applying TAM Across Cultures: The Need for Caution." European Journal of Information Systems 16: 81-90.
56. Ngai, E. W. T., J. K. L. Poon, et al. (2007). "Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM." Computers & Education 48(2): 250-267.
57. P. Konana, S. Balasubramanian (2005) "The social–economic–psychological model of technology adoption and usage: an application to online investing" Decision Support Systems 39 (3) 505-524.
58. Pituch, K. A. and Y.-k. Lee (2006). "The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use." Computers & Education 47(2): 222-244.
59. Prabhudev Konana and S. Balasubramanian. (2005). "The Social–Economic–Psychological Model of Technology Adoption and Usage: An Application to Online Investing." Decision Support Systems 39(3): 505-524.
60. Prabowo, H. (2006). "Multi-Channel Learning - E-Learning Model of Bina Nusantara University." Austrian Computer Society 214: 402-412.
61. Raaij, E. M. v. and J. J. L. Schepers (2008). "The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China." 50 3(838-852).
62. Rezaei, M., Mohammadi, A. H.M., A., et al. (2008). "Predicting e-Learning Application in Agricultural Higher Education Using Technology Acceptance Model." Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 98(1): 85-95.
63. Robert Eisenberger, Peter Fasolo, et al. (1990). "Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence Commitmentand Innovation." Journal of Applied Psychology 75(1): 51-59.
64. Rosenberg JM. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. McGraw-Hill: New York.
65. SeJoon Hong, James Y.L. Thong, et al. (2006). "Understanding Continued Information Technology Usage Behavior: A Comparison of Three Models in The Context of Mobile Internet." Decision Support Systems 42(3): 1819-1934.
66. Soussan Djamasbia, Diane M. Stronga, et al. (2010). "Affect and Acceptance: Examining The Effects of Positive Mood on The Technology Acceptance Model." Decision Support Systems 48(2): 383-394.
67. Srite, M., J. B. Thatcher, et al. (2008). "Does Within-Culture Variation Matter An Empirical Study of Computer Usage." Journal of Global Information Management 16(1): 1-25.
68. Sriwahyuni, Ade. (2008). " Analysis of e-Learning System Acceptance by Using Technology Acceptance Model on PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. " Master Thesis. Magister Management. Gadjah mada University. Yogyakarta. Indonesia.
69. Sulistyo, B. (2007). E-Learning among Indonesianvocational High Schools, The Endof The School Library Era? The 2007 IASL Conference. National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
70. Taylor, S. and P. Todd (1995). "Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience." MIS Quarterly 19(4): 561-571.
71. Thompson, R. L., C. A. Higgins, et al. (1991). "Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization." MIS Quarterly 15(1).
72. Veiga, J. F., S. Floyd, et al. (2001). "Towards Modelling the Effects of National Culture on IT Implementation and Acceptance." Journal of Information Technology 16(3): 145-158.
73. Venkatesh, V. and F. D. Davis (2000). "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies." Management Science 46(2): 186-205.
74. Yousafzai, S. Y., G. R. Foxall, et al. (2007). "Technology Acceptance: a Meta-Analysis of the TAM: Part 1." Journal of Modeling in Management 2(3).
75. Yuen, A. H. K. and W. W. K. Ma (2008). "Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology." Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 36(3): 229-243.
|