博碩士論文 964203039 詳細資訊

姓名 游傑振(Chieh-Chen Yu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 探討關係性知覺對存取記憶系統的影響
(Understanding the Impacts of Perceived Relatedness on Team’s Transactive Memory System)
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 在現今快速變化的商業環境裡,對於組織而言,想要建立與維持競爭優勢,創造與分享知識的能力是很重要的。知識被視為一種重要的資產,藉由知識,組織可將它們的產品與服務差異化。在今天,許多知識導向的組織,使用知識工作者團隊來處理這些知識資產。故近幾年團隊知識流程之相關研究是重要熱門的研究議題。
本研究以存取記憶系統理論來探討團隊知識分享的流程,並將存取記憶系統分成專門性、信任性、協調性三個維度來探討其對團隊績效的影響。此外,本研究也探討自我決定理論 (Self Determination Theory, SDT) 中的關係性知覺與存取記憶理論三個維度的關係,亦即團隊成員與其他成員的支持與聯繫關係,是否會影響團隊中存取記憶系統,而後者是否對團隊整體績效有正向影響。
摘要(英) In today’s rapidly changing business environment, an organization’s ability to create and share knowledge is important for establishing and sustaining competitive advantage. In knowledge-based organization, knowledge-worker teams are used to leverage knowledge assets. This trend may explain a renewed interest in the research of knowledge processes of teams.
This research adopts transactive memory system (TMS) system to explore knowledge processes of teams. TMS has three dimensions, including specialization, coordination, and credibility. Taken from Self Determination Theory (SDT), this research investigates how perceived related impacts the three TMS’s dimensions. Besides, the study also explores how TMS impacts on team performance. This research conducted a field experiment and a total of 92 college students participated in an eight-week business simulation game. 19 teams each consisting of 4 or 5 members was either randomly assigned by the instructor in class A or voluntarily grouped by the participants in class B. Three-round questionnaires were collected from participants before- during-, and post-experiment.
This research found that when team members perceive they are supported and connected by other people, the three dimensions of TMS in teams will be enhanced, which will in turn promote team performance. The managerial implications and research limitations conclude the study.
關鍵字(中) ★ 團隊績效
★ 存取記憶系統
★ 關係性知覺
★ 自我決定理論
關鍵字(英) ★ team performance
★ transactive memory system
★ perceived relatedness
★ Self-Determination Theory
論文目次 Abstract i
Chinese Abstract ii
Acknowledgement iii
Table of Contents iv
Tables v
Figures vi
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Research Motivation 1
1.2 Research Objectives 2
1.3 Research Procedures 3
2. Literature Review 5
2.1 Self-Determination Theory 5
2.2 Transactive Memory System 11
2.3 Summary 19
3. Research Method 21
3.1 Research Model 21
3.2 Research Hypothesis 21
3.3 Research design 24
3.4 Data analysis method 32
4. Data Analysis 35
4.1 Descriptive Statistics 35
4.2 Validity 37
4.3 Reliability 39
4.4 Hypotheses Testing 41
4.5 Summary of Findings 46
5. Conclusion 47
5.1 Implications 49
5.2 Research Limitations 50
5.3 Further Researches 51
6. Reference 53
Appendix 60
參考文獻 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
Archer, R. L. (1980). Self-disclosure. In D. M. Wegner & R. R. Vallacher (Eds.), The Self in Social Psychology (pp. 183-205). New York: Oxford University Press.
Baard, P. P. (2002). Intrinsic need satisfaction in organizations: A motivational basis of success in for-profit and not-for-profit settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Self-determination Research (pp. 255-275). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of though and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 205-229.
Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 633-644.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In J. N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and Group Decision Making. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295, 336.
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2001). Business Research Methods (7 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Developmental Perspectives on Motivation (pp. 57-97). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
deCharms, R. (1968). Personal Causation. New York: Academic Press.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 39-80.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237-288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and the "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagne, M., Leone, D., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930-942.
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804-818.
Faraj, S. A., & Sproull, L. S. (2000). Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams. Management Science, 46, 1554-1568.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, V. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
Fornell, C., Lorange, P., & Roos, J. (1990). The cooperative venture formation process: A latent variable structural modeling approach. Management Science, 1246-1255.
Gagne, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199-223.
Gatewood, R. D., & Field, H. S. (1990). Human Resource Selection (2 ed.). Chicago: The Dryden Press.
Gemuenden, H. G., & Lechler, T. (1997). Success factors of project management: The critical few-anempirical investigation. Paper presented at the Portland International Conference Management of England Technology.
Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 265-275.
Harris, J. E. (1978). External memory aids. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Memory (pp. 172-180). London: Academic Press.
Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model. Human Development, 1, 661-669.
Hayes-Roth, B., & Thorndyke, P. W. (1979). Integration of knowledge from text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 91-108.
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449.
Hollingshead, A. B. (2000). Perceptions of Expertise and Transactive Memory in Work Relationships. Group Processes and Integroup Relations, 3(3), 257-267.
Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. J. Personality Soc. Psych, 77(5), 967-978.
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 195-204.
Ilardi, B. C., Leone, D., Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1789-1805.
Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance over Time. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 783-808.
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985.
Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring Transactive Memory Systems in the Field: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587-604.
Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519-1533.
Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 384-393.
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
Meacham, J. A., & Leiman, B. (1982). Remembering to perform future actions. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory Observed (pp. 327-336). San Francisco: Freeman.
Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 89-106.
Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive Memory: Learning Who Knows What in Work Groups and Organizations. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 117-133.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGrawHill.
Orasanu, J. (1990). Shared Mental Models and Crew Performance (Technical Report No. 46). Princeton, NJ: Cognitive Science Laboratory.
Reis, H. T. (1994). Domains of experience: Investigating relationship processes from three perspectives. In R. Erber & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Theoretical Fromeworks for Personal Relationships (pp. 87-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rentsch, J. R., Heffner, T. S., & Duffy, L. T. (1994). What you know is what you get from experience. Group & Organization Management, 19, 450-474.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, S. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta. Hamburg: http://www.smartpls.de.
Roca, J. C., & Gagne, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1585-1604.
Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy, and the self in psychological development. In R. Dienstbier & J. E. Jacobs (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 40. Developmental Perspectives on Motivation (pp. 1-56). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397-427.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Ryan, R. M., Kuhl, J., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: Organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of selfregulation in behavior and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 701-728.
Ryan, R. M., & La Guardia, J. G. (2000). What is being optimized over development? A self-determination theory perspective on basic psychological needs across the life span. In S. Qualls & R. Abeles (Eds.), Dialogues on Psychology and Aging (pp. 145-172). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big Five traits and its relations with authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380-1393.
Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D., & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(3), 244-265.
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of Group Behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wegner, D. M., Guiliano, T., & Hertel, P. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In W. J. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (pp. 253-276). New York: Springer Verlag.
Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357-381.
White, R. W. (1963). Ego and Reality in Psychoanalytic Theory. New York: International Universities.
Wold, H. (1985). Systems analysis by partial least squares. In P. Nijkamp, H. Leitner & N. Wrigley (Eds.), Measuring The Unmeasurable. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Developments of Transactive Memory Systems and Collective Mind in Virtual Teams. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(2), 187-208.
Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and Managerial Problem Solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229-239.
指導教授 周惠文(Huey-Wen Chou) 審核日期 2009-6-26
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡