博碩士論文 965202094 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:3 、訪客IP:3.12.155.148
姓名 葛之鈞(Chih-chin Ke)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊工程學系
論文名稱 以Blog為基礎之線上知識分享程度:與部落格認知可用性、多元智能以及學習風格關係之研究
(Perceived Level of Knowledge Sharing via blog: A case study of Blog Perceived of Usefulness, Multiple Intelligences and Learning Style)
相關論文
★ 應用智慧分類法提升文章發佈效率於一企業之知識分享平台★ 家庭智能管控之研究與實作
★ 開放式監控影像管理系統之搜尋機制設計及驗證★ 資料探勘應用於呆滯料預警機制之建立
★ 探討問題解決模式下的學習行為分析★ 資訊系統與電子簽核流程之總管理資訊系統
★ 製造執行系統應用於半導體機台停機通知分析處理★ Apple Pay支付於iOS平台上之研究與實作
★ 應用集群分析探究學習模式對學習成效之影響★ 應用序列探勘分析影片瀏覽模式對學習成效的影響
★ 一個以服務品質為基礎的網際服務選擇最佳化方法★ 維基百科知識推薦系統對於使用e-Portfolio的學習者滿意度調查
★ 學生的學習動機、網路自我效能與系統滿意度之探討-以e-Portfolio為例★ 藉由在第二人生內使用自動對話代理人來改善英文學習成效
★ 合作式資訊搜尋對於學生個人網路搜尋能力與策略之影響★ 數位註記對學習者在線上學習環境中反思等級之影響
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 利用科技來輔助教育可以使學習成為一件更生動的事,然而當指導者只熟悉某些軟體或工具,例如e-mail或是powerpoint時,只會令傳達訊息時較為簡單,無法使學習者得到更多元化的資訊。為了能夠激勵學習者在學習上的參予,應該要採用互動式同時又能夠引發學習者的學習特色的多媒體工具,而部落格正是一個適合的學習工具,在激勵學習的同時能夠促進同儕互動。透過科技工具輔助學習可以使學生中心式(student-centered)學習更為活躍,這是傳統教學無法達到的。本研究對部落格使用者的學習特色、部落格認知可用性以及知識分享程度之間進行探討,研究結果發現,1) 部落格上的學習歷程功能與知識分享的形成有顯著相關,2) 多元智能中的語文、人際以及內省智能的培養,會對知識分享的程度有正向的相關,而學習風格屬於口語的學習者則會與其在知識分享上有所相關,3) 學習特色中,多元智能多個構面皆與部落格認知可用性具顯著相關,學習風格則以反思的有顯著相關,4) 透過部落格使用者對部落格功能的認知可用性,能夠對其在知識分享程度上的表現進行預測。基於此結果,本研究能夠提供指導者和教育學者關於部落格上學習者的相關重要訊息,並可以幫助了解部落格平台上的知識分享流程與學習者內涵的相關性,以及幫助學習者對自我的認識。
摘要(英) Educational technology has been used to facilitate more active student learning, however, instructors who have just mastered some software or tools, such as e-mail or powerpoint, it could just as a easily way to transmit information to learners. Learning should apply interactive multimedia that encourage student participation in learning tasks and that appeal to multiple intelligences and learning styles. Since that theme, blog is an appropriate tool which can be used to increase student engagement and to activate peer interaction. Learning tools can create opportunities for effective student-centered learning that were not previously possible. In this study, we research the relation of Multiple Intelligences, Learning Style and Perceived Blog usefulness with Perceived level of online knowledge sharing with bloggers. Based on the result, we give important information related with learning to teachers to teachers and educators on how Blog influences the self-perception of students’ abilities.
關鍵字(中) ★ 多元智能
★ 學習特色
★ 知識分享
★ 部落格
★ 學習風格
關鍵字(英) ★ knowledge sharing
★ blog
★ learning characteristic
論文目次 1. 前言 1
2. 文獻回顧 3
2.1. 部落格與學習以及知識分享 3
2.2. Gardner的多元智能理論 4
2.3. 學習風格 5
2.4. Blog功能,學習以及社會關係 6
2.5. 學習者的個別差異與學習特色 7
3. 研究方法 9
3.1. 學習特色 9
3.2. 認知可用性 13
3.3. 知識分享程度 13
3.4. 研究模型與假設 16
4. 研究結果與討論 18
4.1. 基本資料分析 18
4.2. 信度分析 18
4.3. 差異分析 21
4.4. 相關分析 22
4.5. 預測能力分析 26
5. 討論與結論 28
5.1. 部落格認知可用性與知識分享程度相關 29
5.2. 學習特色與知識分享程度相關 29
5.3. 學習特色與部落格認知可用性的相關 30
5.5. 結論 30
參考文獻 32
附錄 37
參考文獻 Armstrong T. (1994). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria,VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Ali-Hasan, N. F., & Adamic, L. A. (2007). Expressing social relationships on the blog through links and comments. Proceedings of the Internal Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
Alty, J. L., Al-Sharrah, A., & Beacham, N. (2006). When humans form media and media form humans: an experimental study examining the effects different digital media have on the learning outcomes of students who have different learning styles. Interacting with Computers, 18(5), 891-909.
Ayersman, D. (1994). Cognitive psychology and hypermedia: merging the disciplines. Unpublished dissertation at West Virginia University.
Blood, R. (2002a). We’ve got blog: How weblogs are changing our culture? Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
Blood, R. (2002b). Weblog handbook: Practical advice on creating and maintaining your blog. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Demirbas, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students and the relationships of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and Instruction, 17, 345-359.
Delahoussaye, M. (2002). The Perfect Learner: An Expert Debate on Learning Styles. Training, 39(5), 28-36.
Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Students' Learning Styles in Two Classes: Online Distance Learning and Equivalent On-Campus. College Teaching, 47(4), 130-135.
Felder, R. M. (1996). Matters of Style, AEEE Prism, 6(4), 18-23.
Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N. & Dietz, E.J. (1998). A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. V. Comparisons with Traditionally taught Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 469-480.
Felder, R. M., & J. Spurlin. (2005). Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles: A Meta-analysis. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112.
Felder, R. M. & Silverman, L.K. (1988). Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education, Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
Felder, R. M. & Soloman, B.A. (2001). Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire. Retrieved May 26, 2009, from North Carolina State University, http://www2.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/ILS-faq.htm
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind. London: Fontana Press.
Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 200-208.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2000). A case against spiritual intelligence. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10(1), 27-34.
Gardner, H. (2006a). Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2006b). Development and education of the mind, The selected works of Howard Gardner. London: Routledge.
Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.
Hall, E., & Moseley, D. (2005). Is There a Role for Learning Styles in Personalised Education and Training?. International Journal of Lifelong Learning, 24(3), 243-255.
Hoerr, T.R. (2003). It’s no fad: Fifteen years of implementing multiple intelligences. Educational Horizons, 81(2), 92-94.
Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2007). An analysis of peer assessment online discussions within a course that uses project-based learning. Interactive learning environment, 15(3), 237-251.
Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2008). Analysis of Problem-Solving Based Online Asynchronous Discussion Pattern. Educational Technology and Society, 11(1), 17-28.
Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2008). Exploring the behavioral patterns of an online knowledge sharing discussion activity among teachers with problem-solving strategy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 101-108.
Hsu C. L., & Lin, J. C. C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information and Management, 45(1), 65-74.
Jung, J. J. (2009). Social grid platform for collaborative online learning on blogosphere: A case study of eLearning@BlogGrid. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 2177-2186.
Keefe, J. W. (1978). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Students Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs, 1-17. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Kelly, D., & Tangney B. (2006). Adapting to intelligence profile in an adaptive educational system. Interacting with Computers, 18(3), 385-409.
Kim, H. N. (2008). The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of blog use in educational contexts. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1342-1352.
Kraus, L. A., Reed, W. M., & Fitzgerald, G. E. (2001). The effects of learning style and hypermedia prior experience on behavioral disorders knowledge and time on task: A case-based hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 17 (1), 125-140.
Lawrence, G.. (1993). People Types & Tiger Stripes: A Practical Guide to Learning Styles (3rd ed.). Gainesville, Fla.: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
Lazear D. (1991). Seven ways of knowing.Teaching for multiple intelligences. Palatine, IL: IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing.
Liaw, S. S., Chen G.. D., Huang, H. M. (2008). Users’ attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management. Computers and Education, 50(3), 950-961.
Litzinger, T. A., Lee, S. H., Wise, J. C., & Felder R. M. (2005). A Study of the Reliability and Validity of the Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Styles©. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.
Litzinger, T. A., Lee, S. H., Wise, J. C., & Felder, R. M. (2007). A Psychometric Study of the Index of Learning Styles©. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 309-319.
Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10(4), 419-434.
Maag, M. (2006). Podcasting and MP3 players: Emerging education technologies. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 9-13.
Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L., & Klimczak, A. K. (2004). Content analysis of online discussion forums: a comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52(2), 23-40.
Mokhtar, I. A., Majid, S., & Foo, S. (2008). Information literacy education: Applications of mediated learning and multiple intelligences. Library and Information Science Research, 30(3), 195-206.
Montanez, N. (2006). Improved annotation of the blogosphere via autotagging and hierarchical clustering. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web,625-632.
Moritz, J., & Christie, A. (2005). It’s Elementary! Using Electronic Portfolios with Young Students. In Crawford, C., Willis, D., Carlsen, R., Gibson, I., McFerrin, K., & Price, J. Sixteenth International Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education Conference Proceedings: 1905-1909, Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Papanikolaou, K. A., Mabbott, A., Bull, S., & Grigoriadou, M. (2006). Designing learner-controlled educational interactions based on learning/cognitive style and learner behaviour. Interacting with Computers, 18(3), 356-384.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge and Keoan Paul.
Riva, G. (2002). The sociocognitive psychology of computer-mediated communication: the present and future of technology-based interactions. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5(6), 581-598.
Sanchez, E., & Garcia-Rodicio, H. (2008). The use of modality in the design of verbal aids in computer-based learning environments. Interacting with Computers, 20(6), 545-561.
Sözen, H., Sözen, M., & Tekat, A. (2009). Comparison of the profiles of the potential teachers in different disciplines based on multiple intelligences theory (Samsun City Sample). Paper presented at World Conference on Educational Sciences, Nicosia, North Cyprus.
Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2008). Identification of multiple intelligences with the Multiple Intelligence Profiling Questionnaire III. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50 (2), 206-221.
Trier, M., & Bobrik, A. (2009). Social Search: Exploring and Searching Social Architectures in Digital Networks. IEEE Internet Computing, 13(2), 51-59.
Ulrey, D. & Ulrey, J. (1992). Developmentally appropriate practices meet multiple intelligences. Intelligences Connections, 2(1), 4-6.
Wang, L. C. & Chen, M. P. (2008). Promoting ICT skills learning through compensating weaker learning style. Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer and Applied Computational Science.
Wang, H. C., Li T. Y., & Chang C. Y. (2006). A web-based tutoring system with styles-matching strategy for spatial geometric transformation. Interacting with Computers, 18(3), 331-355.
Weiler, A. (2005). Information-seeking behaviour in Generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(1), 46-53.
Workman, M. (2004). Performance and perceived effectiveness in computer-based and computer-aided education: do cognitive styles make a difference?. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 517-534.
Zywno, M.S. (2003). A Contribution of Validation of Score Meaning for Felder-Soloman’s Index of Learning Styles. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual ASEE Conference. Washington, DC: ASEE.
指導教授 楊鎮華(Stephen J.H. Ynag) 審核日期 2009-7-7
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明