地面風及溫度納進對台灣空氣品質模擬的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：8

、訪客IP：3.144.36.141

姓名

吳婷琦(Ting-Chi Wu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

大氣物理研究所

論文名稱

地面風及溫度納進對台灣空氣品質模擬的影響
(Impacts of meteorological surface nudging on air quality simulation in Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 海陸風對台灣沿海地區空氣品質之影響	★ 東亞出流對春季大台北地區臭氧的影響
★ 台灣地區PAMS觀測資料之顯著性和規律性的分析與探討	★ 北台灣地區臭氧汙染之季節效應與東亞汙染出流之影響
★ PAMS光化評估測站揮發性有機物模擬及模式發展

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

氣象場是進行空氣品質模擬的必要輸入，因此氣象模擬的好壞便會直接或間接地影響空氣品質模擬。風場決定污染物的傳送距離及方向，以及邊界層內的垂直混合程度，進而導致污染物的累積與擴散。尤其，污染的來源(排放量)主要由地面提供(交通幹道、工廠、森林等)，若能更精準地掌握近地面的風場，預期對於臭氧事件的模擬將能得到改善。
為加強地面風場的模擬，我們於模擬中應用四為資料同化分析納進法( FDDA analysis nudging )，將台灣環境保護署七十餘個地面監測站的氣象風場資料作為地面分析納進( surface analysis nudging )目標。然而，我們發現由於這些監測站密集地集中在台灣本島，相較於其他沒有監測站分布的區域(如海上)，模擬網域中分析場的風速場會產生無法預期的高風速情形。因此，我們額外加入”虛擬測站”做分析納進，能有效改善上述情形。
為了解分析納進法對於地面風場的改善於空氣品質模擬的影響，我們設計了三組實驗，分別測試納進係數、納進變數，納進網域對於模擬氣象場的影響，並探討以上情況下的大氣化學模擬結果與基本案例( 無任何納進的實驗 )的比較。結果顯示，納進以後的模擬的確能有效改善地面風場，以符合觀測值。納進變數，選擇同時調整風場與溫度場，導致垂直速度增加，污染物被傳送至較高空，而地面的臭氧無法累積；納進係數，雖然沒有開啟地面氣溫的納進，但是隨著係數使用的越大，地面氣溫的模擬有異常增溫的情況，同時，模擬的邊界層高度也有隨之增高的情形，這也對模擬的化學場有不良的影響；納進網域則討論三維分析納進( 3D analysis nudging )對於綜觀天氣形態的解析，由於模擬期間初期正好有納坦颱風侵台，納進網域實驗中發現，加強三維分析納進對於颱風路徑與風場有截然不同的掌握，但是並非主要臭氧事件發生日，因此對於化學場的模擬沒有顯著的差異。
由以上實驗結果顯示，臭氧的前驅物 NOx 以及 NMHC隨著風場的納進，其增長的趨勢與分布有顯著的不同，但是對於臭氧的生成與演變，分析納進實驗與基本案例沒有很大的不同。另外，硝酸與硫酸鹽類的濕沈降方面也有因為納進實驗產生些微的差異。

摘要(英)

Meteorological fields are necessary input for air quality modeling. Wind field is responsible for pollutant transport and turbulent mixing in the troposphere. In this work we studied the impact of analysis nudging of meteorological variables on model performance both for meteorological variables and for air quality variables.
Taiwan Environmental Administration has maintained a network of densely distributed monitoring stations for air quality with associated meteorological observations. We applied this network of 72 meteorological observations to nudge hourly wind speed, wind direction and temperature. Then we used the new meteorological data to conduct air quality study. We first noted that the standard analysis nudging technique as in MM5 and WRF models needs to be modified in order to be applicable to simulation domains such as Taiwan where nudging observations are all located near the center of the simulation domain. In such case surface nudging with the MQD method leads to undesirable changes in oceanic areas around Taiwan. With our modified MQD technique we are able to develop physically acceptable nudging meteorological fields.
We first studied the impact of variations of the three surface nudging constraints, nudging coefficients, nudging variables and nudging domain on meteorological simulation. We found that surface nudging of wind field every 6 hours can reduce hourly surface wind speed to near observations for most of the simulation period. But temperature nudging can lead to unacceptable results if the nudging coefficient is too large. We found this is mostly due to unreasonably fast and deep planetary boundary layer development in the morning and at the evening. Such nudging will while improves surface temperature simulation does lead to overly strong vertical mixing and highly reduced surface pollutant mixing ratios very different from actual observation. Careful structuring of 3-D nudging domains also can improve meteorological simulations such as for the Typhoon Nockten period in 2004 which happens to be within the early part of our selected study period.
For air quality study we found that surface nudging while improved simulation of surface wind field it did not change surface ozone simulation significantly, at least around the land based monitoring stations. But the change in 3-D wind structure did change local circulations that led to differences in off shore flow of pollutants and deposition of acidic materials.

關鍵字(中)

★ 納進

關鍵字(英)

★ analysis nudging

論文目次

目錄
摘要 i
Abstract iii
致謝 v
目錄 vii
附表說明 x
附圖說明 xiii
第一章前言 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究動機 2
第二章文獻回顧 4
2-1 納進法於氣象模擬的應用 4
2-1-1 Analysis nudging 4
2-1-2 Multiquadric Interpolation 5
2-2. 納進法對於大氣化學模擬的影響 6
第三章研究方法 8
3-1 資料來源 9
3-1-1 台灣環保署地面監測站 9
3-1-2 NCEP GFS (AVN) 9
3-2 模式簡介 10
3-2-1 氣象模式 10
3-2-2 空氣品質模式 11
3-3 分析納進法 12
3-3-1 分析納進步驟 12
3-3-2 改良分析納進法 13
3-4 實驗設計 16
3-4-1 個案選擇與模式設定 16
3-4-2 實驗設計 17
3-5 納進策略與氣象場評估 18
3-5-1 納進係數與納進係數延伸實驗 18
3-5-2 納進變數實驗 19
3-5-3 納進網域實驗 19
3-5-4 氣象場驗證 20
第四章模擬結果與討論 22
4-1 納進實驗氣象場模擬結果 22
4-1-1 測站風向、風速、氣溫與模擬的比較 22
4-1-1a 與環保署 72 個測站相比 22
4-1-1b 與氣象局 26 個測站相比 23
4-1-2 地面風場 24
4-2 納進實驗化學場模擬結果 25
4-2-1 測站臭氧、NOx、NMHC 與模擬的比較 25
4-2-2 臭氧的空間分布 30
4-2-3 臭氧前驅物 NOx 的空間分布 31
4-2-4 臭氧前驅物 NMHC 的空間分布 32
4-3 討論納進係數實驗 33
4-3-1邊界層高度分布 33
4-3-2 地面溫度分布 34
4-4 討論納進變數實驗 34
4-4-1 垂直運動與累積降雨 34
4-4-2 硝酸、硫酸鹽類濕沈降量 36
4-5 討論納進網域實驗 36
4-5-1 納坦颱風地面風場 36
第五章結論與未來展望 38
5-1 結論 38
5-2 未來展望 39
參考文獻 41
附表 44
附圖 64

參考文獻

行政院環境保護署網頁，http://taqm.epa.gov.tw/taqm/zh-tw/default.aspx
交通部氣象局網頁，http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V6/index.htm
行政院環境保護署，中華民國台灣地區空氣品質監測報告-九十三年年報
PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Modeling System Tutorial Class Notes and User’s Guide :
MM5 Modeling System Version 3, 2005
http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/documents/MM5_tut_Web_notes/tutorialTOC.htm
CMAQ v4.6 Operational Guidance Document,
http://www.cmaq-model.org/op_guidance_4.6/index.cfm
林沛練，賴信志，葉嘉靜，2004：南高屏地區空氣污染案例之氣象觀測與模擬
探討。第八屆全國大氣科學學術研討會，大氣環境與化學（I）02-OB-
059
柳中明，1993：水平傳送對大台北地區光化生成臭氧的影響研究。
大氣科學， 21(1)，1-22頁。
柳中明，蘇維中，1997：區域氣象環境與高臭氧之相關分析。
大氣科學， 25(1)， 27-50頁。
Comrie Andrew C., Tarnal Brent, 1992: Relationship between synopstic-scale
atmospheric circulation and ozone concentrations in metropolitan Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 26B, No. 3, pp. 301-312.
Nuss, W.A., and D.W. Titley, 1994: Use of Multiquadric Interpolation for
Meteorological Objective Analysis. Monthly Weather Review 122, 1611–1631.
Faccani, C., R. Ferretti, and G. Visconti, 2003: High-Resolution Weather Forecasting
over Complex Orography: Sensitivity to the Assimilation of Conventional
Data. Monthly Weather Review 131, 136–154.
Stauffer, D. R., T.T. Warner and N.L. Seaman, 1985: A Newtonian “nudging”
approach to four-dimensional data assimilation: Use of SESAME-IV data in
a mesosale model. Preprints, Seventh Conference on Numerical Weather
Prediction, Montreal, America Meteorology Society, 77-82.
Stauffer, D.R., and N.L. Seaman, 1990: Use of Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation
in a Limited-Area Mesoscale Model. Part I: Experiments with Synoptic-
Scale Data. Monthly Weather Review 118, 1250–1277.
Stauffer, D.R., N.L. Seaman, and F.S. Binkowski, 1991: Use of Four-Dimensional
Data Assimilation in a Limited-Area Mesoscale Model Part II: Effects of
Data Assimilation within the Planetary Boundary Layer. Monthly Weather
Review 119, 734–754.
Kuo, Y.H., and Y.R. Guo, 1989: Dynamic Initialization Using Observations from a
Hypothetical Network of Profilers. Monthly Weather Review 117, 1975–1998.
Guo, Y.-R. and Kuo, Y.-H, 1994: Testing of Newtonian Nudging Technique in Data
Assimilation on the Meso-Beta-Scale. At Fourth Atmospheric Radiation
Measurement (ARM) Science Team Meeting, February 28 to March 3, 1994,
Charleston, South Carolina.
Seaman, N.L., 2000: Meteorological Modeling for Air-Quality Assessments.
Atmospheric Environment, 34 2231-2259.
Emery, C. A., 2001: Enhanced meteorological modeling and performance evaluation
for two Texas ozone episodes. Prepared for the Texas Natural Resource
Conservation Commission, by ENVIRON International Corporation.
Xu, X., L. Xie, X. Cheng, J. Xu, X. Zhou, and G. Ding, 2008: Application of an
Adaptive Nudging Scheme in Air Quality Forecasting in China. , Journal of
Applied Meteorology and Climatology47, 2105–2114.
Otte, T.L., 2008: The Impact of Nudging in the Meteorological Model for
Retrospective Air Quality Simulations. Part I: Evaluation against National
Observation Networks. , Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 47,
1853–1867.
Otte, T.L., 2008: The Impact of Nudging in the Meteorological Model for
Retrospective Air Quality Simulations. Part II: Evaluating Collocated
Meteorological and Air Quality Observations. Journal of Applied Meteorology
and Climatology 47, 1868–1887.

指導教授

張時禹(Julius S. Chang)

審核日期

2009-7-1

推文