博碩士論文 971202007 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:7 、訪客IP:3.80.5.157
姓名 唐麟(Lin Tang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 英美語文學系
論文名稱 奧斯卡王爾德作品中的自由美學
(Liberal Aesthetics in Oscar Wilde’s Works)
相關論文
★ 霍桑小說中的罪與同情★ 弦外之音:惠特曼詩中的超越觀
★ 梭羅理想與現實之探討★ 愛默生對自然與社會之超越觀
★ 博愛世界的願景:雪萊作品中理想與現實的探討★ Trust and Trustworthiness in Hardy’s The Mayor of Casterbridge
★ 瑪麗.雪梨及其創作:再探<<科學怪人>>之文學地位★ 野蠻的吶喊:惠特曼作品中的自然、博愛及普世
★ ?白鯨記?中浪漫主義與喀爾文教義之調和★ 《簡 愛》中的傳統與革新之研究
★ Tragic View of Life in Thomas Hardy′s Three Novels★ 柯勒律治詩作研究:愛的概念體現
★ 擺盪於理想與現實之間: 羅伯特‧布朗寧詩選之研究★ 建造空中樓閣:《湖濱散記》中梭羅的改革理念探討
★ Isabel Archer as a “Fortune-Hunter” in The Portrait of a Lady★ A Study of Nature and God in Coleridge′s Poetry
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 身為後維多利亞時期的爭議性人物,王爾德宣稱藝術無關道德、非關實用、更不應迎合任何的威權或正典;他的「為藝術而藝術」強調所有的藝術都沒有實際用處,而且美的本質就是美。然而,若藝術誠如王爾德言,如此無用且無意義,我們該如何來檢視王爾德的文學地位,以及「為藝術而藝術」的社會價值?當大部分的現代批評家試圖將王爾德定位成無關社會和政治的藝術家時,本篇論文將試圖重回維多利亞美學運動,找出其自由文化精神,並以此探索王爾德美學的社會和政治重要性。換句話說,本篇論文將承繼,如琳達道林(Linda Dowling)和偉恩湯瑪士(Wayne Thomas)對於維多利亞美學的研究觀點,以自由文化為出發點,試圖重新脈絡化王爾德的美學,找出其社會和政治上的關連性。
在維多利亞美學運動中,約翰羅斯金(John Ruskin)提倡藝術應展現神聖且道德的內涵,並且要有倫理的教育性;而沃爾特佩特(Walter Pater)則強調個人對藝術和美的接收與感知,進而將藝術視為感官經驗的陶冶。但本論文研究發現,王爾德洞察了維多利亞美學內存的問題,因而用不同的方式呈現出真正的美學自由精神。無關道德、非關實用、抵抗威權等美學主張,成為王爾德自由美學,來抗斥以道德/常規化為出發點的美學社會功能。在此新歷史脈絡之下,本論文會將王爾德美學視為一個文化標誌,並探索此文化標誌的意義以及文學再現。
正文第二章「無用之大用」將會分析無關道德和非關實用的議題,探討王爾德美學在維多利亞新教主義與資本主義中的意義建構,本章將使用三篇王爾德的作品來探討王爾德對於維多利亞現代氛圍的批判態度。第三章「美學中的酷異身體」將處理抵抗威權的議題,從維多利亞的新興社會主義出發,延伸到資本主義的常規化力量,研究王爾德如何在他的評論和文學作品中呈現他的反思與反抗。本章將指出王爾德的抵抗式美學建構於他對中產身體的酷異改寫,以及在維多利亞英國中,挑戰所謂「正常」的社會控制與群眾期待;本章也會使用王爾德三篇作品來呈現上述的酷異化美學。第四章結論將會總結以上各章的重點,以王爾德的美學、性意識、和社會關聯性為基礎,呈現出一個較為完整的藝術家王爾德;本章將會論述王爾德自由美學是潛在的抵抗政治,以反本質論的出發點來解構道德/常規化的維多利亞邏輯中心論;在此背景中,王爾德不僅是社會次/反抗文化的殉道者,也是藝術與思想自由的倡議者。
摘要(英) Being a controversial figure in the late Victorian period, Oscar Wilde claims that art should not be about morality and utility, nor should it conform to any authority. Wilde’s art for art’s sake is thus self-defined as that all arts are useless and beauty means only beauty. However, if art is really useless and meaningless, how do we locate Wilde’s literary significance in his art for art’s sake? While many modern scholars who study Wilde’s aesthetics contend that Wilde is an asocial and apolitical artist, this thesis attempts to locate his social and political significance by retrieving the liberal spirit in the aesthetic movement of the Victorian period. In other words, this thesis will go back to the Victorian liberal culture itself and joins in the academic studies, as presented by Linda Dowling and David Thomas, to re-contextualize and re-examine Wilde’s aesthetics in a liberal sense.
While, in this aesthetic movement, John Ruskin proposes that art should be about divine moral order and educational in terms of ethics and Walter Pater contends that art is about individual perception of beauty and a cultivation of sensational experience, this thesis detects that Wilde realizes the intrinsic predicaments in the movement and therefore takes a different path to carry out genuine liberal spirit. His aesthetic claims of amorality, autility, and anti-authority thus become Wildean liberal aesthetics to resist the moral/normal claim of aesthetic social function. In this new-historicist framework, I will read Wilde’s aesthetics as a cultural sign and explore its meanings along with his literary representations.
Chapter two, “Useless Art as Liberating Art,” will focus on the issue of amorality and autility as constructed against the backdrop of Victorian evangelicalism and capitalism. Three of Wilde’s literary representations will be utilized to exemplify his critical stance against this cultural silhouette. Chapter three, “A Queer Body in Aesthetics,” will tackle the issue of anti-authority, set in Victorian fledgling socialism and presented in Wilde’s critical writings and literary works. I will argue that Wilde’s resistant aesthetics consists in his queer rewriting of the bourgeois body and his challenge against the normal in contrast to the social control and public opinion in the Victorian England. Three of Wilde’s literary works will also be scrutinized in detail to elucidate Wilde’s queering attempt. The concluding chapter will integrate the previous main points and render a more complete Wilde on the basis of his aesthetics, sexuality, and social involvement. I will conclude that Wildean liberal aesthetics could be a potential politics of resistance which exerts its anti-essentialist perspective to confound a coerced Victorian logocentrism, and in this scenario, Wilde is not only a martyr of social sub/counter-culture but also a promoter of artistic and intellectual freedom.
關鍵字(中) ★ 王爾德
★ 維多利亞美學
★ 自由文化
★ 身體
★ 酷兒理論
★ 反抗政治
關鍵字(英) ★ resistance politics
★ queer theory
★ body
★ liberal culture
★ Victorian aestheticism
★ Oscar Wilde
論文目次 Table of Contents
Chapter One Introduction…………………………………………………… 1
Chapter Two
Useless Art as Liberating Art…………………………… 20
Chapter Three
A Queer Body in Aesthetics……………………………… 47
Chapter Four
Conclusion.…………………………………………………… 80
Works Cited ………………………………………………………………… 87
參考文獻 Works Cited
Austin, J. L.. How to Do Things with Words. Ed. J. O.
Urmson and Maria Sbisa. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard UP, 1975. Print.
Buttrick, George Arthur, et al. The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. 5 Vols. Nashville: Abingdon Press. 1990. Vol. 4. Print.
Bristow, Joseph, ed. Oscar Wilde and Modern Culture: The Making of a Legend. Athens, Ohio: Ohio UP, 2008. Print.
---. “A Complex Multiform Creature: Wilde’s Sexual Identities.” Raby, The Cambridge Companion, 195-218.
Barris, Jeremy. “Oscar Wilde’s Artificiality and the Logic of Genuine Pluralism.” Contemporary Justice Review 8.2 (June 2005): 193-209. Academic Search Premier. Web. 17 November 2010.
Butler, Judith. “Critically Queer.” Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London: Routledge, 1993. 223-242. Print.
Beaumont, Matthew. “Reinterpreting Oscar Wilde’s Concept of Utopia: ‘The Soul of Man under Socialism.’” Utopian Studies 15. 1 (2004): 13-29. Academic Search Premier. Web. 14 February 2011.
Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproductions.” Illuminations. Trans. Harry Zohn. London: Fontana Press, 1992. 211-244. Print.
Buckler, William E, ed. Prose of the Victorian Period. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1958. Print.
Cockshut, A. O. J. “Victorian Thought.” Pollard, The Victorians, 1-24.
Cohen, Ed. “Writing Gone Wilde: Homoerotic Desire in the Closet of Representation.” PMLA 102. 5 (October 1987): 801-13. JSTOR. Web. 17 August 2010.
Christ, Carol T., and Catherine Robson. “The Victorian Age: An Introduction.” The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt, et al. 8th ed. Vol. 2. New York: Norton, 2006. 979-1001. Print.
Cohen, Philip Kent. The Moral Vision of Oscar Wilde. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 1978. Print.
Calloway, Stephen and David Colvin. The Exquisite Life of Oscar Wilde. London: Orion Media, 1997. Print
Carlyle, Thomas. “Gospel of Mammonism.” Buckler, Prose of the Victorian Period 135-39.
Dowling, Linda. Vulgarization of Art: The Victorians and Aesthetic Democracy. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1996. Print.
Douglas, Mary and Baron Isherwood. “The Use of Goods.” The World of Goods. London: Routledge, 1979. 36-66. Print.
Dellamora, Richard. “Productive Decadence: ‘The Queer Comradeship of Outlawed Thought’: Vernon Lee, Max Nordau, and Oscar Wilde.” New Literary History 35.4 (Autumn, 2004): 529-546. JSTOR. Web. 17 November 2010.
Ellmann, Richard. Oscar Wilde. New York: Vintage Books, 1988. Print.
Gagnier, Regenia. “Wilde and the Victorians.” Raby, The Cambridge Companion, 18-33.
Fraser, Hilary. Beauty and Belief: Aesthetics and Religion in Victorian Literature. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge UP, 1986. Print.
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. Trans. Robert Hurley. 2 Vols. New York: Vintage Books, 1990. Vol. 1. Print.
Halperin, David. “The Queer Politics of Michel Foucault.” Saint = Foucault: Toward a Gay Hagiography. Cambridge: Oxford UP, 1995. 15-125. Print.
Habermas, Jurgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1989. Print.
Holland, Merlin, ed. The Complete Works of Oscar Wilde. Glasgow: HarperCollins, 2003. Print.
Huang, Yutin. From Transgression to Transcendence: A Study on Oscar Wilde’s Development of Aesthetics. MA Thesis. National Cheng-Kung U, 2003. National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan. Web. 6 March 2011.
Joyce, Simon. “Sexual Politics and the Aesthetics of Crime: Oscar Wilde in the Nineties.” ELH 69.2 (Summer, 2002): 501-23. JSTOR. Web. 17 November 2010.
Kohl, Norbert. “Authority and Autonomy: ‘The Soul of Man under Socialism.’” Oscar Wilde: The Works of a Conformist Rebel. Trans. David Henry Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989. 123-37. Print.
Kaye, Richard. “Oscar Wilde and the Politics of Posthumous Sainthood.” Bristow, Oscar Wilde and Modern Culture, 110-132.
Marcovitch, Heather. “The Princess, Persona, and Subjective Desire: A Reading of Oscar Wilde’s Salome.” Papers on Language and Literature 40. 1 (winter 2004): 88-101. Academic Search Premier. Web. 14 February 2011.
Mill, John Stuart. Autobiography. Buckler, Prose of the Victorian Period 288-312.
---. On Liberty. Buckler, Prose of the Victorian Period, 251-287.
Maccormack, Jerusha. “Wilde’s Fiction(s).” Raby, The Cambridge Companion, 96-117.
Mason, Stuart. Oscar Wilde Art and Morality: A Record of the Discussion which Followed the Publication of “Dorian Gray.” New York: Haskell House P0ublishers, 1971. Print.
Novak, Daniel. “Sexuality in the Age of Technology Reproducibility.” Bristow, Oscar Wilde and Modern Culture, 63-95.
Pollard, Arthur, ed. The Victorians. New York: Peter Bedrick Books, 1987. Print.
Pater, Walter. The Renaissance. Buckler, Prose of the Victorian Period, 545-52.
Ruskin, John. Lectures on Art. New York: Allworth Press, 1996. Print.
Raby, Peter, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Oscar Wilde. New York: Cambridge UP, 1997. Print.
---. Oscar Wilde. New York: Cambridge UP, 1988. Print.
Sinfield, Alan. The Wilde Century: Effeminacy, Oscar Wilde, and the Queer Movement. London: Cassel, 1994. Print.
Sedgwick, Eve. “Affect and Queer Performativity.” Sex Center of National Central University, Taiwan. Lecture. 3 October 1998.
Sussman, Herbert. “Criticism as Art: Form in Oscar Wilde’s Critical Writings.” Studies in Philology 70. 1 (January 1973): 108-122. JSTOR. Web. 17 August 2010.
Thomas, Wayne David. Cultivating Victorians: Liberal Culture and the Aesthetic. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania UP, 2004. Print.
Townsend, Julie. “Staking Salome: The Literary Forefathers and Choreographic Daughters of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Hysterical and Perverted Creature.’” Bristow, Oscar Wilde and Modern Culture, 154-79.
Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Unwin University Books, 1930. Print.
Warner, Michael. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics and the Ethics of Queer Life. New York: The Free Press, 1999. Print.
---. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books, 2005. Print.
Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray. Ed. Andrew Elfenbein. New York: Pearson/ Longman, 2007. Print.
---. An Ideal Husband. The Plays of Oscar Wilde. Ed. Anne Varty, and Royal Holloway. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions, 2000. 220-79. Print.
---. “The Critic as Artist.” Holland, The Complete Works, 1108-55.
---. “The Happy Prince.” Holland, The Complete Works, 271-77.
---. “The Portrait of Mr. W. H.” Holland, The Complete Works, 302-50.
---. “The Soul of Man under Socialism.” Holland, The Complete Works, 1174-97.
---. “The Young King.” Holland, The Complete Works, 213-22.
---. “Panthea.” Holland, The Complete Works, 830-34.
---. Salome. The Plays of Oscar Wilde. Ed. Anne Varty, and Royal Holloway. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions, 2000. 133-62. Print.
指導教授 郭章瑞(Chang-jui Kuo) 審核日期 2011-6-9
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明