思考死亡對於說謊行為的調節效果

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：6

、訪客IP：3.138.179.119

姓名

廖昱程(Yu-Cheng Liao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

認知與神經科學研究所

論文名稱

思考死亡對於說謊行為的調節效果
(The effect of death thoughts on deception)

相關論文

★ 探索電玩遊戲頻率對於視覺注意力表現能力的效應	★ 關於胡-黃-王猜測的研究
★ 關於 (2,n) 群試問題的研究	★ 關於方程式 x^2+11=p^n 的研究
★ 關於方程式2x^2+1=3^n的研究	★ On problems of certain arithmetic functions
★ 表音一致性、聲旁結合度對中文閱讀的影響	★ 神經膠細胞在神經同步活動及鈣離子波傳遞中之角色
★ 運用系列情緒史楚普作業探討性侵害犯及正常控制組在情緒及認知上之交互運作：事件相關腦電位研究	★ 性侵害犯的衝動行為表現-情緒狀態如何影響性侵害犯的抑制能力？
★ 伽羅瓦理論	★ k階歐幾里得環
★ On a Paper of P. M. Cohn	★ On some problem in Arithmetic Dynamical System and Diophantine Approximation in Positive Characteristic
★ On Generalized Euclidean Rings	★ ZCm 的理想環生成元個數之上限

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

思想及情緒影響著我們的行為，例如我們的決策行為。過去的研究發現，在負向情緒的狀態下，人們會傾向於改變現狀來設法改善當下的負向情緒，因此會用較為謹慎且理性的方式來處理訊息(Schwarz & Clore, 1996)。Lerner(2004)的研究中還進一步發現，誘發厭惡(disgust)情緒後的受試者會改變其原有的行為傾向，變得會做出丟出所有物的行為決策，例如降低原物品的價格來進行拋售等(Lerner, Small, & Loewenstein, 2004)。那麼思考死亡，會給人類的決策行為帶來什麼樣的影響呢? 本研究主要探討個體在思考死亡的情境下，因思考死亡所產生的焦慮及恐懼，對個體的內在心理會產生什麼樣的影響，並進一步影響個體的外在行為以及決策判斷。根據Greenberg(1992)的研究指出，人類在面臨死亡情境時會為了避免陷入焦慮的情境中，傾向做出符合文化世界觀所要求的行為，即符合所處社會價值觀所接受的行為。
在研究中以恐懼管理理論(Terror Management Theory)的死亡顯著性(mortality salience)情境，探討死亡顯著性如何影響人類對說謊行為的選擇與否，並研究受試者皮膚電位反應及心跳頻率來探討背後的生理機制。實驗一的結果中顯示，相較於原始文獻的實驗，實驗中有說謊傾向的人數比例較少，且在不同的思考情境後說謊傾向的人數比例也差異不大。實驗二則在情境效果的前後差異中發現行為有改變的趨勢，思考死亡後執行說謊行為時所誘發的生理反應大於思考死亡前。實驗三則是藉由模擬競爭的情境來探討受試者在競爭狀態下的行為反應，實驗結果顯示不同的情境會有不同的行為傾向。另外發現說謊行為所誘發的生理反應在透過不同的情境效果後，也會得到不同的結果，例如思考死亡組在思考情境後執行說謊時會誘發較大的生理反應。
整合研究的結果發現，情境思考對於說謊行為的確會產生影響，然而不同情境的組間效果並不顯著，思考死亡與思考拔牙經驗的控制組並無太大的差異，故我們只能推測該實驗的結果雖有發現思考情境有改變行為傾向的效果，但本研究中的兩種思考情境並不具有不同的改變功能，關於思考死亡能夠改變什麼樣的特定行為，以及什麼樣的思考情境能改變說謊行為，目前仍未發現更好的解答，期望未來改善實驗過程中的缺失後，能發現不同思考情境的組間差異，找尋思考死亡對於行為傾向最明顯的改變，也找尋到具有減少說謊行為發生的特定思考情境。

摘要(英)

Emotion and thoughts affect our behavior and decision making. In the past, researchers found that people tend to change their current situation to ameliorate a negative emotional state. Thus, they resort to a more cautious and rational way to deal with receptive information. Lerner’’s study further found that objects eliciting feelings of disgust make people change their original behavior patterns. They may decide to disown the dreaded object, such as through underselling in business. Similarly, studies have asked about what kind of impact thoughts of death would have on people’s decision making? This study focuses on the influence of anxiety and fear induced by thoughts of death on one’s mental affects; further, on one’s behavior and decision making. According to Greenberg, in avoidance of anxiety, people conform their behavior to that required by the world view which is deemed acceptable in society, when facing issues of death and dying.
This study applies mortality salience adopted from Terror Management Theory, to probe into its influence on decision making about whether or not to engage in lying. Moreover, the study explores the physiological mechanisms behind skin conductivity and heart rate. Compared to the existing literature, result of the Experiment 1 in this study indicating the number of lying behaviors has become less. However, the proportion of lying behavior, after each scenario, is not significant. Experiment 2, though, shows that behavior changes when adding thoughts of death into the scenarios. The physiological response induced by lying behavior after thoughts of death is greater than it was before such thoughts.
Through simulating competitive scenarios, experiment 3 explores behaviors under a competitive situation. The result shows indicate that behaviors change across the scenarios, and the physiological response induced by telling a lie, changes with scenarios too. For instance, those who were grouped into cognizing death thoughts gave rise to a greater physiological response after telling a lie.

關鍵字(中)

★ 死亡顯著性
★ 恐懼管理理論
★ 文化世界觀
★ 說謊行為

關鍵字(英)

★ Cultural Worldview
★ Terror Management Theory
★ Mortality salience
★ Lying behavior

論文目次

緒論 1
1-1恐懼管理理論(Terror Management Theory) 1
1-2焦慮緩衝器(Anxiety-Buffer) 4
1-3影響思考死亡效果的因素-負向情緒的影響因素(Negative affects) 5
1-4影響思考死亡效果的因素-延宕效果(Delay effect) 6
2-1說謊行為(lying) 7
3-1預期思考死亡後兩種不同結果的可能性 9
實驗一 12
實驗方法 13
實驗結果 17
討論 18
實驗二 20
實驗方法 21
實驗結果 24
討論 28
實驗三 30
實驗方法 31
實驗結果 35
討論 37
綜合討論 39
實驗限制 42
總結 42
未來研究方向 43
參考文獻 45
附圖 50
附錄 63

參考文獻

Arndt, J., & Greenberg, J. (1999). The Effects of a Self-Esteem Boost and Mortality Salience on Responses to Boost Relevant and Irrelevant Worldview Threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(11), 1331-1341. doi: 10.1177/0146167299259001
Botvinick, Nystrom, Fissell, Carter, & Cohen. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402(6758), 179-181.
Boudreau, McCubbins, & Coulson. (2008). Knowing when to trust others: An ERP study of decision making after receiving information from unknown people. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(1), 23-34. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn034
Burke, M., & Faucher. (2010). Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 155-195.
Carter, Braver, Barch, Botvinick, Noll, & Cohen. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. [Article]. Science, 280(5364), 747-749.
Dawson, S., Filion. (2000). The electrodermal system. Cambridge University Press, p. 200-223.
DeWall, & Baumeister. (2007). From Terror to Joy: Automatic Tuning to Positive Affective Information Following Mortality Salience. Psychological Science, 18(11), 984-990. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02013.x
Falkenstein, Hoormann, Christ, & Hohnsbein. (2000). ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial. Biological Psychology, 51(2-3), 87-107.
Fiske, A. P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures--A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al.(2002).
Gehring, Goss, Coles, Meyer, & Donchin. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4(6), 385-390.
Gombos, V. (2006). The Cognition of Deception - The Role of Executive Processes in Producing Lies. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(3), 197-214.
Greenberg, Porteus, Simon, Pyszczynski, & Solomon. (1995). Evidence of a Terror Management Function of Cultural Icons: The Effects of Mortality Salience on the Inappropriate Use of Cherished Cultural Symbols. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1221-1228.
Greenberg, Pyszczynski, & Solomon. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. Public self and private self, 189, 212.
Greenberg, Simon, Harmon-Jones, Solomon, Pyszczynski, & Lyon. (1995). Testing alternative explanations for mortality salience effects: terror management, value accessibility, or worrisome thoughts? European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(4), 417-433.
Greenberg, Simon, Pyszczynski, Solomon, & Chatel. (1992). Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one’’s worldview? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 212-220.
Greenberg, Solomon, Veeder, Lyon, Pyszczynski, Rosenblatt, & Kirkland. (1990). Evidence For Terror Management Theory .2. The Effects Of Mortality Salience On Reactions To Those Who Threaten Or Bolster The Cultural Worldview. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 308-318.
Greenberg., J., Pyszczynski., T., Solomon., S., Simon., L., & Breus, M. (1994). Role of Consciousness and Accessibility of Death-Related Thoughts in Mortality Salience Effects. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(4), 627 -637.
Greene, & Paxton. (2009). Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(30), 12506-12511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900152106
Harmon-Jones, Simon, Greenberg, Pyszczynski, Solomon, & McGregor. (1997). Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduces mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 24-36.
Johnson, Barnhardt, & Zhu. (2005). Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: An event-related brain potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 386-404. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.011
Kitayama, S. (2002). Culture and basic psychological processes--toward a system view of culture: comment on Oyserman et al.(2002).
Lee, K., Xu, F., Fu, G., Cameron, C. A., & Chen, S. (2001). Taiwan and Mainland Chinese and Canadian children’’s categorization and evaluation of lie‐and truth‐telling: A modesty effect. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19(4), 525-542.
Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings. Psychological Science, 15(5), 337.
Lidberg, & Wallin. (1981). Sympathetic skin nerve in relation to amplitude of skin resistance responses. Psychophysiology, 18, 268-270.
Martini, F. B., Edwin. (2003). Essentials of Anatomy & Physiology (San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings ed.).
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological bulletin, 128(1), 3.
Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 681-690. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.681
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2, 385-400.
Sip, Roepstorff, McGregor, & Frith. (2008). Detecting deception: the scope and limits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.008
Toback, G. M. (1983). Belief Paranormal Phenomena: Assessment Instrucment Development and Implications for Personality Functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 1029-1037.
Vrij, A., Granhag, P.-A., & Stromwall, L. (2004). Guidelines to catch a liar
The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts: Cambridge University Press.
Watson, & Clark. (1992). Affects separable and inseparable: On the hierarchical arrangement of the negative affects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 489–505.
Watson, C. (1994). The PANAS-X manual for the positive and negative affect schedule--Expanded form. (The University of Iowa ed.): David Watson and Lee Anna Clark.
王姿茵, & 余景文. (民98). 性別對於成功恐懼與領導自我效能之影響-死亡顯著性之調節作用. 復興崗學報, 95期, 23-52.
唐寧, & 顏志龍. (民99). 死亡威脅及自察覺狀態對死亡逃避行為之影響. 復興崗學報, 99期, 1-18.
楊中芳. (1994). 中國人真是「集體主義」的嗎？試論中國文化的價值體系: 台北：桂冠圖書股份有限公司.
楊國樞. (1994). 中國人的社會取向：社會互動的觀點: 台北：桂冠.

指導教授

呂明、洪蘭
(Ann M. Lui、Daisy L. Hung)

審核日期

2012-7-27

推文