Triple-A供應鏈績效評估模式之建立

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：48

、訪客IP：18.226.163.123

姓名

趙佑宣(Yu-Husan Chao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

Triple-A供應鏈績效評估模式之建立

相關論文

★ 全球供應鏈下專業代工夥伴的管理模組與績效評估模組之因果關係的研究-- 以A公司為例	★ 以平衡計分卡的觀念及層級分析法所建立的相連部件供應商篩選模式– 個案研究
★ 接單式生產環境下之物料管控問題的探討 -- 以一牙科用鹵素燈生產業者為研究對象	★ 國際標準品質管理系統共同之關鍵成功因素對組織績效的影響
★ 工業安全衛生研究與探討-以高科技A公司作業流程為例	★ 推行六標準差品質管理系統之研究 -- 以A公司為例
★ 記憶體模組廠商進入小型記憶卡的產業競爭優勢之探討	★ 電子產品製造商成立模具中心之優劣分析—以A公司為研究對象
★ 臺灣筆記型電腦廠商績效分析	★ 設計協同機制導入過程及實施績效探討- 以 A 公司為例
★ JIT交貨看板電子化導入與應用方式之探討--以A公司為研究對象	★ 顧客關係管理關鍵影響因素之研究 - 以S公司為例
★ 供應商端綠色產品管理系統之研究--以國內主要鋁鎂合金件供應商(W科技公司)為例	★ 台灣IP安全監控產業之競爭優勢與策略建構-以A公司IP監控產品為例
★ 探討ERP系統導入後之組織績效－以A公司為對象分析	★ 拉式生產模式的物料管理資訊系統導入--以A公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來市場全球化、競爭激烈化及外包等因素增加商業環境的不確定性及不可預測性，組織能適應難以預測之改變成為一個獲得與維持競爭優勢的條件。過去研究所建立之供應鏈績效評估模式卻未包含Triple A（Agility, Adaptability, and Alignment）此三項對供應鏈績效表現有所影響的性質。因此，本研究期望為許多面對競爭激烈、環境變遷快速之環境產業的企業，建立一套結合Triple-A性質之供應鏈績效評估模式，使這些企業，可獲知自身供應鏈管理的績效與競爭對手之間的差距，以此輔助供應鏈管理之上的決策。
本研究採用文獻探討法選取出24項績效評估指標，再以前測施測檢視指標與架構的適切性，其後採用分析層級程序法（Analytic Hierarchy Process），請人類專家為供應鏈績效評估模式中各構面之間以及各指標之間決定相對權重。整合專家意見後，將取得績效評估指標的跨構面相對權重值，即為本研究所建立之供應鏈績效評估模式。最後，將再以驗證問卷確認模式可於實務界中有效運作。
根據研究結果，企業進行供應鏈績效評估時，最重視指標為「前置時間縮短指標」、「彼此信任指標」、「顧客滿意度」等非資源投入相關之指標，而與傳統中最被重視的資源相關的指標，卻無一成為關鍵績效指標，顯示出受到現今商業環境的影響，企業對於供應鏈績效的衡量準則已有所變化。

摘要(英)

The market globalization, intense competition, and outsourcing contributing to uncertainty and unpredictability, and the abilities of an organization to adapt to unexpected changes are critical to achieving and maintaining a competitive advantage. Researches about establishing Supply Chain Performance Measurement Models (SCPMM) in the past didn’t con contain the Triple-A’s attributes (Agility, Adaptability, and Alignment) which held a huge influence in the Supply Chain Performance. Thus, this research expects to establish a SCPMM for companies in many industries which are fronting intensely competitive and fast-changing environment. So that the companies can understand how is the supply chain performance gap between the competitors and itself, and use this information to make the decision on supply chain management.
This research extracts 24 metrics by reviewing literatures, and uses a pretesting to validate the metrics and architecture. Afterward, it applys Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to establish the SCPMM: The human experts determine the relative importance between the dimensions and the metrics. After the opinions converged, the cross-dimensional relative importance will be determined, and it is the SCPMM. Finally, this rearch uses the vailition survey to confirm the model is really worked.
According the research result, when a company is measuring its supply chain performance, the most important metrics are “lead time condensation”, “Trust each other”, and “Customer satisfaction” but not the traditional resource-related metrics. In fact, there is no resource-related metric being a key performance measurement metric.The result implies the principles that companies measuring the SC performance are changing for the current commercial environment.

關鍵字(中)

★ 利益一致性
★ 適應性
★ 供應鏈
★ 績效評估
★ 反應靈活性

關鍵字(英)

★ Supply Chain
★ Performance Measurement
★ Agility
★ Adaptability
★ Alignment

論文目次

論文提要 II
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 2
1.3 研究目的 3
1.4 研究流程 4
第二章文獻探討 6
2.1 供應鏈管理 6
2.2 供應鏈績效評估模式 9
2.2.1 供應鏈績效評估模式設計原則 9
2.2.2 績效評估模式之設計架構 10
2.2.3 績效評估模式之建構 12
2.3資源投入構面與指標 16
2.4 產出構面與指標 20
2.5 反應靈活構面與指標 23
2.6 適應性構面與指標 28
2.7 利益一致性產出構面與指標 32
第三章研究方法 36
3.1 研究設計 36
3.1.1 供應鏈績效評估模式之建立步驟 36
3.1.2 供應鏈績效評估構面與指標 38
3.1.3 供應鏈績效評估模式之架構 42
3.1.4 分析層級程序法 43
3.2 問卷設計 47
3.2.1 前測問卷 47
3.2.2 專家問卷 47
3.2.3 驗證問卷 48
3.2.4 樣本資格 48
3.3 資料分析方法與工具 49
3.3.1 資料分析方法 49
3.3.2 資料分析工具 50
第四章研究結果與分析 52
4.1 前測問卷分析 52
4.1.1 前測問卷樣本分析 52
4.1.2 前測問卷資料分析 53
4.2 專家問卷分析 60
4.2.1 專家問卷樣本分析 60
4.2.2 專家問卷資料分析 61
4.3 驗證問卷分析 68
4.3.1 驗證問卷樣本分析 68
4.3.2 驗證問卷資料分析 69
4.4 本研究之供應鏈績效評鑑表 72
第五章研究結論與建議 74
5.1 研究結論 74
5.2 研究建議 76
參考文獻 77
附錄一前測問卷 82
附錄二專家問卷 86
附錄三驗證問卷 95

參考文獻

中文部份：
1. 鄧振源、曾國雄 (1989)，『層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)』，中國統計學報，27(6)，5-22。
2. 鄧振源、曾國雄 (1989)，『層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下)』，中國統計學報，27(7)，1-20。
3. 宋忠儒 (2000)，『資訊電子業供應鏈績效評估系統之研究』，國立成功大學工業管理學系碩士論文，民89，82。
4. 李正文、姜玉苹 (2005)，『供應鏈管理績效評估模式之建構-以筆記型電腦產業為例』。東吳經濟商學學報，(51) ，37-70.
5. 陳麗玉 (2000) ，『全球化供應鏈管理績效評估與探討』，國立政治大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，民88，124。
6. 黃延聰、許雅茜 (2008)，『廠商與供應商間關係、供應商知識整合與新產品開發績效-臺灣資訊科技廠商之個案研究』，商管科技季刊, 9(1), 99-135.
英文部份：
1. Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2006). Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(1), 211-225.
2. Angerhofer, B. J., & Angelides, M. C. (2006). A model and a performance measurement system for collaborative supply chains. Decision Support Systems, 42(1), 283-301.
3. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
4. Beamon, B. M. (1996). Performance measures in supply chain management. Proceedings of the 1996 Conference on Agile and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, 2-3.
5. Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3-4), 275-292.
6. Bhagwat, R., & Sharma, M. K. (2007). Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53(1), 43-62.
7. Bititci, U. S., Turner, T., & Begemann, C. (2000). Dynamics of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(5-6), 692-704.
8. Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., & Platts, K. (2000). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(7), 754-771.
9. Brewer, P. C., & Speh, T. W. (2000). Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 75-94.
10. Chae, B. (. (2009). Developing key performance indicators for supply chain: An industry perspective. Supply Chain Management-an International Journal, 14(6), 422-428.
11. Chan, F. T. S., & Qi, H. J. (2003). An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management. Supply Chain Management-an International Journal, 8(3-4), 209-223.
12. Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119-150.
13. Cho, H., Jung, M., & Kim, M. (1996). Enabling technologies of agile manufacturing and its related activities in korea. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 30(3), 323-334.
14. Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 235-246.
15. Cohendet, P., & Llerena, P. (1990). Nature de l'information, évaluation et organisation de l'entreprise. Revue d'Économie Industrielle, 51(1), 141-165.
16. Cooper, M. C., Lambert, D. M., & Pagh, J. D. (1997). Supply chain management: More than a new name for logistics. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1), 1-14.
17. Coronado, M., Adrian, E., Sarhadi, M., & Millar, C. (2002). Defining a framework for information systems requirements for agile manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 75(1-2), 57-68.
18. De Toni, A., & Tonchia, S. (2001). Performance measurement systems - models, characteristics and measures. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1-2), 46-70.
19. Dove, R. (1999). Knowledge management, response ability, and the agile enterprise. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 18.
20. F. T. S. Chan. (2003). Performance measurement in a supply chain. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(7), 534-548.
21. Ganguly, A., Nilchiani, R., & Farr, J. V. (2009). Evaluating agility in corporate enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(2), 410-423.
22. Ghalayini, A. M., Noble, J. S., & Crowe, T. J. (1997). An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, 48(3), 207-225.
23. Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & Tirtiroglu, E. (2001). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1-2), 71-87.
24. Gunasekaran, A., Williams, H. J., & McGaughey, R. E. (2005). Performance measurement and costing system in new enterprise. Technovation, 25(5), 523-533.
25. Gunasekaran, A., & Kobu, B. (2007). Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: A review of recent literature (1995-2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 45(12), 2819-2840.
26. Handfield, R. B., & Bechtel, C. (2002). The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(4), 367-382.
27. Hofmann, E., & Locker, A. (2009). Value-based performance measurement in supply chains: A case study from the packaging industry. Production Planning & Control, 20(1), 68-81.
28. Huang, S. H., & Keskar, H. (2007). Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 105(2), 510-523.
29. Jahre, M., & Fabbe-Costes, N. (2005). Adaptation and adaptability in logistics networks. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 8(2), 143-157.
30. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
31. Keebler, J. S., Manrodt, K. B., Durtsche, D. A., & Ledyard, D. M. (1999). Keeping score: Measuring the business value of logistics in the supply chain Council of Logistics Management Oak Brook IL.
32. Ketchen, D.,Jr, Rebarick, W., Hult, G., & Meyer, D. (2008). Best value supply chains: A key competitive weapon for the 21st century. Business Horizons, 51(3), 236.
33. Kisperska-Moron, D., & Swierczek, A. (2009). The agile capabilities of polish companies in the supply chain: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(1), 217-224.
34. Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65-83.
35. Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102.
36. Lee, H. L., & Billington, C. (1992). Managing supply chain inventory - pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 65-73.
37. Narayanan, V., & Raman, A. (2004). Aligning incentives in supply chains. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 94-+.
38. Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 80-116.
39. Otto, A., & Kotzab, H. (2003). Does supply chain management really pay? six perspectives to measure the performance of managing a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(2), 306-320.
40. Ross, D. F. (1998). Competing through supply chain management: Creating market-winning strategies through supply chain partnerships Kluwer Academic Publishers.
41. Ross, A. D., Buffa, F. P., Droge, C., & Carrington, D. (2009). Using buyer-supplier performance frontiers to manage relationship performance. Decision Sciences, 40(1), 37-64.
42. Schloetzer, J. (2008). Essays on nonfinancial performance measurement, relative bargaining power and supply chain performance. (Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh). , 135.
43. Sharp, J. M., Irani, Z., & Desai, S. (1999). Working towards agile manufacturing in the UK industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2), 155-169.
44. Shepherd, C., & Gunter, H. (2006). Measuring supply chain performance: Current research and future directions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(3/4), 242-258.
45. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2000). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts. Strategies and Case Studies, Boston,
46. Stevens, J. (1989). Integrating the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management, 19(8), 3-8.
47. Stewart, G. (1995). Supply chain performance benchmarking study reveals keys to supply chain excellence. Logistics Information Management, 8(2), 38-44.
48. Teigen, R. (1997). Information flow in a supply chain management system. University of Toronto,
49. Trkman, P., Stemberger, M. I., Jaklic, J., & Groznik, A. (2007). Process approach to supply chain integration. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(2), 116-128.
50. Van Hoek, R. I. (1998). "Measuring the unmeasurable"-measuring and improving performance in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 3(4), 187-192.
51. Van Hoek, R. I., Harrison, A., & Christopher, M. (2001). Measuring agile capabilities in the supply chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1-2), 126-147.
52. Vitale, M. R., & Mavrinac, S. C. (1995). How effective is your performance measurement system? MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING-NEW YORK-, 77, 43-43.
53. Weber, M. M. (2002). Measuring supply chain agility in the virtual organization. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(7), 577-590.
54. Wong, W. P., & Wong, K. Y. (2008). A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measures. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(1), 25-51.
55. Wong, W. P., & Wong, K. Y. (2007). Supply chain performance measurement system using DEA modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(3-4), 361-381.

指導教授

何應欽(Ying-chin Ho)

審核日期

2010-7-27

推文