Ackerman, L., and Humphreys, L. G. 1990. “Individual differences theory in industrial and organizational psychology.” In M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough(eds). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2nd edition. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Arkes, H.R., 1991. “Cost and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debasing. Psychological Bulletin, 110: 486-498.
Athey, T. R., and McIntyre, R. M. 1987. “Effects of rater training on rater accuracy: levels -of-processing theory and social facilitation theory perspectives.” Journal of Applied psychology, 72: 567-572.
Beckner, D., and Highhouse, S., Hazer. J. T. 1998. “Effects of upward accountability and rating purpose on peer-rater inflation and delay: a field experiment.” Journal of Organizational Behavior. 19: 209-214.
Bernardin, H. J., and Buckley, M. R. 1981. “Strategies in rater training.” Academy of Management Review, 6: 205-212
Bernardin, H. J., Buckley, M. R., Tyler, C. I. and Wiese, D. S. 2001. “A reconsideration of strategies for rater training.” Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management. 221-274.
Blumberg, H. H. 1972. “Communication of interpersonal evaluations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23: 157-162.
Bonner, S. E., Hastie, R., Sprinkle, G. B., and Young, S. M. 2000. “A review of the effects of financial incentives on performance in laboratory tasks” Implications for Management accounting. 12: 19-64.
Brtek, M. D., and Motowidlo S. J. 2002. “Effects of procedure and outcome accountability on interviews validity.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 185-191.
Curtis. A. B., Harvey R. D., and Ravden. D. 2005. “Source of political distortions in performance appraisals: appraisal purpose and rater accountability.” Group and Organization Management, 30: 42-60.
Decenzo, D.A., and Robbins, 2005. Fundamentals of Human Resource Management (8th ed) , Hobbken, New Jersey, Wiley.
Doney, P.M., and Armstrong, G.M. 1996. “Effects of accountability on symbolic information search and information analysis by organizational buyers.” Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 24: 57-65.
Dose, J. J., and Klimoski, R. J. 1995. “Doing the right thing in the workplace: responsibility in the face of accountability. ” Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 8: 35-56.
Fisher, C.D. 1979. “Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinates: a laboratory investigation”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 64: 533-40.
Frink, D., and Klimoski, R. 1999. “The moderating effect of accountability on the conscientiousness-performance relationship.” Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 515–524.
Ginzell, L. E., Kramer, R. M., and Sutton R. I. 1992. “OIM as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organizational audience.” Research in Organizational Behavior, 15: 227-266.
Glen, R. M. 1990. “Performance appraisal: An unnerving yet useful process.” Public Personnel Management, 19: 1-10.
Gordon, R. A., Rozelle, R. M.and Baxter, J. C. 1998. “The effect applicant age, job level and accountability on the evaluation of job applicants.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41: 20-33.
Grenny, J., Maxfield, D., and Shimberg, A. 2008. “How to Have Influence” Leadership and Organizational Studies, 50: 47-52.
Grover, V. 1993. “An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems.” In Decision Sciences, 24: 603-639.
Ilgen, D. R., and Knowlton, W. A. 1980. “Performance attribution effects on feedback from supervisors.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25: 441-456.
Jaramillo, F., and Marshall, G. W. 2004. “Critical success factors in the personal selling process: An empirical investigation of Ecuadorian salespeople in the banking industry.” The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22: 9-25.
Jones, R. G. 1992. Attention allocation choices as an influence on accuracy and discriminant validity of observational ratings: When are we diligent? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Jones, E.E., and Wortman, C. 1973. Ingratiation: An attribution approach. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Katz, D., and Kahn, R. L. 1978. The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
Klimoski, R., and Inks, L. 1990. “Accountability forces in performance appraisal.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 45: 194-208.
Levin, I. P, Schneider, S. L.and Gaeth, G. J. 1998. “All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76: 149-88.
Locke, E.A., and Latham .G. P., 1990. Goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
London, M., Smither, J. W., and Adsit, D. J. 1997. “Accountability: the Achilles’ heel of multisource feedback.” Group and Organization Management. 22: 162-184.
Longenecker, C. O. 1989 “Truth or consequences: Politics and performance appraisals.” Business Horizons, 32: 76-82.
Longenecker, C. O., and Gioia, D. A. 1994. “The politics of executive appraisals.” Journal of Compensation and Benefits, 10: 5-11.
Longenecker, C. I., Sims, H. P., and Gioia, D. A. 1987. “Behind the mask: The politics of performance appraisal.” Academy of Management Executive, 1: 188-193.
Maier, N.R.F. 1955. Psychology in industry. Boston, MA: Houghton - Mifflin.
McIntyre R. M. and Smith, D. E. and Hassett, C.E.1984. “Accuracy of Performance Ratings as Affected by Rater Training and Perceived Purpose of Rating.”Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 147-156
Murphy, K. R., and Cleveland, J. N. 1995. Performance Appraisal: An organizational perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
O’ Reilly, C. A. III and Chatman, J. A. 1994. “Working smarter and harder: A Longitudinal Study of Managerial Success.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 603-627.
Palmer, J.K., and Feldman, J. K. 2005. “Accountability and need for cognition effects on contrast, halo, and accuracy in performance ratings.” The Journal of Psychology, 3: 127-139.
Pesta, B. J. , Kass, D. S. , Dunegan, K. J. 2005. “Image theory and the appraisal of employee performance: To screen or not to screen?” Journal of Business and Psychology, 19: 341-360.
Pinder, C. 1984. Work motivation: theory issues and applications. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
Roberts, N. 2002. “Keeping public officials accountable through dialogue: resolving the accountability paradox. “Public Administration Review, 62: 658-669.
Roch, S. G., and Ayman Roya, Newhouse Noelle, Harris, M. 2005. “Effect of Identifiability, rating audience, and conscientiousness on rating level.” International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13: 53-69.
Pulakos, E. D. 1984 “A comparison of rater training programs. Error training and accuracy training.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 581-588.
Pulakos, E. D. 1986 “The development of training programs to increase accuracy with different rating tasks.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process. 38: 79-91.
Salvemini, N. J., and Reilly, R. R.1993. “The influence of rater motivation on assimilation effects and accuracy in performance ratings.” Organizational behavior and Human Decision Process, 55: 41-60.
Scherer, R. F, Owen,C. L, and Brodzinski, J. D. 1991. “Rater and ratee sex effects on performance evaluations in a field setting a multivariate analysis: Method participants performance appraisal instrument and procedure results discussion and supplementary analysis conclusions references.” Management Communication Quarterly, 5: 174-192
Siegel-Jacobs, K., and Yates, J. F.1996. “Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65: 1-17.
Simonson, I., and Nye, P. 1992. “The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51: 416-446.
Simonson. I., and Nye. P. 1992. “De-escalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 419-426.
Simonson, I., and Staw. B. M. 1992. “Escalation Strategies: A comparison of Techniques for reducing for commitment to losing course of action.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 419-426.
Smith, D.E. 1986. “Training programs for performance appraisal” A Review of Management, 28-40.
Smith, V. L., and Walker, M. 1993. “Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics”, Economic Inquiry, 31: 245-261.
Stamoulis, D.T., and Hauenstein, N. M. A. 1993. “Rater training and rating accuracy: training for dimensional accuracy versus training for ratee differentiation.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 994-1003.
Sulsky, L. M., and Day, D. V. 1992. “Frame training and cognitive categorization: An empirical investigation of rater memory Issues.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 501-510.
Tessor, A., and Rosen, S. 1975. “The reluctance to transmit bad news”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 8: 193-232.
Tetlock, P. E., 1983a. “Accountability and complexity of thought”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45: 74-83.
Tetlock, P. E., 1983b. “Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 46: 285-292.
Tetlock, P.E., and Boettger, R. 1989. “Accountability: social magnifier of the dilution effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 388-398.
Tetlock, P. E., Skitka, L., and Boettger, R. 1989. “Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 632-640.
Tetlock, P.E. and Kim, J. I. 1987. “Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 700-9.
Weigold, M. E, and Schlenker, B. R. 1991. “Accountability and risk taking.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17: 25-29.
Woehr, D. J. 1994. “Understanding frame-of-reference Training: The impact of training on recall of performance information.”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 525-534.
Zhang, Y. L., and Mittal, V. 2005. “Decision difficulty: effects of procedural and outcome accountability.” Journal of Consumer Research, l: 465-462.