| 摘要(英) |
The definition of Corporate Groups under the Companies Act, means including a "control and affiliation of the company" and "mutual investment company", with the Corporate Groups, are entitled to the sharing of resources, or the advantage of resources complementary, and then maybe have the advantage of the performance in operating than the companies outside the group of the same industry.
TFT-LCD industry is one of the key support industries of our “two trillion Twin Star” industries. Taiwan’’s flat panel industry has experienced more than ten years of development, the increasing scale over Japan and compete with South Korea. However, under fierce competition, Taiwan’’s flat panel factory had no advantage of global brand and lost cost advantage. The gap of market share between Taiwan and the market leader Korea brand gradually widening. In this study, the panel industry - A Company as the research object, from the perspective of the supply chain industry, and then use DEA method to investigate if the Corporate Groups have some competitive advantages compared with non-Corporate Group enterprises in the same industry.
This study is mainly to collect public information open to the public observation station for the upstream industry and its transfer A Company investment companies, using data envelopment analysis to assess the DMUs, use cost of goods sold, marketing and administrative expenses, research and development expenses, fixed assets as input variables Operating income and income before income tax for the output variable, with the industry to measure the relative efficiency of each DMU and identify indicators of the efficiency of their respective affiliates to explore the extent of variation, and possible directions and suggestions for improvement.
By Malmquist productivity index to compare the efficiency of different stages of the companies can be drawn the evolution of progress or decline of different industries and the Corporate Groups, but also the relationship between companies can be obtained relative position in the industry, analyze the reasons for the differences caused and appropriate recommendations. Further decision-making can be used as reference for policy makers.
|
| 參考文獻 |
1. 李正文、陳翔修（2008），「台灣光電產業之經營效率分析－資料包絡分析法之應用」，《中原企管評論》，第六卷第一期，頁1-30。
2. 李明德（2008），「以資料包絡法分析半導體封裝測試廠經營績效」，逢甲大學工業工程與系統管理研究所碩士論文。
3. 高強、黃旭男、Toshiyuki Sueyoshi（2003），「管理績效評估：資料包絡分析法」，台北：華泰書局。
4. 吳濟華、何柏正(2008)，「組織效率與生產力評估 - 資料包絡分析法」，台北: 前程文化事業。
5. 孫遜(2004)，「資料包絡分析法-理論與應用」
6. 周世忠(2005)，「台灣地區數位相機產業經營之績效評估」，佛光人文社會學院 經濟學研究所碩士論文。
7. 陳俊銘(2003)，我國光電產業經營效率之研究—資料包絡分析法的應用，國立政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
8. 洪淑娟（2003），「筆記型電腦產業之經營效率 - 以資料包絡法分析」，世新大學經濟學系研究所碩士論文。
9. 黃金祥（2002），「DEA方法之產業效率與產業發展策略的實證分析—以光電產業為例」，義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
10. 湯澎君、張瑞真（2008），「臺灣手機製造業技術效率與生產力變動之研究」，《運籌與管理學刊》，第七卷第一期，頁23-35。
11. 黃允成、薛成凱（2007），「企業內多廠區間營運效率之研究」，《管理科學研究》2007第二屆管理與決策學術研討會特刊，頁123-137。
12. 溫玲玉、李文清（2008），「臺灣地區科技大學辦學相對效率之評估-DEA與超效率模式之應用」，《彰化師大教育學報》，第13輯，頁121-148。
13. 郭文利（2004），「衡量擁擠現象對產業垂直分工相對經營效率之影響」，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
14. 韓慧林（2004），「台灣地區半導體業績效評估」，《管理研究學報》第一卷第四期，頁71-89。
15. 經濟日報 2010/06/10
英文部分：
1. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A.S., and Cooper, W.W. (1984) “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, Vol.30, pp.1078-1092.
2. Brockett, P.L., Cooper, W.W., Shin, H.C., and Wang, Y. (1998) “Inefficiency and congestion in Chinese production before and after the 1978 economic reforms,” Socio-Economic Planning Science, Vol.32, pp.1-20.
3. Byrnes, P., Fare, R., and Grosskopf, S. (1984) “Measuring productive efficiency: an application to Illinois strip mines,” Management Science, Vol.30, pp.671-681.
4. Farrell, M. J.(1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3): 253-281
5. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W.(1978), “Managerial Economics: Past, Present and Future,” Journal of Enterprise Management, Vol. 1, No.1, pp.5-23
6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E.(1979), “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Unit”, European Journal of Operational Reserch, 3(4): 339-454
7. Giokas,D. I. and Pentzaropoulos,G.. C. (2000), “Evaluation Productive 3 Efficiency in Telecommunications: Evidence from Greece”, Telecommunications Policy, 24 (8-9): 781-794
8. Thore, S., Kozmetsky, G.. and Philips, F(1994), “DEA of Financial Statements Data: The U.S. Computer Industry”, The journal of Producitivity Analysis, 5(3): 229-248
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit