博碩士論文 974403011 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:6 、訪客IP:18.205.109.82
姓名 劉樺蓉(Hua-Jung Liu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 價值本質之探索研究
(A Study of the Nature of Value)
相關論文
★ 探討國內田徑競賽資訊系統-以103年全國大專田徑公開賽資訊系統為例★ 生物晶片之基因微陣列影像分析之研究
★ 台灣資訊家電產業IPv6技術地圖與發展策略之研究★ 台灣第三代行動通訊產業IPv6技術地圖與發展策略之研究
★ 影響消費者使用電子書閱讀器採納意願之研究★ 以資訊素養映對數位學習平台功能之研究
★ 台商群聚指標模式與資料分析之研究★ 未來輪輔助軟體發展之需求擷取研究
★ 以工作流程圖展現未來研究方法配適於前瞻研究流程之研究★ 以物件導向塑模未來研究方法配適於前瞻研究之系統架構
★ 應用TRIZ 探討核心因素 建構電子商務新畫布★ 企業策略資訊策略人力資源管理策略對組織績效的影響
★ 採用Color Petri Net方法偵測程式原始碼緩衝區溢位問題★ 簡單且彈性化的軟體代理人通訊協定之探討與實作
★ 利用分析層級程序法探討台灣中草藥製造業之關鍵成功因素★ 利用微陣列資料分析於基因調控網路之建構與預測
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 願景是「未來抱負與價值的認知與導引」,為一種可以描述的未來景象,可以引導組織前進,更是策略規劃的源頭。在凡事都無法掌握也無法確定的環境中,要如何做出正確且有效的策略並進行管理,是相當重要的。由策略學說十大學派中得知,價值觀為認知學派策略形成過程的核心基礎,由於認知體系不同,可能做了錯誤或選擇了個人所認知但非理性的價值而進行決策,因此唯有確定價值本質,去除非理性的認知,讓決策時,可以較理性的選擇出真正符合問題之策略。因此利用《唯識三十頌》之八識的層面,探索內心決策之過程,由探索內心,而尋回真實的無漏之價值判斷模式,以解決策略學說十大學派無法解決之黑箱問題。
研究目的,包括:發展探索價值之模式,並驗證模式之可行性,進而探索價值之本質。本研究採用混合研究,以「菁英講座」課程作為資料蒐集之對象,於開課之前蒐集質性資料,假借問卷調查法調查實驗對象;並於課程進行18週後,針對構面進行重要性與滿意度分析,進行量化資料分析,找出優勢與需改善之構面集合。在相同模式下,透過正、反、合與馬可夫鏈的概念,比較三年資料,分析出需要維持、改善、不變,與資源投入過多之關鍵因素之集合,找出一致不易的因素,做為推論價值本質之依據。
本研究成果為假借問卷調查法和重要性與滿意度分析蒐集資料,透過正、反、合,與馬可夫鏈的概念,建立探索價值之模式,並透過「菁英講座」課程,進行探索價值模式之驗證,找出一致不易之因素,推論出案例價值本質。案例價值本質探索結果為:在課程認知方面,價值本質是學習典範,以及工作啟發與經驗。在安排課程目的方面,價值本質為培養未來菁英、跨領域知識,以及職涯發展。在期望程度方面,價值本質是學習典範,以及工作啟發與經驗。在演講者的特質方面,價值本質是人生歷練、領導特質,以及人生觀。在演講主題方面,價值本質是職涯發展、人生觀、趨勢議題,以及國際與時事。
摘要(英) Vision is “knowledge and practice based on future aspirations and values.” Through its power to describe future scenes and promote the advancement of organizations, vision becomes a source of strategic planning. In a world where nothing seems certain or permanent, it is important to know how to correctly and effectively strategize and make management decisions.
As the Ten Great Schools of Strategic Thought have observed, a system of values is the central basis upon which a given school of knowledge takes shape. However, differences between knowledge systems can lead to errors or basing decision-making on irrational values that people still hold on to. For this reason, we can only make rational decisions that truly address the problems at hand by determining the nature of values and eliminating irrational beliefs. To do this, we can adopt the eight levels of consciousness from Thirty Verses on Consciousness to explore the inner mental processes of decision-making. Through exploring and thereby knowing our inner hearts, it is possible to recover an infallible method for determining values and thus discover solutions for the unsolvable Black Box problems of the Ten Great Schools. The goals of this study include: advancing the methods of values-exploration, validating the feasibility of these methods, and exploring the nature of values.
This study applies a mixed research method to data gathered during an Elite Lecture course. Prior to the course commencement, the questionnaires survey was conducted on experimental subjects in order to collect qualitative data. After 18 weeks of classes, we conducted an importance and performance analysis to obtain a quantitative set of factors suggesting both positive achievements and things that could be improved. Using an identical model, we compared data collected over three years using dialectical and Markov analyses to discover points where results were maintained, improved, and remained unchanged, and a set of critical factors for the over-investment of data. The uniform set of factors that was obtained from this forms an inferential basis for the nature of values.
This study result relied on collecting data via questionnaires and importance and performance analysis. It established a value exploration model through positive, negative, integrated, and Markov chain concepts. Through the Elite Seminar program, it conducted the verification of value exploration model, identified consistent factors, and derived the natures of values in different cases. The exploring results in the natures of case values are stated as follows. In course cognition, the natures of value are learning paradigm, work inspiration, and experience. In course arrangement purpose, its nature of value is future elite cultivation, interdisciplinary knowledge, and career development. Also, in expectation, the natures of value are learning paradigm, work inspiration, and experience. Concerning the characteristics of speakers, the natures of value are living experience, characteristic in leadership, and living philosophy. In lecturing topics, the natures of value are career development, living philosophy, trend topics, and international and current affairs.
關鍵字(中) ★ 價值本質
★ 價值觀
★ 黑箱問題
★ 唯識三十頌
關鍵字(英) ★ nature of value
★ system of values
★ Black Box problems
★ Thirty Verses on Consciousness
論文目次 摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 X

第一章 緒論 1
1.1. 研究背景與動機 1
1.2. 研究目的 10
1.3. 研究流程與研究架構 11
1.4. 研究範圍 15

第二章 文獻回顧 17
2.1 策略十大學派 17
2.2 價值與價值觀 18
2.3 唯識三十頌 21
2.4 問卷調查法 26
2.5 重要性與滿意度分析 27
2.6 否定之否定定律 29
2.7 馬可夫鏈 30
2.8 資源基礎理論 33
2.9 研究流程與研究架構之彙整與演化過程 35

第三章 研究方法 40
3.1 研究架構:步驟與工具 40
3.2 研究方法與研究對象 44
3.3 資料蒐集方法 46
3.4 個案分析方法 48
3.4.1 質性資料分析方法 48
3.4.2 量化資料分析方法 49
3.5 確保資料品質 49

第四章 「菁英講座」之個案分析 52
4.1 「菁英講座」之個案資料分析 52
4.1.1 「菁英講座」之第一年個案資料 52
4.1.2 「菁英講座」之第二年個案資料 54
4.1.3 「菁英講座」之第三年個案資料 56
4.2 三年「菁英講座」之個案驗證 58
4.2.1. 「菁英講座」之基本資料分析 58
4.2.2. 第一次驗證比較 59
4.2.2.1. 問卷調查法-正、反、合集合 59
4.2.2.2. 重要性與滿意度分析-正、反、合集合 63
4.2.3. 第二次驗證比較 64
4.2.3.1. 問卷調查法-正、反、合集合 64
4.2.3.2. 重要性與滿意度分析之正、反、合集合 67
4.3 收斂判斷-價值本質 68
?
第五章 結論與建議 72
5.1 研究成果 72
5.2 管理意涵與學術意涵 74
5.3 研究限制 75
5.4 未來研究建議 76

參考文獻 79

附錄一:問卷調查法-第一年的問卷 85
附錄二:問卷調查法-第二年的問卷 87
附錄三:問卷調查法-第三年的問卷 89
附錄四:重要性與滿意度分析之問卷 92
參考文獻 英文部份
Anderson, N. H. (1971). Integration theory and attitude change. Psychological Review, 78, 171-206.
Anderson, N. H. (1974). Cognitive algebra: Integration theory applied to social attribution. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 7, pp. 1-101). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Anderson, N. H. (1991). Contributions to information integration theory (vols. 1, 2, 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ashforth, B.E, & Meal F., (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
Cooke, R.A.,& Rousseau DM., (1988). Behavioral Norms and ExpectationsA Quantitative Approach To the Assessment of Organizational Culture. Group Organization Management, 13(3), 245-273.
Edward, W., (1961). Behavioral Decision Theory. Annual Review of Psychology. 12, 473-498.
Engel, J.F., Kollat, D.T. & Blackwell, R.D. , (1968). Consumer behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Enz, C.A., (1988). The Role of Value Congruity in Intraorganizational Power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 284-304.
Fischhoff, B., (1975). Hindsight Foresight: The effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment under Uncertainty. Journal of experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1, 288-299.
Fishbein, M. (1967). A behavioral theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and attitude toward that object. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 389-400). New York: Wiley.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, J., (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory Research: Reading. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Freud, Sigmund., (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. Trans. A. A. Brill. The MajorWorks of Sigmund Freud. London: Encyclopedia Britannica, inc, 135- 398.
Freud, Sigmund., (1910) Five Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, Trans. James Strachey, New York: W. W.Norton & Company.
Freud, Sigmund., (1923). The Ego and Id. Trans. Joan Riviere The Major Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Encyclopedia Britannica, inc, 697-717.
Gordon, D. G. (2001). Classroom management: Problems and solutions. Music Educators Journal, 88(2), 17-23.
Gordon, T. J., & Helmer, O., (1964). Report on a Long-Range Forecasting Study. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica/ California.
Hammond, K.R. & Adelman, L., (1976). Social Judgment Theory. In M. Kaplan S. Schwartz Eds. Human Judgement and Decision Process. New York: Academice Press.
Hammond, K.R., Mcaleffanf. G.H., & Mumpover, J., (1980). Human Judgemnt and Decision Making theories, methods and procedures. New York: Praeger Publication.
Heckausen, H. (1985). Achievement motivation in perspective. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Hofstede, G., Nejijen, B., Ohayv, D.D., & Sanders, G., (1990). Measuring Organizational Culture: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study Across Twenty Cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 286-316.
Holden, M. C., & Wedman, J. F., (1993). Future Issues of Computer-mediated Communication: The Results of a Delphi Study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(4), 5-24.
Liu, H.J., & Shiue, Y.C., (2011). Exploring the Dharma of Strategic Value. BAI 2011 International Conference, Thailand.
Liu, H.J., & Shiue, Y.C., (2012). Formulating and Evaluating Corporate Policy Using the Importance-Performance Analysis to Verification of Dharma of Value. BAI 2012 International Conference, Sapporo, Japan.
Jennifer, M., & Gareth, R. (2004). Organizational behavior, structure, processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Jerome, C. G., & Theodore J. G., (2009). Futures Research Methodology—Version 3.0. The Millennium Project.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A., (1972). Subjectives Probability: A judgment of Representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
Kahneman, D,. & Tversky, A., (1973). On the Psychology of Predicition. Psychological Review. 80(4), 237-251.
Kenny, R. L.,& Raiffa, F., (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley.
Kluckhohn, C. K., (1951). Value and Value Organization in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G., (2001). Principle of Marketing(9th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P., (1991). Marketing Management Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control(7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M., (1979). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. MA: Addison-Wesly Publishing Company.
Louis MR., (1983). Organizations as Culture-bearing millieux. In Organization symblism, Pondy L, Forst R, Morgan G, Dandrige T (eds.). JAI Press: Greewich, CT.
Louviere, J.J., (1988). Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis. London New Delhi: Sage.
Martilla JA., & James JC., (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79.
Martin J., & Siehl C., (1983). Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 52-64.
Maslow, A. H., (1943). Maslow′s Hierarchy of Needs. Originally Published in Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
Mintzberg H., & Quinn JB., (1988). Readings in the strategy process 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River: New Jersey.
Mintzberg H., Lampel J., &Ahlstrand B., (2005). Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. Business Weekly Publications, Inc.
Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O., (1995). Delphi: A versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423-436.
O’Reilly CA., Chatman J., & Caldwell DF., (1991). People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516.
Rokeach, M., (1973). The Nature Of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
Sahin, S.O., Ulengin,F., & Ulengin,B., (2004). Using Neural Networks and Cognitive Mapping in Scenario Aanalysis: The Case of Turkey’s Inflation Dynamics. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(1), 124-145.
Sampson, S.E.& Showalter, M.J. (1999). The Performance-Importance Response Function: Observations and Implications. The Service Industries Journal, 1-25.
Schwartz SH., (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Zanna M (ed). Academic Press: San Diego.
Seashore, S. E., & Taber, T. D. (1976). Job satisfaction and their correlation. American Behavior & Scientist, 18, 346-68.
Shy, O., (2000). The Economics of Network Industries. Cambridge Univ Pr.
Wiener N., (1988). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Da Capo Press.

中文部份
Cooper, D.R., & Schindler, P.S. 著。古永嘉和楊雪蘭編譯(2009)。《企業研究方法》。第三版。美商麥格羅‧希爾國際股份有限公司: 台灣分公司。
IBM商業價值研究院. (2007). 消除策略盲點:技術驅動型企業策略推動創新和成長. (http://www-935.ibm.com/services/multimedia/strategies_to_eliminate_blind_spots.pdf)
于凌波. (1992)。《唯識學綱要》。台北市:東大圖書。pp.91-172; 223-242。
于凌波. (1994)。《唯識三論今詮》。台北市:東大圖書。 pp.27-35; 151-212。
弗洛伊德著。車文博編。 (1998)。《弗洛伊德文集(全八卷)》。長春出版社。第三卷與第六卷。
朱邦復. (2008)。《智慧學九論(修訂本) 》。台灣商務. pp.229-256。
亨利‧明茲伯格 (Henry Mintzberg),約瑟夫‧藍佩爾(Joseph Lampel),布魯斯‧亞斯蘭(Bruce Ahlstrand)著。林金榜譯 (2006)。《明茲伯格策略管理》。商周出版。
余民寧(2002)。《教育測驗與評量-成就測驗與教學評量》。心理出版社。
李政賢(2006)。《質性研究設計與規劃撰寫》。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
姜祖恕(2005)。馬可夫鏈的簡介。2013年5月29日。取自: http://episte.math.ntu.edu.tw/articles/mm/mm_09_3_08/index.html
陳世佳(2009)。臺灣大學生的學習歷程與表現。載於張雪梅、彭森明(主編),大學生學期間打工現象之分析。臺北市:師大教評中心。pp.239-259。
陳柏亦. (2009)。以辯證思維規律分析決策的形成。國立中央大學組織管理研究所碩士論文。
黃玉湘(2002)。我國社區大學學員學習動機與學習滿意度之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
黑格爾著。賀麟譯. (1980)。《小邏輯(精選本) 》。商務(香港)。
劉創馥 (2006)。黑格爾思辯哲學與分析哲學之發展。國立政治大學哲學學報。第十五期.。pp. 81-134。
薛義誠(2008)。《策略規劃與管理》。雙葉書廊。pp.1-16,179-189,238-248。
指導教授 薛義誠(Yih-Chearng Shiue) 審核日期 2014-5-8
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明