新產品在預算限制及模糊與隨機價值期限下多類別與多等級之專案選擇

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：42

、訪客IP：3.145.52.86

姓名

徐文傑(Wen-chieh Hsu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

新產品在預算限制及模糊與隨機價值期限下多類別與多等級之專案選擇
(Multi-category and Multi-standard Project Selection with Fuzzy and Stochastic Value-based Time Limit for Creating the Prestige of New Product)

相關論文

★ 佈置變更專案工程的執行研究－以H公司研發單位為例	★ MIL-STD-1916、MIL-STD-105E與結合製程能力指標之抽樣檢驗計畫
★ 建構客戶導向的製造品質資訊系統--以某筆記型電腦專業代工廠商為例	★ GMP藥廠設施佈置規劃的探討--以E公司為研究對象
★ 應用Fuzzy c-Means演算法之物流中心位址決策模式研究	★ 品質資訊系統之規劃與建構 -- 以某光碟製造公司為研究對象
★ 從製程特性的觀點探討生產過程中SPC管制圖監控運用的適切性 -- 以Wafer Level 封裝公司為例	★ 六標準差之應用個案研究-以光學薄膜包裝流程改善為例
★ 利用六標準差管理提昇中小企業之製程品質-以錦絲線添加防銹蠟改善為例	★ 專業半導體測試廠MES 系統導入狀況、成果及問題之探討-以A 公司為例
★ 以RFID技術為基礎進行安全管理導入－以A公司為例	★ 如何提昇產品品質及降低成本—以光碟壓片廠A公司為例
★ ERP導入專案個案分析—以半導體封裝廠A公司為例	★ 石英元件製造業之延遲策略應用— 以T公司為研究對象
★ 十二吋晶圓廠自動化搬運系統規劃與導入—以A公司為例	★ 半導體封裝產業之生產革新改善活動-A半導體股份有限公司導入經驗探討-

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本文將新產品開發的計畫區分為多種研發(R&D)類別。每種研發類別代表著一種可以再設計/升級的特定產品。類別當中的每項專案執行品質(技術)都擁有多重的等級可供選擇。鑑此，本文提出一個多類別及其多等級的專案選擇性問題，該問題亦同時考量每期預算限制下的專案排程議題。本文的內容係由四個部分組成：(1)專案推移策略的選擇係專案排序時考量軟性因素做為專案排程的架構，(2)將消費者對產品的品牌印象引用為長期的平均獲利最大化之目標函數，(3)將週期性預算限制及模糊與隨機之價值期限轉換為一可計算之模式，(4)轉換目標函數轉換為一適當格式，以使參數更容易被估計，進而使最終結果被解釋為具管理意涵的內容。另外，我們針對本文所提出之每個模型，逐行進行54項模擬測試。測試結果發現模式的最佳解能夠在短時間內被找到；換言之，本文所提出之模型是具有可行性與應用性。

摘要(英)

This research proposes a new approach to select projects and their quality-standards corresponding to successively providing new products in the market. The problem involves the situation in which each new product development (NPD) program can be differentiated as multiple categories. Each project has multiple choices of quality/technology standards. Based on this problem, the proposed approach consists of following four components: (1) selecting a project advancement strategy to serve as a scheduling framework for taking into account soft factors in scheduling process, (2) employing the brand-image score of consumers as the objective function for ultimately increasing long-run average profitability, (3) formulating a computable model in which periodical budget constraints are involved and fuzzy and stochastic value-based time limits are specified, and (4) transforming the objective function into an appropriate form in which the parameters can be estimated more easily and the objective value can be predicated as a clear managerial implication. Also, we would simulate 54 items to test the computable model. The testing results should can find the global optimal in a short time for most testing items. That is, and the proposed computable model has high feasibility and applicability.

關鍵字(中)

★ 新產品開發
★ 專案選擇與排程
★ 多重品質等級選擇
★ 品牌印象

關鍵字(英)

★ New product development
★ Project selection and scheduling
★ Multi-choice of quality standards
★ Brand image

論文目次

THE LIST

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Motivation 1
1.2 Objectives 2
1.3 Research Framework 3

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 7

2.1 The Project Advancement Strategy 7
2.2 R&D Project Selections about NPD 9
2.3 Brand Image of Consumers 11
2.4 The Profile View of Relevant Problems 12

CHAPTER 3: MAXIMIZING THE BRAND-IMAGE
JUDGEMENTS OF CONSUMERS 15

CHAPTER 4: A COMPUTABLE FORMULATION FOR FUZZY MODEL 20

4.1 The Concerned Problem and Notations for Single Model 20
4.2 The Concerned Problem and Notations for Multi Model 22
4.3 Generating the Periodical Budget Constraints 24
4.4 Specifying Fuzzy Value-based Time Limit 25
4.5 The Proposed Computable Model 28
4.6 Further Consideration of Objective Function 32
4.7 The Numerical Example and Model Testing 34

CHAPTER 5: A COMPUTABLE FORMULATION FOR STOCHASTIC MODEL 43
5.1 The Concerned Problem and Notations for Single Model 43
5.2 The Concerned Problem and Notations for Multi Model 45
5.3 Generating the Periodical Budget Constraints 47
5.4 Specifying random value-based time limit 49
5.5 The Proposed Computable Model 50
5.6 Evaluation of model parameter 54
5.7 Further Consideration of Objective Function 56
5.8 The Numerical Example and Model Testing 59

CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION AND FUTURE RESEARCH 68

6.1 Conclusion 68
6.2 Future Research 70

REFERENCES 72

APPENDIX 80

參考文獻

【1】Aaker, D.A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing On the Value of a Brand Name, Free Press, New York, NY.
【2】Adler, P., Madelbaum, A., Nguyen, V. and Schwerer, E., (1995). From project to process management: an empirically based framework for analyzing product development time. Management Science, 41 (3), 458–484.
【3】Alan, D., Arun, J., Paul, R., (1996). How consumers evaluate store brands, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 5(2), 19-28.
【4】Arnold, D., (1992). The Handbook of Brand Management, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
【5】Aristeidis, T., Katerina, P. and Michael, T., (2012). Effects of Expiration Date-Based Pricing on Brand Image Perceptions, Journal of Retailing, 88(1), 72–87.
【6】Asher, D.I., (1962). A Linear Programming Model for the Allocation of R&D Efforts, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 9, 154-157.
【7】Baker, N. and Freeland, J., (1975). Recent advances in R&D benefit measurement and project selection methods. Management Science, 21(10), 1164–1175.
【8】Berry, L., (2000), Cultivating service brand equity, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 128–137.
【9】Bruno, G., Daniele, P., Gaetano, A., Raffaele, D., Priscilla, Chan., Hyunjoo, O., Rahul, S., Irina, I.S., Junji, T. and Bart, W., (2012). Brand and country-of-origin effect on consumers′ decision to purchase luxury products, Journal of Business Research, 65, 1461–1470.
【10】Brown, S.L. and Eisenhardt, K.M., (1995). Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343-378.
【11】Chang, C.C. and Chen, R.S., (2007). Theory of Project Advancement and Its Applications: A Case on Multi-Air-Route Quality Budget Allocation, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(8), 1008-1020.
【12】Chang, C.C. and Yang, Y.T., (2011). City-location-deployment with perceived-majority based demand spillover in services: A business competitive strategy, European Journal of Social Sciences, 20(2), 194-211.
【13】Chen, C.M. and Zhu, J., (2011). Efficient Resource Allocation via Efficiency Bootstraps: An Application to R&D Project Budgeting, Operations Research, 59(3), 729-741.
【14】Clark, K.B. and Fujimoto, T., (1991). Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and to avoid compromises that unduly sacrifice the Management in the World Auto Industry, Harvard integrity or quality of individual products, Boston: Business School Press.
【15】Coffin, M.A. and Taylor, B.W., (1996). Multiple criteria R&D selection and scheduling using fuzzy logic, Computers & Operations Research, 23, 207–220.
【16】Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J., (1988). Resource allocation in the new product process, Industrial Marketing Management, 17, 249-262.
【17】Cooper, R.G., (1996). Overhauling the new product process, Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 465-482.
【18】Colleen, C.D. and Tara, L., (2003). Store brands and retail differentiation: the influence of store image and store brand attitude on store own brand perceptions, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10, 345-352.
【19】Day, G.S. and Wensley, R., (1988). Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52, 1–20.
【20】Fabio, C. and Francesca, M., (2012). Business-to-Business Branding: A Review and Assessment of the Impact of Non-Attribute-Based Brand Beliefs on Buyer’s Attitudinal Loyalty, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29, 242–254.
【21】Farhad, H., Mikael, C. and Mohammad, M. (2012). A Practical Approach to R&D Portfolio Selection Using the Fuzzy Pay-Off Method, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 20(4), 615-622.
【22】Farhad, H., Mikael, C. and Mohammad, M. (2012). A practical R&D selection model using fuzzy pay-off method, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 58, 227–236.
【23】Fang, L., Jianyao, L., Dick, M. and Huangting, S., Self-congruity, brand attitude, and brand loyalty: a study on luxury brands, European Journal of Marketing, 46(7), 922-937.
【24】Fichter, C. and Jonas, K., (2008). Image Effects of Newspapers How Brand Images Change Consumers′ Product Ratings, Zeitschrift fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology, 216(4), 226-234.
【25】Frank, K. and Joseph, M.S. and Andreas, H. and Frank, H. and Stephanie, H. and Lee, D.J., (2006). Direct and indirect effects of self-image congruence on brand loyalty, Journal of Business Research, 59, 955-964, 2006.
【26】Girotra, K., Terwiesch, C. and Ulrich, K.T., (2007). Valuing R&D projects in a portfolio: evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Management Science, 53(9), 1452–1466.
【27】Hall, D.L. and Nauda, A., (1990). An Interactive Approach for Selecting IR&D Projects, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(2), 126-133.
【28】Henriksen, A.D. and Palocsay, S.W., (2008). An excel-based decision support system for scoring and ranking proposed R&D projects, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 7(3), 529-546.
【29】Henriksen, A.D. and Traynor, A.J., (1999). A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46, 158–170.
【30】Inuiguchi, M. and Ramík, J., (2000). Possibilistic linear programming: a brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem, Fuzzy sets and systems, 111, 3-28.
【31】Inuiguchi, M. and Sakawa, M., (1995). A possibilistic linear program is equivalent to a stochastic linear program in a special case, Fuzzy sets and systems, 76, 309-318.
【32】Israel, D.N. and Eugene, D.J., (1996). Measuring the joint effect of brand and country image in consumer evaluation of global products, International Marketing Review, 13(4), 5-22.
【33】Kataoka, S., (1963). A stochastic programming model, Econometrica, 31(1-2), 181-196.
【34】Keller, K.L., (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity, Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-10.
【35】Kester, L. and Griffin, A. and Hultink, E.J. and Lauche, K., (2011). Exploring Portfolio Decision-Making Processes, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 641-661.
【36】Keown, A.J., Taylor, III B. W. and Duncan, C. P., (1979). Allocation of Research and Development Funds: A Zero-One Goal Programming Approach. Management Science, 7, 345-351.
【37】Kolisch, R., Meyer, K. and Mohr, R., 2005. Maximizing R&D portfolio value. Research-Technology Management, 48(3), 33-39.
【38】Krishnan, V. and Ulrich, K.T., (2001). Product development decisions: a review of the literature. Management Science, 47 (1), 1–21.
【39】Kwon, W.S. and Sharron, J.L., (2009). What induces online loyalty? Online versus offline brand images, Journal of Business Research, 62, 557-564.
【40】Kurt, H. and Christian, S., (1999). Research and development project selection and resource allocation: a review of quantitative modeling approaches. International journal of management reviews, 1(2), 197-224.
【41】Lee, W. I. and Lee, C. L., (2011). An innovative information and relationship between service quality, customer value, customer satisfaction, and purchase intention, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 7(7A), 3571-3581.
【42】Lichtenstein, D.R. and Ridgway, N.M. and Netemeyer, R.G., (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior-a field-study, Journal of marketing research, 30(2), 234-245.
【43】Lieh, M. L., (2012). Optimal diversification for R&D project portfolios, Scientometrics, 91, 219–229.
【44】Liu, S.S. and Wang, C.J., (2011). Optimizing project selection and scheduling problems with time-dependent resource constraints, Automation in Construction, 20, 1110-1119.
【45】Low, J. and Blois, K., (2002). The evolution of generic brands in industrial markets: challenges to owners of brand equity, Industrial Marketing Management, 31(5), 385–392.
【46】Lynne, P.C., (2003). A research agenda to reduce risk in new product development through knowledge management: a practitioner perspective, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20, 117–140.
【47】Maxwell, W. and Jenni, R. and Svetlana, B., (2008). Positive and negative brand beliefs and brand defection/uptake, European Journal of Marketing, 42(5/6), 553-570.
【48】Martin, S.R., (1995). Effects of Global Market Conditions on Brand Image Customization and Brand Performance, Journal of Advertising, 26(4), 55-75.
【49】Martino, J.P., (1995). R&D Project Selection. New York: Wiley.
【50】Meade, L.M. and Presley, A., (2002). R&D project selection using the analytic network process, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 59–66.
【51】Merrilees, B. and Miller, D., (2010). Brand morphing across Wal-Mart customer segments, Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1129–1135..
【52】Ming, H. H., (2002). Identifying Brand Image Dimensionality and Measuring the Degree of Brand Globalization: A Cross-National Study, Journal of International Marketing, 10(2), 46-67.
【53】Nishihara, M. and Ohyama, A., (2008). R&D competition in alternative technologies: A real options approach, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 51(1), 55-80.
【54】Norman, R.B. (2012). R&D Project Selection Models: An Assessment, R&D Management, 5(S1), 105-111.
【55】Nobeoka, K. and Cusumano, M.A., (1997). Multi-project strategy and sales growth: the benefits of rapid design transfer in new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3), 169–186.
【56】Pedro, L.P. and Francisco, M.V., (2009). R&D Activity Selection Process: Building a Strategy-Aligned R&D Portfolio for Government and Nonprofit Organizations, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56(1), 95-105.
【57】Pereira, O. and Junior, D., (1988). The R&D project selection problem with fuzzy coefficients, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 26, 299–316.
【58】Pettijohn, L.S. and Mellott, D. and Pettijohn, C.E., (1992). The relationship between retailer image and brand image, Psychology and Marketing, 9(4), 311-328.
【59】Phau, I. and Prendergast, G., (2000). Consuming luxury brands: the relevance of the “rarity principle”, Journal of Brand Management, 8, 122–38.
【60】Robert, G.C., and Scott, J.E., and Elko, J.K., (1999). New Product Portfolio Management: Practices and Performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16, 333–351.
【61】Robert, J.T., (1993). New product Development, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
【62】Rupak, B., Pankaj, K. and Samarjit, K. (2011). Fuzzy R&D portfolio selection of interdependent projects, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 62(10), 3857-3870.
【63】Rutsch, K.H., and Viljoen, P.J. and Steyn, H., (2006). An investigation into the current practice of project portfolio selection in research and development division of the South African minerals and energy industry, Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 106(10), 665-670.
【64】Sengupta, J.K. and Portillo-Campbell, J.H., (1970). A fractile approach to linear programming under risk, Management Science, 16(5), 298-308.
【65】Sun, H. and Ma, T., (2005). A Packing-multiple-boxes Model for R&D Project Selection and Scheduling, Technovation, 25, 1355-1361.
【66】Triplett, T., (1994). Brand personality must be managed or it will assume a life of its own, Marketing News, 28(10), 9.
【67】Timothy, R.G., (1997). Consumption Situations and the Effects of Brand Image on Consumers′ Brand Evaluation. Psychology & Marketing, 14(1), 49-70.
【68】Van Riel, A.C.R., de Mortanges, C.P., and Streukens, S., (2005). Marketing antecedents of industrial brand equity: an empirical investigation in specialty chemicals, Industrial Marketing Management, 34(8), 841–847.
【69】Verma, D. and Mishrab, A. and Sinha, K. K., (2011). The development and application of a process model for R&D project management in a high tech firm: A field study, Journal of Operations Management, 29, 462-476.
【70】Wang, B. and Wang, S. and Watada, J., (2010). Real Options Analysis Based on Fuzzy Random Variables, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 6(4), 1689-1698.
【71】Wang, M. J. and Yang, M. F., (2011). Application of Signed Distances Method to Integrate Linear Programming for Fuzzy Multi-Objective Project Management, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 7(1), 237-252.
【72】Wei, C.C. and Chang, H.W., (2011). A new approach for selecting portfolio of new product development projects, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 429-434.
【73】Xiao, R. and Chen, T. and Ju, C., (2011). Research on Product Development Iterations Based on Feedback Control Theory in Adynamic Environment Intention, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 7(5B), 2669-2688.
【74】Arnaout, J. P., (2013). Ant colony optimization algorithm for the Euclidean location-allocation problem with unknown number of facilities, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(1), 45-54.
【75】Shukla, N. and Choudhary, A.K. and Prakash, P.K.S. and Fernandes, K.J. and Tiwari, M.K., (2013). Algorithm portfolios for logistics optimization considering stochastic demands and mobility allowance, Interational Journal of Production Economics, 141(1), 146-166.
【76】Liou, C.D. and Hsieh, Y.C. and Chen, Y.Y., (2013). A new encoding scheme-based hybrid algorithm for minimising two-machine flow-shop group scheduling problem, Interational Journal of Systems Science, 44(1), 77-93.
【77】Singh, M.R. and Mahapatra, S.S. (2012). A swarm optimization approach for flexible flow shop scheduling with multiprocessor tasks, Interational Journal of Advanced Manufacturng Technology, 62(1-4), 267-277.

指導教授

何應欽(Ying-Chin Ho)

審核日期

2015-6-22

推文