以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：32

、訪客IP：3.129.13.201

姓名	劉名寰(Ming-Huan Liou)  查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	經濟學系
論文名稱	國際經濟學的三篇實證研究 (Essays on International Economics)
相關論文	★ 中國出口對鄰近東亞國家之影響 ★ 貿易自由化對中國對外出口之影響 ★ 從產業關聯表檢視美國再工業化成效 ★ 出口、外人直接投資與勞動產出份額：中國的實證研究 ★ 技術變動對薪資影響之研究－以臺灣製造業為例 ★ 高等教育投資值得嗎? 研究所教育報酬之探討 ★ 中國旅遊需求分析：世界遺產的影響 ★ 中國銀行效率分析 ★ 遠來的和尚會念經？NBA球員之薪資與效率分析 ★ 開放政策，人力資本與區域經濟發展─越南的實證研究 ★ 環境管制、研發與生產力:台灣製造業實證研究 ★ 國家研發效率與生產力之分析 ★ 外人援助，貪污，與經濟成長：門檻迴歸模型的應用 ★  Three essays on China's regional economic analysis ★ 要素配置、結構調整和生產力動態 —印尼製造業的研究 ★ 運動經濟學的三篇實證研究
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載] 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中)	過去數十年間，受到全球化與經濟自由化趨勢的影響，國際經濟環境遭逢巨變。在此時代巨輪變遷的過程中，除了為許多國家帶來前所未有的發展機會與挑戰，同時也衍生出諸多值得深入探究的經濟現象與課題。本論文之要旨，即透過詳細的觀察、整理與歸納大量統計數據，經由嚴謹的計量模型估計，系統性地針對三個當今廣受討論的國際經濟議題進行實證研究。 　　議題一分析人民幣升值對中國貿易順差的影響。中國自1978年實施改革開放以來，透過大量釋放出低廉的生產要素（土地、勞動），結合『偏低』的匯率政策，吸引外國資金投資，成就其經濟發展，並累積出數量驚人的貿易盈餘。 　　近年有論者將全球金融危機歸究於偏低的人民幣匯率所導致的全球貿易失衡，進而倡議中國應進行幣值重估，以協助矯正世界貿易結構。有趣的是，人民幣匯率在2005年到2009年間，每年平均升值幅度達4.4%，惟中國貿易順差仍持續累積。此現象令人好奇人民幣升值是否對減少中國順差的效果有限，甚或人民幣匯率並非改善全球貿易失衡的關鍵？ 　　議題一整理中國與其前49大貿易對手國的商品進出口統計，並根據聯合國商品分類系統（BEC System）將商品析分成三大類：原物料、中間財、最終財，藉以分析人民幣升值對不同財貨之影響。研究發現，中國三大出口商品對匯率的敏感程度大於進口。匯率升值除了減少中國出口，其中間財進口需求也將因出口下降而減少，從而抵銷部份匯率升值對順差的抑制效果。此外，中國內需規模對於改善順差的效果明顯，顯示中國經濟轉型實為改善全球貿易失衡不可或缺的因素。 　　議題二驗證產業內貿易發展程度與勞動市場雇用變化之間的關係。有別於李嘉圖比較利益理論的預測，近十來年受到新興國家加入全球生產供應鏈的行列，以及運輸、通訊成本降低的影響，全球產業內貿易發展快速。根據『平滑調整假說』(Smooth Adjustment Hypothesis, SAH)，倘若一國的貿易型態偏重於產業內貿易，則其生產要素的投入波動受到貿易的衝擊將小於產業間貿易。 　　議題二利用聯合國『商品與行業』對照表，自行編算台灣製造業進出口貿易資料，並整理相對應的勞動雇用統計，檢視『平滑調整假說』是否成立。台灣是小型開放經濟體，目前正積極投身區域經濟整合的行列。身為全球生產供應鏈的重要成員，此議題對於參與經濟整合時的衝擊影響分析具有重要的參考價值。 研究結果發現，產業內貿易程度愈高確實有助於減少勞動雇用量的波動程度。專業技術人員在產業內所占的雇用比例愈高，則該產業的勞動雇用波動程度也愈低。值得一提的是，根據本研究實證結果，貿易開放程度並不影響台灣製造業的雇用變化，顯示政府在制訂貿易政策時，產業的貿易發展型態（而非貿易開放程度）應是重要的決策考量。 　　議題三嘗試辨認出哪些因素影響廠商在三種不同出口行為的績效表現：出口市場數、產品數及產品品質。受惠於經濟全球化的影響，許多新興國家不約而同採取『出口導向』策略作為經濟發展的主軸戰略。在出口導向經濟發展模式的初期，充份有效地利用國內生產要素以促進出口量的快速成長是重要的特徵。然而，伴隨著後進新興國家加入市場賽局，早發新興經濟體便無法確保在要素價格上擁有永久的絕對優勢。因此，如何藉由提升產業出口能力及產品品質，以增加產業附加價值便成為永續發展的關鍵。 　　議題三合併中國海關貿易庫及中國中大型企業調查資料，嘗試找出影響中國電子業廠商出口行為表現的決定因素。研究結果發現，總要素生產力、廠齡及融資能力等三項因素，對於廠商在上述三種出口表現具有正向顯著的影響力；總要素生產力愈高、廠齡較大，以及融資能力較佳的廠商，愈有能力經營較多的海外市場、出口較多高品質的產品。而廠商規模及資本密集程度對於廠商出口行為的影響力較不一致；規模較大的廠商，具有經營較多市場及出口較多產品的能力，然而它對於出口產品品質的影響則不一定。此外，資本密集度僅對廠商出口市場數具有顯著影響，對於出口產品數及產品品質則不具影響力。 　　如前所述，廠商的融資能力影響其出口績效表現。因此，對於像中國一樣的新興經濟體而言，健全國內金融環境，使廠商在營運資金的取得及調度上不致成為其經營侷限，是採取出口導向發展策略的新興國家在政策上可著力之處。
摘要(英)	This dissertation is organized by three essays attempting to empirically explore issues regarding international economics. We aim to clarify the following questions: (1) Does RMB revaluation have limited effect on China’s trade surplus? (2) Does the growth of intra-industry trade pattern indeed lower the labor market variation in Taiwanese manufacturing industries? (3) What determines firm’s performance in shipping to more oversea markets, selling more products, and exporting product of higher quality? The first essay examines the influence of the RMB variation on trades of primary, intermediate, and final goods between China and its 49 major trading partners. The empirical result shows that China’s exports are more sensitive to exchange rate than imports. Among the results, we find a counterintuitive one that an RMB appreciation will reduce China’s intermediate goods imports. This finding, along with the other one that the final goods exports, the major source of the surplus, are not sensitive to exchange rate change, are probably the main reasons why the RMB appreciation has limited effect on restraining China’s rising surplus. To deal with the trade imbalance issue between China and its partners, other than the RMB revaluation, our estimation results suggest that China needs to also speed its economic transformation from export-led to domestic-oriented model. The second essay investigates the relationship between intra-industry trade (IIT) expansion and labor market adjustment in Taiwan. We adopt a panel dataset containing detailed employment information and utilize various measures of labor market adjustment to conduct empirical estimations. After controlling for industry-specific effects and the structure of occupational composition, the empirical results demonstrate that IIT expansion does have a smoothing effect on labor market adjustment. In addition, industries with abundant skilled workers experience lower employment adjustment costs. The final essay explores what kinds of exporters perform better in three aspects: export to more destinations, export more varieties of products, and export products of higher quality. Using a comprehensive firm-level panel data of China’s electronics industry during 2003-2006 which is compiled from firm survey and Custom dataset, this study provides, one of the first systematically studies, the firm-level panel evidence to deal with this issue. We find that firm productivity matters not only in the two extensive margins in export destinations and varieties of products as expected, but in export quality, so far novel in the existing heterogeneous-firm trade literature. Moreover, exporters’ financing ability is found to be influential in all three aspects of performance. To deal with the sample selection as well as endogenous problems, we adopt also various datasets and variable measurement to implement empirical estimations. Most evidences support the importance of productivity on export performance.
關鍵字(中)	★ 中國 ★ 人民幣 ★ 產業內貿易 ★ 異質性廠商 ★ 貿易	關鍵字(英)	★ China’s Trade ★ China’s Exchange Rate ★ Intra-Industry Trade ★ Heterogeneous Firms ★ Trade
論文目次	Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 RMB Revaluation and China’s Trade: Does RMB Have Limited Effect on China’s Surplus? 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Literature Review 8 2.3 Data and The Stylized Facts of China’s Trade 9 2.4 Empirical Specification 14 2.5 Empirical Results 18 2.5.1 The Effect of the RMB Appreciation on China’s Total Trade 18 2.5.2 The Effect of the RMB Appreciation on China’s Trade by Stages of Production 20 2.6 Conclusions 26 Chapter 3 Intra-Industry Trade and Labor Market Adjustment in Taiwan 28 3.1 Introduction 28 3.2 Literature Review 32 3.3 Labor Adjustment and MIIT Index 35 3.4 Data Description and Empirical Specification 37 3.4.1 Data Description 37 3.4.2 Empirical specification 39 3.5 Empirical Results and Discussions 43 3.5.1 Panel analysis: Dimension adjustment effect 43 3.5.2 Panel Analysis: Total Adjustment Effect 46 3.6 Conclusions 52 Chapter 4 Heterogeneous Firms and Trade: The Determinants of Exporters’ Performance in Destinations, Varieties, and Quality 54 4.1 Introduction 54 4.2 Related Literature 56 4.3 Data and Stylized Facts 59 4.3.1 Data 59 4.3.2 Stylized Facts of Export Heterogeneity in China’s Electronics Industry 60 4.4 Empirical Model and Measurement of Productivity 66 4.5 Empirical Results 71 4.5.1 The Determinants of the Two Types of Export Extensive Margins 71 4.5.2 The Determinants of Export Quality 78 4.5.3 Robustness Check 84 4.6 Conclusions 90 Chapter 5 Concluding Remarks and Policy Implications 92 References 94
參考文獻	Ahmed, S., (2009), “Are Chinese Exports Sensitive to Changes in the Exchange Rate?” Federal Reserve Board, International Finance Discussion Paper, No. 987. Arellano, M. and Bond, S. R., (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations,”Review of Economic Studies 58, 277-297. Arkolakis C. and Muendler, M., (2010), “The extensive margin of exporting goods: A firm-level analysis,” NBER Working Paper Series, No.16641. Athukorala, P. C., (2005), “Product fragmentation and trade patterns in East Asia,” Asian Economic Paper 4(3), 1–27. Athukorala, P., (2006), “Product Fragmentation and Trade Patterns in East Asia,” Asian Economic Papers 4(3), 1–27. Athukorala, P. and Yamashita, N., (2009), “Global Production Sharing and Sino-US Trade Relations,” China & World Economy, Vol. 17, 39-56. Athukorala, P. C., (2009), “The rise of China and East Asian export performance: Is the crowding-out fear warranted?” The World Economy 32(2), 234–266. Aw, B. Y., Chung, S., and Roberts, M. J., (2000), “Productivity and turnover in the export market: micro-level evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan,” World Bank Economic Review 14(1), 65-96. Azhar, A. K. M. and Elliott, R. J. R., (2008), “On the Measurement of Changes in Product Quality in Marginal Intra-Industry Trade,” Review of World Economics 144(2), 225-247. Azhar, A. K. M. and Elliott, R. J. R., (2003), “On the Measurement of Trade-induced Adjustment,” Review of World Economics 139(3), 419-439. Baak, S., (2008), “The Bilateral Real Exchange Rates and Trade between China and the U.S.,” China Economic Review, 19, 117-127. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Wang, Y., (2006), “The J Curve: China versus Her Trading Partners,” Bulletin of Economic Research 58(4), 307-378. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Wang, Y., (2007), “United States-China Trade at the Commodity Level and the Yuan-Dollar Exchange Rate,” Contemporary Economic Policy 25(3), 341-361. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Wang, Y., (2008), “The J Curve: Evidence from Commodity Trade between US and China,” Applied Economics 40, 2735-2747. Bai, C. E., Hsieh, C. T. and Qian, Y., (2006), “Returns to Capital in China,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2006):61-88. Balassa, B., (1966), “Tariff Reductions and Trade in Manufactures among the Industrial Countries,” American Economic Review, 56(1), 466-473. Baldwin, R. and Harrigan, J., (2010), “Zeros, Quality and Space: Trade Theory and Trade Evidence,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 3, 60-88. Bastos, P. and Silva, J. (2010), “The quality of a firm’s exports: Where you export to matters,” Journal of International Economics 82, 99-111. Bellone, F., Musso, P., Nesta, L. and Schiavo, S., (2010), “Financial constraints and firm export behaviour,” World Economy 33(3), 347-373. Bernard, A. and Jensen, J. B., (2004), “Why some firms export,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 561-569. Bernard, A., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. and Schott, P., (2007), “Firms in international trade,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21, 105-130. Bernard, A., Redding, S. and Schott, P., (2006), “Multi-product firms and trade liberalization,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 12782. Bernard, A., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J. and Schott, P. K., (2012), “The Empirics of firm heterogeneity and international trade.” Annual Review of Economics4, 283-313. Brülhart, M., (1994), “Marginal Intra-Industry Trade: Measurement and Relevance for the Pattern of Industrial Adjustment,” Review of World Economics, 130(4), 600–613. Brülhart, M., (1999), “Marginal Intra-Industry Trade and Trade-Induced Adjustment: A Survey,” In M. Brülhart and R. Hine (eds.), Intra-Industry Trade and Adjustment: The European Experience, Macmillan, London. Brülhart, M., (2000), “Dynamics of Intra-Industry Trade and Labour-Market Adjustments,” Review of International Economics, 8(3), 420–435. Brülhart, M., (2009), “An Account of Global Intra-industry Trade 1962-2006,” World Economy 32(3), 401-459. Brülhart, M. and Elliott, R. J. R., (1998), “Adjustments to the European Single Market: Inferences from Intra-Industry Trade Patterns,” Journal of Economic Studies 25(3), 225–247. Brülhart, M. and Elliott, R. J. R., (2002), “Labour-Market Effects of Intra-Industry Trade: Evidence for the United Kingdom,” Review of World Economics, 138(2), 207–228. Brülhart, M. and Hine, R., (1999), “Intra-Industry Trade and Adjustment: The European Experience,” Macmillan, London. Brülhart, M. and Thorpe, M., (2000), “Intra-Industry Trade and Adjustment in Malaysia: Puzzling Evidence,” Applied Economics Letters 7(11), 729–733. Brülhart, M., Elliott, R.J.R. and Lindley, J., (2006), “Intra-Industry Trade and Labour-Market Adjustment: A Reassessment Using Data on Individual Workers,” Review of World Economics, 142(3), 521-545. Cabral, M. and Silva, J., (2006), “Intra-Industry Trade Expansion and Employment Reallocation between Sectors and Occupations,” Review of World Economics, 142(3), 496-520. Cheung, Y. W., Chinn, M. D., and Fujii, E., (2009), “China’s Current Account and Exchange Rate,” National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Working Paper 14673. Cline, W. R. and Williamson, J., (2008), “Estimates of the Equilibrium Exchange Rate of the Renminbi: Is There a Consensus and IF Not, Why Not?” Chapter 4 in M. Goldstein and N. Lardy, eds., Debating China’s Exchange Rate Policy, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC. Eckel, C. and Neary, J. P., (2010), “Multi-product firms and flexible manufacturing in the global economy,” Review of Economic Studies 77(1), 188-217. Elliott, R.J.R. and Lindley, J., (2006), “Trade Skills and Adjustment Costs: A Study of Intra-Sectoral Labour Mobility,” Review of Development Economics 10(1), 20–41. Erlat, G. and Erlat, H., (2006), “Intraindustry Trade and Labor Market Adjustment in Turkey: Another Piece of Puzzling Evidence?” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 45(5), 5-27. Falvey, R., Kierzkowski H., (1987), “Product Quality, Intra-Industry Trade and (Im)perfect Competition,” in: Kierzkowski (ed.). Faustino, H. C., (2010), “Intra-Industry Trade and Labour Market Adjustment in the Automobile Industry,” International Journal of Economics and Finance 2(4) 3-6. Feenstra, R. C. and Ma, H., (2007), “Optimal choice of product scope for multiproduct firms under monopolistic competition,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 13703. Ferto, I., (2009), “Labour Market Adjustment and Intra-Industry Trade: The Effects of Association on the Hungarian Food Industry,” Journal of Agricultural Economics 60(3), 668-681. Fukao, K., Ishido, H. and Ito, K., (2003), “Vertical Intra-industry Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in East Asia,” China Economic Review 17(4), 468-506. Gabszewicz, J. and Turrini, A., (2000), “Worker’s Skills and Industrial Equilibrium,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 18(4), 575-593. Garcia-Herroero A. and Koivu, T., (2009), “China’s Exchange Rate Policy and Asian Trade,” Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Working Paper No. 282. Gaulier, G., Lemoine, F. and Ünal-Kesenci, D., (2007), “China’s Integration in East Asia: Production Sharing, FDI & High-Tech Trade,” Economic Change and Restructuring 40(1-2), 27-63. Goldstein, M. and Khan, M. S., (1985), “Income and Price Effects in Foreign Trade,” In Jones, R.W. and P. Kennen (eds), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Noth-Holland. Greenaway, D. and Milner, C. R., (1986), “Adjustment to Trade Expansion,” Basil Blackwell, Oxford. Greenaway, D., Hine, R. C., Milner, C. and Elliott, R., (1994), “Adjustment and the Measurement of Marginal Intra-Industry Trade,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 130(2), 418-427. Greenaway, D. and Kneller, R., (2007), “Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment,” The Economic Journal 177, F134-F161. Groenewold, N. and He, L., (2007), “The US-China Trade Imbalance: Will Revaluing the RMB Help (Much)?” Economics Letters 96, 127-132. Grubel, H. and Lloyd, P., (1975), “Intra-industry Trade: Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products,” Macmillan, London. Gumede, V., (2004), “Export propensities and intensities of small and medium manufacturing enterprises in South Africa,” Small Business Economics 22(5), 379-389. Hallak, J. C., (2006), “Product quality and the direction of trade,” Journal of International Economics 68, 238-265. Hallak, J. C. and Sivadasan, J., (2009), “Firms’ exporting behavior under quality constraints,” NBER Working Paper. No. 14928. Haltiwanger, J. C., Lane, J. I. and Splezer, J. R., (1999), “Productivity differences across employers: The role of employer size, age, and human capital,” American Economic Review 89, 94-98. Hamilton, C. and Kniest, P., (1991), “Trade Liberalisation, Structural Adjustment and Intra-Industry Trade: A Note,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 127(2), 356-367. Hausmann, R., Hwang, J. and Rodrik, D., (2007), “What You Export Matters,” Journal of Economic Growth 12(1), 1-25. Hua, P., (2008), “Real Exchange Rates and China’s Bilateral Exports towards Industrialized Countries,” Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 6(3), 241-259. Hummels, D. and Klenow, P., (2005), “The variety and quality of a nation’s exports,” American Economic Review 95, 704-723. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. and Shin, Y., (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels,” Journal of Econometrics 115, 53-74. Johnson, R. C., (2012), “Trade and prices with heterogeneous firms,” Journal of International Economics 86, 43-56. Koopman R., Wang, Z. and Wei, S. J., (2009), “A World Factory in Global Production Chains: Estimating Imported Value Added in Chinese Exports,” Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper No. 7430. Krishna, P. and Maloney, F. W., (2011), “Export quality dynamics,” Policy Research Working Paper Series 5701. The World Bank. Kugler, M. and Verhoogen, E., (2012), “Prices, plant size, and product quality,” Review of Economic Studies 79(1), 307-339. Kwan, A. C. C. and Kwok, B. (1995), “Exogeneity and the Export-Led Growth Hypothesis: The Case of China,” Southern Economic Journal 61 (4), 1158-1166. Lemoine F. and Ünal-Kesenci, D., (2004), “Assembly Trade and Technology Transfer: The Case of China,” World Development 32(5), 829-850. Levin, A., Lin, C. F. and Chu, C. J., (2002), “Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties,” Journal of Econometrics 108, 1-24. Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A., (2003), “Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservable,” Review of Economic Studies 70(2), 317-342. Lovely, M. and Nelson, D., (2000), “Marginal Intraindustry Trade and Labor Adjustment,” Review of International Economics, 8(3), 436–447. Lovely, M. and Nelson, D., (2002), “Intra-Industry Trade as an Indicator of Labor Market Adjustment,” Review of World Economics, 138(2), 197-206. Mann, C. and Plück, K., (2005), “The U.S. Trade Deficit: A Disaggregated Perspective,” Institute for International Economics Working Paper WP 05-11, Washington, DC. Manova, K., (2012), “Credit Constraints, Heterogeneous Firms, and International Trade,” Working Papers, Standford University and NBER. Manova, K. and Zhang, Z., (2012), “Export prices across firms and destinations,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127, 379-463. Marquez, J. and Schindler, J., (2007), “Exchange Rate Effects on China’s Trade,” Reviews of International Economics, 15(5), 837-853. Mayer, T. and Ottaviano, GIP., (2008), “The happy few: New facts on the internationalisation of European firms,” Intereconomics 43(3), 135-148. Mayer, T., Melitz, M. J. and Ottaviano, G., (2011), “Market size, competition, and the product mix of exporters,” NBER Working Paper Series. No. 16959. Melitz, M., (2003), “The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocation and aggregate industry productivity,” Econometrica 71, 1695-1725. Minetti, R. and Zhu, C., (2011), “Credit constraints and firm export: Microeconomic evidence from Italy,” Journal of International Economics 83, 109-125. Narayan, P. K., (2006), “Examining the Relationship between Trade Balance and Exchange Rate: the Case of China’s Trade with the USA,” Applied Economics Letters, 13, 507-510. Nocke, V. and Yeaple, S. R., (2006), “Globalization and endogenous firm scope,” NBER Working Paper. No. 12322. Olley, S. and Pakes, A., (1996), “The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry,” Econometrica 64, 1263-98. Petrin, A., Poi, B.P. and Levinsohn, J., (2004), “Production Function Estimation in Stata using Inputs to Control for Unobservable,” The Stata Journal 4(2), 113-123. Plumper, T., and Troeger, V.E.,(2007), “Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analysis with unit fixed effect,” Political Analysis 15(1), 124-139. Rahman, M., (2009), “The Impact of Real Exchange Rate Flexibility on East Asian Exports,” World Economy 32, 1075-1090. Rahman, M. and Thorbecke. W., (2007), “How Would China’s Exports be Affected by a Unilateral Appreciation of the RMB and by a Joint Appreciation of Countries Supplying Intermediate Imports?” RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 07-E-012. Rasekhi, S. and Ghaderi, S., (2012), “Marginal Intra-industry Trade and Adjustment Costs: the Case Study of Iran’s Manufacturing Industries,” International Journal of Economics and Business Research 4(1-2), 35-43. Redding, S. J., (2010), “Theories of heterogeneous firms and trade,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 16562. Roberts, M. J. and Tybout, J. R.,(1997), “The decision to export in Columbia: An empirical model of entry with sunk costs,” American Economic Review 87, 545–64. Roper, S., Love, J.H., and Hígon, D. A., (2006), “The determinants of export performance: evidence for manufacturing plants in Ireland and Northern Ireland,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 53, 586-615. Schott, P., (2004), “Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119, 647-678. Solow, R. M., (1957), “Technical change and the aggregate production function,” Review of Economics and Statistics 39, 312-320. Thom R. and McDowell, M., (1999), “Measuring Marginal Intra-industry Trade,” Review of World Economics, 135(1), 48-61. Thorbecke, W., (2006), “How Would an Appreciation of the Renminbi Affect the U.S. Trade Deficit with China?” The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 6(3), Article 3. Thorbecke, W., (2010), “How Would an Appreciation of the Yuan Affect the People’s Republic of China’s Surplus in Processing Trade?” ADBI Working Paper 219. Tokyo: ADBI. Thorbecke, W. and Smith, G., (2010), “How Would an Appreciation of the Renminbi and Other East Asian Currencies Affect China’s Exports?” Review of International Economics 18(1), 95-108. Thorbecke, W. and Zhang, H., (2009), “The Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on China’s Labour-Intensive Manufacturing Exports,” Pacific Economic Review 14(3), 398-409. Tybout, J., (2003), “Plant and firm level evidence on new trade theories,” In: Kwan, E., Harrigan, J. (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics. Blackwell, Oxford, 388-415. Vahter, P., and Masso, J., (2007), “Home versus host country effects of FDI: Searching for new evidence of productivity spillovers,” Applied Economics Quarterly, 53(2): 165-196. Verhoogen, E., (2008), “Trade, quality upgrading, and wage inequality in the Mexican manufacturing sector,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123, 489-530. Wakelin, K., (1998), “Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level,” Research Policy 26, 829-841. Wang, L., (2011), “Quality Differentiation, Input Choices and learning by Exporting: Evidence from Chinese Exports,” Working Papers, University of Toronto. World Trade Organization, (2008), “World trade report: Trade in globalizing world,” Geneva: World Trade Organization. Yang, C. H., Lin, C. H. and Ma, L. D., (2010), “R&D, human capital investment and productivity: Firm-level evidence from China’s electronics industry,” China & World Economy 18(5), 72- 89. Yang, C. H., Lin, H. L. and Wu, I. Y., (2010), “Outward Investment to China and Domestic Innovation of Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms,” Japan Economic Review, 61(4), 538-557. Yeaple, S. R., (2005), “A simple model of firm heterogeneity, international trade, and wages,” Journal of International Economics 65(1), 1-20. Xing, Y., (2011), “Processing Trade, Exchange Rates, and the People’s Republic of China’s Bilateral Trade Balances,” ADBI Working Paper 270. Tokyo: ADBI. Yu, M., (2009), “Revaluation of Chinese Yuan and Triad Trade: A Gravity Assessment,” Journal of Asian Economics, 20, 655-668. Zheng, G., Guo, L., Jiang, X., Zhang, X. and Wang, S., (2006), “The Impact of RMB’s Appreciation on China’s Trade,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 13, 35-50.
指導教授	楊志海(Chih-Hai Yang)	審核日期	2013-7-15
推文	facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare