博碩士論文 975202034 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:14 、訪客IP:3.227.235.216
姓名 覃志宗(Chih-Chung Tan)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊工程學系
論文名稱 維基百科知識推薦系統對於使用e-Portfolio的學習者滿意度調查
(Investigating the influence of Wikipedia knowledge recommendation system on learners’ satisfaction of using e-Portfolio)
相關論文
★ 應用智慧分類法提升文章發佈效率於一企業之知識分享平台★ 家庭智能管控之研究與實作
★ 開放式監控影像管理系統之搜尋機制設計及驗證★ 資料探勘應用於呆滯料預警機制之建立
★ 探討問題解決模式下的學習行為分析★ 資訊系統與電子簽核流程之總管理資訊系統
★ 製造執行系統應用於半導體機台停機通知分析處理★ Apple Pay支付於iOS平台上之研究與實作
★ 應用集群分析探究學習模式對學習成效之影響★ 應用序列探勘分析影片瀏覽模式對學習成效的影響
★ 一個以服務品質為基礎的網際服務選擇最佳化方法★ 學生的學習動機、網路自我效能與系統滿意度之探討-以e-Portfolio為例
★ 藉由在第二人生內使用自動對話代理人來改善英文學習成效★ 合作式資訊搜尋對於學生個人網路搜尋能力與策略之影響
★ 數位註記對學習者在線上學習環境中反思等級之影響★ Web 2.0 社交網站的開發與實作:以國立中央大學e-Portfolio為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) e-Portfolio近年來已經成為數位化學習的熱門主題,並廣泛的在各大專院校推廣。但e-Portfolio卻常常受限於系統資訊的匱乏以及與相關資源配合不足的問題,以致於系統的滿意度與系統使用普遍低落,為了解決這個問題,在本論文中,Wikipedia Knowledge recommendation System被提出,WKRS,他是一套用來辨識與註記學生學習歷程檔中的維基百科知識並且推薦與學生相關的維基百科知識的系統。參與實驗者有100位學生,研究結果顯示,在e-Portfolio平台中加入WKRS能夠提高系統的滿意度,此外,WKRS系統具有適應性的特質,在持續的使用WKRS,使用者皆能感到系統能提供更精確的知識/資訊品質。
摘要(英) This paper presents a Wikipedia Knowledge Recommendation System (WKRS), and investigating its influence on learners’ satisfaction of using e-Portfolio. WKRS is able to identify and annotate Wikipedia knowledge on learner’s portfolio and recommend the knowledge which is related to learners defined on Wikipedia. System quality, knowledge or information quality, system use, and learners’ satisfaction of e-Portfolio platform were investigated after applying WKRS. The samples of this study are 100 students. Experimental results showed that e-Portfolio using plug-in WKRS could enhance the learners’ satisfaction, and the use of e-Portfolio system. In addition, according to the characteristics of adaptability of WKRS, most of the participants perceived that the e-Portfolio system can provide more accurate and higher knowledge or information quality.
關鍵字(中) ★ 學習者滿意度
★ 知識推薦
★ 維基百科
★ 數位化學習歷程檔
關鍵字(英) ★ e-Portfolio
★ Wikipedia
★ Knowledge Recommendation
★ Learners’ Satisfaction
論文目次 摘 要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature review 4
2.1 The application and the development process of e-Portfolio 4
2.2 e-Portfolio and personal knowledge management 6
2.3 Information and Knowledge Success Model 7
3. Hypothesis 10
4. Wikipedia knowledge recommendation system 13
4.1 System Architecture 13
4.2 System Demo 15
5. Method 19
5.1 Participants and subject 19
5.2 Research procedure 19
5.3 Research tools 23
6. Result 27
6.1 Reliability analysis and Validity analysis 27
6.2 Results of questionnaire analysis 27
6.3 Pearson correlation analysis 28
6.4 Hypothesis testing 33
7. Discussion 35
7.1 Influences of WKRS on system quality, knowledge or information, system use and learners’ satisfaction 35
7.2 Influences of the system quality and knowledge or information quality on learners’ satisfaction 38
7.2.1 Influences of the system quality on learners’ satisfaction 38
7.2.2 Influences of the knowledge or information quality on learners’ satisfaction 38
7.3 Influences of the system use on knowledge or information quality 39
8. Conclusions 41
Reference 43
Appendix A. Questionnaire items and sources 48
Appendix B: WKRS Algorithm 50
Appendix C: WKRS API 66
參考文獻 1. Albino, V., Garavelli, A.C.,& Schiuma, G.(1999). Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts: the role of the leader firm. Technovation, 19(11), 53-63.
2. Barker, K. C. (2006). Environmental scan: Overview of the ePortfolio in general and in the workplace specifically.Retrieved on October 20, 2006 from http://www.FuturEd.com.
3. Barrett, H. (2004). Metaphors for portfolios: A series of quotes. Retrieved April 02, 2007, from http://electronicportfolios.com/metaphors.html
4. Barrett, H. C. (2001). Electronic portfolios. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Educational technology: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clic.
5. Barrett, Helen (2000, April). Create Your Own Electronic Portfolio. Learning & Leading with Technology, 27(7), 14-21.
6. Beauchamp, M. A. (1965). An improved index of centrality. Behavioral Science, 10(2),161-163.
7. Chang, C.-C. (2008). Enhancing self-perceived effects using Web-based portfolio assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1753-1771.
8. Clemente, B.E. & Pollara, V.J. (2005), Mapping the course, marking the trail, IT Professional, 7(6), 10-15.
9. Crockett, (1998).The portfolio journey: a creative guide to keeping student-managed portfolios in the classroom. Englewood, Colo.: Teacher Ideas Press.
10. D. Alahakoon, S. K. Halgamuge and B. Sirinivasan (2000), "Dynamic Self Organizing Maps With Controlled Growth for Knowledge Discovery", IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Special Issue on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 11(3), 601-614.
11. Danielson, Charlotte & Abrutyn, Leslye (1997) An Introduction to Using Portfolios in the Classroom. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12. DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success:A ten-year update.Journal of Management Information System, 19(4), 9-30.
13. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research ,3(1), 60-95.
14. Dennis, C. & J. Hardy (2006). Development of a model to advance the uptake of e-portfolios for undergraduates in teacher education and registered nurse preparation: An exemplar of best practice. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, AACE.
15. Dorsey, P.A(2000). What is PKM?, Seminar, Millikin University from http://www.millikin.edu/webmaster/seminar/pkm.html
16. Eichler, G. (2003). E-learning and communities, supporting the circulation of knowledge pieces. Innovative Internet Community Systems Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2877, 48–64.
17. e-Portfolio Consortium (2003). Electronic portfolio white paper. Retrieved December 30, 2006, from http://eportconsortium.org/.
18. Eriksson, I. V. and Dickson, G. W., (2000) Knowledge Sharing in High Technology Companies, Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems(AMCIS), 1330-1335.
19. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? the influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2):91-100.
20. Ives, B., Olson M. H., & Baroudi, J. J. (1983). The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 785-793.
21. Jafari, A. (2004), The “Sticky” ePortfolio System:Tackling Challenges and Identifying Attributes.EDUCAUSE Review, 39(4), 38 - 49.
22. Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., and Marra, R. M. (2002). Learning to Solve Problems with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective (2nd Edition). Prentice Hall.
23. Kohonen, T. (1982). Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43(1):59-69.
24. Lee, K.-C. (2001). Teaching materials and methods of comprehensive activity fields. Taipei: Shin-Lee.
25. Li, W., & Liu, Y. (2008). Personal Knowledge Management in E-Learning Era. Lecture notes in computer science, 5093, 200-205.
26. Mansvelder-Longayroux, D. D., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2007). The portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 47-62.
27. McAfee, A. E. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review 47(3).
28. Michael J. Albers(2008). Human-information interaction, Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication, September 22-24, Lisbon, Portugal.
29. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.
30. P.B. Seddon, M.Y. Kiew(1994). A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success,International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, Canada, 99–110.
31. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skill training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426.
32. Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50–69.
33. Redman, T. C. (1995), Improve Data Quality for Competitive Advantage, Sloan Management Review, 36(2): 99-107
34. Regis University (2005).《e-Portfolio Basics:What to include in ane-portfolio?》http://academic.regis.edu/LAAP/eportfolio/basics_include.htm
35. Rossi, P. G., Magnoler, P., Giannandrea, L. (2008). From an e-portfolio model to e-portfolio practices: someguidelines. Campus Wide Information Systems. 25(4), 219-232
36. Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253.
37. Smith, K., & Tilemma, H. (2003). Clarifying different types of portfolio use. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (6), 625-648.
38. Sun P., Tsai R. J., Finger G., Chen Y.,Yeh D. (2008), What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction, Computers & Education, 50(4): 1183–1202.
39. Tan, J., Biswas, G., and Schwartz, D. (2006), Feedback for Metacognitive Support in Learning by Teaching Environments. Feedback for Metacognitive Support in Learning by Teaching Environments, The 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, Canada, 828-833.
40. Verkasalo, M., & Lappalainen, P.(1998). A method of measuring the efficiency of the knowledge utilization process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(4), 414-423.
41. Wang, Y-S., Wang, H-Y., and Shee, D. Y. (2007a) ‘Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation.’ Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1): 1792–1808
42. Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information System Research, 16(1), 85-102
43. Wu, J.-H. and Wang, Y.-M. (2006) Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean's model, Information & Management, 43(6) : 728-739.
44. Wu, Y.-I. (2005). Portfolio assessment. Educational test and assessment: From classroom viewpoint. Taipei: Wu-Nan.
45. Zhang, S.X., L. Olfman and P. Ractham (2007) “Designing ePortfolio 2.0: Integrating and Coordinating Web 2.0 Services with ePortfolio Systems for enhancing Users’ Learning”, Journal of Information Systems Education 2(18), 203-214.
指導教授 楊鎮華(Stephen Jennhwa Yang) 審核日期 2010-7-6
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明