不同成就學生於模擬遊戲環境中程式學習效果之探究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：15

、訪客IP：3.22.181.209

姓名

李中正(Zhong-zheng Li) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

不同成就學生於模擬遊戲環境中程式學習效果之探究
(The Effect of Programming Learning in a Simulation Game: A Study among Students of Different Ability Level)

相關論文

★ 以視覺為主的遊戲空間輔助全身性學習	★ 以數位教室環境增進同步遠距教學之臨場感
★ 以行動載具支援並分析合作式的探索活動	★ 以混合實境支援工作臺協同探究學習
★ 使用資料探勘輔助學習者探索大型資料庫—學習者經驗之研究	★ 以貢獻與聯結為基礎之社會知識創造模型—一個資源與概念合作聯結工具
★ 互動式計算桌面環境對於合作學習的優缺點	★ 以共享螢幕及群組軟體支援一對一環境下面對面的合作網路探索
★ 合作學習使用網際網路: 學習腳本在面對面網路合作探索的影響	★ 兒童使用超媒體的Web2.0創作故事平台之探究--衍生與重組
★ 以創用為基礎之合作說故事平台 - 衍生、重組、擁有感	★ 透過網路實施模擬實務社群並利用即興創作激發創意
★ 使用群組軟體與共同螢幕進行一對一合作網路探索活動	★ 以Cyber-Physical環境支援程式設計學習之探究
★ 跨領域合作設計活動之互動分析：群組軟體的支援與設計	★ 在Web 2.0 平台上對於學童知識分享意願與行為分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

程式語言的學習對大部的初學者來說都是困難的，學習者在面對除了結構化問題的挑戰和去了解程式語言如何執行外，初學者在對程式語言學習的第一個困難就是要去記憶看似隨意又容易混淆的語法和指令，往往不知從何下手，讓學習者感到焦慮，降低學習動機，變的害怕學習程式語言，改善初學者對程式語言學習的環境是很重要的。
因此，本研究建置了一個模擬真實情境的遊戲式學習環境，「Train B&P」火車模擬遊戲，以簡單視覺化的方式，讓學習者可以快速的連結現實中的觀念，結合在遊戲式的學習環境中去學習程式語言。
本研究對象為修習「物件導向程式設計」課程的資工系大一學生117位，並依照該課程期中考成績將學生分成高成就、中成就和低成就三個群組；探討各成就學生在模擬遊戲環境中的程式學習效果。探討的方向從不同成就學生的心流狀態、學習動機的變化和在使用本系統學習行為上的差異，最後再比較不同成就學生在使用本系統的學習成效上的不同。

摘要(英)

Learning to program is difficult to most beginners; this is because learners have to face challenges of learning to form structured solutions to problems and understanding how programs are executed. When learning to program, beginners come across problems like learning rigid syntax and commands that may have seemingly arbitrary or perhaps confusing names. Beginners usually do not know how to begin can cause anxiety and fear towards learning, lowering the learning motivation; therefore, improving the beginners environment of learning to program is indeed important.
Hence, this study set up a virtual reality learning environment, called Train B&P. Train B&P is a train simulation game designed in simple visualized way, it allows learners to learn programming through the game-like learning environment.
The participants of the study are 117 freshmen from the Department of Information Engineering, attending the "Object-Oriented Programming" course. The purpose of the study is to find out the effects of program learning in a simulation game between students of different ability level. These Students are classified into three different groups –high, medium and low ability level. The study investigates the student’s flow status of different ability level, the changes in learning motivation and differences in learning behavior with the use of the learning system.

關鍵字(中)

★ 心流理論
★ 經驗學習
★ 遊戲式學習
★ 程式設計

關鍵字(英)

★ Flow Theory
★ Experiential Learning
★ Game-Based Learning
★ Programming

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第1章緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的與問題 2
第2章文獻探討 4
2-1 心流與遊戲式學習 4
2-2 經驗式學習 6
2-3 程式語言學習輔助系統 9
2-3-1 Alice 2 10
2-3-2 Scratch 11
2-3-3 Tangible Programming With Train 13
2-4 總結 14
第3章系統設計與實作 16
3-1 系統架構 16
3-2 『Train B&P』三大特性和三項設計理念 18
3-2-1 三大特性 18
3-2-2 三項設計理念 20
3-3 資料庫設計 21
3-4 「Train B&P」程式學習平台之操作說明 22
3-4-1 系統網站 22
3-4-2 系統程式 23
第4章研究設計 29
4-1 研究流程 29
4-2 研究對象 29
4-3 研究工具 30
4-3-1 沉浸過程量表 30
4-3-2 學習動機導向策略量表 30
4-4 實驗程序 31
4-4-1 實驗流程說明 31
4-4-2 實驗環境介紹 32
4-4-3 系統活動階段說明 33
4-4-4 學生訪談 36
4-5 資料收集 37
4-5-1 問卷 37
4-5-2 活動記錄 37
4-6 資料分析 38
4-6-1 問卷統計分析過程 39
4-6-2 學習者行為過程分析 39
4-6-3 學習成效評量分析過程 42
第5章實驗結果與討論 44
5-1 問卷統計分析 44
5-1-1 心流歷程變化 44
5-1-2 學習階段與心流狀態關聯分析 47
5-1-3 學習動機變化 48
5-1-4 問卷統分析小結 53
5-2 學習者行為分析 53
5-2-1 學習歷程統計分析 53
5-2-2 使用手冊檢索歷程分析 56
5-2-3 貼上程式碼行為分析 61
5-2-4 學習者主要學習方式分析 62
5-2-5 學習歷程模式分析 64
5-3 學習成效評量分析 69
5-4 訪談結果 70
第6章結論與建議 72
6-1 結論 72
6-2 建議 73
參考文獻 75
附錄A 心流問卷-甲班前測 80
附錄B 心流問卷-乙班前測 81
附錄C 心流問卷-甲班後測 82
附錄D 心流問卷-乙班後測 83
附錄E 學習動機問卷-甲班前測 84
附錄F 學習動機問卷-乙班前測 85
附錄G 學習動機問卷-甲班後測 86
附錄H 學習動機問卷-乙班後測 87
附錄I 實驗活動問題 88
附錄J 學習成效評量測驗 89
附錄K 甲乙班期中考題 91
附錄L 詳細實驗時程表 94

參考文獻

Baker, A. C., Jensen, P. J., & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Conversational learning: An experiential approach to knowledge creation. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 489-542.
Begel, A. (1996). LogoBlocks: A graphical programming language for interacting with the world. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, MIT, Boston, MA.
C. M. Finneran, & Zhang, P. (2003). A person-artefact-task (PAT) model of flow antecedents in computer-mediated environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 475-496.
Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., & Nilan, M. S. (1999). Optimal experience of Web activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 585-608.
Christian, C. A. (2003). Scientists' role in educational content development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(1), 31-37.
Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Pausch, R. (2000). Alice: a 3-D tool for introductory programming concepts. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 15(5), 107–116.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass San Francisco.
Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Praha: Lidové Noviny.
Ezeife, C. I., & Lu, Y. (2005). Mining web log sequential patterns with position coded pre-order linked wap-tree. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(1), 5–38.
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. The Journal of Marketing, 50-68.
Jensen, N. (2004). Supporting experiential learning in virtual laboratories. In Proceeding of Sixth International Conference German Online Research (pp. 72-74).
Kayes, D. C. (2002). Experiential learning and its critics: Preserving the role of experience in management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 137-149.
Kelleher, C., & Pausch, R. (2005). Lowering the barriers to programming. ACM Computing Surveys, 37(2), 83–137.
Kelleher, C., & Pausch, R. (2005). Lowering the barriers to programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers. ACM Comput. Surv., 37(2), 83-137. doi:10.1145/1089733.1089734
Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and higher education, 8(1), 13-24.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Maloney, J. H., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y., Resnick, M., & Rusk, N. (2008). Programming by choice: urban youth learning programming with scratch. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 367-371). ACM.
MARTIN, F., COLOBONG, G. L., & RESNICK, M. (1996). Tangible Programming with Trains. Retrieved from http://el.www.media.mit.edu/projects/trains
McCracken, M., Almstrum, V., Diaz, D., Guzdial, M., Hagan, D., Kolikant, Y. B., Laxer, C., et al. (2001). A multi-national, multi-institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year CS students. In Working group reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 125-180). Canterbury, UK: ACM. doi:10.1145/572133.572137
McMullan, W. E., & Cahoon, A. (1979). Integrating abstract conceptualizing with experiential learning. Academy of Management Review, 4(3), 453-458.
McNerney, T. S. (2004). From turtles to Tangible Programming Bricks: explorations in physical language design. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 8(5), 326-337.
Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Deweyʼs theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54-72.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81-97.
Oxendine, C., Robinson, J., & Willson, G. (2004). Experiential learning. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology.Retrieved October, 13, 2006.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. Basic Books New York.
Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic books.
Pearce, J. M., & Howard, S. (2004). Designing for flow in a complex activity. In Computer Human Interaction (pp. 349-358). Springer.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor.Michigan, 48109, 1259.
Provenzo Jr, E. F. (1992). The Video Generation. American School Board Journal, 179(3), 29-32.
Resnick, M., Rusk, N., & Cooke, S. (1998). The computer clubhouse: Technological fluency in the inner city. High technology and low-income communities, 266-286.
Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C., & Almeida, L. (2002). Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 471-488.
Vince, R. (1998). Behind and beyond Kolb's learning cycle. Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 304.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964). Thought and language. Annals of Dyslexia, 14(1), 97-98.
Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411-426.
Whitelock, D., Romano, D., Jelfs, A., & Brna, P. (2000). Perfect presence: What does this mean for the design of virtual learning environments? Education and Information Technologies, 5(4), 277-289.
Xia Skadberg, Y., & Kimmel, J. R. (2004). Visitors' Flow experience while browsing a web site: its measurement, contributing factors and consequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(3), 403-422.
Yamauchi, Y., Yokozawa, M., Shinohara, T., & Ishida, T. (2000). Collaboration with Lean Media: how open-source software succeeds. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 329-338). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States: ACM. doi:10.1145/358916.359004

指導教授

劉晨鐘(Chen-chung Liu)

審核日期

2010-7-28

推文