 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：25 、訪客IP：18.221.98.71
姓名 謝玟倩(WenChien Hsieh) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 土木工程學系 論文名稱 機車紅燈怠速熄火節能減碳效果評估
(Evaluating the effect of Motorcycle Idling Stop during Red Time on Energy saving and Carbon reduction)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 台灣地區機車總量不斷攀升，相對廢氣排放量亦日漸增加，適逢國內對於交通號誌紅燈倒數計時器逐步推廣建置之同時，基於全球暖化議題，交通環境政策之制定實應進一步探討生活科技對於降低環境傷害，提供更舒適、更為永續之環境給予下一代。本研究利用存活分析理論中之Cox等比率危險模式應用於機車騎士紅燈怠速熄火意願之研究，透過條件評估法進行問卷設計調查，經過資料整理、模式構建、參數校估及模式配適檢定後發現，｢節能減碳認知｣、｢機車使用特性｣、｢健康認知｣以及｢個人屬性｣四大類變數確實可以有效解釋機車騎士紅燈怠速熄火意願。透過存活函數相對風險概念以及判斷中位存活時間，可以觀察出解釋變數的改變帶來的實際效益─熄火時間的增加，結合實際調查路口資料，計算各變數等級變動下之溫室氣體每年CO2、CH4、N2O排放減量；發現「油價上漲」對於怠速熄火策略影響最佳。
摘要(英) The total amount of motorcycles increased continuously as well as the emissions of pollution. Under the issue of global warming, the development of traffic and environmental policies should be further investigated into life science and technology while the installation of Traffic Signal Countdown Displays, in order to reduce environmental harm, to provide a more comfortable and sustainable environment to the next generation.Within The theory of survival analysis, Cox proportional hazard model was applied in to investigate motorcyclists’ willingness to do idling stop on the red light by means of the contingent valuation method questionnaire survey. Through data compilation, model construction, parameter calibration and goodness of fit test for the model, the result shows that motorcyclists’ behavior of idling stop on red is significantly influenced by four major categories: "the awareness of energy saving and carbon reduction awareness," "the characteristics of using motorcycle," "the health Awareness," and "personal property." Using the Cox model as a model of relative risk and determine the median survival time, we can observe the change of variables to count the actual benefits ─ the increase of idling stop time. Combine the fact-finding intersection data, we can calculate the increase of idling stop time with the variable of Greenhouse gases,the exhaust pollutant can be reduced in CO2、CH4、N2O per year；For the idling stop strategy of the best is "oil price rising".
關鍵字(中) ★ 存活分析法
★ 怠速熄火
★ Cox等比例危險模式
★ 節能減碳關鍵字(英) ★ idling stop
★ energy saving and carbon reduction
★ Cox proportional hazard model
★ survival analysis論文目次 摘要................................................................................................................................ i
Abstract .......................................................................................................................... v
致謝............................................................................................................................... vi
目錄.............................................................................................................................. vii
表目錄........................................................................................................................... ix
圖目錄........................................................................................................................... xi
第一章 緒論.................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 研究動機......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 研究目的......................................................................................................... 2
1.3研究內容.......................................................................................................... 3
1.4研究流程.......................................................................................................... 3
第二章 文獻回顧.......................................................................................................... 4
2.1 條件評估法..................................................................................................... 4
2.2 存活分析法..................................................................................................... 7
2.3 汽機車怠速停等........................................................................................... 11
第三章 條件評估法.................................................................................................... 19
3.1 理論發展與應用........................................................................................... 19
3.2 設計原則與步驟........................................................................................... 20
3.3 詢價方式....................................................................................................... 21
3.4 常見偏誤....................................................................................................... 23
第四章 問卷調查與分析............................................................................................ 26
4.1 問卷設計....................................................................................................... 26
4.2 調查結果分析............................................................................................... 28
第五章 研究方法........................................................................................................ 32
5.1 存活理論....................................................................................................... 32
5.2 Cox等比率危險模式 .................................................................................... 36
5.3模型配適檢定................................................................................................ 38
5.4 等比率危險模式檢定................................................................................... 40
5.5 中位存活時間............................................................................................... 41
第六章 實證分析與應用............................................................................................ 42
6.1 分析流程....................................................................................................... 42
6.2 Cox等比率危險模式 .................................................................................... 43
6.2.1 變數定義............................................................................................ 43
6.2.2 模式配適檢定.................................................................................... 45
6.2.3等比率危險模式檢定......................................................................... 48
6.3 影響變數分析............................................................................................... 50
6.3.1 相對風險............................................................................................ 50
6.3.2中位存活時間..................................................................................... 57
6.4 紅燈怠速熄火效果推估............................................................................... 60
6.4.1 實際路口調查分析............................................................................ 60
6.4.2 熄火時間增量.................................................................................... 63
6.5 節能減碳成效推估....................................................................................... 79
6.5.1節能量推估......................................................................................... 79
6.5.2溫室氣體推估..................................................................................... 81
第七章 結論與建議.................................................................................................... 88
7.1結論................................................................................................................ 88
7.2建議................................................................................................................ 89
參考文獻...................................................................................................................... 90
附錄.............................................................................................................................. 94
參考文獻 1.交通部統計處，「機動車輛登記數」，民國98年。
2.交通部運輸研究所，「台灣地區公路車輛行車成本調查」，民國83年。
3.交通部運輸研究所，「行車管制號誌加裝倒數計時顯示裝置之影響評估」，民國96年。
4.廖慧嵐「台灣地區公路運輸部門能源消費與CO2排放變動分析」，國立成功大學環境工程學系碩士論文，民國95年6月。
5.陳高村、許志誠，「道路交通事故賠償金額推估之研究」，道路交通安全與執法研討會，民國89年6月。
6.周京弘，「高速鐵路台北-台中暨台北-高雄路段通車效益評估」，國立台灣大學農業經濟學研究所碩士論文，民國94年1月。
7.陳靜，林逢春，「條件評估法在城市軌道交通社會效益評估中的應用」，城市軌道交通研究，pp. 17-20，2005。
8.葉寶文，傅祖壇，「酒後駕車行為之取締的願付風險價值研究」，運輸計劃季刊，Vo1. 36 No. 4，PP. 509～ 534，2007。
9.陸雲，｢高速公路車輛汙染之經濟評估｣，能源經濟學研討會論文集，第290-304頁，民國76年。
10.林俊昇、黃文琪，｢東港溪猪糞尿汙染之外部成本推估｣，自然資源與環境經濟學：理論基礎與本土案例分析，雙葉書廊有限公司，民國92年。
11.張新立，吳舜丞，賴允勻「以存活理論探討影響機車失竊因素之研究」，中華民國運輸學會第十五屆論文研討會，民國89年12月。
12.葉祖宏，「存活分析法應用於機車持有年限之研究」，運輸計劃季刊，pp.443-468，民國94年8月。
13.蔡永祥「以數位式行車紀錄辨析高肇事大客車駕駛族群」，國立交通大學交通工程與管理學系碩士論文，民國97年6月。
14.陳怡君「應用存活分析法探討國內航線之營運」，商管科技季刊，9(3)，301-314，2008.
15.蕭羽媛，｢存活分析法應用於機車紅燈熄火行為之研究｣，國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士論文，民國98年6月。
16.蘇殷甲，｢機車騎士紅燈怠速熄火意願及其預期成效之研究｣，國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士論文，民國99年6月。
17.莊志偉，｢柴油小客車節能效率以及汽機車Idling Stop技術評估研究｣，低耗能車輛研究與推廣研討會，新竹，民國95年。
18.洪金火，｢機車等停對空氣污染排放之影響研究｣，朝陽科技大學環境工程與管理系碩士論文，民國96年。
19.中華民國交通部運輸研究所，｢運輸部門能源節約及溫室氣體減量潛力評估與因應策略規劃｣，民國95年。
20.郎慧珠、何俊傑、劉錦添：假設市場評價法在健康經濟學之應用。取自http://qolce.ntumc.org/pdf/book/chap06.doc.
21.廖宜彥，｢台灣地區垃圾焚化爐與掩埋場之不寧適質損｣，國立政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文，民國95年。
22.蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、溫麗琪，｢環境保護之成本效益分析：理論、方法與應用｣，俊傑書局，民國92年1月。
23.蘇明達，｢近似理想誘導支付條件評估模式之理論建構與實證檢驗：以黑面琵鷺保護區多樣性資源價值之探討為例｣，國立臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所博士論文，民國92年。
24.林建甫，存活分析，民國97年7月。
25.陳家豪，｢存活分析方法應用於汽車貸款客戶信用風險管理之研究｣，國立成功大學統計學系碩士班論文，民國92年。
26.FORMOSUN先進動力研究中心，「車輛怠速測試計劃結果報告」，2008。
27.Nils C. Soguel, “Costing the Traffic Barrier Effect: A Contingent Valuation Survey.” Environmental & Resource Economics,Vol. 6, issue 3, pages 301-308,1995.
28.J. Lambert, F. Poisson, P. Champelovier, “Valuing benefits of a road traffic noise abatement programme: a contingent valuation survey.”17th International Congress on Acoustics, Rome,2001.
29.Wipulanusat and Herabat., “Road user benefits transfer : the case of contingent valuation method and and vehicle operating cost.” Thammasat international journal of science and technology, pp,78-87,2007.
30.Grosclaude, P. and N.C. Soguel, “Valuing Damage to Historic Building Using a Contingent Market：A Case Study of Road Traffic Externalities,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 37(3), pp.279-287, 1994.
31.Danielson, Leon, at el., “Measuring the Benefits of Local Public Goods: Environmental Quality in Gaston County, North Carolina,” Applied Economics, Vol.27, issue 12, pp.1253-1260, 1995.
32.Jovanis, P.P. and Chang, H.L., “Disaggregate model of highway accident occurrence using survival theory”,Accident Analysis and Prevention Vol.21,pp. 445–458,1989.
33.Jones,B., Janssen, L., Mannering, F., “Analysis of the frequency and duration of freeway accidents in Seattle”, Accident Analysis and Prevention Vol.23,pp. 239-255,1990.
34.Mannering, F., “Male/female driver characteristics and accident risk: some new evidence.” Accident Analysis and Prevention Vol.25, pp.77–84,1993.
35.Schönfelder, S. and K.W. Axhausen.,“Modelling the rhythms of travel using survival analysis”,paper submitted to the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 2000.
36.T.Akerstedt., P.Fredlund., M.Gillberg and B.Jansson.,“A prospective study of fatal occupational accidents relationship to sleeping difficulties and occupational factors.”Journal of Sleep Research 11, 69-71,2002
37.Bhat, C.R., Steed, J.L.“A continuous-time model of departure time choice for urban shopping trips”, Transportation Research Part B：Vol.36., pp.207–224 ,2002.
38.Fu H. , Wilmot, C. G., Survival Analysis-Based Dynamic Travel Demand Models for Hurricane Evacuation. In Transportation Research Record, Volume 1964 pp.211-218, 2006.
39.Tiwari G, Bangdiwala S, Saraswat A and Gaurav S.“Survival analysis: Pedestrian risk exposure at signalized intersections”,Transportation Research Part F: Vol.10, p.77-89, 2007.
40.Ikeda, R. Kawashima, H. Oda, T. , “Determination of Traffic Signal Settings for Minimizing Fuel Consumption” Intelligent Transportation Systems Proceedings pp.272-277, 1999.
41.Shauna L. Hallmark, Ignatius Fomunung, Randall Guensler, William Bachman., “Assessing Impacts of Improved Signal Timing as a Transportation Control Measure Using an Activity-Specific Modeling Approach” Transportation Research Record 1738,2000.
42.Yoshitaka Motoda and Masaaki Taniguchi., “A Study On Saving Fuel by Idling Stops While Driving Vehicles”The Energy Conservation Center, Japan,2002.
43.Alper Unal, Nagui M. Rouphail, H. Christopher Frey “Effect of Arterial Signalization and Level of Service on Measured Vehicle Emissions ” Transportation Research Record 1842,2003.
44.Xiugang Li, Guoqiang Li, Su-Seng Pang , Xiaoguang Yang , Jialin Tian., “Signal timing of intersections using integrated optimization of traffic quality, emissions and fuel consumption: a note” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Volume 9, Issue 5, September 2004, Pages 401-407,2004.
45.Steven I Chien; Kitae Kim; Janice Daniel., “Cost and Benefit Analysis for Optimized Signal Timing-Case Study: New Jersey”, Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal, 2006.
46.Schweitzer Lisa, Christie-Joy Brodrick ,and Spivey, Sue E.,“Truck driver environmental and energy attitudes – an exploratory analysis” Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp.141-150, 2008.
47.Davis, R. K. “The Value of Outdoor Recreation: An Economic Study of theMain Woods,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Economics, HarvardUniversity,1963.
48.Randall, A., B. Ives and C. Eastman, “Bidding Games for Valuation of Aesthetic Environmental Improvements,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , Vol.1, pp.132-149,1974.
49.Richard T. Carson, Nicholas E. Flores, Norman F. Meade,”Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence,” Forthcoming Environmental and Resource Economics, July 2000
50.Bateman, I.J. and Langford, I.H.” Non-users' willingness to pay for a National Park: an application and critique of the contingent valuation method”, Regional Studies, 31(6): 571-582,1997.
51.Le, C. T., Applied Survival Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, .P38,1997.
指導教授 吳健生(Jiann-Sheng Wu) 審核日期 2011-7-13 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit