摘要(英) |
Abstract
The major objective of construction project management and value engineering executive management is to create the best operating profit for the company.
The traditional construction industry management tools, in which traditional 2-dimension design shop drawings are used, cannot effectively process complex planning.
As a consequence, the design interface is poorly integrated thereby resulting in construction errors and quality that does not meet owner expectations, making necessary re-workings which generate material waste, schedule delays, cost overruns, and low overall project performance. Reflecting this, the productivity of the construction industry has actually decreased in recent years as a result of poor communication due to software communication barriers, while at the same time clients are demanding improved quality and value engineering management.
The construction industry has therefore started to move away from the traditional construction industry type of contract to a new contract type, known as Alliance Contracting. Unlike the traditional construction industry management, this new contract type also promotes cooperation based on trust. This new contract type also moves away from 2-dimension to 3-dimension design software shared through the World Wide Web. Due to these three factors, the construction industry has started to a new delivery model called Integrated Project Delivery (IPD).
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) is a project delivery approach that integrates people, systems, business structures and practices into a process that collaboratively harnesses the talents and insights of all participants to reduce waste and optimize efficiency through all phases of design, fabrication and construction.
This new delivery model does not propose specific methods for integration among business model, project management and collaboration systems. As a consequence, this study performs a structure of collaboration and operational flow to integrate the IPD, Project Management Information System, and Building Information Modeling (BIM) into a complete collaborative process.
This study explored the feasibility of implementing a collaboration framework and operational flow, as well as developed a scorecard to assess the studied projects. The result embodied the benefits of this collaborative integrated delivery system therefore verified the feasibility.
This study also discussed the feasibility of applying the IPD in domestic construction industry, afterward to propose and suggest further research directions for the domestic construction industry utilizing the IPD in the future.
Keywords: Integrated Project Delivery, Building Information Modeling, Collaboration.
|
參考文獻 |
參考文獻
〔1〕 ―Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide‖, AIA, AIA CC, 2007.
〔2〕 ―Integrated Project Delivery For Public and Private Owners‖, NASFA, COAA, APPA, AGC and AIA, 2010.
〔3〕 ―Integrated Project Delivery: A Working Definition‖, AIA, 2007.
〔4〕 Suzanne H. Harness, Esq., AIA, Construction Risk, LLC, ―Risks and Rewards of Integrated Project Delivery‖, A&E Briefings, Winter, Zurich American Insurance Company, 2011.
〔5〕 網路資料:維基百科。2011年05月27日,取自http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_Project_Delivery。
〔6〕 ―ConsensusDOCS 301: Building Information Model (BIM) ADDENDUM‖, ConsensusDOCS LLC, 2008.
〔7〕 Ted Sive, FSMPS, Matt Hays, ―Integrated Project Delivery: Reality and Promise A Strategist’s Guide to Understanding and Marketing IPD‖, Society for Marketing Professional Services Foundation, 2009.
〔8〕 WANG JILEI, ―Integrated Project Delivery --Achieving Relational Contracting through Traditional Project Management Methods‖, University of Cincinnati, Master of Science, 2008.
〔9〕 Howard W. Ashcraft, Jr,―Negotiating an Integrated Project Delivery Agreement‖, Hanson Bridgett LLP, 2010.
〔10〕 網路資料:i-designs整合設計公司。2011年04月26日,取自www.i-designs.ca。
〔11〕 網路資料:歐特克公司。2011年04月26日,取自http://www.autodesk.com.tw。
〔12〕 Michael Scott Singleton,―Implementing Integrated project delivery on Department of the Navy Construction Project‖, Colorado State University,Master of Science, 2010.
〔13〕 ―Integrated Project Delivery Frequently Asked Questions‖, AIA, 2006.
〔14〕 Patrick J. O’Connor, Jr.,―Integrated Project Delivery:Collaboration Through New Contract Forms‖, Faegre & Benson, LLP, 2009.
〔15〕 ―Integrated Project Delivery:Case Studies‖, AIA, 2010.
〔16〕 ―IPD Case Studies‖, AIA, AIA Minnesota, School of Architecture University of Minnesota, February 2011.
〔17〕 網路資料:維基百科。2011年05月27日,取自http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building_Information_Modeling
〔18〕 許萬利,「談3D BIM工程技術興貣及臺灣推動應用的課題」,中華技術,第88期,6-13頁,2010年10月。
129
〔19〕 ―BIM Project Execution Planning Guide and Templates_V2.0‖, The Pennsylvania State University, CICRG, 2010.
〔20〕 吳翌禎、謝尚賢,「4D營建管理系統之現況分析與發展趨勢」,營建管理季刊,第74期,23-34頁,2008。
〔21〕 吳翌禎,「多維度工程專案資訊整合管理與視覺化之研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所,博士論文,2007。
〔22〕 陳怡兆,「專案資訊整合模型之建構與專案管理資訊系統之應用」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所,博士論文,2009。
〔23〕 周志鴻,「以流程觀點探討企業電子化對組織協同與績效之影響」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所,碩士論文,2009。
〔24〕 ―Integrated Project Delivery Agreement‖, Hanson Bridgett LLP, 2009
〔25〕 網路資料:歐特克AEC建築工程總部。2011年05月27日,取自http://www.autodesk.com.tw/adsk/servlet/item?siteID=1170616&id=13541553
|